
China was on the sidelines of the Iran-Israel war. That's just where it wanted to be
CNN —
Weeks after his country was battered by waves of Israeli strikes and the US bombed three of its prized nuclear facilities, Iran's foreign minister came to a gathering of regional diplomats in China this week with a simple ask.
Their group, the Beijing and Moscow-backed Shanghai Cooperation Organization, should have a way to coordinate response to military aggression and play a 'central role' in addressing such threats, Abbas Araghchi said, according to Iranian state media.
Along with Iran, fellow SCO members China and Russia are key members of what lawmakers in Washington have dubbed an 'axis' of authoritarian nations or a growing anti-American alignment of Iran, North Korea, China and Russia.
But Iran's proposal didn't seem to get the direct endorsement of the group, a regional security body whose 10 members include close partners China and Russia, but also rivals India and Pakistan.
And contained in Araghchi's message was a public hint of Iran's disappointment: that in its time of need last month – when Israeli and US forces struck at will at top military and technological targets – its powerful friends in Beijing and Moscow appeared to sit on the sidelines.
Even still, in a meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in China's Tianjin on Wednesday, Araghchi 'thanked China for its valuable support to Iran,' according to a Chinese readout.
Earlier this month at a summit of BRICS, another China- and Russia-backed grouping of major emerging economies, member state Iran got little more than a statement of 'serious concern over deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities.'
The declaration 'condemned' the strikes but did not name Israel or the US.
China's public response – to explicitly condemn the attacks, but not take an evident direct role in peacemaking – however, was widely seen as a sign of the limits to its power in the Middle East, despite its bid in recent years to ramp up its economic and diplomat clout in the region.
Beijing has instead focused on using the conflict to play up another message: that China does not want to be a global leader that uses power in the same way as the US.
Iran's Minister of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi mets Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov of a Shanghai Cooperation Organization meeting on July 15 in Tianjin, China.
Russian Ministry of Foreign Affair/Anadolu/Getty Images
China's security vision
The propaganda machine of China's ruling Communist Party has long decried America's 'hegemony' and its 'wanton use' of force as its rolls out examples of US' involvement in multiple conflicts of recent decades.
Frictions with Washington over trade and tech make selling that messaging more important for Beijing, as it needs friends now more than ever. And it sees US President Donald Trump's brash 'America First' foreign policy as creating an opening there.
Over the past decade, Chinese aggression to enforce its disputed claims in the South China Sea, its military intimidation of Taiwan, and the growing reach of its expanded navy, whose aircraft carrier strike groups recently conducted drills further from home shores and in greater strength than ever before, have raised alarm among its neighbors – and fueled Washington's urgent warnings to its allies against dealing too closely with China.
Beijing has cried 'hypocrisy' and, in 2022, Chinese leader Xi Jinping unveiled his own vision for global security architecture – short on detail, but clear that it opposed the US-led alliance system and military intervention.
That vision has brought together Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose shared mistrust for NATO – and view that it's a provocative actor – is a key point of alignment, and a subtext for why Beijing has never condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Experts say China's apparent lack of a role even in mediating the conflict between Israel and Iran, a country with which Beijing has deep historic and economic ties, shows the limits of its influence in the region.
But they also say Beijing has little interest in wading into the region's security as a power player.
'In terms of providing mediation, (China) has offered and is more than willing … but it has little capacity to project military power in the Middle East, and even less political will to be openly and directly involved,' said William Figueroa, an expert of China-Iran relations and an assistant professor at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands.
Unlike the US, which maintains substantial military assets to back its allies and interests in the region, China's on the ground military presence is limited to a naval base in the Horn of Africa nation of Djibouti. Indeed, Beijing's only military alliance is a historic one with neighboring and fellow one-party communist state North Korea.
Beijing also shied away from joining international efforts last winter to protect key shipping lanes under attack from Houthi rebels in Yemen following Israel's war on Gaza.
The attacks put China's commercial interests at risk even though the Houthis said they won't target Chinese or Russian vessels. And when it comes to efforts to push for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, China has again been on the sidelines, despite positioning itself as leading international voice calling for a ceasefire and criticizing Israel's war.
Some experts have argued that if China had more global military might then it may throw around that weight more outside its own region.
But in the Israel-Iran conflict, Beijing's focus was instead on 'presenting its support for international law as a superior alternative to what it portrays as the West's militaristic, unlawful interventions,' according to Tong Zhao, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
'While this narrative has limited traction among Middle Eastern states, it plays well in the Global South—where it serves to burnish China's image and reinforce its strategic competition with Washington at the global level,' Zhao added.
Iran's Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh (second from left) joins SCO counterparts in a meeting in China's Qingdao a day after the Israel-Iran ceasefire last month.
Pedro Pardo/AFP/Getty Images
Fair weather friends?
