
Sleep divorce: could sleeping separately from your partner lead to a better night's rest?
Hundreds of years ago, it was common for married couples among the European upper classes to have separate bedrooms. Sleeping separately was a symbol of luxury and status historically reserved for royalty and the very wealthy.
Nowadays, it's common for married couples and other couples in relationships to sleep in the same bed. But sometimes – for reasons from conflicting schedules to snoring to sleep talking – couples might choose to sleep separately in pursuit of a better night's sleep.
This is known as 'sleep divorce'. Though I prefer the term 'sleep separation', as this doesn't have to be a permanent arrangement – but more on that later.
So why might couples choose to sleep separately? And what does the evidence say about the effects on sleep quality if you sleep alone versus with a partner?
Why do couples opt for a sleep separation?
Couples may choose to sleep apart if one partner's sleep is disturbing the other's, or both are disrupting one another. This can happen for a variety of reasons.
These include waking up frequently in the night, mismatched body clocks (for example, one person coming to bed later than the other), conflicting schedules (for example, shift workers), snoring, twitching legs, or sleep talking.
Parents with babies and young children may choose to sleep separately to avoid both partners' sleep being disturbed.
Those with conflicting preferences for sleeping environments, such as one partner liking a cool room with a fan and the other preferring warmth, may also decide to sleep apart.
What are the benefits of sleeping alone?
Many couples say they prefer to sleep – and sleep better – next to their partner.
But when scientists measure sleep objectively, such as via an electroencephalogram (EEG) to assess brain waves, the data actually shows poorer sleep quality when co-sleeping. So sleeping alone may, in fact, mean better quality and longer sleep.
Research also shows when one member of the couple has a sleep disorder, such as insomnia or sleep apnoea (where breathing is frequently interrupted during sleep), these people often inadvertently wake up their partner when they wake in the night. So sleeping alone could be a good idea if your bed partner has a sleep disorder.
What's more, studies have found sleep disturbances are linked to reduced relationship satisfaction. So sleeping apart could actually mean happier couples.
Finally, anyone who has struggled with their sleep will know anxiety around sleep is common. Many clients I have seen who experience insomnia report sleeping alone can alleviate some of their anxiety because at least they know they won't disturb, or be disturbed by, their partner.
Are there any downsides to separate sleeping arrangements?
Some people dislike sleeping alone, reporting comfort, and feelings of safety and protection when sleeping alongside their partner – and loneliness when they don't.
Sleeping separately also requires two rooms, or at least two beds. Many couples may not have these options available to them in their home.
Sleeping separately is often stigmatised, with some people seeing it as the death of a couple's sex life. But while sleeping in separate beds may provide fewer opportunities for sex, this doesn't necessarily mean the end of intimacy.
Sleeping apart could mean some couples actually have more sex. We know better sleep is linked to more positive feelings about relationships, so it's possible the desire to be intimate could increase after a good night's sleep in separate beds. Sleeping apart may even mean some couples have more energy to be intimate.
Nonetheless, if you choose to sleep separately from your partner, it's important to have an open discussion and prioritise opportunities for connection and intimacy. One client I worked with referred to 'visiting rights', where her partner came into her bed for a short period before sleep or in the morning.
Who should potentially consider a sleep separation?
You may wish to think about a 'sleep separation' if you are disturbing each other's sleep, have young children, or have different preferences in terms of temperature, light and noise, which are causing issues.
Ultimately, if sleeping in the same bed is leading to poor sleep, then sleeping apart, if it's possible, could help.
If you can't sleep separately, there may be other ways to reduce disturbance from a partner, such as using an eye mask, white noise or earplugs.
If you decide to try a sleep separation, remember this can be a flexible arrangement or 're-set' and doesn't have to be permanent, or every night. Some couples find sleeping separately during the working week, but sharing a bed on the weekend works well for them.
Lastly, it's important to talk to your GP about any persistent sleep problems, such as snoring, insomnia, or unusual behaviour during sleep (for example, shouting or walking around), as there may be an underlying sleep disorder which needs treating. DM

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
6 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Sleep divorce: could sleeping separately from your partner lead to a better night's rest?
