
Congress Moves to Clarify Joint Employer Rule
Franchise owners could soon see relief from one of the industry's most contentious legal issues: the joint employer standard. A bill working its way through the U.S. House of Representatives aims to permanently define when two businesses can be considered joint employers — an issue with major implications for the more than 800,000 franchise establishments across the country. Together, those businesses generate hundreds of millions in annual economic output and support close to nine million jobs in the U.S.
Related: Considering franchise ownership? Get started now to find your personalized list of franchises that match your lifestyle, interests and budget.
The Save Local Business Act, sponsored by Rep. James Comer (R-KY), would lock in the current, narrower joint employer definition that requires "direct and immediate control" over essential terms of employment. This would replace the shifting regulatory standards that have bounced back and forth for more than a decade, depending on which party controls the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
At stake is the legal relationship between franchisors and franchisees. Under a narrow joint employer standard, franchisees are considered independent operators responsible for hiring, firing, scheduling and supervising their own employees. But under broader definitions — like the one the NLRB attempted to implement in 2023 — franchisors could be held liable simply for having the potential to influence those decisions, even if they never exercised that power.
Related: 'Send a Man Next Time': How an Entrepreneur and Her Daughters Built a $2.5 Million Franchise in a Male-Dominated Field
The 2023 rule faced immediate backlash from the business community, including franchise owners, labor attorneys and trade organizations, led by the International Franchise Association. Many argued that it was too vague and broad, leaving employers uncertain about their legal responsibilities. A federal judge struck down the rule in March 2024, calling it overly expansive and difficult to enforce.
Despite that legal win for franchise businesses, the concern remains that future administrations could revive similar language. The Save Local Business Act is designed to prevent that by codifying the narrower standard into federal law.
Previous attempts to expand the joint employer standard have had measurable economic consequences. When a broader rule was adopted in 2015, the franchise sector saw an estimated $33 billion in lost output, according to IFA research.
Related: I Walked Away From a Corporate Career to Start My Own Small Business — Here's Why You Should Do the Same
The uncertainty has also made some franchisors more hesitant to support or expand their franchise networks. Under a broader rule, offering training, guidance or shared HR tools could expose them to legal liability, undermining the collaborative model that helps local owners succeed.
Supporters of the new bill argue that locking in a clear, consistent joint employer definition would restore confidence for franchise operators, investors and employees alike. They say the current model balances brand standards with local control and allows small business owners to grow within a proven system.
Related: 3 Lessons I Learned Selling My Billion-Dollar Company
Opponents of the bill, including some labor advocates, argue that the narrow standard makes it harder for workers to hold the appropriate parties accountable in cases of labor violations. They believe companies that benefit from franchise labor should also share in the responsibility.
Still, for most franchise businesses, the issue is about clarity, not politics. Whether they run gyms, restaurants, home services or child care centers, local owners are looking for regulatory stability so they can plan for growth without fear of surprise liability.
The Save Local Business Act now heads to committee and may be folded into broader labor or small business legislation later this year. Whether or not it passes, the debate over who qualifies as a joint employer is likely to remain a flashpoint in labor policy — and a top priority for the franchise sector heading into 2025.
Join top CEOs, founders and operators at the Level Up conference to unlock strategies for scaling your business, boosting revenue and building sustainable success.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Big banks are back. Here's why.
Big banks are starting to flex again — and one analyst said their stocks are the best place for investors to be in the second half of 2025. Following better-than-expected earnings from Goldman Sachs (GS), Bank of America (BAC), and Morgan Stanley (MS), Argus Research director of financial services research Stephen Biggar said the environment now favors big players with exposure to capital markets. "These big banks are actually gaining share," Biggar said on Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid. Major banks are showing strong investment banking results and positive loan growth, with average loans up 5% at JPMorgan (JPM) and 7% at Bank of America. Year to date, stocks of Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan are up 22% and 19%, respectively, handily beating the S&P 500's (^GSPC) 6% gain. Morgan Stanley and BoA are up 10% and 3%, respectively. That's a significant shift from earlier in the year, when many on Wall Street were bracing for sluggish growth and cautious outlooks tied to tariff-related turmoil. Bank executives had struck a more conservative tone, particularly around the pace of investment banking recovery, but the latest numbers reveal a more optimistic story. Biggar argued that big banks are pulling ahead of regional players, largely because of their scale, diversification, and ability to benefit from improving capital markets activity. "I think regionals are struggling a bit here," Biggar said, adding that large firms are better positioned because they can grow more by increasing loans and expanding their service areas. For example, JPMorgan is adding 500 branches over the next few years and has a wider array of products for the average consumer, Biggar said. There are also regulatory tailwinds that could develop under the Trump administration, including the prospect