Care home in special measures over 'poor management'
A Kent care home has been placed in special measures after inspectors found "poor management and a deterioration in the level of care".
Hillbeck Residential Care Home in Bearsted near Maidstone has been rated "inadequate" by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) after an inspection in February.
Inspectors found residents' basic care needs were not always being met, with some patients not having toothbrushes in their rooms, and criticised leaders allowing a "closed culture" to develop where staff did not feel able to speak up.
Charing Healthcare, which runs Hillbeck, said it would "continue to work at rectifying the issues raised".
An inspection on 4 and 5 February found a number of falls by residents had gone unnoticed, with more than half of these taking place during the night shift.
However, inspectors said there was "no evidence" that leaders had considered changing how the home was staffed to better protect residents.
Inspectors also found bathroom cabinets with prescription medicine and hygiene products which were "unlocked, rusted casings were chipped and paint was peeling off".
Serena Coleman, CQC deputy director of operations for the south, said: "We've told Hillbeck Residential Care Home where widespread and immediate improvements are needed by issuing four warning notices.
"We're monitoring the service closely while these necessary changes are made, and we will not hesitate to take further action to keep people safe."
The care home has been placed in special measures, having previously been rated good, meaning it will be kept under close review to ensure improvements are made.
A spokesperson for Charing Healthcare said it was "extremely disappointed" by what had been found in the report.
It added: "We have produced a plan of action and will continue to work through this with our staff team. We have already made good progress."
Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
Medway care home for veterans encourages volunteers
Woman secretly filmed her mum being abused in care home
Charing Healthcare
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Claims spread Trump wore catheter at UFC event. Here's what we know
On June 9, 2025, a photograph of U.S. President Donald Trump spread online, claiming he was wearing a catheter under his suit while at an Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) event. The photograph in question showed fighter Kayla Harrison, who had just won the UFC women's bantamweight championship bout, putting her victor's belt around Trump's waist. A number of posts on X, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok made this claim. One post stated: Trump is absolutely wearing a Foley catheter. It's a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag strapped to the leg. That line down his pants? Not a crease. It's tubing. Every step he takes sounds like the sloshing of a warm Capri Sun (Instagram user "oldrowofficial") We looked closely at footage of the 78-year-old president walking around at the event, as well as photographs of him alongside Harrison. At this time, we were unable to independently confirm whether he wore a catheter under his suit. White House spokesperson Steven Cheung denied the claim in an email: The President has been the most transparent president in history, and the recent medical report that was released clearly and unequivocally shows he is in peak condition. These conspiracy theories peddled by demented individuals hiding behind social media, and now being given a platform by the fake news, clearly suffer from a debilitating case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. These are the same people who have been caught trying to gaslight the American people for years by saying Joe Biden was cognitively fine, when in fact, he was in much worse condition than thought. On June 7, 2025, Trump attended a UFC 316 event in New Jersey. The above photograph appears to be authentic, given that the White House posted other pictures of Harrison putting the championship belt on Trump, though his pants are not visible. (The White House) In most available press images showing Trump interacting with Harrison, or standing around at the UFC event, his upper leg is shadowed by his suit jacket making it difficult to determine if the bulge was just a fold in the pant leg or something else. According to the Cleveland Clinic, a "Foley catheter" is a device that "drains urine from your urinary bladder into a collection bag outside of your body when you can't pee on your own or for various medical reasons." Images from the website show a narrow tube connecting to a bag that collects urine. The following YouTube video compiles a range of clips of Trump walking into the UFC arena and interacting with Harrison. At the 32-second mark, Harrison puts her championship belt over his shoulder. We paused at numerous moments in the clip and found there was a noticeable shadow on Trump's leg but no evidence of a bulge as he stood at that angle. It is possible the bulge was visible when Harrison wrapped the belt around Trump's waist, pulling his pants back. However, there is no way