Three Things the CDS Interviews in Singapore Tell Us
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
Security
Three Things the CDS Interviews in Singapore Tell Us
The Wire Analysis
4 minutes ago
General Anil Chauhan's Singapore interviews mark a significant shift toward openness about military setbacks and successes, and underscore the complex nature of recent India-Pakistan hostilities.
Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan. Photo: PTI
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
The Chief of Defence Staff, General Anil Chauhan, broke new ground with his candid interviews to Bloomberg and Reuters at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Saturday (May 31), offering rare official insight into the recent India-Pakistan conflict.
Here are three key takeaways from his remarks:
The IAF lost fighter jets on the first night
For the first time, a senior Indian official confirmed that the Indian Air Force lost fighter jets on the opening night of Operation Sindoor, the military campaign launched by India after the Pahalgam terror attack. General Chauhan acknowledged these 'initial losses' were the result of tactical errors, refusing to confirm the exact numbers though he rejected Pakistan's claim of downing six Indian jets as 'absolutely incorrect'. He emphasised that the focus should be on understanding why the losses occurred and how the mistakes were rectified, rather than the number of jets lost.
The IAF didn't fly all its fighter jets for two days after the losses
After suffering these losses, the IAF paused its full-scale operations for nearly two days. During this period, tactics were reviewed and corrected. 'We were able to understand the tactical mistake which we made, remedy it, rectify it, and then implement it again after two days and flew all our jets again, targeting at long range,' General Chauhan told Bloomberg. This operational pause, with at least certain aircraft, allowed the IAF to regroup and return with precision strikes deep inside Pakistan, demonstrating resilience and adaptability.
Pakistan's military leadership was mature and rational
Despite the intensity of the conflict, General Chauhan noted that both sides displayed 'rationality' and maturity, avoiding escalation to the nuclear threshold. 'In every step that happened during Operation Sindoor, I found both sides displaying a lot of rationality in their thoughts as well as actions,' he said to Reuters. He dismissed suggestions that either side was close to using nuclear weapons as 'far-fetched,' and pointed out that communication channels remained open, helping to manage the crisis.
In sum, General Chauhan's Singapore interviews mark a significant shift toward openness about military setbacks and successes, and underscore the complex nature of recent India-Pakistan hostilities. His remarks have triggered calls for greater transparency in official communications from the Modi government, as these important revelations were made on foreign soil.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
CDS Accepts Loss of IAF Fighter Jets
Unexpected Fallout of Op Sindoor Has Been Tilt in Pakistan's Military Balance Toward Its Air Force
Political Rent-seeking of Armed Forces is Detrimental to Democracy
For Arms Dealers, Operation Sindoor Was Not a Crisis Conflict But a Business Opportunity
The Opposition Owes the Indian public Some Answers
Why Naya Bharat Needs a Jameel Mahmood
'Trade Offer Averted India-Pakistan War': Trump Administration Tells US Court
India May Push FATF to Revert Pakistan to 'Grey List' on Terror Funding Charges
Row Over Army Statement That India's Air Defence System Shielded Golden Temple From Pakistan's Strikes
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
17 minutes ago
- News18
Explained: Can China Really Stop The Flow Of Brahmaputra Water To India?
Last Updated: Taking technical, geographical and geopolitical factors into consideration, while China can alter the flow of Brahmaputra to some extent, it cannot fully stop it. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has hit back at Pakistan for claiming China could choke the flow of the Brahmaputra to India with facts, stating that the river 'grows in India, not shrinks". His remarks came after a senior aide to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Rana Ihsaan Afzal, claimed that the suspension of Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan could set a precedent for China to block the Brahmaputra River to India. 'If India does something like this, they stop the flow to Pakistan, then China can also do the same thing. But if things like this happen, then the entire world will be in a war," Afzal told Geo News. But, can China really stop the flow of Brahmaputra river to India? Taking technical, geographical and geopolitical factors into consideration, while China can alter the flow of Brahmaputra to some extent, it cannot fully stop it. In fact, altering the flow, too, could have major implications. Here's a closer look at why China cannot fully stop Brahmaputra's flow into India: Partial Control Due To Geography According to an article on China accounts for only 22 to 30 per cent of the total Brahmaputra River Basin's discharge. The article has been authored by PK Saxena, former Indian Commissioner for Indus Waters and Adviser, Ken Betwa Link Project Authority, Bhopal, and Teerath Singh Mehra, former commissioner, Brahmaputra and Barak, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India. The authors say that the Tibetan weather and scanty rainfall and snowfall amounting to 4-12 inches per annum are mainly responsible for this. They also mention that Bhutan, despite its small size, contributes an equally significant 21 per cent while covering only 6.7 per cent of the river basin. Meanwhile, the Indian basin, which covers 34.2 per cent of the area, they say, contributes the maximum, 39 per cent, of the total discharge in the Brahmaputra River. 'Only 14 per cent of the entire Brahmaputra flow is therefore in the river before it enters India. The balance 86 per cent is contributed by the rains and monsoons in India. It is thus evident that China's contribution to the river flow of the Brahmaputra is minor, though not insignificant," the article says. Assam CM Sarma, in his post on X, mentioned, 'China contributes only ~30–35% of the Brahmaputra's total flow — mostly through glacial melt and limited Tibetan rainfall. The remaining 65–70% is generated within India, thanks to: Torrential monsoon rainfall in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Nagaland, and Meghalaya, Major tributaries like Subansiri, Lohit, Kameng, Manas, Dhansiri, Jia-Bharali, Kopili and additional inflows from the Khasi, Garo, and Jaintia Hills via rivers such as Krishnai, Digaru, and Kulsi." 