
Shashi Tharoor wants Virat Kohli to unretire. BCCI, Gambhir should coax him back
The problem, though, is that Kohli abruptly retired from Test cricket just before the England series. Kohli was keen for a new challenge, perhaps captaincy, to re-ignite his passion for the game. The selectors and coach Gautam Gambhir insisted that he play under a new captain. Unable to summon the motivation to continue playing, Kohli announced his exit.Since the ruling dispensation and circumstances have not changed, despite mounting pressure from fans, Kohli's return hinges on his personal conviction—a factor that even the most persuasive wordsmith may struggle to sway.The Case For KohliIndia's batting experiments in England reveal a lack of stability. Sai Sudarshan and Karun Nair, shuffled in and out of the No. 3 slot, have struggled to cement their places. Sudarshan's technique against the moving ball has been exposed, raising doubts about his suitability for the top order. Unless he adapts swiftly, his tenure at No. 3 seems precarious. Nair's comeback, while inspiring, has been fleeting. His inability to convert starts into big scores, coupled with his age, suggests the England tour may mark the end of his Test journey.The Indian batting has done well in England, especially in the last two Tests. But it has relied heavily on Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar, two all-rounders whose primary responsibility should be bowling. Because of the lack of spine in the middle order, India have compromised with the bowling, leaving out the attacking Kuldeep Yadav, and putting immense burden on its pacers, especially Siraj Ahmed. At Oval, the selection blunder was amplified by the team's reluctance to bowl Jadeja and Washington, stretching the pacers beyond their limits. Fortunately, rain breaks helped India by letting the pacers rest their tired bodies for one more spirited assault.In contrast, Kohli's vast experience, particularly in England, made him a superior option. Despite recent form fluctuations in Australia, Kohli showed a willingness to address his weakness outside the off-stump, tailoring his game for English conditions. At 36, he was in his prime, deserving of further opportunities to anchor India's batting.Criticism of his recent failures was valid. Since 2021, Kohli's average had fallen dramatically, and he was struggling to come up with big scores in Tests. But, his form in other forms of cricket—the recent Champions Trophy, for example—underlined his ability to perform on the big stage, and with the passion that has defined his career.advertisementBut, as the cliche goes, form is temporary, class is permanent. Kohli, it seemed, was just one great knock away from rediscovering his Test-match skills and temperament. But, the myopic BCCI, and the perennially insecure Gambhir created the circumstances for Kohli to walk out, his fire doused by their hubris and wranglings.Beyond The BattingBeyond his batting, Kohli's absence as a leader and motivator has left India rudderless. His animated celebrations, in-your-face aggro that intimidates opposition, his regal swag, and the ability to rally crowds with the sheer force of his personality have galvanised India often, lifting the spirits of his men like the Spartan King Leonidas.Anecdotes from his career paint a vivid picture. In the 2018 England tour, with India trailing, Kohli's 149 in Edgbaston—scored under pressure with a back injury—rallied the team, nearly snatching victory. In 2021 at Lord's, Kohli's fiery exchanges with England's tailenders sparked India's bowlers to deliver the '60 overs of hell,' securing a famous win.Kohli's ability to read the game, and his inputs on bowling and fielding changes have been missed. In the Root-Brook partnership, India's captain Shubman Gill appeared reactive, unable to disrupt the flow. Kohli, with his knack for breaking partnerships through sheer will, might have altered the narrative, much as he did in 2021 by unsettling England's batsmen with relentless pressure.advertisementThe absence of the Kohli rule book was evident in the first two games when Gill seemed to feign aggression, a style that doesn't suit the mild-mannered captain with the boyish face–a huge contrast to Rohit Sharma's foul-mouthed feline ferocity and Kohli's Viking warrior persona. Unfortunately, the adopted persona affected Gill's performance, forcing him to revert to his natural self—a good decision.Will The TRS Work?Tharoor's plea has reignited the debate for Kohli's return. If cricket were a democracy, Kohli's fans would have reacted to TRS–Tharoor Review System–and overturned the retirement decision. But, unlike politicians, cricketers do not change their stance easily.Kohli's retirement was a personal choice born of frustration. But the door remains ajar for a comeback if his passion can be reignited. As India navigates this transitional phase, the question lingers—can the BCCI and Gambhir create the conditions to lure back their talisman, or will Kohli's Test legacy remain a tale of what might have been?As fervent devotees of cricket's hallowed pantheon, and ardent disciples of Tharoor's sesquipedalian lexicon, we unleash a vociferous appeal: may Gambhir and the BCCI, in groveling genuflection, supplicate Kohli, the knight in shining armour, to redeem his squad. Let his soul, enkindled by ardor's implacable clarion, avow an unwavering 'I do' to the sport's perennial apotheosis.Sandipan Sharma, our guest author, likes to write on cricket, cinema, music and politics. He believes they are interconnected.- EndsMust Watch

