logo
Stefanik asks Army to fast-track repairs to Fort Drum's Wheeler-Sack Airfield

Stefanik asks Army to fast-track repairs to Fort Drum's Wheeler-Sack Airfield

Yahoo4 days ago

FORT DRUM, N.Y. (WWTI) – North country congresswoman Elise Stefanik is urging United States Army officials to fast-track approval for repairs to Fort Drum's Wheeler-Sack Airfield.
In an announcement from Stefanik's office, the representative for New York's 21st congressional district said that she sent a formal request to fast-track $70 million in funding to make critical repairs.
Fort Drum museum makes military history accessible, relevant to soldiers, community
Stefanik asked Army leadership to reallocate the 2027 Army Facilities Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization funds into the 2026 fiscal year. This move would speed up work on projects slated for the 2027 fiscal year.
Reallocation of the funds would allow the base to address issues with Wheeler-Sack's power system according to the announcement.
The functionality of this airfield is essential to maintaining the rapid deployment capabilities and operational readiness of the division. However, the current condition of the airfield's electric power system is rapidly deteriorating. This poses an unacceptable risk to flight operations, training, and Army support for U.S. power projection in the near-term.
United States Congressperson Elise Stefanik
Stefanik added 'The functionality of this airfield is essential to maintaining the rapid deployment capabilities and operational readiness of the division,' Stefanik said. 'However, the current condition of the airfield's electric power system is rapidly deteriorating. This poses an unacceptable risk to flight operations, training, and Army support for U.S. power projection in the near-term.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New York governor's No. 2 is challenging her in next year's election
New York governor's No. 2 is challenging her in next year's election

Associated Press

time3 hours ago

  • Associated Press

New York governor's No. 2 is challenging her in next year's election

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — New York Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado announced Monday that he will challenge his boss, Gov. Kathy Hochul, in the governor's race next year, months after a feud between the two Democrats erupted into public view. In a short campaign video, Delgado sought to introduce himself to voters, highlighting his educational background and offering a broad preview of his platform, saying 'what we need right here in New York is bold, decisive transformational leadership.' 'Listen, the powerful and well-connected have their champions. I'm running for governor to be yours,' he said. Delgado has been hinting at a primary challenge against Hochul for months and earlier this year said he would he would not run for reelection alongside the governor, ramping up speculation about his future and leading Hochul's office to sideline him from the duties of his ceremonial post. For Hochul, who appointed Delgado after her previous lieutenant governor was indicted, the announcement comes as she is expected to face a tough reelection fight next year, with serious opponents lining up. U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik, a Republican who is considering a run against Hochul, released a statement after Delgado's announcement that said, 'Let's FIRE HOCHUL in 2026.' 'Her own Lieutenant Governor that she hand picked is now primarying her which shows she has lost support not just from Republicans and Independents, but Democrat New Yorkers as well,' Stefanik said. Delgado and Hochul have long been at odds. Discord between the two leaders became apparent last year ahead the presidential election when the lieutenant governor called on former President Joe Biden to drop his reelection bid, while Hochul was one of Biden's biggest supporters and surrogates. After the election, Delgado wrote an op-ed for The New York Times that argued Democrats are 'ready for the next generation,' arguing that the party won't succeed 'with the same politicians telling the same old stories.' In another break with Hochul, Delgado had called for New York City Mayor Eric Adams to resign as the mayor was battling his now-dismissed corruption case, while the governor was much more measured in her approach. The lieutenant governor's position on Adams led to a spokesperson for the governor releasing a statement that said 'Lieutenant Governor Delgado does not now and has not ever spoken on behalf of this administration.' Delgado previously served in the U.S. House before becoming lieutenant governor.