to independently verify whether this bulge is from a catheter. We also zoomed in on the image in question and found a similar shadow on Trump's other leg, indicating that the bulge is likely also just a result of the angle of the light. (Instagram user "oldrowofficial") Many have been also claiming from other photographs at the White House that Trump was wearing a secret "leg brace" under his suit after his stumble while climbing Air Force One. In April 2025, White House physician Capt. Sean Barbabella said Trump was in "excellent health." Trump has frequently been the subject of speculation around his health. We previously covered an authentic video of him stumbling while climbing the stairs to Air Force One. We have also reported on unknown red sores that appeared on his hand in January 2024. "DONALD TRUMP at UFC 316: BEST MOMENTS Nobody Has Seen." YouTube, Dario AS, 8 June 2025, Accessed 11 June 2025. Garrett, Luke. "White House Doctor Says Trump Is 'fully Fit' in Medical Report." NPR, 13 Apr. 2025. NPR, Accessed 11 June 2025. Ibrahim, Nur. "Strange Red 'Sores' on Trump's Hand Mystify Internet, Then Disappear." Snopes, 18 Jan. 2024, Accessed 11 June 2025. "Kayla Harrison Celebrates with U.S. President Donald Trump and UFC..." Getty Images, 8 June 2025, Accessed 11 June 2025. Liles, Jordan. "Yes, Video Shows Trump Stumbling up Steps to Air Force One." Snopes, 9 June 2025, Accessed 11 June 2025. "President Trump Attends UFC 316." The White House, Accessed 11 June 2025. "Social Media Speculates Trump 'Is Wearing a Leg Brace' after Air Force One Fall." The Independent, 11 June 2025, Accessed 11 June 2025. "US President Donald Trump and UFC CEO Dana White Attend a UFC 316..." Getty Images, 8 June 2025, Accessed 11 June 2025. "What Is a Foley Catheter?" Cleveland Clinic, Accessed 11 June 2025.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Regulator acts against care home 'to protect users'
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has removed the registration of a care provider in Surrey to "protect people". The regulator has taken the action against Head Office, run by Mitchells' Care Homes Limited, which provided a supported living service in Horley, to prevent it from operating after it was rated inadequate for a second time. An inspection last year found no "significant, widespread" improvement could be sustained. Natasha Mitchell, who runs Head Office, said the decision to remove the company from the CQC register was based on "incorrect information". Head Office provided care to adults with severe learning disabilities and complex autism across 21 settings. It was inspected in May 2023 after the CQC received concerns about unsafe care, unsafe staff levels and people not being protected from abuse. The second inspection across April and May last year was carried out during a tribunal process in which Head Office was appealing the CQC's attempts to get it removed from the register. Inspectors said they found leaders failed to ensure staff were properly recruited or trained and were working long hours over multiple days causing fatigue and poor care. Relatives told the CQC management could be unhelpful and defensive when they raised issues. One family member told inspectors about their loved one being bullied in one of the houses and it was found staff had failed to look into why this was happening. Many other issues were discovered, including leaders running an "institutionalised" service where care was provided based on what was easier for staff rather than what people preferred. Staff failed to help service users develop or retain their ability to make choices, which could lead to a loss of independence, the CQC said. As a result, Head Office was again rated inadequate. The findings were then presented to a judge and the care provider was unsuccessful in its appeal to a tribunal. It means Head Office has been deregistered from the CQC and cannot run a CQC-regulated service. Ms Mitchell said Head Office was put into administration during the tribunal process but care receivers remain at the properties they own as a new provider was brought in. "All the allegations made against us were subject to appeal at tribunal, however, we were unable to complete this process as we entered administration," she said. Ms Mitchell said her priority now was to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the people in her properties. Last year, the CQC cancelled the registration of Mitchell's Care Homes Limited after inadequate ratings at all three of its care homes. Surrey County Council said it had ensured everyone supported by Mitchell's Care Homes and the Head Office division had been moved safely to new providers - which in most cases meant people were able to remain in their existing homes. Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. Regulator confirms action taken against care homes Care homes close amid 'neglect' concerns from CQC
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alabama IVF ruling looms over 2026 statewide elections
