
Use Patient-Centered Language in Discussions About Weight
Pediatric primary care providers need more training and support in respectfully addressing weight issues with families while avoiding inadvertently stigmatizing terms, suggest findings from a qualitative study presented at Pediatric Academic Societies (PAS) 2025 Meeting.
An estimated 1 in 3 US children aged 2-18 years have overweight or obesity, so this issue is one that all primary care pediatricians inevitably must address on a regular basis with their patients and their caregivers. At the same time, extensive research has revealed the harms of fat bias in healthcare and the ways in which weight stigma increases unhealthy behaviors and even the risk for mortality. The American Academy of Pediatrics therefore recommends non-stigmatizing and person-first language (eg, person with obesity) in discussing weight.
While many of the providers interviewed for the study were aware of the importance of using respectful, responsive language, the research also revealed more work needs to be done to support pediatric providers 'in delivering patient-centered, non-stigmatizing care for overweight and obesity,' concluded Katrina B. Dietsche, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, and her colleagues in their poster.
Dietsche told Medscape Medical News she was impressed with how often providers used preferred terms, but she was also a little surprised at how little person-first language was used, perhaps because it's a newer recommendation.
'While this study explored how clinicians talk to researchers about weight, I think it's very possible the way we talk about weight when we're not talking to patients reveals some of the biases we all have. I also think it's easy to slip up and accidentally use stigmatizing language with patients if it's not something we're consistent about outside of visits.'
But she said it was very clear that clinicians want well-defined language to use with patients in these discussions, and Dietsche hopes that one result of her research will be to design scripts to help better prepare clinicians for these conversations.
'This study highlights a crucial, often overlooked aspect of obesity care — how we talk to patients and families about what it means to live in a larger body,' Alaina Vidmar, MD, the medical director of the Obesity Medicine and Bariatric Surgery Program at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, told Medscape Medical News .
'Communication has a profound impact on trust, engagement, and outcomes. As we work to address the obesity epidemic in children, aligning our language with empathy and evidence-based guidance is just as important as the treatment itself,' said Vidmar, who was not involved in the research.
The researchers conducted a qualitative study with primary care practices in three US health systems in the Northeast, Midwest, and South. Through semi-structured interviews, the researchers explored how primary care providers manage overweight and obesity in their clinical practice.
Before the interviews, a content analysis of words from a literature review in PubMed identified preferred and stigmatizing terms related to weight. Preferred terms included body mass index (BMI), weight, and overweight, while potentially stigmatizing terms included obesity, large, heavy, and morbidly obese.
The 21 interviewees were mostly female (81%) attending physicians (90%) who had been in practice more than 10 years (86%). When discussing weight, 29% used a mix of nonperson first ('obese patient') and person-first ('patient with obesity') language, while 33% used person-first language only and 33% used nonperson first language only.
The most used terms by providers were BMI and weight, each used by 20 of the interviewees, and obesity, used by 19 of them. Overweight was used by 14, while three or fewer used large, heavy, or morbidly obese.
'There was a wide spectrum as to how primary care clinicians discussed weight, but it was mainly along a spectrum of 'weight focused' or 'lifestyle/health focused,'' Dietsche said. 'A common way to introduce the conversation about weight was to use the growth chart, which then helped give patients a visual.'
One physician who used the growth chart strategy would then say something such as ''Your 6-year-old weighs like a 12-year-old' because I think that opens their eyes a little bit more.'
Overall, four strategies emerged for how the providers discuss weight. One focuses specifically on the weight/BMI itself, such as drawing attention to where a child falls on the growth chart or comparing them with children of other ages. A second strategy avoids discussion of weight and focuses on health and lifestyle, such as how patients are eating and how much exercise they're getting.
'I'll say, 'I'm not so much interested in the total number of the weight. I'm interested in how healthy your body is,'' one provider said. That approach 'is instructive for identifying weight as a problem and linking it to health,' Dietsche said.
'One clinician used a very poetic metaphor about patients' growing bodies like growing a garden,' Dietsche said. 'They talked about how important nourishing foods were to grow a garden and related it to how we need to feed, water, and exercise our own bodies.'
A third approach centers on respect for patient values, preferences, and context, including asking permission from the family to discuss it. The fourth strategy involves being attuned to emotions and cues from the patient and family and following their lead. 'Then the discussion is very sensitive to whatever signals you're getting as feedback from what you're saying,' one physician who uses this approach said.
Mahnoosh Sharifi, MD, MPH, an associate professor of pediatrics at Yale and the senior author on the study, noted that they intentionally used the term 'potentially stigmatizing' when assessing the terms used 'to avoid placing a definitive value judgement on whether it is appropriate or not to use terms like 'obesity.''
What's key, Sharifi said, is preserving trust with patients and remaining patient-centered in communication.
'It is important to balance a focus on health and well-being with communication that obesity is a chronic disease that is not a patient's fault,' Sharifi told Medscape Medical News .