Seeing farther, striking deeper, this brigade is pushing its drones
Seeing farther, striking deeper, this brigade is pushing its drones

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Seeing farther, striking deeper, this brigade is pushing its drones

Soldiers with the Hawaii-based 25th Infantry Division are in the midst of a training exercise with Philippine allies that has them pushing farther and striking deeper with the help of new drones. The 2nd Mobile Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, is forward deployed in the Philippines, training with the 7th Infantry Division of the Philippine Armed Forces as part of a Joint Pacific Multinational Readiness Center, or JPMRC, exercise. Maj. Gen. Marcus Evans, 25th Infantry Division commanding general, told Army Times on Monday that the most challenging part of the exercise so far has been the environmental factors. High temperatures and monsoon conditions have slammed troops as they've operated across islands and jungles in the Luzon area of the Philippines. The exercise marks the brigade's second evolution of the Army's Transformation in Contact, or TIC, initiative following its first evolution in 2024. As part of the initiative, which seeks to modernize and evolve formations as they prepare for real-world deployments, soldiers received new drones, counter-drone equipment and electronic warfare tools. First armor brigade conducts combat training center rotation with new tools Since then, the unit has been issued farther-reaching drones with both medium- and long-range capabilities, giving soldiers nearly 10 times the range of previous drones. Last year, units were limited to about a 3-kilometer distance for drones to scout enemy locations. Now they can see, sense and strike targets as far as 30 kilometers out, Evans said. 'It creates increased survivability,' Evans said of the striking range. 'It enhances their ability to protect themselves with greater standoff and strike with loitering munitions or weaponized drones.' Meanwhile, the brigade also brought 3D printing capabilities, which it has used to make replacement parts for equipment and build nearly 50 first-person-view drones so far during the exercise, he said. The brigade brought an estimated 2,000 soldiers from Hawaii and Guam for the exercise, with Philippine partners bringing about the same amount of manpower. They're facing off against a simulated battalion-size enemy force equipped with its own drone, counter-drone and electronic warfare capabilities. During its Philippine rotation last year, which was also an exportable combat training center evolution, the brigade didn't have infantry squad vehicles. This time, however, it does, and the vehicles have made a major difference for troops in both mobility and sustainability, Evans said. The Army's TIC initiative first focused on the brigade level with dismounted units. The second iteration is looking to make similar changes in mechanized or armor formations. That also ties in division-level assets. On this run for the 2nd Mobile Brigade Combat Team, the 25th Infantry Division is using its headquarters to simulate a larger force and bringing division assets, such as long-range fires, to the brigade. Troops are also using the 25th Infantry Division headquarters to synchronize and integrate with the Philippine's 7th Infantry Division headquarters, Evans said. '[Their] main objective is procedural interoperability,' Evans said. 'U.S. and Philippine forces train sustainment, movement and maneuver together. See further, sense better and be able to strike.' Following the initial field training, the units will gather at Fort Magsaysay, Philippines, and then conduct a combined maritime, land and air movement of more than 400 kilometers into 'enemy' territory north of the outpost to Camp Melchor F. dela Cruz in mid-June, he said.

Keir Starmer has just revealed his defence shopping list. Here's what should have been on it
Keir Starmer has just revealed his defence shopping list. Here's what should have been on it

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Keir Starmer has just revealed his defence shopping list. Here's what should have been on it

