The Strait of Hormuz is a vital route for oil. Closing it could backfire on Iran
The U.S. military's strike on three sites in Iran over the weekend has raised questions about how its military might respond.
The Strait of Hormuz is between Oman and Iran, which boasts a fleet of fast-attack boats and thousands of naval mines as well as missiles that it could use to make the strait impassable, at least for a time.
Iran's main naval base at Bandar Abbas is on the north coast of the strait. It could also fire missiles from its long Persian Gulf shore, as its allies, Yemen's Houthi rebels, have done in the Red Sea.
About 20 million barrels of oil per day, or around 20% of the world's oil consumption, passed through the strait in 2024. Most of that oil goes to Asia.
Here is a look at the waterway and its impact on the global economy:
The strait connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It's only 33 kilometers (21 miles) wide at its narrowest point, but deep enough and wide enough to handle the world's largest crude oil tankers.
Oil that passes through the strait comes from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, and Bahrain, while major supplies of liquefied natural gas come from Qatar. At its narrowest point, the sea lanes for tankers lie in Omani waters, and before and after that cross into Iranian territory.
While some global oil chokepoints can be circumvented by taking longer routes that simply add costs, that's not an option for most of the oil moving through the strait.
That's because the pipelines that could be used to carry the oil on land, such as Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline, they don't have nearly enough capacity. 'Most volumes that transit the strait have no alternative means of exiting the region,' according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
If Iran blocked the strait, oil prices could shoot as high as $120-$130 per barrel, at least temporarily, said Homayoun Falakshahi, head of crude oil analyst at Kpler, in an online webinar Sunday.
That would deal an inflationary shock to the global economy — if it lasted. Analysts think it wouldn't.
Asia would be directly impacted because 84% of the oil moving through the strait is headed for Asia; top destinations are China, India, Japan and South Korea. China gets 47% of its seaborne oil from the Gulf. China, however, has an oil inventory of 1.1 billion barrels, or 2 1/2 months of supply.
U.S. oil customers would feel the impact of the higher prices but would not lose much supply. The U.S. imported only about 7% of its oil from Persian Gulf countries through the strait in 2024, according to the USEIA. That was the lowest level in nearly 40 years.
Closing the strait would cut off Iran's own oil exports. While Iran does have a new terminal under construction at Jask, just outside the strait, the new facility has loaded oil only once and isn't in a position to replace the strait, according to Kpler analysts.
Closure would hit China, Iran's largest trading partner and only remaining oil customer, and harm its oil-exporting Arab neighbors, who are at least officially supporting it in its war with Israel.
And it would mean blocking Oman's territorial waters, offending a country that has served as a mediator between the U.S. and Iran.
Any price spike would probably not last. One big reason: Analysts expect that the U.S. Navy would intervene to keep the strait open. In the 1980s, U.S. warships escorted Kuwaiti oil tankers through the strait to protect them against Iranian attacks during the Iran-Iraq war.
A price spike 'wouldn't last very long' and the strait would likely be reopened 'very fast,' said Kpler's Falakshahi.
U.S. use of force to reopen the strait would likely be supported by Europe and 'even unofficially by China,' he said. 'Iran's navy would probably get destroyed in a matter of hours or days.'