of lower capital requirements from the Federal Reserve, which could free up big banks to lend more aggressively. That would add to already strong momentum in key areas like credit cards and commercial lending. Bigger added that the deck is currently stacked in favor of firms involved in equity and debt underwriting, advisory services, and trading. Goldman Sachs, for example, posted strong investment banking results in Q2, thanks in part to rising M&A activity and a pickup in debt underwriting. JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley also showed strength in these areas, suggesting that deal activity is coming back to life. "There's a long runway ahead," he said. "We think there's a lot of pent-up demand in investment banking, more M&A activity, and an easier regulatory environment, which could mean the big banks would be the prime beneficiaries." While the news on big banks is solid, "the great news is on investment banking, and that's cyclical," Commerce Street Holdings CEO Dory Wiley said on Yahoo Finance's Market Catalysts. Wiley pointed to Huntington Bancshares' (HBAN) $1.9 billion acquisition of Veritex (VBTX) as a possible prelude to more regional bank consolidation across the US. "Investors are realizing this was priced in already," he said, noting that while some deal optimism is returning, "there's still a lot of pressure on the consumer." Francisco Velasquez is a Reporter at Yahoo Finance. He can be reached on LinkedIn and X, or via email at Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Scotiabank Raises Comcast (CMCSA) Price Target, Maintains Sector Perform Rating
Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA) is one of the Best Non-Mega Cap NASDAQ Stocks to Buy Right Now. Scotiabank has nudged its price target on Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA) to $45 from $44.50, maintaining a rating on the stock. The adjustment reflects the bank's cautious optimism toward the broader Telecom, Media, and Technology (TMT) space as macroeconomic pressures intensify. A couple watching their favorite show on TV, enjoying the entertainment network service. In a note to clients, Scotiabank analysts described the TMT sector as a 'great place to hide' amid mounting global uncertainties, including slowing economic momentum and the impact of escalating tariff disputes. The firm sees companies like Comcast as relatively well-positioned to weather volatility, offering stability in a shifting landscape. While financial performance across the sector is expected to hold steady, Scotiabank flagged potential softness in key subscriber metrics. The bank pointed to slowing population growth, largely attributed to reduced immigration, as a factor that may weigh on new customer acquisition, particularly in broadband and wireless segments. Still, the firm sees Comcast's diversified portfolio, which spans broadband, content, and theme parks, as a buffer against near-term pressures. The modest target increase reflects both confidence in Comcast's earnings potential and caution over demographic headwinds. While we acknowledge the potential of CMCSA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: Top 10 Healthcare AI Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds and 10 Consumer Defensive Stocks to Buy Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.

Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DeSantis names Sen. Blaise Ingoglia Florida's next CFO
Gov. Ron DeSantis appointed his ally Sen. Blaise Ingoglia as the state's chief financial officer on Wednesday, setting up a clash with a President Donald Trump-backed legislator who also wants the job. Ingoglia, 54, will fill the remainder of former CFO Jimmy Patronis' term. Patronis left the job in March after winning a seat in the U.S. Congress. Ingoglia, a Spring Hill Republican and businessman, is expected to face a primary challenge next year from state Sen. Joe Gruters, R-Sarasota, who Trump endorsed for the job. In addition to supervising the state's finances, the CFO oversees the insurance industry and serves as the state's fire marshal. At a news conference in Tampa, Ingoglia vowed to defend Floridians from unscrupulous insurers, serve as a 'conservative pit bull' tackling wasteful government spending and support DeSantis' push to eliminate property taxes. Ingoglia said he thinks Florida's property insurance reforms have been effective in reducing waste and fraud but also promised to defend consumers. 'I want the insurance companies to listen … if an insurance company does not do what they say they're going to do and are contractually obligated to do, I am going to call you out,' he said. Ingoglia attributed rising property insurance premiums to higher replacement costs of homes and fraudulent claims. Home insurance costs in Florida spiked in third quarter. Are more increases on the way? A native of Queens, New York, Ingoglia owns the homebuilding company Hartland Homes and has a net worth of $28 million, according to his latest disclosure statement. He served as chairman of the Republican Party of Florida from 2015 to 2019. His resume also includes a stint in the Florida House Aside from his business and political career, he's an internationally ranked poker player, posting earnings of $468,282. DeSantis touted Ingoglia as a conservative warrior who has supported his agenda on immigration, property taxes and other key issues. 'Every single time we've had a flashpoint in Florida, Blaise is running into battle to stand up for people,' he said. Gruters, an accountant and former Florida GOP party chair, announced Wednesday he has enlisted two of Trump's top political advisers — strategist Chris LaCivita and pollster Tony Fabrizio — to help his statewide campaign for CFO. The two sides started trading blows Wednesday. LaCivita and Fabrizio branded Ingoglia a 'Never Trumper,' while DeSantis blasted Gruters as not reflecting core conservative principles. He mentioned Gruters' support of last year's ballot initiative seeking to legalize recreational marijuana as an example. 'If George Washington rose from the dead and came back and tapped me on the shoulder and said, 'Will you appoint Joe Gruters CFO?' my response would be, 'No,'' DeSantis said. 'I can't do that without betraying the voters that elected me.'