Doug Ford making gas tax cut permanent, ending tolls on eastern section of Highway 407
Fulfilling a promise from the Progressive Conservatives' Feb. 27 re-election campaign, Premier
Doug Ford
and Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy are cutting 5.7 cents a litre of the gas tax and eliminating tolls on the provincially operated part of the tollway.
As of June 1, the levies, which can be up to $20, will be lifted on the 43-kilometre portion of Highway 407 from Brock Road in Pickering east to Highway 35/115 north of Clarington, which will cost the treasury around $72 million annually.
But tolls that can cost $86 depending on the
time of day
will remain on the privately operated 108-kilometre section of Highway 407 from the Queen Elizabeth Way in Burlington to Brock Road.
In Thursday's budget, Bethlenfalvy will also make permanent a temporary reduction in the gas tax he introduced in 2022 and has extended annually since. The tax will remain at 9 cents a litre, down from 14.7 cents three years ago.
'I know that families and business owners are worried about rising costs, especially as U.S. tariffs threaten to raise the price of everyday essentials,' Ford told reporters in Pickering Tuesday.
'That's why we're cutting the gas tax permanently and taking tolls off Highway 407 East, and that's why we'll always keep looking for ways to put more money back into the pockets of Ontario families,' he said.
Ford has frequently said it was a 'big mistake' for former Tory premier Mike Harris to sign a 99-year lease with a private consortium to operate Highway 407 for $3.1 billion in 1999.
It would cost taxpayers an estimated $35 billion to end that contract.
Bethlenfalvy, noting the average family will save $115 a year in gas taxes with his changes, stressed the government is mindful that people are concerned about their pocketbooks.
'To help Ontarians cope with the high cost of living and the impacts of the economic uncertainty caused by tariffs, we are continuing to take action to ease the pressure and do more to help lower costs for households,' said the treasurer.
Durham Region Chair John Henry said the moves are 'great news' for commuters.
'It will ease pressures during a time of reduced affordability by bringing down the cost of living, improving mobility, fighting congestion on our highways and supporting local and provincial economic growth,' said Henry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
AI in education's potential privacy nightmare
AI is now firmly entrenched in classrooms, but student privacy rules haven't caught up. Why it matters: Chatbots can expose troves of personal data in ways few parents, students or teachers fully understand. The big picture: The 2025-26 school year is shaping up to be one where educators feel that they must embrace AI to keep students competitive. Here are three top concerns with classroom AI, according to privacy advocates and AI companies Axios spoke to. 1. Student work could be used to train AI models AI firms are constantly seeking data to train their models. They're not required to say exactly where they get it, but they do have to say how they're using customer data, especially when they're dealing with students. Guidelines like The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) don't guarantee meaningful protections for students. FERPA was signed into law under President Ford in 1974 and has not been significantly updated since. "Penalty for violating FERPA is that your federal funding is withheld," Elizabeth Laird, director at the Center for Democracy and Technology, told Axios. "And that has been enforced exactly zero times. Literally never." Most educational AI firms say they're not training models on classroom work. Content submitted by teachers and students is not used to train the foundational AI models that underlie Khan Academy's AI tutor, Khanmigo, the company's chief learning officer, Kristen DiCerbo, told Axios. But training on a diverse set of student data would make the models less biased, DiCerbo said: "There's no easy answer to these things, and it's all trade-offs between different priorities." Institutions technically could allow student work to be used for AI training, though they're unlikely to do so, several educators told Axios. Yes, but: Data that's "publicly available" on the web is a different story. Business Insider recently reported on what it described as a list of sites that Anthropic contractors were allowed to scrape — including domains from Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Northwestern and other universities. Funding mandates often require universities to post student research online, meaning more of it is considered freely available data for training AI. An Anthropic spokesperson told Axios that it could not validate the list of sites found by Business Insider because it was created by a third-party vendor without Anthropic's involvement. 