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Oval win heralds new era for Indian cricket
As this Indian team got ready to embark on a five-Test series in England, the fear was they'd get caught out by the conditions, by Bazball, by their inexperience. They were missing Virat Kohli, R Ashwin and Rohit Sharma, all retired. They had a new captain in Shubman Gill, a struggling coach in Gautam Gambhir and their best bowler, Jasprit Bumrah, was going to play just three matches. An England tour would have been tough for the best of teams, but for a young squad, with such constraints, the difficulty level was a few notches higher. Sometimes, though, a crisis can bring the best in a team. Throughout the series, that is what India discovered, and as an HT analysis pointed out, while the outcome read 2-2 in terms of matches, it was 37-29 in favour of India in terms of sessions. In sports, teams are often judged from a historical perspective — can they repeat Wadekar & Co's heroics from 1971 or do what Kapil's devils did in 1986? Are they as good as Ganguly's boys or Dravid's series-winning team from 2007? It is a measure of this team's success that they are now part of that lore. In sports, teams are often judged from a historical perspective — can they repeat Wadekar & Co's heroics from 1971 or do what Kapil's devils did in 1986? Are they as good as Dravid's series-winning team from 2007? It is a measure of this team's success that they are now part of that lore. (@BCCI X/ANI Photo)


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Sachin Tendulkar gives verdict on Shubman Gill's captaincy on epic England tour: ‘2-2, things could've been different but…'
Shubman Gill's first-ever Test series as India's captain in the longest format was a gruelling five-match series in England but the legendary Sachin Tendulkar feels that the 25-year-old fared well in that role. The series, which was the first to have a trophy partially named after Tendulkar – the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, is now being widely rated as among the greatest of the century. Every match went the full five days and with most going well into the last sessions, and the series ended 2-2. 'All in all, a fantastic result. 2-2, things could've been different but there are no ifs and buts in cricket,' said Tendulkar in a video on Reddit in which he analysed the series. Tendulkar said that Gill seemed to be searching for ideas a bit whenever England had compiled a good partnership but also stated that it is only natural for a captain to have that approach in such a situation. 'Captaincy has a lot to do with how the bowlers are bowling, how disciplined they are and how long they can persist with their plans,' said Tendulkar. 'Sometimes what happens is that if things are not going the bowlers' way, they start experimenting. That is when the captain feels that the fielders he has on the ground is not enough, he needs more, because runs will be coming from everywhere. 'He still looked calm and composed but when partnershops happen, it becomes difficult for any captain and the priority becomes to dry their runs.' Tendulkar said that overall, Gill seemed to be controlling his team and the game pretty well. 'Overall I felt he controlled the team well. There were areas things could've been different but, everyone has their opinion. This was his first series and possibly against the most attacking side in Test cricket. I don't think any other team bats the way this England side does,' he said. Tendulkar was gushing with praise for Gill as far as the Indian captain's own performance with the bat went. The 25-year-old broke a plethora of records as he smashed as many as 754 runs in the series. This included the second Test in which he scored 269 in the first innings and 161 in the second. 'Shubman batted brilliantly throughout the series, he looked calm and composed, organised,' said Tendulkar. 'When it comes to quality batting, you've got to have a clear head and a game plan. And he was extemely consistent as far as his thought process is concerned because it reflects on your footwork. If you are not clear in your head, your body doesn't respond accordingly. His body responded brilliantly, he looked so much control he had so much time to play the ball. 'There was precision in his footwork. The most important thing that I noticed was the respect to a good ball. Where the tendency sometimes is to push the ball on your front foot even if the ball is not near your foot, he was able to defend there. And consistently defend well on front foot. His ability to leave was very good. Overall, shot selection was very, very good and precise.'