For decades, British defence policy has willed the end but not the means. Prime ministers have made soaring speeches, filled with promises to strengthen the Armed Forces, but without demonstrating how all the glittering equipment programmes will be paid for. Incredibly, not even Europe's biggest war since 1945 has been enough to end this dismal pattern. Sir Keir Starmer duly announced a Strategic Defence Review (SDR) replete with grandiose phrases (a 'battle-ready, armour-clad nation') but no new money. The Prime Minister could only restate his existing pledge to spend 2.5 per cent of GDP on defence by 2027, with an 'ambition' to hit 3 per cent 'in the next Parliament', which means by 2034. So what should have been done? The answer can be summed up in three words: money, mass and drones. First and foremost, the Prime Minister should have committed to spending 3 per cent of GDP on defence by 2029 at the latest – aligning Britain with what is fast becoming the European consensus. Every Nato country bordering Russia now treats 3 per cent as the bare minimum. Poland already spends more than 4 per cent and intends to exceed 5 next year. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are all above 3 per cent and climbing toward 5, while Finland aims to reach 3 per cent by 2029. Yet Britain has only expressed an 'ambition' to reach that target five years later. What assumptions is the Government making about Russia's military trajectory? Is Sir Keir confident that Moscow will be unable to invade a Nato ally or launch a broader war in Europe before 2034? If so, why does his assessment differ so starkly from that of Germany's defence chief, General Carsten Breuer, who warned this week that Russia could be ready to strike a Nato country by 2029? 'This is what the analysts are assessing,' Breuer said. 'So we have to be ready by 2029.' Being ready by 2034 will be of little use if – heaven forbid – the German assessment proves correct. To show true seriousness of purpose, Sir Keir should have set out a clear path to reaching 3 per cent by 2029, with a year-by-year breakdown of spending commitments. One of the clearest lessons from the war in Ukraine is that numbers matter. No amount of advanced technology or cyber capability can offset the brutal reality that high-intensity warfare exacts a devastating human toll. Armies must be large enough to absorb heavy losses and still regenerate their fighting strength. It is astonishing that a nation of nearly 70 million has struggled to maintain an army of just 82,000 – the modest target set in the 2015 Defence Review. Today, the Army's trained strength has slipped below 73,000 and continues to fall. The Russian army, by contrast, is recruiting about 30,000 new soldiers every month, which means that Vladimir Putin is replicating the entire British Army every 10 weeks. If the Government were serious, it would be doing everything in its power to grow the Army – starting with schools and universities, which should be championing military careers as proudly as any other. Instead, despite talk of a 'whole-of-society approach', Defence Secretary John Healey confirmed on Monday that Army numbers won't rise for another four years. By failing to do whatever it takes to expand the regular Army, the Government risks giving the impression that it has ignored a prime lesson of Ukraine's struggle and still underestimates the significance of mass. Mass does not apply simply to the Army. The SDR promises that Britain will build 'up to' 12 new nuclear-powered attack submarines to replace the current Astute class by the end of the 2030s. That is good news – but the qualifying phrase is revealing. Governments use the phrase 'up to' when they know they will not build the maximum number, but want to give the impression that they might. Far better if Mr Healey had secured the budget increase that would have allowed the deletion of 'up to'. Recommendation 34 of the Defence Review says the Government must 'confirm the intended numbers' of new submarines 'as soon as possible'. Indeed. But time will not make this decision any easier. The failure to agree a final number is yet another sign that this Defence Review follows the worst traditions of its predecessors. Ukraine has just crippled the air-launched component of Russia's nuclear arsenal by sending swarms of armed drones to destroy enemy bombers on their bases. Earlier, Ukraine crippled the Russian Black Sea fleet and forced it from its home port of Sevastopol by unleashing fleets of autonomous marine drones. Meanwhile, on the front line, drones have become the single biggest killer – hunting down individual soldiers and making it impossible for either side to deploy main battle tanks or armoured personnel carriers in combat. Drones, sensors and artillery have combined to create a battlefield where Ukraine routinely breaks up Russian attacks with heavy casualties. The lesson is unmistakable: to be able to fight Russia, Britain needs more drones. Here, the picture in the Defence Review is far better. Mr Healey said that Britain would 'double investment in autonomous systems' and 'learn the lessons of Ukraine', focusing even more on high technology. British aircraft carriers will be the first in Europe to go to sea with 'hybrid air wings' – combining manned and unmanned aircraft. The Royal Navy will become a 'hybrid force,' deploying both conventional warships and 'autonomous vessels.' The RAF will increasingly operate 'autonomous fighters' alongside its Typhoon and F-35 jets, capable of 'defending Britain's skies and striking anywhere in the world.' The Defence Review says the Army will become 10 times more lethal by integrating its existing formations with 'land drone swarms.' So there is some good news, even if the pattern of grand announcements without new funding is sadly familiar. But drones alone do not convey seriousness of purpose as clearly as increased spending and manpower. By failing to do what is necessary – and what many of our European allies are already doing – Sir Keir has squandered the chance to demonstrate that he truly grasps the gravity of the moment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store