Ethiopia, Eritrea and Tigray Are Back on a War Footing
ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia—A political crisis in Ethiopia's war-battered Tigray escalated dramatically in March, bringing armed men out onto the streets and raising fears of a fresh conflict in the still-fragile region. At its heart is a power struggle between Debretsion Gebremichael, chairman of the dominant Tigray People's Liberation Front, or TPLF, party, and Getachew Reda, Tigray's interim regional president and Debretsion's deputy in the TPLF.
But in the background lurks a potentially more explosive dynamic: the escalating rivalry between Ethiopia's federal government and Eritrea, which united in the war against Tigray in 2020-2022 but fell out over the peace deal that ended it. More than two years later, tensions between the two are spiking over Ethiopia's quest to end its status as the world's most-populous landlocked country.
Last year Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed explored gaining sea access through the breakaway Somali republic of Somaliland, but backtracked after a fierce backlash from Mogadishu. Now he appears to have settled on reclaiming Eritrea's port at Assab, part of the Red Sea coastline Ethiopia lost when Eritrea seceded in 1993—a loss Abiy has termed a 'historical mistake.'
Tigray is sandwiched between the rival powers. Its vice president, Gen Tsadkan Gebretensae, has warned that 'war seems inevitable' and that Tigray risks 'becoming a battlefield for Asmara and Addis Ababa.' Former envoys to the Horn of Africa for the U.S. and the European Union describe the tensions in Tigray as 'dry tinder waiting for a match that could ignite an interstate war between Ethiopia and Eritrea.' Meanwhile, Debretsion's rivals allege his TPLF faction has made contact with Eritrean intelligence—allegations it strongly denies.
To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter.
Debretsion and Getachew, Tigray's two key political players, have long had an uneasy relationship. The roots of the current crisis in Tigray, however, date back to the peace deal with Addis Ababa that Getachew signed on behalf of the TPLF in November 2022 in Pretoria, South Africa. In doing so, Debretsion argues, he unilaterally caved in to the federal government's conditions. 'The other side pushed,' Debretsion said in an interview in February. 'We expected this. But there should have been a collective decision' before Getachew agreed to the final deal, he added.
For their part, Getachew's allies say Tigray had little leverage during the negotiations, which took place against the backdrop of fierce fighting and huge battlefield reversals. 'Maybe the war should have ended sooner,' said one. Debretsion insists he's now committed to the peace deal, despite seeing it as flawed, but he adds that there are also 'differences' among the TPLF leadership regarding 'its execution.'
Nearly two and a half years after the Pretoria agreement silenced the guns, most of its key parts have not been implemented. Eritrean troops and forces from the Amhara region still occupy some 40 percent of Tigray's districts. This has blocked the return of almost 1 million displaced people, who languish in squalid camps. Ethiopia's military was supposed to take control of Tigray's international borders, but the federal government's presence amounts to little more than a few policemen outside the region's three airports. Efforts to hold perpetrators of war crimes accountable have made little headway. Fresh regional elections are yet to be held. And Tigray is still not represented in Ethiopia's federal parliament. It limps on in a state of limbo, unable to access donor funds crucial for its reconstruction.
The situation has badly destabilized the region. Debretsion's TPLF faction, which controls the party apparatus, blames it on the incompetence of Getachew's interim administration. Competition is also heating up to control Tigray's lucrative gold deposits and state companies. In August, the TPLF held a congress that expelled Getachew and several members of his Cabinet from the party. Debretsion says they must step down from their positions in the regional government. Getachew's allies maintain the congress was illegal.
Things reached a boiling point in early March when Getachew tried to fire three top TPLF generals, who he accused of plotting a 'coup.' Debretsion's TPLF faction then took over several districts across Tigray, including the major city of Adigrat. They also seized the mayor's office and radio station in Mekelle, Tigray's capital. These military movements sparked panic among residents, who rushed to withdraw cash from banks. Air tickets to Addis Ababa sold out.
'Everyone is concerned about war,' said Tesfasellassie Medhin, the Catholic bishop of Adigrat. 'The people do not want more destruction.'
The showdown had been brewing for weeks, but its climax came quickly. Apart from a few isolated clashes, it was largely bloodless. Getachew appealed to the federal government to intervene, which could have sparked an armed confrontation and risked sucking in Eritrea, whose leader—long-ruling President Isaias Afwerki—feels he has unfinished business in Tigray. But Abiy declined to do so.