McHugh writes for the Associated Press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
16 hours ago
- Newsweek
Iran Turns to China for Missile Boost: Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new report from Israeli media has warned of increased military cooperation between Iran and China, particularly in the production of surface-to-surface missiles. Yedioth Ahronoth cited intelligence findings that Beijing may be helping Tehran rebuild missile capabilities damaged in the recent June war. The concerns surfaced as Israel's military chief, Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, said the army is ready to launch further strikes on Iran if necessary, following what he described as a successful preemptive campaign. Newsweek has reached out to the foreign ministries of Israel, China and Iran for comment. Why It Matters The reported cooperation between Beijing and Tehran is viewed by Israel as a significant security challenge. Israel fought a 12-day, United States-backed war against Iran in June and is now watching for any moves that could restore Iran's missile capacity. Israeli authorities have stated that Chinese involvement in missile development or supply could directly undermine Israel's defense efforts. Iranians drive past missiles during a rally marking the 42nd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, at Azadi Square in Tehran on February 10, 2021. Iranians drive past missiles during a rally marking the 42nd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, at Azadi Square in Tehran on February 10, 2021. Ebrahim Noroozi/AP Photo What To Know Officials told Yedioth Ahronoth that China has not confirmed any plans to supply weapons to Iran, but its actions suggest it is "actually rebuilding the Iranian capabilities." The outlet reported that European intelligence agencies have recently tracked closer cooperation between China and Iran. Israel's ambassador to the U.S., Yechiel Leiter, said in late July that there were "troubling" indications China was aiding Iran in rebuilding its missile arsenal. Speaking to Voice of America, he expressed concern over the possible transfer of materials that could "reconstitute a ballistic missile program." Iran-China Ties Last month, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi visited China for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Summit, highlighting Tehran's growing ties with Beijing. Around that time, reports from Middle East Eye and Israel Hayom indicated Iran received Chinese-made surface-to-air missiles paid for in oil. China has denied arms sales to nations "engaged in warfare." Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz at the Pentagon for a meeting with U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on July 18, 2025. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz at the Pentagon for a meeting with U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on July 18, 2025. Mark Schiefelbein/AP Photo Rising War Rhetoric The latest Yedioth Ahronoth report comes amid public discussion in Israel about the possibility of renewed conflict with Iran. On June 27, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said he had instructed the military to prepare an "enforcement plan" targeting Iran's nuclear and missile programs. Tehran has stated it will continue nuclear enrichment and maintain a peaceful nuclear energy program. What People Are Saying Israel's ambassador to the U.S., Yechiel Leiter, told Voice of America in July: "There's no reason why we couldn't have good relations with the people of China. But we certainly don't want to see China acting alongside those who threaten our very existence." Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, at a meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi in July: "China will continue to support Iran in safeguarding its national sovereignty and dignity, resisting power politics and bullying, defending its legitimate rights and interests through political negotiation." What Happens Next Israeli officials have said they will act to prevent Iran from restoring its missile capabilities. At the same time, Iran has emphasized its right to pursue nuclear enrichment and strengthen its defenses, signaling readiness to respond to threats. China's growing military and economic cooperation with Tehran adds further complexity, as Israel continues monitoring Beijing's role in supporting Iran's missile and defense programs.


New York Post
16 hours ago
- New York Post
It's the Age of Trump — and he's forging a new political era
If you had to sum up President Donald Trump's second term so far in one word, you could do worse than 'epic.' Trump may be on the path to the most consequential presidency since Ronald Reagan's. We don't know how it will end — an unforeseen crisis could upend everything — but the emphasis has been on governing ambition from Day 1. Advertisement Even if Trump's second term ended tomorrow, he would have left a significant mark. Consider his signature issues of trade and immigration. Advertisement For all the talk about how he doesn't have core convictions, Trump has favored tariffs for decades and has instituted a tariff regime that — absent discrediting economic turmoil — is likely to endure. This would have seemed almost unthinkable when Trump descended the elevator in 2015, and a relatively free-trade consensus prevailed in US policy. He's brought border crossings to a historic low, and the United States could experience negative net migration for the first time in 50 years. Advertisement Again, this is a big change, and one that it's hard to imagine anyone besides Donald Trump effecting. He's dealt a blow to DEI programs in the federal government and is making it harder for colleges and universities to pursue race-conscious policies. His election coincided with the beginning of a pullback from DEI in the private sector, one that his administration has encouraged. DEI was the culmination of a half-century campaign by the left for quotas in hiring and admissions and other racialized policies. Trump's counteroffensive could represent an inflection point. Advertisement Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters He's signed