KPMG approved to launch US law firm in first for Big Four
Feb 27 (Reuters) - KPMG won approval from Arizona's Supreme Court on Thursday to launch a law firm in Arizona, making it the first of the Big Four accounting firms to be able to practice law in the United States.
KPMG Law US, an independently-managed subsidiary of KPMG, will work with the accounting firm to provide legal and consulting services, the firm said.
"KPMG is uniquely positioned to transform the delivery of legal services," Rema Serafi, vice chair of tax at KPMG LLP, said in a statement.
Arizona in 2020 became the first U.S. state to scrap rules barring non-lawyers from having an economic interest in law firms, allowing them to have co-ownership with court approval.
Most states still allow only lawyers to practice law, own law firms and share legal fees. Supporters of reforming such barriers say they can make legal advice more expensive, hamper innovation in the market and restrict access to justice.
Utah introduced limited reforms similar to Arizona's in 2020. But such efforts have stalled in some states, including California, in part over fears of ethical abuses if providers are not fully bound by professional rules that licensed lawyers must obey.
KPMG Law US "will be governed by the same high ethical standards that apply to other law firms," a KPMG US spokesperson told Reuters while its Arizona application was under review.
Arizona's high court licensed, opens new tab the KPMG subsidiary as an alternative legal business on Thursday after a court committee recommended approval last month.
The decision "places Arizona's ABS program in the national and global spotlight as a groundbreaking approach to providing legal services," the court said in a statement.
As a condition of approval, KPMG Law US will not be allowed to provide legal services to clients for which KPMG LLP or its network firms perform financial audits.
KPMG has said its new law firm unit will provide technology-powered legal services including legal operations consulting, volume contracting and other managed services.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Out
an hour ago
- Time Out
Revealed: The shocking income you need to buy a house in Australia
Despite sky-high house prices, many Aussies can't let go of the dream of owning a home one day – even if it's just a shoebox with good natural light. The unfortunate news is that aspiring home buyers in almost every capital city now need to earn almost double what they did in pre-pandemic times to afford a house. In March this year, the ABS revealed that the average price of residential dwellings in Australia passed $1 million for the first time ever. Eeek! If you're still holding onto hope, a new Canstar analysis has unveiled the minimum annual salary you need to comfortably buy a median-priced house (defined as spending less than a third of your household income on mortgage repayments). As expected, Sydneysiders top the list when it comes to the income required to buy a home. With the city's median price jumping from $950,000 in 2020 to a whopping $1,460,000 in 2025, purchasing a house is now only realistic for those earning a gross household income of $272,737. That's $150,000 more pay than you would have needed five years ago (gulp). The Sunshine State follows close behind, with Queenslanders now needing to earn around $100,000 more a year than they did before the pandemic to afford a typical home. The study reveals that to buy a median-priced house ($920,000) in Brisbane, you'd need an annual income of $171,862 – a huge jump from $72,628 back in 2020. Like Queensland, Melbourne buyers now need to earn nearly $100,000 more per year – bringing the total to $160,000 – to comfortably afford the same home they could have snapped up in 2020. The median-priced house has climbed $61,000 in the past five years to $855,000. Sorry, South Australia – you'll need to have boosted your income by $90,000 over the past five years to comfortably afford loan repayments on a house. Even our two smallest states, Tasmania and the Northern Territory, aren't immune, with the income needed to buy almost doubling in both. Rather than buying property, how about taking a holiday instead (to cheer you up)? Here are our favourite places to go. The gross income needed to buy a house in Australia: RECOMMENDED FOR YOU: 👧🏻 🌳 The 10 Aussie regional hotspots everyone wants to move to in 2025
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Japan wholesale inflation slows in May
TOKYO, June 11 (Reuters) - Japan's wholesale prices rose 3.2% in May from a year earlier, data showed on Wednesday, slowing from April in a sign falling import costs for raw materials were easing price pressures for companies. The rise in the corporate goods price index (CGPI), which measures the price companies charge each other for their goods and services, compared with a median market forecast for a 3.5% annual increase and follows a revised 4.1% increase in April. The yen-based import price index fell 10.3% in May from a year earlier after a revised 7.3% drop in April, the data showed, indicating the currency's rebound was pushing down the cost of raw material imports.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
TRADING DAY Buoyancy trumping uncertainty
ORLANDO, Florida, June 10 (Reuters) - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist I'm excited to announce that I'm now part of Reuters Open Interest (ROI), an essential new source for data-driven, expert commentary on market and economic trends. You can find ROI on the Reuters website, and you can follow us on LinkedIn and X. Global markets remain buoyant, awaiting the outcome of U.S.-China trade talks in London and U.S. inflation figures on Wednesday, both of which could have a bearing on guidance from the Federal Reserve next week and investor sentiment more broadly. In my column today I look at how the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration could cause labor market distortions and headaches for Fed officials. More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. Today's Key Market Moves Buoyancy trumping uncertainty On the day The World Bank slashed global growth forecasts, warning of the "significant headwind" from tariffs and heightened uncertainty, global stocks clocked their fifth consecutive all-time high. Britain's benchmark FTSE 100 is a whisker from reaching new peaks and Germany's DAX hit an all-time high last week, while on Wall Street the Nasdaq and S&P 500 are within a couple of percentage points of new record levels also. Yet the reasons for equity investors to be fearful right now are plentiful - worries over growth, inflation, tariffs, long-term interest rates, U.S. debt and deficits, and the fact that China, the world's second-largest economy, is still mired in a low growth and deflationary funk. Something not quite adding up, right? Perhaps. On the other hand, the fiscal taps are being turned on in China and Germany, British finance minister Rachel Reeves outlines her multi-year 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) spending plan on Wednesday, and U.S. President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' currently going through Congress is front-loaded with fiscal stimulus too. None of that is really fresh news but the upshot is a lot of liquidity coursing through the global economy. Right now it is something investors appear willing to accept even if the price is increased debt, and for the U.S. and UK in particular, worse public finances. Big corporate deals are being struck, like the OpenAI and Google cloud service tie-up and Meta Platforms reportedly paying $15 billion for a 49% stake in AI startup Scale AI, and implied equity and bond volatility is low. After a period of fretting more about deficits and spiking bond yields, investors may now be viewing the future with their glass half full. Fiscal stimulus is coming and interest rates around the world are being cut. The monetary outliers are Japan and the U.S., but the Bank of Japan could be near the end of its tightening cycle and the Fed may be about to begin easing later this year. On top of this, there's a general belief that Trump will back down from his hardline stance on tariffs and that a palatable deal with China will be reached, the so-called 'TACO' - Trump Always Chickens Out - trade. Fresh news on that front, at least, should be forthcoming on Wednesday. Trump immigration crackdown creates jobs distortions, Fed headaches Seismic shifts in immigration are distorting the U.S. employment picture, making it harder for investors and policymakers to know exactly how much the labor market is actually slowing. Assuming the Trump administration makes good on its pledge to reduce immigration, either by stopping the flow of people coming into the country or by deporting many already here, the labor supply will shrink. The long-term impact of lower immigration is generally agreed to be negative, as new workers are needed to replace retirees, fill job vacancies and drive economic growth. Over time, fewer new workers will likely mean lower growth. But in the short term, a smaller pool of workers results in a tighter labor market, which keeps a lid on the unemployment rate, albeit artificially and probably temporarily. This may already be playing out. Figures released last week showed that employment in May fell by 696,000 jobs. That's the biggest single monthly decline since the historic losses seen during the pandemic in early 2020. Some economists argue that the recent drop is a consequence of Trump's immigration crackdown. Nonfarm payrolls rose 139,000. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate held steady at 4.2%, which though higher than it was two years ago, is still historically low by any measure. All else being equal, this points to a tight labor market, which should put upward pressure on wages and perhaps even warrant a more hawkish policy stance from the Federal Reserve. But that is almost certainly a misreading. When labor supply and the labor force participation rate fall, this brings down a country's so-called 'breakeven' job growth. That's the number of net new jobs the economy needs to keep up with growth in the working-age population and maintain a steady unemployment rate. That figure is falling, and if the Trump administration toughens up its anti-immigration policies further, this decline is likely to accelerate. According to economists at Morgan Stanley, breakeven employment growth averaged 210,000 jobs a month last year, and is averaging 170,000 so far this year. They reckon it will fall to 90,000 by the end of this year and 80,000 next year. Ryan Sweet, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, goes further, estimating that the breakeven rate is "quickly approaching" 50,000 jobs a month due to weakening labor supply growth, primarily because of reduced immigration. "The unemployment rate can remain low, but for the wrong reasons," Sweet says. If these projections prove accurate, monthly employment and job growth could continue to slow without raising the unemployment rate. The contradictory signals this sends could create confusion for both investors and policymakers. In his press conference after the most recent Fed policy meeting, Chair Jerome Powell repeatedly told reporters that the labor market is "solid". The unemployment rate "remains low," and the labor market is "at or near maximum employment." If these headline indicators are the gauge, Powell is absolutely correct. But he also stressed that policymakers are looking at the "whole huge array" of labor market indicators for a truer guide. One of those inputs in the months ahead will no doubt be net immigration. And that could generate significant uncertainty, as there are huge gray areas and wide margins of error when trying to estimate net immigration and its impact on the labor market. In January, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office projected net immigration of 2 million people this year and 1.5 million next year, down from an estimated 3.3 million in 2023. With Trump seemingly hardening his stance on immigration, those projections could turn out to be far too high. Morgan Stanley's economists just slashed their immigration forecasts to 800,000 this year and 500,000 next year. If these figures turn out to be closer to reality, we could soon be looking at a "tight" labor market with monthly payrolls gains of well under 100,000. Pity the poor Fed Chair who has to communicate policy in that environment. What could move markets tomorrow? Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