Getachew is now on his way out, and Debretsion's faction wants to replace him with Tadesse Werede, the head of Tigray's regional armed forces and another regional vice president. On Wednesday, however, Abiy appeared to block his nomination, announcing he would instead consider public proposals for Tigray's new leader. The TPLF blasted his statement as 'unacceptable,' accusing Abiy's government of engaging in 'provocative, hostile and destabilizing activities that threaten the survival of the deeply wounded people of Tigray' and 'attempting to unilaterally determine' the region's leadership.
Meanwhile, tensions between Eritrea and Ethiopia linger. Abiy has staked his legacy on regaining sea access. Ethiopia's landlocked status currently eats up $1.6 billion a year in port fees to Djibouti, which handles 90 percent of Ethiopia's trade. Gaining access to the sea would not only save scarce foreign currency but could boost economic growth by 25 percent to 30 percent, according to Abiy.
The Ethiopian prime minister is unlikely to drop the issue, although he insists he is committed to resolving it peacefully. 'Ethiopia has no intention to invade Eritrea to gain Red Sea access,' Abiy told parliament last week. 'Our desire is to talk about it under the principle of give and take, in a mutually beneficial manner, and according to commercial law.'
But the warning signs are there. In February, Eritrea ordered a nationwide military mobilization. Its reclusive regime has ruled out giving up Assab port under any circumstances, with its information minister last week describing Ethiopia's maritime ambitions as 'misguided and outdated.' According to Western diplomats who spoke off the record, Eritrea is also trying to destabilize Abiy's government by assisting rebels in Ethiopia's Amhara region, where an insurgency is escalating. On March 21, Ethiopia's military claimed it had killed 300 fighters in two days of fighting. The day before, it claimed that a top Tigrayan general had 'encouraged and coordinated' attacks by Amhara rebels, which the TPLF denies.
Meanwhile, if Debretsion's TPLF faction does take control of Tigray's regional government, it may feel emboldened to prepare a military strike to reclaim control of western Tigray. This fertile area was seized by Amhara forces during the Tigray war. Its status was supposed to be resolved constitutionally, according to the Pretoria peace agreement. The failure to do so is the main reason for Tigray's ongoing displacement crisis. An offensive could reignite an internationalized conflict involving Eritrean forces.
Ethiopia has also been moving tanks, troops and military equipment to its border with Eritrea in the arid Afar region. And its state media is making loud claims over Assab. The deployments are small in scale and might be a show of force, calculated to put pressure on Eritrea, as Abiy can ill afford to stretch his forces any thinner. In addition to Amhara, the federal government is battling an entrenched insurgency in Oromia, Ethiopia's biggest region. That makes the timing bad for a conflict with Eritrea. Yet diplomats fear the consequences of any miscalculation on either side, similar to the skirmishes that inadvertently escalated the border war between Eritrea and Ethiopia in 1998-2000.
An interstate war would be devastating for the Horn of Africa, a region already struggling with internal conflicts in Sudan, South Sudan and Somalia, said Ahmed Soliman at Chatham House. 'Abiy has at least opened the door for some kind of accommodation,' said Soliman. 'There is a possibility to de-escalate.'
Hopefully, for Tigray's and the broader region's sake, Abiy will seize it.
Fred Harter is a freelance journalist based in Addis Ababa whose work has appeared in The Guardian, The Times of London, The Independent, VOA and the New Humanitarian. He has covered Ethiopia since March 2021 and traveled extensively in every region affected by the 2020-2022 conflict.