This arrangement can have benefits. But it doesn't have to be permanent, and doesn't have to mean the end of intimacy. Hundreds of years ago, it was common for married couples among the European upper classes to have separate bedrooms. Sleeping separately was a symbol of luxury and status historically reserved for royalty and the very wealthy. Nowadays, it's common for married couples and other couples in relationships to sleep in the same bed. But sometimes – for reasons from conflicting schedules to snoring to sleep talking – couples might choose to sleep separately in pursuit of a better night's sleep. This is known as 'sleep divorce'. Though I prefer the term 'sleep separation', as this doesn't have to be a permanent arrangement – but more on that later. So why might couples choose to sleep separately? And what does the evidence say about the effects on sleep quality if you sleep alone versus with a partner? Why do couples opt for a sleep separation? Couples may choose to sleep apart if one partner's sleep is disturbing the other's, or both are disrupting one another. This can happen for a variety of reasons. These include waking up frequently in the night, mismatched body clocks (for example, one person coming to bed later than the other), conflicting schedules (for example, shift workers), snoring, twitching legs, or sleep talking. Parents with babies and young children may choose to sleep separately to avoid both partners' sleep being disturbed. Those with conflicting preferences for sleeping environments, such as one partner liking a cool room with a fan and the other preferring warmth, may also decide to sleep apart. What are the benefits of sleeping alone? Many couples say they prefer to sleep – and sleep better – next to their partner. But when scientists measure sleep objectively, such as via an electroencephalogram (EEG) to assess brain waves, the data actually shows poorer sleep quality when co-sleeping. So sleeping alone may, in fact, mean better quality and longer sleep. Research also shows when one member of the couple has a sleep disorder, such as insomnia or sleep apnoea (where breathing is frequently interrupted during sleep), these people often inadvertently wake up their partner when they wake in the night. So sleeping alone could be a good idea if your bed partner has a sleep disorder. What's more, studies have found sleep disturbances are linked to reduced relationship satisfaction. So sleeping apart could actually mean happier couples. Finally, anyone who has struggled with their sleep will know anxiety around sleep is common. Many clients I have seen who experience insomnia report sleeping alone can alleviate some of their anxiety because at least they know they won't disturb, or be disturbed by, their partner. Are there any downsides to separate sleeping arrangements? Some people dislike sleeping alone, reporting comfort, and feelings of safety and protection when sleeping alongside their partner – and loneliness when they don't. Sleeping separately also requires two rooms, or at least two beds. Many couples may not have these options available to them in their home. Sleeping separately is often stigmatised, with some people seeing it as the death of a couple's sex life. But while sleeping in separate beds may provide fewer opportunities for sex, this doesn't necessarily mean the end of intimacy. Sleeping apart could mean some couples actually have more sex. We know better sleep is linked to more positive feelings about relationships, so it's possible the desire to be intimate could increase after a good night's sleep in separate beds. Sleeping apart may even mean some couples have more energy to be intimate. Nonetheless, if you choose to sleep separately from your partner, it's important to have an open discussion and prioritise opportunities for connection and intimacy. One client I worked with referred to 'visiting rights', where her partner came into her bed for a short period before sleep or in the morning. Who should potentially consider a sleep separation? You may wish to think about a 'sleep separation' if you are disturbing each other's sleep, have young children, or have different preferences in terms of temperature, light and noise, which are causing issues. Ultimately, if sleeping in the same bed is leading to poor sleep, then sleeping apart, if it's possible, could help. If you can't sleep separately, there may be other ways to reduce disturbance from a partner, such as using an eye mask, white noise or earplugs. If you decide to try a sleep separation, remember this can be a flexible arrangement or 're-set' and doesn't have to be permanent, or every night. Some couples find sleeping separately during the working week, but sharing a bed on the weekend works well for them. Lastly, it's important to talk to your GP about any persistent sleep problems, such as snoring, insomnia, or unusual behaviour during sleep (for example, shouting or walking around), as there may be an underlying sleep disorder which needs treating. DM

TimesLIVE
27-06-2025
- TimesLIVE
TikTok teams up with local organisations to foster mental health dialogues
