
Michael McDowell pushed for British amnesty for IRA members without trial, UK files reveal
argued as attorney general in 2000 that the British government could avoid a struggle to pass Westminster legislation to give 'on-the-run'
IRA
members an amnesty.
Instead, Mr McDowell, who is now a member of Seanad Éireann, repeatedly suggested that the British could use a centuries-old law to grant pardons without prosecuting any of them. This seems to have been met with astonishment by British officials.
The difficulties posed by
Sinn Féin's
demands for 'on-the-run' IRA members – some of whom were sought for offences such as murder – to be given guarantees features in British archive files released on Tuesday.
The treatment of the IRA 'on the runs', better known simply as 'OTRs', became a major controversy in 2014 when it was revealed that nearly 300 IRA members had been given so-called 'comfort letters' saying they were not then wanted by British police.
READ MORE
The issue emerged in February 2014 when John Downey, an alleged IRA member, faced trial in London for the July 1982 Hyde Park bombing, which killed four British soldiers and seven horses.
His Old Bailey trial collapsed when it emerged that he had received his comfort letter in 2007 even though there was an active warrant for his arrest. The trial judge halted the trial after ruling this was an abuse of process.
Under Mr McDowell's proposal in 2000, which went farther than the comfort letter tactic later used, the British government would have been able, he said, to avoid bringing strongly opposed immunity legislation before Westminster.
The idea 'first surfaced' at a meeting between Irish and British officials in Dublin in early November 2000 when the British side was told Mr McDowell believed London could grant 'pardons before convictions' to IRA members.
The proposal was outlined in greater depth to the British side in November 2000 at 'a hastily arranged' meeting, where Mr McDowell was described in a British note as being 'quite a student of the English legal system, and admired its flexibility'.
However, British officials doubted the idea from the off, saying a royal pardon could be used only after sentence, while a free pardon could expunge the effects of a conviction.
Mr McDowell came back to his idea when he was included in the Irish delegation, which included
Bertie Ahern
, then taoiseach, which travelled from London with British prime minister
Tony Blair
for an
EU
meeting in Zagreb, Croatia, shortly afterwards.
Here, Mr McDowell again argued that wanted IRA members could be given 'a prosecution amnesty', citing the decision by the British not to prosecute Soviet spy Anthony Blunt for treachery.
'His basic thesis seemed to be that our legal system was sufficiently flexible to allow immunity to be granted without the need for primary legislation,' the Northern Ireland Office's political director, Bill Jeffreys, told an official in the British attorney general's office.
He said he had told Mr McDowell his proposal ran counter to the views of the British attorney general, who was 'unwilling' to give immunity to individuals on general public interest grounds.
However, if Mr McDowell was arguing that the Northern Ireland secretary of state could 'pre-empt prosecution in a whole class of cases' then that would be 'an entirely new departure'.
Widening the grounds for immunity 'seemed to me to run entirely against the trend, and would be very difficult to justify in today's conditions, when we would be expected to seek the necessary powers from parliament', Mr Jeffreys also said.
Separately, the files also show the efforts Sinn Féin made to ensure leading IRA figures in the United States such as Gabriel Megahey would not be deported. Now, 25 years later, they are now facing fresh expulsion attempts by
Donald Trump's
administration.
Bill Clinton
, US president at the time, had wanted to 'tie off the loose end' created by the six men's issues before he left office, fearing the incoming
George W Bush
presidency would be less sympathetic.
In 1997, US secretary of state
Madeleine Albright
'persuaded the US attorney general to suspend deportation action' against the men on 'the foreign policy grounds that it would contribute to the NI political process'.
The importance of the OTR issue to Sinn Féin is evident throughout the files, with the party's Gerry Kelly 'grumbling' to Northern Ireland Office officials 'that the lack of movement was causing Sinn Féin great difficulties'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
13 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Possible tariff deal with US not a win for EU but does avoid damaging trade war
After months of back and forth and lots of shadow boxing, the European Union and the United States are said to be closing in on a trade deal that would impose a 15 per cent tariff on European imports. This would be similar to the agreement Donald Trump struck with Japan earlier this week and half the level threatened in recent weeks by the White House. On the face of it, such a deal might be considered a victory for the EU, limiting the damage for Irish and other European imports. There is talk of exclusions for medical devices and spirits, which would be of benefit to Ireland. READ MORE Yet a 15 per cent deal would be five percentage points higher than what the UK has agreed with Trump, putting Irish exporters at a disadvantage to their counterparts in Britain and north of the Border. It also means that some companies will have to consider raising their prices for a second time this year – a universal 10 per cent tariff has been in place since April 5th -or taking the tax hit themselves. Neither is an appealing scenario. [ US and EU close in on 15% tariff deal Opens in new window ] And it goes without saying that US consumers might baulk at the price of Kerrygold butter being increased again. There has to be a ceiling to what they are prepared to pay for a block of butter. Plus, what of the pharma sector (a key source of exports and corporation tax for Ireland), which has been separately threatened with tariffs of up to 200 per cent? Lots of details remain to be ironed out and a deal has yet to be signed, sealed and delivered. Trump might yet do another U-turn on negotiations. Anything is possible in the current uncertain climate. How will the updated National Development Plan shape Ireland in years to come? Listen | 35:59 But a deal would avoid a damaging trade war, and hopefully, draw a line under this saga. Irish and European businesses will also welcome some certainty on the tariffs issue, albeit at a cost to them, and an end to the swirl or rumour and uncertainty that has existed since Trump returned to power.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Government's spending overruns amount to ‘poor planning', Fiscal Council says
The Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) has said the Government's ongoing spending overruns amount to 'poor planning and budgeting'. It follows the Summer Economic Statement (SES), published on Tuesday, showing that planned expenditure for this year is now expected to amount to €108.7 billion, €3.3 billion more than set out in Budget 2025. Some €90.5 billion was allocated in the budget to current expenditure, or the cost of delivering public services, and €14.9 billion to capital expenditure. Both lines have since increased. 'Based on spending data for the first six months of the year, this upward revision is likely to be insufficient,' IFAC said in one of a series of posts it made on X on Wednesday afternoon on the Summer Economic Statement. [ Tax and spending package of €9.4bn to form basis of Budget 2026 Opens in new window ] 'Analysis by the Council suggests current spending is likely to be around current spending is likely to be around €1 billion higher than the SES figures.' IFAC chairman Seamus Coffey confirmed the posts when contacted by The Irish Times. While gross voted spending is now officially forecast to rise by €7.9 billion next year, IFAC said that spending overruns in 2026 are 'almost inevitable'. Some €2 billion of the increase is being provided for capital expenditure under the Government's revised National Development Plan. The Government is allowing for scope for €1.5 billion of tax cuts in Budget 2026, which, IFAC notes, is the equivalent of linking the system to inflation. [ What did the summer economic statement really tell us about Budget 2026? Opens in new window ] 'Excluding windfall corporation tax receipts, the Government is forecasting a budget deficit of almost €11 billion next year,' the watchdog said, nothing that this equates to 3.2 per cent of gross national income-star (GNI*), a measure of the domestic economy. 'This is despite a strong economy.' IFAC also took aim at how the Government warned that if there is a deterioration in the international tariffs landscape, the 2026 budget package would be smaller. 'This is exactly the opposite of standard economic advice. Countercyclical policy means giving more support when the economy is weak and less when it is strong,' it said. The EU is currently in trade talks with the US in an effort to avert US president Donald Trump's threatened 30 per cent charge on most European imports kicking in from August 1st. The EU has threatened to impose nearly €100 billion worth of retaliatory tariffs on US imports ranging from bourbon whiskey to Boeing aircraft in one fell swoop if an accord isn't reached by the deadline. 'More generally, the Government's budgetary plans are focused on the short term,' IFAC said, noting that the Government has yet to live up to its own programme commitment to publish a medium-term fiscal structural plan.


Sunday World
2 hours ago
- Sunday World
All-Ireland winning hurler found not guilty of assaulting boy (12) with stick
At Ennis Circuit Court today, the jury delivered a majority not guilty verdict A jury has found former All-Star and Clare All-Ireland winning hurler, Niall Gilligan not guilty of assaulting a then 12 year old boy with a stick. At Ennis Circuit Court today, the jury delivered a majority not guilty verdict that Mr Gilligan of Rossroe, Kilmurry, Sixmilebridge had assaulted causing harm of the boy at the Jamaica Inn Hostel, Sixmilebridge on October 5th 2023. Niall Gilligan at Ennis Circuit Court News in 90 Seconds - July 23rd Mr Gilligan sat impassive in the court as the court registrar read out the not guilty verdicts in the case concerning the assault causing harm charge and use of a stick. Earlier, judge in the assault case has asked the jury in the case to make 'a fresh start' in their deliberations this morning. Judge Francis Comerford sent the jury out at 10.40am to resume their deliberations. In the case, Mr Gilligan (48) of Rossroe, Kilmurry, Sixmilebridge denied the assault causing harm with a stick of a then 12-year old boy at the Jamaica Inn hostel, Sixmilebridge on October 5, 2023. On Tuesday, the jury deliberated for 2 hours and 47 minutes before they returned to the court just before 5pm and the jury foreman asked Judge Comerford: 'What is the next step if we are not unanimous?' In court this morning, Judge Comerford told the jury: 'I would ask you a fresh start and consider matters again and talk through the issues." Judge Comerford told the jury if they have a question or want to communicate any difficulties they can come back into court. Judge Comerford said that he would call the jury back in the course of the morning to confirm where they are and consider whether to move onto the next stage or not. On Tuesday, Judge Comerford told the jury: "It is always preferable that you try to reach a unanimous verdict - that is the ideal and it is better than any alternative." They jury commenced their deliberations at 12.33pm on Tuesday and before they commenced, Judge Comerford told them that they should make their decision in the case 'after a cold, direct, forensic determination of the facts'. In his closing speech to the jury on Monday counsel for Mr Gilligan, Patrick Whyms BL said in no way is Mr Gilligan trying to suggest that he was entitled to punish the boy as was suggested and said that the injuries sustained by the boy 'are clearly regrettable'. Mr Whyms said that on the evening at the Jamaica Inn hostel, Mr Gilligan 'didn't know that he was dealing with a child and did not create this situation'. Mr Whyms, instructed by solicitor, Daragh Hassett, said that Mr Gilligan "was at the end of his tether" by the vandalism being done to a vacant property he was trying to sell. Putting forward the defence of reasonable force against the charge, Mr Whyms said that Mr Gilligan was at the Jamaica Inn hostel on the night of October 5th 'in the dark and believed that he was under siege'. He said: 'Believing himself under threat and needing to protect himself and his property, Niall Gilligan needs to make an instant decision and so we are here." Mr Whyms said: 'And Mr Gilligan, a family man who has young children and no previous convictions gives a clear story which hans't changed and an entirely credible, fulsome account of what happened." Earlier in her closing speech on Monday, Ms Sarah Jane Comerford BL (instructed by State Solicitor for Clare, Aisling Casey) told the jury: 'This is a story of a man who lost his cool.' She said: 'Instead of picking up the boy after he slipped and bringing him out to his car and driving him home and telling his parents, he hit him and lost it and he was angry and frustrated.' Ms Comerford said that the alleged assault in broad daylight 'is the action of a man who took out his anger and frustration on a child. There is no evidence that his injuries were caused by anything other than his interactions with Niall Gilligan.' Ms Comerford said that Niall Gilligan 'lost control and punished the boy for the damage and inconvenience caused to his property on a morning when he had to clean up human faeces and urine from his property'.