The post Ethiopia, Eritrea and Tigray Are Back on a War Footing appeared first on World Politics Review.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump: willing to extend July 8 deadline for trade talks, but not likely necessary
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday he would be willing to extend a July 8 deadline for completing trade talks with countries before higher U.S. tariffs take effect, but did not believe that would be necessary. Trump, speaking to reporters before a performance of "Les Miserables" at the Kennedy Center, said trade negotiations were continuing with about 15 countries, including South Korea, Japan and the European Union. He said the U.S. would send out letters in one to two weeks outlining the terms of trade deals to dozens of other countries, which they could embrace or reject.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The treaty Gibraltar wants, for the future we all need
For over five years, Gibraltar has been at the centre of one of the most complex, technical, and geopolitically sensitive negotiations undertaken by the United Kingdom and the European Union since Brexit. The process has consumed me. It has occupied close to half of my time in elected office, taken over almost every waking hour of the last five years, and, in truth, deprived the people of Gibraltar of their Chief Minister in the way they are used to having him, that is, from fixing housing and parking complaints to defending their sovereignty in the international arena. For much longer than I would have wanted, I have been behind closed doors, in physical or virtual boardrooms, working through the details of a document that will shape the next generation of our people. It has been a relentless, exhausting endeavour. Throughout this time, the UK and Gibraltar teams have worked together seamlessly, 'hand in glove', without a flash of daylight between us. We have worked in close partnership with both Conservative and Labour prime ministers and foreign secretaries; from Dominic Raab, Liz Truss and James Cleverly to David Cameron and now David Lammy. What we have negotiated is not the product of fragmented agendas, but the position of a unified British family determined to find a solution worthy of our people. Without a treaty, Gibraltar could be staring down the barrel of a hard border, marked by endless queues, disrupted supply chains, and a deeply uncertain future for many of our businesses. Our hospitals and elderly care homes would face chronic understaffing, and the surrounding region would suffer the almost certain loss of employment for many of the 15,000 cross-borderworkers who depend on Gibraltar's economy to support their families. The services we deliver to our people would all come under strain. Our public finances would be pushed to the brink. The self-governing Gibraltar we have built would be diminished, replaced by something poorer, more isolated, more inward-looking, and ultimately less able to thrive as a proud, British European Territory. Instead, we now stand at the threshold of something remarkable, and not just for Gibraltar, but also for the United Kingdom, for Spain, and for Europe and our people. Something bold. Something forward looking and hopeful. Something that finally breaks free of the negative inertia that has defined too much of our recent past. This is politics at its most elevated. The service-led principle of working for our people's benefit and not the performative personal antagonism that too often infects public life. Real, hard graft that overcomes challenges to deliver progress. This is the kind of result our people demand when they voice distrust and decry the political 'establishment'. Our Spanish and EU counterparts, for their part, have brought to the table a seriousness of purpose that also reflects the gravity of the moment. They, too, have recognised that this treaty is not merely about fluidity of movement, but about unlocking human and economic potential across borders. Make no mistake: the treaty that is now within reach is not one that the Gibraltarians have been forced to accept. Our people voted for us to have a mandate to turn our New Year's Eve agreement of 2020 into a UK/EU agreement/treaty. So we say 'yes' to this agreement, but not because we don't know how to say 'no' when we have to. We did so, emphatically, in 2002, when we triggered a referendum to reject Jack Straw's proposal of joint sovereignty with Spain, and I am just as adamant today that this treaty will not in any way compromise British sovereignty over Gibraltar. That will be set out, black upon white, in the treaty when it is published. It is a legal undertaking given by both sides in clear and unequivocal terms. So to be clear: in this treaty we have not ceded any control of Gibraltar to any authority. Just like today, only Gibraltar will decide who enters Gibraltar – exactly as we agreed in 2020 when Dominic Raab was foreign secretary and Boris Johnson was prime minister. This treaty unleashes the potential to usher in a new era. One in which we move beyond the tired narratives of the past on constant sovereignty disputes, towards a future defined by hope, cooperation and shared prosperity. It will pave the way for better jobs, more investment and lasting stability for Gibraltar and the wider region. It can deliver more harmonious human relations and a better quality of life for all our people. When you read it, I ask that you to look up from the pages of this treaty and see that better reality as it peers back at us from the future. This will be the treaty Gibraltar wants. It will be a treaty the UK and the EU can be proud of. And it will be a treaty that will propel us all to the better future politicians are elected to deliver. When the time comes, back Gibraltar and its proudly British people by backing the Gibraltar treaty. Fabian Picardo is the chief minister of Gibraltar Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
EU Envoy Flags Concern With Beijing-Moscow Axis, Pushes Defence Pact with Australia
China's military build-up is not just a regional concern, the EU's top envoy in Australia has cautioned, citing Europe's deepening worries about Beijing's cooperation with Moscow. Speaking at the National Press Club in Canberra on June 11, European Union Ambassador Gabriele Visentin said the continent was worried the alignment between China and Russia would threaten global stability.