A crowd at the Alabama Statehouse listens to Corrin O'Brien of the Fight for Alabama Families Coalition speaker during a rally for protections for in vitro fertilization on Feb. 28, 2024 in Montgomery, Alabama. The rally took place prior to scheduled committee hearings in the Alabama Legislature on legislation to protect the procedure. (Brian Lyman/Alabama Reflector) The Alabama Supreme Court's 2024 decision declaring frozen embryos children could be a factor in Alabama's 2026 elections, particularly in the races for attorney general and Supreme Court. The decision halted IVF treatments across the state and started a debate that is now looming over upcoming statewide elections. Alabama Supreme Court Jay Mitchell wrote in a majority opinion that an 1872 law allowing civil lawsuits over the wrongful death of children also applied to frozen embryos, saying that the Wrongful Death of a Minor Act 'provides a cause of action for the death of any 'minor child,' without exception or limitation.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Mitchell, now running for the Republican nomination for Alabama attorney general, did not respond to interview requests. Democrats appear determined to use the opinion — which drew national criticism and led to a swift move from the GOP-controlled Legislature to pass a law intended to protect IVF access — in the coming race. His opponent, Pamela Casey, also seeking the Republican nomination for attorney general, publicly called IVF a 'miracle.' 'Today and everyday, I am thankful for the miracle of IVF that made me a momma x2. Why does my baby boy look so grown?' Casey said in a caption of a photo of her two children on Facebook. In another post, she said, 'Infertility and IVF is not political for me. It is personal.' Casey was not available for an interview. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE The ruling, which stemmed from wrongful death lawsuits filed by couples whose frozen embryos were destroyed in an accident, sparked widespread alarm among patients and medical professionals. Despite the state law, advocates and patients emphasize that the future of IVF in Alabama remains uncertain and a significant concern for voters. AshLeigh Dunham, an attorney at Magic City Fertility Law and a referee in Jefferson County's Juvenile Court who is running as a Democrat for an Alabama Supreme Court seat, is putting her own experiences with IVF at the center of her campaign. 'I want your family to be able to get the care that they need, the medical care that they need, the food and stability that they need,' Dunham said in a phone interview Tuesday. 'So that's what I'm telling everyone is that I'm pro family. If your family needs IVF to expand and to start, then by all means, you deserve to have IVF, and a state should not actually be able to limit that.' After years of unsuccessful treatments in Alabama and advice from her fertility doctor, Dunham and her husband traveled to Oregon in 2020. There, she experienced a 'completely different' and more individualized IVF process, which led to three viable embryos and the successful birth of her daughter. 'We have very intelligent doctors, but I think right now, they're a little bit limited in what they can do … For those who fit in the box, the clinics here are wonderful and even the ones who get more individualized care, it is great. But for me, I didn't fit,' Dunham said. Dunham called the Alabama Supreme Court's decision 'disdainful' and 'horrendous.' She believes the ruling, which granted personhood status to embryos, creates a conflict with IVF. 'Once you create personhood status, you cannot have IVF and personhood. They cannot coexist,' Dunham said. Corinn O'Brien, an IVF patient and head of Fight for Alabama Families, an organization advocating for IVF access in Alabama, said in an interview that IVF remains a critical issue. O'Brien, who is nine months pregnant after successful treatment, said that the temporary protection offered by the IVF immunity law is 'tenuous at best and could be overturned.' 'We're still fighting for more permanent protection of IVF, whether that be more legislation, whether that be a constitutional amendment, we're still identifying the pathway,' O'Brien said. 'I think the fact that we're still having conversations about it shows everyone we're not done. We still have work to do.' O'Brien pointed to the stress and uncertainty that patients continue to face, even after the new law, due to looming legal threats, saying that families who need or have gone through IVF feel like a 'political football' in the debate. 'There is nothing literally more pro-family than helping families welcome more children into the world. And that's just common sense,' O'Brien said. IVF providers are still concerned about long-term IVF access. Dr. Mamie McLean, an IVF provider with Alabama Fertility in Birmingham, said that infertility affects one in six couples, making it a relevant issue for many families in Alabama. 'We believe that the status of IVF treatments in our state feels like a ticking time bomb. We understand there's still a conversation about whether the immunity law is constitutional. And to be transparent, we worry that this is a bad case, one lawsuit away from totally blowing up the immunity law and rendering us back at square one,' said McLean.