2. Off-the-shelf AI tools could expose student data Many teachers are experimenting with free chatbot tools. Some are from well-known players like OpenAI, Google, Perplexity and Anthropic. Others are from lesser-known startups with questionable privacy policies. In many cases, educators use these apps without district approval or formal guidance. Accelerating pushes from both big tech and President Trump for school and student adoption of AI have changed the vibe around AI heading into the new academic year, ed tech experts told Axios. "Where in the 2024-2025 school year most schools had the LLM on lockdown through their filter, this year all flowers will bloom," Tammy Wincup, CEO of Securly, a software company that builds safety tools for K-12 schools, told Axios. Products designed for educational use, like ChatGPT Edu, do not train on student data, but some of the consumer-facing free and paid versions of ChatGPT and other chatbotshave different policies. "That's where things get tricky," says Melissa Loble, chief academic officer at Instructure, the company behind the learning management system known as Canvas. "If AI tools are used outside our system, the data may not be protected under the school's policies." Yes but: Teachers are often the best judges of AI tools for their students. Ed tech is "a bottom-up adoption industry. It grows and thrives on teachers finding tools they like for teaching and learning and then getting districts to adopt," Wincup says. 3. Hacks are an increasing threat Earlier this year, a breach at PowerSchool — a widely used student information system — exposed sensitive personal data of tens of thousands of students and parents. "When you introduce any new tool, when you collect any new piece of information, you are necessarily introducing increased risk," Laird says. That makes thoughtful planning critical, she added. If AI tools store or process student data, a breach could expose not just grades and attendance records but also behavioral data, writing samples, and private communications. One way to prevent leaks is to delete data periodically. DiCerbo says Khan Academy deletes chats after 365 days. Yes, but: The advantage of using chatbots is that they can remember and learn from previous conversations, so some users want to store more information than might be safe. Between the lines: AI is steamrolling into classrooms and colleges and privacy is just one on a long list of concerns these institutions must manage. Khan Academy's DiCerbo says AI adoption is moving faster than anything she's seen in her 20 years working in ed tech. Khan Academy expects to reach a million students with its AI-powered tutor Khanmigo that launched in 2023. Earlier this year the California State University system introduced ChatGPT Edu to more than 460,000 students and over 63,000 staff and faculty across its 23 campuses. Google just started offering its AI Pro plan for free to students over 18 for a year. What we're watching: Some ed tech providers are looking beyond OpenAI, Anthropic and Google and using services like AWS and Microsoft's Azure to keep student data separate from the model providers. Brisk Teaching, a classroom AI assistant, uses this approach to mitigate concerns that student data might be used to train new models — even though OpenAI and Google say that their education-focused models don't train on user data. Brisk Teaching founder Arman Jaffer told Axios that there's a lot of "lost trust" between schools and the big AI providers. "It's just easier for us to say Google is not touching your data because they could potentially use it to train the next version of their model," he said.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
1 ‘Strong Buy' Dividend Stock to Buy to Protect Your Portfolio
While gold (GCZ25) is usually seen as a defensive asset and investors don't really expect it to keep outperforming risk assets like equities over the long term, things have been different over the last few years. The precious metal is outperforming the S&P 500 Index ($SPX) this year, something it has also done over the last two-year and three-year periods. Gold miners are a leveraged bet on gold as they tend to rise or fall more than the precious metal. We see something similar with other commodity producers, given their earnings sensitivity to the underlying commodity. More News from Barchart Is Ford Stock's Juicy Dividend Still Safe Amid the Global Tariff War? After Hitting 30th 52-Week Low, Is Adobe Too Cheap to Ignore? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. In the gold mining space, Agnico-Eagle Mines (AEM) is one name that looks like a good bet. The stock has outperformed the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) this year and looks set to continue its good run, as we'll discuss in this article. But, before that, let's look at gold's outlook. Gold Has Outperformed Stocks in 2025 Gold is a hedge against the volatile equity markets, and often the two assets tend to move in opposite directionntals. While stocks tend to do well in periods of economic boom and macro and geopolitically stability, the yellow metal outperforms when there is economic turmoil or geopolitical tension. Invest in Gold Thor Metals Group: Best Overall Gold IRA Priority Gold: Up to $15k in Free Silver + Zero Account Fees on Qualifying Purchase American Hartford Gold: #1 Precious Metals Dealer in the Nation Over the last few years, though, both gold and the S&P 500 Index have been moving in tandem and rewarded investors. Notably, while the S&P 500 Index has hit record highs and put the tariff tantrum behind it, there are several risks that markets are wary of. These include a burgeoning U.S. national