a tax and spending bill that makes permanent the tax cuts from his first term, funds a large-scale investment in immigration enforcement and includes a meaningful reform of Medicaid. He bombed the Iranian nuclear program, at the very least setting it back for years. He cajoled commitments for greater defense spending out of NATO countries. Almost any one of these items would be a notable first-six-months accomplishment, but he's done them all, with lots of other activity besides. His environmental and energy officials are rolling back the left's climate agenda. Trump defunded public broadcasting and kneecapped the Department of Education (for now). His administration has taken important steps to protect female sports and to keep minors from being subjected to 'gender-affirming care.' Advertisement He's pushed universities into adopting reforms and probably upended forever the assumption that billions of federal dollars would flow to top universities as a matter of course. His election was both a symbol of, and a catalyst for, the woke tide's receding. Trump has what is, in recent memory, an unprecedented grip on his party and has remade it in his image over the last decade. If a Trump-endorsed GOP nominee wins the general election, he would be the George H.W. Bush to Trump's Reagan. Advertisement In sum, the rise of Trump in 2016 represented a break with what had been the post–Cold War consensus, although it was incompletely realized and seemingly a political fizzle when voters ousted him in the COVID election of 2020. Biden was a partial return to a more conventional politics. Now, with his second term, Trump is more fully effecting a transition to a new era — which alone makes him a highly consequential figure. The usual caveats apply: Again, a catastrophe could scramble all of this, and to say Trump is important is not to endorse everything he's doing, whether big (e.g., the tariffs) or small (e.g., firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner). Advertisement Since he's done so much unilaterally, it's subject to relatively easy reversal if a Democrat is elected in 2028. But there's little doubt we are witnessing something historic. Steve Hayward called his volumes on the Republican giant of the 1980s 'The Age of Reagan' — and Arthur Schlesinger wrote both 'The Age of Jackson' and 'The Age of Roosevelt.' Advertisement The equivalent of Hayward or Schlesinger decades from now will probably be justified in continuing the trope: All indications are that we are living in the Age of Trump. Twitter: @RichLowry

Business Insider
16 hours ago
- Business Insider
Ukraine says its forces bombed a Russian ship carrying Iranian ammo as it ramps up deep-strike operations
The Ukrainian military said on Friday that it carried out an attack against a Russian ship carrying Iranian ammunition, marking one of the latest deep strikes far behind the front lines. Separately, Ukraine said that it struck an oil refinery that supplies fuel to the Russian military. The two attacks are the latest in a string of long-range strikes deep into Russian territory and come as Ukraine continues to target critical military and energy facilities. Kyiv hopes this campaign will put additional strains on Moscow's war machine. Ukraine's Special Operations Forces said they struck the vessel Port Olya 4 in Russia's Astrakhan region, which borders the Caspian Sea, during an operation on Thursday. It said the ship was loaded with parts for one-way attack drones and ammunition from Iran, adding that the results of the attack are still under investigation. SOF said Russia uses the port as a logistics hub to transport military supplies from Iran. They said in a statement that "hitting this vessel disrupts a critical supply chain." The General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces said SOF was behind another long-range attack on Friday, this time striking an oil refinery in Russia's Samara region, which borders Kazakhstan. It said in a statement that the Syzran refinery produces various fuels, including some for aircraft, and supplies the Russian military. It added that the attack caused fires and explosions. It's unclear what weapons Ukrainian forces used in the attacks. Business Insider was unable to independently verify all the details of the two deep-strike operations. Ukraine previously faced restrictions on using its limited arsenal of Western-provided cruise and ballistic missiles for strikes inside Russia, restrictions that hamstrung the Ukrainian military until they were lifted last year. The main problem now appears to be munition availability. As a workaround, Kyiv began to invest heavily in locally produced long-range drones and missiles. Over the past year, it has used these weapons to carry out a range of strikes on Russian airfields, ammunition storage facilities, energy sites, and other high-profile targets. In recent weeks, Ukraine has kept up its long-range attacks. Megan Ewert, a geospatial researcher at the Institute for the Study of War, a US think tank that closely tracks the grinding conflict, found that Kyiv carried out 40 drone strikes in Russian territory between July 15 and August 10. Ewert explained to Business Insider that the number of strikes correlates with the number of sites attacked and said the number of days each week with strikes seems to have an upward trend over the timeframe. She attributed this shift to a possible increase in the intensity of drone use, though ISW does not track the exact number of drones that Ukraine launches in each attack. The number of Ukrainian drones often varies with each attack. On Monday, for instance, a source in Ukraine's internal security agency, the SBU, said at least four long-range drones struck a facility that makes parts for cruise missiles in Russia's Nizhny Novgorod region. Other attacks may use a different number of munitions. The SBU told Business Insider that facilities within Russia's military-industrial complex, which contribute to Moscow's war machine, "are absolutely legitimate military targets." "The SBU continues to work on the demilitarization of facilities that produce weapons for the terror of peaceful Ukrainian cities," the source said in translated remarks.