Even if Beijing's reaction was not surprising to Tehran, going to China and 'acting like everything's great' may have a been 'a bitter pill to swallow' for Araghchi and Iran's Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh as both traveled to China in recent weeks, according to Jonathan Fulton, a senior fellow for the Atlantic Council's Middle East Programs.
Beijing and Tehran have no mutual defense treaty, and the relationship has largely been an economic one. China takes more than 90% of Iran's oil trade, imported through intermediaries, which totaled some $40 billion in profits for Iran last year, according to Muyu Xu, a senior oil analyst at trade intelligence firm Kpler.
Even when it comes to China's closest international partner, Russia, Beijing has tread carefully: stopping short of large-scale supply of military goods for Moscow's war in Ukraine, instead buying up Russian fuel and supplying it with dual-use goods that can power its defense industrial base.
That support, and more direct military backing from Iran and North Korea for Russia's war, has raised alarm in the West about emerging coordination among members into a so-called anti-American 'axis.'
But the latest stress-test of the 'axis' appeared to show its weaknesses: as Israeli and US bombs rained down on Iran, Russia and China looked more focused on their own interests and rhetoric, analysts say, rather than backing Iran materially or using their weight to push Israel or the US to stop the fighting. Xi and Putin did, however, use the conflict to stress their own united front.
That said, when it comes to ties with Iran, the real test is likely what's next.
'This is a good example (that) there are limitations to what China's going to do in terms of direct intervention in a military conflict,' Brian Hart, a fellow of the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) think tank, said during a recent talk held by the Washington-based center. But 'it's too soon to count China's support for Iran out.'
China's model for Russia of 'largely walking right up to that line of not providing overt military support,' could become a dynamic that develops here, Hart said, as Beijing looks to help the regime in Tehran say in power. Dual-use Chinese-made chemicals needed to produce missile fuel were delivered to Iran earlier this year, CNN reporting shows.
Even still, Beijing may be looking more skeptically at Iran as a powerful partner in the region in light of the country's 'inability to project power to defend its airspace' against Israel last month, according to Atlantic Council's Fulton.
And when it comes to how the latest events may impact any coordination between the so-called 'axis' countries, the fundamentals have not changed, he said.
Far from being an alliance or a bloc like those in the West, China, Iran, Russia and North Korea have an 'alignment of grievances' against the West, but 'very different ideas' of how to reshape global rules to address that, Fulton said.
And for Beijing, 'what it needs in the Middle East is economically motivated – it needs a stable region, and Iran doesn't really support that. Iran causes as many problems as it solves for Beijing.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al-Ahram Weekly
4 minutes ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
UN gathering eyes solution to deadlocked Palestinian question - War on Gaza
Fired by France's imminent recognition of Palestinian statehood, UN members meet next week to breathe life into the push for a two-state solution as Israel, expected to be absent, presses its genocidal war in Gaza, starving the Palestinians/ Days before the July 28-30 conference on fostering Israeli and Palestinian states living peacefully side-by-side to be co-chaired by Riyadh and Paris, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would formally recognise the State of Palestine in September. His declaration "will breathe new life into a conference that seemed destined to irrelevance," said Richard Gowan, an analyst at International Crisis Group. "Macron's announcement changes the game. Other participants will be scrabbling to decide if they should also declare an intent to recognise Palestine." According to an AFP database, at least 142 of the 193 UN member states -- including France -- now recognise the Palestinian state proclaimed by the Palestinian leadership in exile in 1988. In 1947, the 181 resolution of the UN General Assembly decided on the partition of Palestine, then under a British mandate, into two independent states -- one Jewish and the other Arab. The following year, the State of Israel was proclaimed in the Palestinian Territories. For several decades, the vast majority of UN member states have supported the idea of a two-state solution: Israeli and Palestinian, living side-by-side peacefully and securely. But after 77 years of Israeli occupation and more than 21 months of war in Gaza, the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and senior Israeli officials declaring designs to annexe occupied territory, it is feared that a Palestinian state could be geographically impossible. The New York conference is a response to the crisis, with Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa and several dozen ministers from around the world expected to attend. 'No alternative' The meeting comes as a two-state solution is "more threatened than it has ever been (but) even more necessary than before, because we see very clearly that there is no alternative," said a French diplomatic source. Beyond facilitating conditions for recognition of a Palestinian state, the meeting will have three other focuses -- reform of the Palestinian Authority, disarmament of Hamas and its exclusion from Palestinian public life, and normalisation of relations with Israel by Arab states that have not yet done so. The diplomatic source warned that no announcement of new normalisation deals was expected next week. Ahead of the conference, which was delayed from June, Britain said it would not recognise a Palestinian state unilaterally and would wait for "a wider plan" for peace in the region. The conference "offers a unique opportunity to transform international law and the international consensus into an achievable plan and to demonstrate resolve to end the occupation and conflict once and for all, for the benefit of all peoples," said the Palestinian ambassador to the UN, Riyad Mansour, calling for "courage" from participants. Israel and the United States will not take part in the meeting. As international pressure continues to mount on Israel to end nearly two years of war in Gaza, the humanitarian catastrophe in the ravaged coastal territory is expected to dominate speeches by representatives of more than 100 countries as they take to the podium from Monday to Wednesday. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Al-Ahram Weekly
4 minutes ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Taiwan votes to decide whether to oust lawmakers from China-friendly - International
Taiwanese were voting Saturday to determine whether to oust about one-fifth of their lawmakers, all from the opposition Nationalist Party, in elections that could potentially reshape the power balance in the self-ruled island's legislature. The independence-leaning ruling Democratic Progressive Party won last year's presidential election, but the China-friendly Nationalists, also known as the KMT, and the smaller Taiwan People's Party have enough seats to form a majority bloc. Those who support removing the 24 lawmakers are angry that the KMT and its allies have blocked key legislation, especially the defence budget, and passed controversial changes that are seen as diminishing the power of the executive and favouring China, which considers the island its territory. The opposition parties' actions sparked concerns among some Taiwanese about the island's democratic integrity and its ability to deter Chinese military threats, leading to the recall campaigns. The scale of the recall elections is unprecedented, with another seven KMT lawmakers facing similar votes on Aug. 23. But the KMT alleged the ruling party was resorting to political retaliation after it lost the legislative majority, saying the recalls were undermining and challenging Taiwan's democratic system. The KMT holds 52 seats, while the ruling DPP holds 51 seats. For the DPP to secure a legislative majority, at least six KMT lawmakers would need to be ousted, and the ruling party would need to win all by-elections, which would need to be held within three months following the announcement of results. For the recall to pass, more than a quarter of eligible voters in the electoral district must vote in favour of the recall, and the total number of supporters must exceed those against. If KMT loses its seats in the recall elections, the party can file new candidates for the by-elections and may be able to win back the seats. Outside a Taipei polling station, voters old and young were waiting in line to cast their ballots. The poll will close at 4 p.m. local time, with results expected on Saturday night. The elections have intensified tensions between those backing the status quo and those favouring improved ties with Beijing. Critics accuse China-friendly politicians of compromising Taiwan and take issue with their meetings with mainland Chinese politicians. But these Taiwanese politicians claim their connections are vital for dialogue, given Beijing's refusal to interact with the DPP. When asked about the recall election, China's Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian said in June that since the administration of Taiwan President Lai Ching-te came into power, it has sought to achieve 'one-party dominance' and practised 'dictatorship' under the guise of 'democracy," state broadcaster CCTV reported. She was quoted as saying that Lai's government has spared no effort in suppressing opposition parties and those who supported the development of cross-strait relations. Taiwan's mainland affairs council said Wednesday that the Chinese authorities and state media had tried to interfere with the vote blatantly. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Egypt Independent
17 minutes ago
- Egypt Independent
Thai-Cambodian conflict pits a well-equipped US ally against a weaker adversary with strong China links
CNN — The deadly conflict on the Thai-Cambodian border pits a longtime United States ally with decades of experience against a relatively young armed force with close ties to China. Bangkok and Phnom Penh are fighting over territory disputed since colonial power France drew the border between them more than a century ago. Clashes continued into Saturday, according to officials on both sides. More than a dozen people have been reported killed, dozens wounded, and more than 150,000 civilians evacuated since fighting began on Thursday. Here's a look at the histories and capabilities of the two sides. Numbers favor Thailand Thailand's military dwarfs that of neighboring Cambodia, both in personnel and weaponry. Thailand's total of 361,000 active-duty personnel spread across all branches of the kingdom's military is three times Cambodia's. And those troops have at their disposal weaponry their Cambodian counterparts could only dream of. 