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Chennai Grand Masters, the final piece of Chennai's chess legacy, hopes to build long-lasting heritage
As the end of 2023 approached, two of India's top prodigies, Gukesh Dommaraju and Arjun Erigaisi, were getting increasingly despondent. Their chance of qualifying for the Candidates tournament — an event where eight players fight it out for the right to challenge the world champion — were starting to seem impossible with the calendar running out of tournaments. The third member of India's golden generation — Praggnanandhaa — had already secured his place as had Vidit Gujrathi. And then, the Chennai Grand Masters event made an appearance almost out of thin air, offering not just Gukesh and Arjun, but other players like Parham Maghsoodloo too, a chance to qualify for the Candidates. It was a chance that Gukesh seized, booking a spot in the Candidates and then winning the World Championship barely a year later in Singapore. The Chennai Grand Masters tournament has since then become a permanent fixture of the Indian chess scene which until 2023 only had one showpiece annual event that attracted top names: the Tata Steel Rapid and Blitz Kolkata. The event is fittingly held in the spiritual home of Indian chess, Chennai, which has given the sport two world champions in the form of Viswanathan Anand and Gukesh. Many strong players like Praggnanandhaa and Vaishali besides stellar coaches like RB Ramesh, Vishnu Prasanna and Srinath Narayanan also call the city home. Despite the stockpile of chess talent in Chennai, the city has not hosted too many elite chess tournaments barring the Anand vs Magnus Carlsen World Chess Championship battle in 2013 and the prestigious Chess Olympiad in 2022 which saw participants from 200 countries. Chennai Grand Masters, in only its third year, has ambitious plans in a sport where a few decades ago many chess events with long traditions downed shutters. 'We hope the Chennai tournament will become a permanent fixture in the calendar, but we are still figuring that part out,' says grandmaster Srinath Narayanan, who has transitioned to tournament director for the event. 'It's moving strongly towards being a permanent fixture in the calendar and a traditional annual tournament. Like a Wijk aan Zee (the Tata Steel Chess tournament held in the Dutch village of Wijk aan Zee). Wijk Aan Zee has a very robust history. It has been around for almost a hundred years, having survived two World Wars, the COVID-19 pandemic. In chess, we have seen many tournaments come and go. Linares, Dortmund are among many traditional tournaments which couldn't sustain over the years. But we certainly do hope that this will be a Tata Steel-like tournament, a Wijk Aan Zee of sorts.' This year, the Chennai event will see 20 players competing. While the main field will see the likes of GM Arjun Erigaisi, GM Anish Giri, GM Vincent Keymer, GM Vidit Gujrathi, GM Nihal Sarin, GM Karthikeyan Murali, GM Jorden van Foreest, GM Awonder Liang, GM Ray Robson and GM Pranav Venkatesh competing, the Challengers event will see players like GM Abhimanyu Puranik, GM Adhiban Baskaran, GM Harika Dronavalli, GM Vaishali Rameshbabu, GM Pranesh M, GM Leon Luke Mendonca, GM Aryan Chopra, GM Diptayan Ghosh, GM Iniyan P and IM Harshavardhan GB in the fray. This year, the Chennai Grand Masters has been brought forward to August rather than its usual window at the end of the year. Srinath points at the upcoming FIDE World Cup in India later this year as a reason the event was brought forward. Srinath expressed hope that in coming editions, the event could feature the two world-beaters from Chennai: Gukesh and Pragg. But Gukesh, the reigning world champion, will turn out at the St Louis Rapid and Blitz Tournament, which is part of the Grand Chess Tour, from August 10 to 15. 'Ideally, we would have loved to have Gukesh and Pragg playing. But this year, we had to clash our event with the Grand Chess Tour because the calendar was insanely full. And we simply didn't get any free dates. But in the future, whenever they are available, we would certainly love to have them. And hopefully, we can schedule it at a time when it doesn't clash with another major event in the future years,' said Srinath. Srinath points at just how packed the chess calendar is this year, with new events like Checkmate: USA vs India, Esports World Cup and Freestyle Chess Grand Slam Tour events jostling for a window with annual fixtures like Norway Chess, Tata Steel, GCT events, St Louis Rapid and Blitz, Sinquefield Cup and popular leagues like the Spanish League and the Turkish League. Adding to this condensed mix are FIDE events like the World Cup, to be hosted by India, and the Grand Swiss, both of which offer Candidates spots. 'This year in particular, it was very challenging (to find a window to hold the event in). You will see events happening parallelly or right one after another,' he says. Srinath does add that for the organisers, the biggest pleasure is giving the next in line players from India — names like Pranav Venkatesh, Pranesh M and Iniyan P — a platform to compete in. 'Over the last two years, we have already seen a tradition where a young talented player goes on to get world-class recognition after winning here. Happened with Gukesh in 2023, happened with Aravindh Chithambaram also. Although Aravindh was improving substantially even before winning the Chennai event, the title helped him get so many invitations across the world. Similarly, we hope to keep unearthing more talents,' says Srinath.