The expansion of its $2.3m global Mental Health Education Fund will include organisations from Sub-Saharan Africa for the first time. The organisations are the South African Depression and Anxiety Group, Mentally Aware Nigeria Initiative and Kenya's Mental360. They will receive funding and platform support to develop locally relevant, evidence-based content that raises awareness, reduces stigma, and encourages open dialogue around mental health in African communities. TikTok created the Mental Health Education Fund in 2023 to support organisations in creating authoritative, engaging and uplifting mental health content. Globally the fund has so far helped organisations gain more than 173-million impressions of their content, more than 600,000 new followers for their accounts, prompted more than 200,000 web visits and helped recruit 486 new volunteers, thanks to a combined $7.3m (R130m) in ad credit donations. Building on a successful pilot in France and subsequent rollout across European countries, TikTok was expanding in-app helpline resources across Africa. In the coming weeks, users of some countries in Africa will have access to local helplines in-app that provide expert support when reporting content related to suicide, self-harm, hate and harassment. 'The feature builds on existing capabilities that direct users to mental health resources when they report bullying and harassment, further strengthening access to timely and relevant support on the platform. The partners can offer assistance, including counselling, advice, free psychological support and other essential services to those in need. While TikTok reviews reported content and removes violations of community guidelines, users can connect with the partner organisations to receive personal support should they need it,' said Fortune Mgwili-Sibanda, director of public policy and government relations at TikTok. As part of its ongoing partnership with the World Health Organisation (WHO), TikTok officially introduced its new mental health ambassadors, who are verified healthcare professionals from the WHO fides network. They are South Africans Sanam Naran and Dr Siyamak Saleh, Dr Claire Kinuthia from Kenya and Dr Wales from Nigeria. Naran said: 'High-quality social connections are essential to our mental and physical well-being. As more of us turn to online platforms to find community, it's critical these digital interactions are safe, healthy and informed by mental health expertise. Platforms such as TikTok have a powerful role to play in helping people connect meaningfully, and by making the spaces safer and more supportive, they're protecting not only conversations, but people.'


The Citizen
24-06-2025
- The Citizen
French state held liable for death linked to toxic green algae
A French court ordered the state to pay over €277,000 in damages after finding the government failed to enforce environmental protections, resulting in a fatal gas exposure. A French court on Tuesday ordered the state to compensate the family of a 50-year-old man who died in 2016 during a run after inhaling poisonous gas emitted by rotting green algae piled along the country's western coast. The Nantes appeals court found France liable for the death of Jean-Rene Auffray, citing its 'negligence' in enforcing environmental regulations to protect its waters and prevent toxic green algae blooms. For more than five decades, tons of green algae have washed up annually on Brittany's beaches in western France, releasing hydrogen sulphide gas as it rots — a toxin that can prove deadly in high concentrations. Initial legal efforts dismissed by courts Auffray, a keen trail runner, died of sudden respiratory failure while jogging in the algae-choked Gouessant estuary near the city of Saint-Brieuc. His family sued over his death, but in 2022 a court rejected the claim, ruling there was insufficient evidence to link the toxic algae to Auffray's death. Tuesday's decision reversed that ruling, marking the first time France has been held liable for the health risks posed by deadly green algae blooms along its coast. Court confirms failure to enforce pollution regulations The court 'holds the State liable for negligence due to its failure to implement European and national regulations designed to protect waters from agricultural pollution', which is 'the main cause of the proliferation of green algae in Brittany', it explained in a statement. ALSO READ: French prosecutors seek murder charge for school stabbing suspect The court found Auffray's death was caused by a rapid pulmonary oedema — a condition in which there is too much fluid in the lungs — which could only be explained by fatal poisoning from inhaling hydrogen sulphide at very high concentrations. 'State's negligence' 'For the first time, a French court has recognised the link between a person's death and the state's negligence in these green algae cases,' said the family's lawyer, Francois Lafforgue. The deceased's family will receive partial compensation, as the court found the state 60 percent liable, noting that he had taken a personal risk by jogging in the estuary. The state has been ordered to pay 277,343 euros ($321,750) to the jogger's wife, 15,000 euros to each of his three children, and 9,000 euros to his brother. Agricultural pollution driving algae blooms According to a 2021 report from France's top audit court, around 90 percent of Brittany's algae blooms are caused by agriculture, where the use of nitrogen fertilisers has increased significantly since the 1960s. Intensive farming — especially pig farming — and the resulting nitrate pollution have been linked to the spread of green algae in the western Cotes-d'Armor region. NOW READ: French grandmother files genocide complaint over Gaza killings