'Using the word 'obesity' may not be helpful and could be unnecessarily experienced as stigmatizing in counseling a parent of a toddler whose BMI is just over the threshold of obesity, but discussing the diagnosis of obesity and using the term may be very helpful in communicating about the condition and treatment options such as medication and bariatric surgery for an adolescent with severe obesity and early-onset diabetes and high blood pressure,' she said.
So while using the term 'obesity' has a role in describing a medical condition with patients, 'we should take care to center the patient's and family's needs, values, and preferences,' she said.
The research was funded by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. The authors reported having no disclosures. Vidmar reported having no disclosures.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
41 minutes ago
- Medscape
What Your Breathing Says About Your Mental Health
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Welcome to Impact Factor , your weekly dose of commentary on a new medical study. I'm Dr F. Perry Wilson from the Yale School of Medicine. You don't need to think about it until you think about it: breathing. The most fundamental physical function. The most basic act that our bodies undertake to keep our brains alive, exchanging cardon dioxide for oxygen, nourishing every cell inside us. The reason you don't need to think about breathing is because of an area of the brainstem called the pre-Bötzinger complex. It's a group of cells that acts as a pacemaker clicking off about 12 times a minute, triggering your body, without conscious thought at all, to breathe. Of course, you know it's more complicated than that. You can hold your breath, after all — you are in control of the process. And it's more complicated than that . Higher levels of your brain feed into the pre-Bötzinger complex to increase your breathing rate when your body is moving, or when energy expenditure goes up. And it's even more complicated than that. You may never have noticed, but when you are breathing through your nose, you're mostly breathing through one nostril at a time, oscillating back and forth, allowing one nasal passage to regain some moisture while the other does the work. For something you don't think about at all, breathing is taking up a lot of brain space. Could these complex respiratory patterns reveal something, then, about the state of our brains? Are all the yogis and gurus and influencers right about the importance of how we breathe? Is the breath the window to the soul? If you want to really interrogate the way we breathe, you need to do some pretty precise measurements — which is why I was so intrigued by this paper, appearing this week in Current Biology. The centerpiece of the article is a new technology: a nasal cannula, but not of the sort you've seen before. Researchers led by Timna Soroka created this device, which precisely measures the airflow in and out of each nostril. They recruited 100 people to wear it for 24 full hours. At a sampling rate of 6 Hz, this is a ton of data. In fact, compressing that stream of data into interpretable metrics is a feat in and of itself. The primary analysis derived 24 different measures from this airflow data. Some of these are intuitive: the volume of air inhaled and exhaled, the rate of airflow, the rate of oscillation between one nostril and the other. This graph, which colors airflow from the right nostril in purple and the left in blue, shows that oscillation in a single participant. Some metrics are less obvious: the coefficient of variation of the breathing duty cycle, for example, appears to quantify how much one breath changes compared to others. Our brains are unique, and, it turns out, so are our breathing patterns. The researchers wanted to know whether the 24 metrics derived from someone's breathing pattern could be used to identify them. Can breathing act like a fingerprint? The results were impressive. This graph shows how a computer model did when predicting which of the 100 patients a given airflow pattern came from. The diagonal lines are correct predictions. If airflow patterns were random, the machine would only get this right 1% of the time. Instead, it was correct 91% of the time. This approaches biometric levels of accuracy, similar to voice recognition. These unique respiratory fingerprints were stable over time. Forty-two of the participants came back for another round of 24-hour monitoring, somewhere between 5 days and 2 years later. The system could identify who was who with 95% accuracy even all that time later. This is all pretty cool, but let's be honest: You're never going to unlock your laptop by strapping a nasal cannula to your face and breathing for a while. Where this study gets really interesting is in the links between breathing parameters and other physical and psychological parameters. For example, the breathing pattern was associated with body mass index. People with a higher BMI had a higher tidal volume — a larger volume of air during a typical respiration — than people with a lower BMI. That makes some sense. People with more mass might need to exchange more air to keep oxygen and carbon dioxide levels normal. But our psychology changes how we breathe as well. The researchers divided people into low and high scorers on the Beck Depression Inventory. Now, it's worth noting that none of these participants suffered from clinical depression, but of course some had higher scores and some had lower scores. You can see here that the peak inspiratory flow, the fastest rate at which we breathe in, was substantially higher in those with more depressive symptoms. This is not a conscious process. This is the state of your brain controlling subtle features about how you breathe that can only be revealed with new technology. It didn't stop with depression. The researchers could distinguish between people with high vs low anxiety scores by looking at the variation in their inspiratory pause. And you could determine who was more likely to have autistic features — again, none of these individuals had clinical autism — by looking at the percentage of breaths with an inspiratory pause. This is where this stuff starts to get interesting, because it suggests that there are physiologic links between brain states and breathing patterns and that those links can be mapped with careful measurement. I actually think there is a practical application to this. No, I don't think we'll all be walking around with tubes in our noses like stillsuits from Dune . But plenty of people are wearing nasal cannulas at night — for CPAP treatment. Adding technology like this to those devices could give insights into how these metrics change over time, perhaps cluing us into changes in our mood or anxiety or other health conditions before we are even consciously aware of them. Our breathing says a lot about us. So, to paraphrase Sylvia Plath, take a deep breath and listen to the old brag of your heart. I am, I am, I am.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Study: Lesbian, gay, bisexual medical students less likely to graduate
