logo
COVID Vaccines for Adults: 6 New Findings on Boosters

COVID Vaccines for Adults: 6 New Findings on Boosters

WebMD01-07-2025
booster this year, maybe two.
That's what researchers concluded from the first real-world analysis after last year's recommendation that older adults – ages 65 and up – get the shot twice a year.
Among adults of all ages, a single COVID booster provided added protection against serious illness, found the study, which included data for nearly 500,000 adults during the 2023-24 COVID season. For those ages 65 and older, a second dose offered even better protection against serious illness.
The findings are important as the nation wrestles with questions about who should continue to get COVID booster shots (extra doses given after the first series). The CDC's vaccine advisory committee is expected to consider recommendations for the 2025-26 season in the coming months, but many leading professional medical organizations continue to recommend baseline vaccination and boosters for everyone ages 6 months and older.
"While we know that vaccines used to prevent COVID in the U.S. were found to be of high value earlier in the pandemic, question remains as to whether this value is still present now that nearly all persons have some degree of immunity" through prior infection or vaccination, said Richard Martinello, MD, chief medical officer at Yale Medicine and an infectious diseases professor at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut. "The results show that we should continue to recommend vaccination for our adult patients."
Indiana University professor Brian Dixon, MPA, PhD, was one of the researchers who worked on the analysis. He called the results "the most up-to-date information on whether COVID-19 vaccines continue to protect adults against hospitalization and seeking emergency care, regardless of their prior vaccination status or infection with the virus."
Here's what to know about the new study results, published Wednesday in JAMA Network Open:
COVID boosters still give you a lot of extra protection. Adults who got a booster had a 24% reduced risk of going to the emergency room or urgent care for COVID, compared to people who didn't get a booster. Boosters also reduced the risk of hospitalization by 29%, and intensive care unit admission or in-hospital death by 48%.
You ' re most protected during the two months after a booster. Vaccines reduced the risk of severe illness by 68% within the first 60 days.
"It is best to get the booster in the early fall, especially if the 60 days will be during the period people visit with family around the holidays," said Dixon, who is also director of the Center for Biomedical Informatics at the Regenstrief Institute in Indianapolis. "Additional protections after 60 days can be discussed with your medical doctor."
One booster reduced the risk of serious illness in older adults – but two boosters lowered it more. Among the 65-and-older crowd, those who got two doses had a 21% more reduced risk of needing urgent or emergency care for COVID, compared to those who only got one booster. Two doses also further reduced hospitalization risk by 18%. About 40% of the adults in the study were 65 or older.
Younger adults may want to consider twice-yearly boosters as well – particularly if the usual fall COVID season ever shifts, Martinello said.
"In my opinion, there is still a great deal of uncertainty on whether COVID will be a seasonal infection such as we see with influenza and RSV," Martinello said. If the virus turns out to be present year-round, "physicians will need to consider whether the recommendation for vaccinating every 6 months should be broadened."
Boosters give you added protection even if you ' ve already been infected with COVID. Before the study, most people had some degree of immunity from past infection and/or vaccination against the virus. Even so, people who didn't get new booster shots were more likely to seek care for serious COVID illness sooner than people who got a booster.
An annual COVID booster is about as effective an annual flu shot. Think of it this way: "The added protection from COVID boosters is similar to preparations one might do if a hurricane was approaching your home," said Dixon. "You might have a well-built house, but if you board up the windows and reinforce your doors, then your home is better protected against the high winds and hail. It makes sense to protect your house and yourself against anything that might cause significant damage."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FDA Warns About ‘Mousse' Sunscreens
FDA Warns About ‘Mousse' Sunscreens