'At the Indo-China border (Tuting): Flow is ~2,000–3,000 m³/s. In Assam plains (e.g., Guwahati): Flow swells to 15,000–20,000 m³/s during monsoon," he added. China's Dam Construction China has approved the construction of the world's largest hydroelectric dam on the Brahmaputra (Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet), which involves diverting part of the river's flow through tunnels to generate hydropower. While it poses concerns for India over China altering the flow of water, the concerns are seasonal (specially in non-monsoon months). Assam CM Sarma had in January flagged concerns over China's proposed dam on the Brahmaputra in Tibet, saying the project will make the entire ecosystem fragile and dry. He also said the dam will make Assam depend on rainwater from Arunachal Pradesh and Bhutan. According to a PTI report, Sarma had also said the Government of India communicated its concern to the Chinese side. 'We have already communicated that if this dam comes then the Brahmaputra ecosystem will become fragile and dry and then we will depend on the rainwater from Arunachal Pradesh and Bhutan," he said. However, the project poses challenges for China as well. According to a report in Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post, the Tibetan plateau is seismically active, making large dam projects risky with probabilities of big earthquakes. Any malfunction or natural disaster could cause catastrophic flooding downstream, which would be detrimental to China's own interests. The construction of the dam, hence, comes with its own engineering challenges. According to a Business Today report, experts have warned that if the dam fails due to seismic activity, structural flaws, or sabotage, the impact could devastate Arunachal Pradesh and Assam 'in minutes". The construction of the dam also poses the risk of flooding of northeast Indian states with China controlling the flow of water downstream. Meanwhile, India is also advancing the Siang Upper Multipurpose Project in Arunachal Pradesh, aiming to generate 11,000 MW of hydropower. The project is intended to bolster energy security and counterbalance China's upstream activities, but faces local opposition due to environmental and displacement concerns. Geopolitical Implications Of Altering The Flow China has not shared upstream hydrological data with India since 2022. Any unilateral action by China to manipulate the Brahmaputra river's flow could worsen India-China relations and complicate regional security dynamics. Not just India, any restriction to the flow could also harm China's diplomatic relations with Bangladesh, too, which will be impacted by any such alteration. With such geographical limitations and geopolitical concerns, China cannot fully stop the Brahmaputra river flow into India. A large volume of the river is generated within India itself. While China's dam projects and control over the upper reaches give it some leverage, the river's strength downstream and regional geopolitical realities limit China's ability to 'weaponize the water". First Published: June 03, 2025, 14:36 IST News explainers Explained: Can China Really Stop The Flow Of Brahmaputra Water To India?
United News of India
19 minutes ago
- United News of India
INDIA bloc writes to PM demanding special session of Parliament
New Delhi, June 3 (UNI) Leaders of the INDI Alliance met here on Tuesday to press for a special session of Parliament to discuss a 'sequence of events' — from the 'Pahalgam incident to Operation Sindoor and the ceasefire'. Leaders from 16 Opposition parties attended the meeting, including senior Congress leaders Jairam Ramesh, Deepender Singh Hooda, Trinamool Congress leader Derek O Brien, Ramgopal Yadav of the Samajwadi Party and Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut. Later briefing the media, DereK O Brien said the 16 parties have written a letter to the Prime Minister seeking a special session of Parliament. 'The letter basically talks about Poonch, Uri, Rajouri and having a free discussion in the Parliament,' the TMC leader said. He further added, 'The government is responsible to Parliament, Parliament is responsible to the people so it natural for all these parties, since the government is answerable to Parliament, that is why the session to the Parliament is responsible to the people'. On Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) not being a party of the meeting, the TMC leader said, 'Our understanding is that the AAP is writing directly to the PM tomorrow'. Samajwadi Party leader Ram Gopal Yadav said that there are several issues which are "worrisome". Samajwadi Party leader Ram Gopal Yadav said, "On the diplomatic front, the Prime Minister has been visiting numerous countries and meeting many leaders over the past several years. However, his so-called friend, Mr Trump, announced the ceasefire, which is a matter of concern." He further added, "India, being the world's largest democracy, must not appear to be forced into taking such actions. This warrants a discussion in Parliament, and we are demanding a special session to address it." Deepender Singh Hooda said that a special session of Parliament must be called so that from Pahalgam to Operation Sindoor to America's announcement of the ceasefire could be discussed. Meanwhile, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut stated, "The letter sent to the Prime Minister is not an ordinary one. We represent the main Opposition and are the voice of the people. Considering the recent development, a special session of Parliament should be convened. It will uphold the country's dignity and ensure transparency for the public." Raut further questioned, "If a ceasefire can be declared at the behest of President Trump, then why can't a special session of Parliament be called at the request of the Opposition? Do we need to approach President Trump for that as well?" UNI RBE GNK
News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
'Will Share Data Of Pakistan's Losses In Op Sindoor Soon': CDS Anil Chauhan
Last Updated: Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan said that the military will release the data about losses incurred by Pakistan during Operation Sindoor in the future. CDS Anil Chauhan (CNN-News18) Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan on Tuesday reflected upon Operation Sindoor and said that the Indian armed forces will share the specific data of losses incurred by Pakistan in the near future. 'We will share the particular data of Pakistan's losses soon," CDS Chauhan said at an event in Pune. First Published:
