Rider charged with physical sexual assault on six-year-old
KUALA LUMPUR: A despatch rider pleaded not guilty in the Sessions Court here today to physically sexually assaulting his six-year-old daughter last year.
The 37-year-old father of two is accused of committing the offence against his daughter at a house in Kampung Datuk Keramat here, between June 28 and July 10, 2024.
The charge is framed under Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, read together with Section 16(1) of the same law.
If convicted, Section 14(a) provides for a maximum prison sentence of 20 years and whipping, while Section 16(1) carries a jail term of up to five years and a maximum of two strokes of the cane.
Deputy public prosecutor M. Saravanan requested bail be set at RM20,000 in one surety, along with an additional condition that the accused must report to the nearest police station once a month.
'In addition, the accused must surrender his passport to the court and is prohibited from contacting or disturbing the victim, as he is the child's biological father and has visitation rights,' said the prosecutor.
Meanwhile, the accused, who was unrepresented, appealed for a lower bail on the grounds of his RM2,000 monthly income and the fact that the victim is currently living with his ex-wife, who has since remarried.
Judge Azrul Darus set July 16 for mention and granted the accused bail of RM5,000 in one surety, along with the condition that he must report to the nearest police station once a month until the disposal of the case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
32 minutes ago
- The Star
Retired doctor loses nearly RM4mil to family friend
IPOH: A retired doctor lost about RM3.9mil to a non-existent financial scheme he had continually invested in for over a decade with a woman he met through his late wife. The 74-year-old was introduced to the scheme more than 10 years ago through a family friend, said Perak police chief Comm Datuk Noor Hisam Noordin. The doctor was cheated by the female suspect with whom he got acquainted by his late wife in 2014, he said. 'The suspect had offered him the opportunity to invest in a scheme. 'Having been briefed by the suspect, he got interested and trusted her because she was his wife's friend,' Comm Noor Hisam said in a statement yesterday. The doctor first invested in the scheme in December 2014, when he gave the suspect RM12,000 in person at a bank in Ipoh. 'Over the years until April 9 this year, he continued making payments, both in cash and through bank transfers to the suspect's personal account, amounting to RM3.9mil. 'The victim only recently realised that he had been deceived after never receiving any returns or profits from the investment scheme,' Comm Noor Hisam said, adding that a report was lodged at the district police station here on Thursday. 'Each time he asked about the money, the suspect would give various excuses,' he added. The case is being investigated under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Bus driver in Gerik crash claims trial
Facing the law: Mohd Amirul being escorted after pleading not guilty to 16 charges at the Gerik Magistrate's Court. — Bernama Accused pleads not guilty to all 16 charges GERIK: The bus driver involved in an accident which killed 15 Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) students in Gerik this week has been slapped with 16 charges in court. Mohd Amirul Fadhil Zulkifle, 39, was charged with 15 counts of dangerous driving resulting in death and one charge of driving in a manner dangerous to the public. He pleaded not guilty to all the charges before magistrate Muhammad Firdaus Nor Azlan yesterday. Mohd Amirul allegedly committed the offences at approximately 1.15am on June 9 at KM53 of the Gerik-Jeli East-West Highway, thereby causing the death of 15 UPSI students. The students who perished in the tragedy were Fakhrul Arif Rosdi, 20; Mohammad Aqil Taqiuddin Mohd Sofian, 21; Nik Amni Nadiah Nik Nor Zabir, 21; Nurul Fatihah Abu Setaman, 22; Nurul Izyanti Muhamad Azahar, 21; Sufea Adela Maslihaizan, 21; Nur Ainul Qistina Mat Ali, 21; Nur Dalila Farhana Mohamad Isma, 21; Nurly Sahirah Azman, 23; Fatin Nasrien Fadli, 22; Muhammad Mustaqim Rosde, 21; Anis Soffiyya Md Zaidi, 20; Nor Ayuni Maslan, 21; Muhammad Adib Hazim Halim, 21; and Wan Nur Suhaila Wan Muhammad, 22. He was charged under Section 41(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987 for causing death by dangerous driving. The offence carries a jail term of five to 10 years, a fine of up to RM50,000 and disqualification from holding or obtaining a driving licence for a minimum of five years, upon conviction. The additional charge was under Section 42(1) of the same Act for reckless and dangerous driving. The section provides for imprisonment of up to five years, a minimum fine of RM5,000 or both, and disqualification from holding or obtaining a driving licence for a period of not less than five years, upon conviction. The court granted bail at RM19,000 in two sureties. The accused was also ordered to report weekly to the nearest police station. His driving licences were suspended pending the disposal of the case. The court then fixed July 14 for next mention to enable the accused to appoint a lawyer, Bernama reported. Perak prosecution director Muhammad Zaki Abdul Kudos and deputy public prosecutors Nasrul Hadi Abdul Ghani and Moganaraj Mithra appeared for the prosecution. In the crash on Monday, 15 UPSI students were killed and 33 others injured when the bus they were travelling in overturned along the highway, near Tasik Banding, Gerik.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Na'imah charge ‘likely retaliation'
Rejection of bid to refer questions to High Court unfair, says lawyer KUALA LUMPUR: The Sessions Court's dismissal of Toh Puan Na'imah Abdul Khalid's application to refer questions of law to the High Court was a miscarriage of justice, the High Court heard. Lawyer Datuk Dr Gurdial Singh Nijar told High Court judge Justice K. Muniandy that the dismissal had denied his client clarity on her legal position and this should be rectified by the High Court to uphold the integrity of the judicial process. Gurdial was submitting in Na'imah's application for a revision of the Sessions Court's dismissal of her application to refer eight questions regarding the validity of charges she is facing. These are for allegedly failing to declare her assets to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). In his submission, Gurdial said the present charge against Na'imah was an offence that was 'purely technical' and likely made 'in retaliation' by the MACC. He said Na'imah was asked to assist in the investigation against her late husband, Tun Daim Zainuddin, as a witness and she was never a suspect. The MACC issued a Section 36(1)(b) notice on her, requiring disclosure of information in respect of her assets and she had complied with this notice to the best of her ability, Gurdial said. 'Notwithstanding this, the MACC took the view that her compliance was insufficient... insufficient perhaps for them to formulate a charge against the late Daim for any criminal offence. 'Perhaps in retaliation, the MACC commenced the present charge against the applicant,' he said. Gurdial said the dismissal by the Sessions Court showed a clear misconception in law and procedure when the lower court judge made certain findings that misconstrued the true nature of the charge against Na'imah. 'In this case, the Sessions Court's dismissal deprived the applicant of this fundamental right, thereby failing to ensure that the legal questions, which are central to the case, were properly addressed,' he added. Justice Muniandy fixed July 11 for parties to continue their submission. On Jan 23, 2024, Na'imah was charged for failure to comply with a notice to declare her assets, which included Menara Ilham and several other properties in Kuala Lumpur and Penang. She was charged under Section 36(2) of the MACC Act 2009, which carries a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment or a fine of RM100,000, upon conviction. On Feb 29, 2024, Na'imah filed an application to refer questions of law pertaining to Sections 30(5), 36(2) and 62 of the MACC Act 2009, as well as Section 32(3)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 to the High Court. On Feb 18, the application was dismissed by the Sessions Court on grounds that it lacked merit, as there were no constitutional issues raised in the case.