Medscape

time25 minutes ago

  • Medscape

FDA Warns About ‘Mousse' Sunscreens

The FDA has issued warnings to several manufacturers of 'mousse' or 'whipped cream' sunscreen products, according to the agency's website. Over-the-counter sunscreen products are regulated as drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act because they are intended to prevent sunburn and reduce the risk for skin cancer and premature skin aging. However, the currently approved formulations include oils, creams, lotions, sticks, gels, powders, ointments, pastes, and sprays but not foam, mousse, or whipped formulas. Therefore, these formulations need to go through the new drug application process to earn FDA approval. As of August 18, warnings have been sent to five companies: Supergoop!, Vacation Inc., Kalani Sunwear, K & Care Organics, and Fallien Cosmeceuticals (manufacturer of TiZo sunscreen), according to the FDA. For example, the warning letter to Vacation Inc. states that the company's product is misbranded and therefore misleading to consumers. 'To date, no final order has been issued by the Secretary under 505G(b) or 505G(c) that would authorize marketing of a sunscreen in foam (aka, mousse or whip) dosage form,' the letter states. In addition, Vacation, in particular, markets sunscreen products similar in appearance to whipped cream products, both in the packaging and dispenser style. The website's description of the bottle's actuator producing 'perfect, star-shaped mountains of foam, inspired by everyone's favorite after dinner indulgence' has prompted concerns about ingestion by children who mistake it for actual whipped cream. Efficacy Unconfirmed Sunscreens are considered over-the-counter drugs, so they are held to a different standard compared with other skincare products, Adam Friedman, MD, professor and chair of dermatology at George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, said in an interview. The companies selling mousse sunscreen products have not gone through the proper testing, 'so we don't know whether the SPF [sun protection factor] advertised is actually true,' Friedman said. Even if the companies had tested the products, mousses are not currently within the FDA's sunscreen monograph and would have to be added, although that may happen in the future if companies research the effectiveness of the products correctly, he noted. Part of the testing process is to determine how the vehicle interfaces with the skin and affects the product's ability to protect skin from sun damage, Friedman explained. Ultimately, the best sunscreen is the one someone will use consistently, he pointed out. But there is no quality assurance with any of the mousse sunscreens and the companies' responses to the FDA warnings remain to be seen. The popularity of the mousse and whipped sunscreen products may promote appropriate testing, and arguably, using a mousse sunscreen could be an improvement over using no sunscreen at all, Friedman told Medscape Medical News . However, he advises clinicians to stop short of actively endorsing these products if patients ask about them. 'Be honest with patients,' he said. 'We don't know whether these products are safe and effective because the manufacturers didn't follow the rules before marketing them.'

Scientists stunned by discovery after analyzing 160 days of camera footage in national park: 'I was very surprised'
Scientists stunned by discovery after analyzing 160 days of camera footage in national park: 'I was very surprised'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Scientists stunned by discovery after analyzing 160 days of camera footage in national park: 'I was very surprised'

Scientists stunned by discovery after analyzing 160 days of camera footage in national park: 'I was very surprised' Scientists have learned that outdoor activities on mountain paths affect deer and elk in different ways, with some animals avoiding busy routes and others seeking them out, reported Montrose Press. What's happening? Researchers from Western Colorado University placed over 100 cameras across 59 locations in the Upper Gunnison Basin to track how animals respond to human activity on trails. The cameras captured roughly 130,000 images of people using paths over 160 days, along with 22,000 deer photos and 10,000 elk photos. The findings showed stark differences between species. Elk stayed away from zones up to 655 meters from busy paths, and more human traffic pushed them even further back. Deer did the opposite, showing up more often near popular routes. "I was very surprised by the number of recreators that are out there! At some cameras, it was almost nonstop traffic throughout the day and sometimes into the night and early morning," said researcher Chloe Beaupré, per Montrose Press. The study examined different path types, from backcountry roads to hiking-only routes, providing comprehensive data about how recreation affects animals across the region. Why is trail recreation impact important? Growing outdoor activity across western regions creates invisible boundaries that reshape where animals live and feed. When elk avoid large zones around paths, they lose access to food sources and safe spaces they've used for generations. This habitat loss forces animals into smaller territories, potentially affecting their health and reproduction rates. Fewer elk near trails could mean fewer wildlife viewing opportunities that draw tourists and support local economies. These shifting patterns affect entire ecosystems. Changes in where large animals graze alter plant growth patterns, which affects smaller creatures and insects that depend on specific vegetation. What can I do to help reduce trail impacts? If you enjoy hiking or biking, stick to designated paths rather than creating new routes through untouched areas, which keeps human activity concentrated in zones animals already avoid. Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Respecting seasonal closures that protect animals during sensitive times like mating or birthing seasons gives wildlife breathing room when they need it most, while you can also choose less popular trails or visit during off-peak hours. Spreading out recreation reduces the constant pressure on animals trying to access resources near busy routes. Supporting local conservation groups is also a boost, as many organizations help design trail systems that minimize habitat disruption while maintaining outdoor access. If you do spot wildlife when exploring, make sure to keep a reasonable distance. Quick, quiet passages are less stressful for animals than prolonged encounters. Contact land management agencies to voice your support for wildlife corridors and protected zones. These refuges provide animals with spaces free from human disturbance, allowing populations to thrive. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the the daily Crossword

Inmate died hours after being booked into Bernalillo County jail
Inmate died hours after being booked into Bernalillo County jail

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Inmate died hours after being booked into Bernalillo County jail

Aug. 19—A male inmate died a day after being booked into the Metropolitan Detention Center over the weekend, officials said Tuesday. "Despite rigorous life-saving efforts, an inmate died Sunday at the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center," MDC spokeswoman Candace Hopkins said in a news release. MDC will not release the 62-year-old man's name until his family has been notified, she said. The man was booked into the jail around 7 a.m. Saturday. The next day, around 9 p.m., the man "experienced a medical emergency, prompting a code to be called," Hopkins said. MDC staff and University of New Mexico Hospital staff stabilized the man before taking him to a medical unit in the detention center. Roughly 22 minutes later, the man had another medical emergency. An ambulance arrived around 10:08 p.m. to assist in life-saving measures, Hopkins said. At 10:26 p.m., UNMH staff pronounced the man dead. The man is the sixth MDC inmate to die at the facility or die after falling ill at the facility this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store