'Thailand has a large, well-funded military and its air force is one of the best equipped and trained in Southeast Asia,' the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) wrote in its 'Military Balance 2025' look at the world's armed forces. Meanwhile, a 2024 ranking of the military capabilities of 27 regional nations by the Lowy Institute places Thailand at 14th, to Cambodia's 23rd. US Air Force personnel walk past planes on display at Thailand's 88th Royal Air Force Anniversary Air Show on March 7, 2025 in Bangkok, a disparity is perhaps to be expected, given Thailand has four times as many people as Cambodia, and a GDP more than 10 times larger. Unlike Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, it escaped the ravages of the wars that engulfed the region in the second half of the 20th century, and the European colonialism that preceded them. Overall, with factors including military, economic, diplomatic and cultural power weighed in the Lowy Asia Power Index, Thailand is ranked 10th, considered a middle power, just behind Indonesia but ahead of countries including Malaysia and Vietnam. Lowy ranks Cambodia as a minor power in Asia, grouped with countries such as Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Laos. Thailand has strong US ties, global outlook Thailand's military has long been a major player in the kingdom's politics. The country has for years been dominated by a conservative establishment comprising the military, the monarchy and influential elites. Generals have seized power in 20 coups since 1932, often toppling democratic governments, according to the CIA World Factbook, and the military portrays itself as the ultimate defender of the monarchy. Thailand is a United States treaty ally, a status dating back to the signing of the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty, also known as the Manila Pact, in 1954, according to the US State Department. During the Vietnam War, Thailand hosted US Air Force assets at some air bases, including B-52 bombers, and tens of thousands Thai troops fought on the side of the US-backed South Vietnam against the communist North. US B-52 bombers operated from air bases in Thailand during the Vietnam War. Pictures from History/Universal ImagesStrong ties between Washington and Bangkok have endured. Thailand is classed as a major non-NATO ally by the US, giving it special benefits that have enabled it to enjoy access to decades of US support for its weapons programs. Thailand and the US Indo-Pacific Command co-host the annual Cobra Gold military exercise, which began in 1982 as joint drills with the US but has since added dozens of other participants. It's the longest-running international military exercise in the world, according to the US military. Besides Cobra Gold, Thai and US forces hold more than 60 exercises together, and more than 900 US aircraft and 40 Navy ships visit Thailand yearly, the US State Department says. Despite all that history with Washington, these days the Thai military tries to maintain a more neutral approach to military policy, increasing ties with China in the past decade. Not wanting to rely on any one country as its arms supplier, it has also developed a strong domestic weapons industry, with the help of countries such as Israel, Italy, Russia, South Korea and Sweden, the 'Military Balance' report says. Cambodia's Chinese support Cambodia's military is young in comparison to Thailand's, established in 1993 after forces of the communist government were merged with two non-communist resistance armies, according to the IISS. 'Cambodia's most important international defense links are with China and Vietnam. Despite a traditional reliance on Russia for defense equipment, China has emerged as a key supplier,' the IISS says. Beijing has even developed a naval base in Cambodia. The Ream Naval Base, on the Gulf of Thailand, would be able to host Chinese aircraft carriers, according to international analysts. Cambodia and China completed the seventh edition of their annual Golden Dragon joint military exercise in May, which was touted as the largest ever and featured live-fire training scenarios. Chinese military personnel take part in the Golden Dragon joint military exercise with Cambodia in Svay Chok in Kampong Chhnang Province, Cambodia, on May 30, a relationship that's expected to reach 'a new level and achieve new development' this year, according to a February report on the People's Liberation Army's English-language website. 'China and Cambodia are iron-clad friends who… always support each other. The two militaries enjoy unbreakable relations and rock-solid brotherhood,' Chinese Defense Ministry spokesperson Senior Col. Wu Qian told a press conference in February, when asked about possible fissures in relations. Cambodia's military needs the support. 'Cambodia currently lacks the ability to design and manufacture modern equipment for its armed forces,' the IISS report says. Weapons on each side Bolstered by years of US support, the Royal Thai Air Force is well equipped, with at least 11 modern Swedish Gripen fighter jets and dozens of older, US-made F-16 and F-5 jets, according to the IISS. Cambodia has no combat-capable air force to speak of. On the ground, Thailand has dozens of battle tanks, including 60 modern, Chinese-made VT-4 tanks, and hundreds of older, US-made tanks. Cambodia has about 200 old Chinese- and Soviet-made tanks, the 'Military Balance' shows. A Thai amphibious assault vehicle seen during an assault exercise as part of the Cobra Gold 2025 joint military exercise at the military base in Sattahip, Chonburi province, Thailand, on March 3, 2025. Peerapon Boonyakiat/SOPA Images/LightRocket/Getty Images The Thai army boasts more than 600 artillery pieces, including at least 56 powerful 155mm weapons and more than 550 105mm towed guns. Cambodia has only a dozen 155mm guns with around 400 smaller towed artillery pieces, according to IISS figures. In the air, the army has US-made Cobra attack helicopters as well as 18 US Black Hawk transports. Cambodia has only a few dozen older Soviet and Chinese transport helicopters. What comes next Hawaii-based military analyst Carl Schuster, a former director of operations at the US Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center, said that while Thailand has the numerical and qualitative military advantage, Cambodia has at least one thing in its favor – the actual land along the disputed border. 'Terrain favors access from Cambodian territory to the disputed area,' Schuster told CNN. And with Cambodian forces allegedly laying landmines and booby traps in the disputed area, Thailand can be expected to rely on longer-range weaponry, he said. 'The Royal Thai Air Force is superior and their special forces are superior,' Schuster said. 'I think the Thais will prefer to emphasize air power and long-range firepower in the conflict.'