Bisexual, gay and lesbian medical students are more likely to leave school before graduation, a new study says. Bisexual medical students were twice as likely to drop out or be dismissed from medical school, and gay and lesbian students were 47% more likely, according to findings published Tuesday in JAMA Network Open. "Although future studies need to examine the cause of these disparities in attrition, LGB students experience discrimination within medical training environments, which may lead to risk of attrition," wrote the research team led by Dr. Sarwat Chaudhry, associate dean for student research at Yale School of Medicine. For this study, researchers reviewed 2014 to 2017 data from the Association of American Medical Colleges to track more than 45,000 registered medical students. Nearly 1,400 said they were bisexual on a student questionnaire, and more than 1,500 said they were gay or lesbian. In all, 4.2% of bisexual students and 3.7% of gay and lesbian students didn't finish medical school, compared to 2.4% of non-LGB students, the study found. Hispanic queer people were at particularly high risk for leaving medical school, researchers found. Their attrition rates were three-and-a-half times higher than other groups. "Members of both the LGB and Hispanic communities may encounter less supportive attitudes toward homosexuality, often more prevalent among recent immigrants or first-generation households, and traditional cultural values around notions of masculinity, authority, and gender roles, perpetuating rigid expectations around sexuality and gender expression and alienating Hispanic LGB students," the research team wrote. Medical schools also haven't explicitly addressed discrimination against Hispanic students, inadvertently leaving them with less social support, researchers added. They said future studies should examine the ways in which ethnicity and sexuality might combine to create greater problems for some medical students. More information The Medical Student Pride Alliance has more for future queer medical students. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


WebMD
an hour ago
- WebMD
More Thoughts on the Myth of the Perfect Patient
In my last post, I talked about the extreme efforts I took to be the healthiest, most perfect MS patient. I realized I had more to say on the subject. If the average person looked at my diet today, they'd still think I was pretty strict. I still cut out most inflammatory foods: gluten, dairy, excessive sugar, corn, oats, veggie oils, and highly processed foods. But some "bad" habits have definitely snuck back into my life. I drink coffee every day, have Diet Coke a few times a week, indulge in (gluten-free and vegan) sugary desserts, eat out often, sacrifice sleep for fun, no longer read food labels with a magnifying glass, blast music through my headphones, and occasionally grab fast food after a night out. And with these choices comes guilt. Constant, nagging guilt that I indulge so much despite having an inflammatory condition. You would think I'd have more self-restraint, given the implications, and yet I've entered a chapter in my life where that's just … not a priority. People are often surprised by my lifestyle. Those who knew me throughout my MS journey saw me transform from a lifestyle that was average, to extremely strict and healthy, to average again, and now possibly even slightly unhealthy. They're shocked that I've "regressed" so much, and I get questioned about it constantly. I'm always uncomfortable answering. What do I say? "Yes, I still have multiple sclerosis and it's a really scary disease, but I'm just kind of taking a break from being healthy"? Or when people who newly meet me realize I have MS, they often question how it's possible when we seemingly live the same lives. They applaud me for having so much energy and "handling it so well." But they don't see me take three-hour naps just to get through my day. They don't see the migraines, numbness, and spasms that creep up on me. They don't see the constant doctor appointments, blood tests, and MRIs. Why are they so shocked by my diagnosis? Why are people shocked that I stopped eating such a strict diet? Why do they make comments about it? Why do their comments make me feel even more guilty? Why are they allowed to drink a can of soda, but not me? Nothing is worse than when someone points out I'm doing something unhealthy and asks how it affects my MS. Even when they don't mention my MS directly, the implications of my chronic illness hang heavy in the air. Because the reality is they're projecting an image of a perfect patient onto me, and that simply does not exist. Even when I was at my healthiest, I wasn't perfect. Eating that healthy gave me extreme anxiety, and any misstep sent me into a spiral. But truly, you cannot win with a chronic illness. When you try to eat super healthy, you put immense pressure and stress on yourself. When you decide not to prioritize it, the guilt and shame eat at you. Not to mention that your body changes throughout each transformation, making the transition even more obvious and difficult. When people come to me for advice about managing MS through lifestyle changes, I feel like an imposter. Yes, for almost two years I was eating strictly healthy and following all the health trends. But now, I don't really think about them. I feel inauthentic talking to people about what they should do to be healthier because I don't currently follow those practices. Sometimes, I wish I could recapture that energy, passion, discipline, and motivation I had to be so healthy. But I'm not perfect, and I am certainly not the perfect patient. For now, I will enjoy my indulgences. I will remind myself that nothing in life is permanent and that life has many chapters. I will never be the perfect patient, because there is no perfect patient. It is not my fault I have MS, and there is no need to punish myself more for it. I'm sure my healthy habits will come back to me one day. For now, I will enjoy myself in ways I never even thought possible a few years ago. And I'll try to let go of the guilt that comes from not living up to an impossible standard. Maybe the healthiest thing I can do is accept myself exactly as I am today, and try my best to live in the present.