debt, geopolitical tensions as China and Russia push for a new world order, and the trade tensions which are testing the current global system. While stock markets have learned to live with these issues, unless they seem to threaten the world economy in a significant way, investors are increasingly pivoting to gold to hedge their bets. Global central banks have also been increasing gold's share in their foreign currency reserves, creating a tailwind for gold demand and, by extension, prices. Why Agnico Eagle Mines Looks Like a Good Buy AEM is one of the largest gold mining companies globally, with mines in 'safe' jurisdictions in Canada, Mexico, Australia, and Finland. Its all-in sustaining costs (AISC) were $1,279 per troy ounce in Q2, and management reaffirmed the 2025 guidance of between $1,250-$1300 per troy ounce. The company is in the second-quartile of the global cost curve, which places it in a sweet spot, as it has good leverage to any upside in gold prices. On the downside, the company's costs are significantly below what gold prices currently trade at, providing it ample cushion to survive any gold price slump. AEM Has Paid Dividends for 42 Consecutive Years While being a 'non-yielding' asset is one of gold's drawbacks, gold mining companies make it up through dividends. AEM has paid dividends for 42 consecutive years, and the bonanza is expected to continue as higher gold prices lead to an increase in earnings. In Q2 2025, Agnico-Eagle Mines generated free cash flows of $1.3 billion, of which it used $200 million for dividends and another $100 million for share repurchases. The company also pared its debt by $550 million in the quarter and now has a net cash position of almost $1 billion. The company aims to return around a third of its free cash flows to shareholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases. It is also investing in organic growth, which bodes well for its production profile in the coming years. While the current dividend yield of 1.2% is a tad below the S&P 500 Index, AEM should increase the dividend either later this year or early next year as higher gold prices lift its cash flows. AEM stock trades at a forward enterprise value-to-earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EV-to-EBITDA) ratio of 9.6x, which, although higher than its historical averages and some of its peers, is not yet frothy, given the structural tailwinds for gold prices. Moreover, Agnico-Eagle has historically commanded a premium over peers given its relatively safe business and strong balance sheet. Overall, with a growing production profile, favorable position on the global cost curve, rock-solid balance sheet with a net cash position, and finally reasonable valuations, I find AEM a good dividend stock to buy. Agnico-Eagle Mines Stock Forecast Brokerages are also quite bullish on AEM, and it has a consensus rating of 'Strong Buy' from the 15 analysts covering the stock. AEM's mean target price of $142.56 is 5.2% higher than the Aug. 11 closing price. The stock has continued to rally since the last time I covered it in June, and I expect it to build on its YTD gains in the coming months, even as there might be some downward pressure in the short term. On the date of publication, Mohit Oberoi did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ford Missing from 2024 American-Made Vehicles Top 20 Ranking
⚡️ Read the full article on Motorious Ford fails to place in 2024 American-Made Index, highlighting shifting supply chains and Tesla's dominance in U.S. manufacturing rankings. Ford Motor Co. failed to place a single model in the top 20 of the 2024 American-Made Index, a ranking compiled annually by to highlight vehicles with the highest domestic manufacturing content. The list, marking its 20th anniversary this year, arrives at a time when U.S. manufacturing and supply chains are under heightened scrutiny. uses a five-factor methodology that considers final assembly location, origin of the engine and transmission, percentage of U.S. and Canadian parts, and the direct American workforce involved in production. Tesla dominated the upper tier, with all four of its current models — the Model 3, Model Y, Model S, and Model X — claiming the top four spots. Stellantis placed two vehicles in the ranking: the Jeep Gladiator at No. 5 and the Jeep Wrangler at No. 13, both built in Toledo, Ohio. General Motors had just one entry, the Chevrolet Colorado pickup, assembled in Wentzville, Missouri, at No. 19. Ford's absence is notable given its position as one of the 'Big Three' U.S. automakers alongside GM and Stellantis. While the company builds several vehicles domestically, none met the index's criteria strongly enough to make the cut this year. analysts say the results underscore the complexity of modern automotive manufacturing, where even brands with deep U.S. roots rely heavily on global supply chains. Vehicles assembled domestically may still fall short on domestic-parts content or engine and transmission sourcing, which weigh heavily in the rankings. The report also serves as a reminder that a vehicle's badge is not always the best indicator of its economic footprint. As automakers navigate shifting supply lines, consumer interest in buying 'American-made' continues to be balanced by the realities of global production.
