Indigenous business drive crucial Closing the Gap gains
A landmark report from Supply Nation found Indigenous businesses create $42.6 billion of social value each year and allow First Nations people more freedom to live on their own terms.
It's leading to better mental health outcomes, more pride among communities and a better connection to culture and Country, the report found.
Supply Nation, which provides Australia's biggest database of Indigenous businesses, said "social value" included things such as agency over life, expanded aspirations, financial security and physical and mental health.
Some $16.2 billion of the social value created was experienced by Indigenous employees.
Supply Nation chief executive Kate Russell launched The Sleeping Giant Rises report at a Business Sydney event on Monday, coinciding with NAIDOC Week.
"Trade and business are not new concepts to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples … a thriving economy existed long before colonisation," Ms Russell wrote in the report.
"Indigenous-owned businesses are contributing to the prosperity of all Australians and driving positive impact in their own communities.
"They create jobs, drive innovation, develop skills, and implement long-term sustainability initiatives."
Nearly 66,000 First Nations people are employed by Indigenous businesses, and 84 per cent of owners said those employees were better able to support families and feel positive about life.
Many owners reported more home ownership among staff, with more than six-in-10 believing employees were more likely to own homes.
Educational Closing the Gap targets, currently assessed as not on track by the Productivity Commission, were also aided by business ownership, the report said.
Seven-in-10 business owners said young people in their families were more likely to finish year 12, the same result as those who were more likely to complete a university or TAFE degree.
One business owner quoted in the report described themselves as a "role model to my children".
"They've seen the hard work that's gone into being a business owner for the last 16 years and now they are starting to see the benefits for me and for them," they said.
"I can support them to build their own careers (as well as provide for) education and travel."
The report called for more programs and funding to boost Indigenous entrepreneurship along with involving businesses in Closing the Gap priority reforms.
"All levels of government must prioritise practical support for the Indigenous business sector," Ms Russell said.
"Indigenous businesses right across Australia are making a real difference.
"They deserve to be backed."
13YARN 13 92 76
Indigenous businesses are creating billions of dollars of social value and helping towards progress on Closing the Gap targets.
A landmark report from Supply Nation found Indigenous businesses create $42.6 billion of social value each year and allow First Nations people more freedom to live on their own terms.
It's leading to better mental health outcomes, more pride among communities and a better connection to culture and Country, the report found.
Supply Nation, which provides Australia's biggest database of Indigenous businesses, said "social value" included things such as agency over life, expanded aspirations, financial security and physical and mental health.
Some $16.2 billion of the social value created was experienced by Indigenous employees.
Supply Nation chief executive Kate Russell launched The Sleeping Giant Rises report at a Business Sydney event on Monday, coinciding with NAIDOC Week.
"Trade and business are not new concepts to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples … a thriving economy existed long before colonisation," Ms Russell wrote in the report.
"Indigenous-owned businesses are contributing to the prosperity of all Australians and driving positive impact in their own communities.
"They create jobs, drive innovation, develop skills, and implement long-term sustainability initiatives."
Nearly 66,000 First Nations people are employed by Indigenous businesses, and 84 per cent of owners said those employees were better able to support families and feel positive about life.
Many owners reported more home ownership among staff, with more than six-in-10 believing employees were more likely to own homes.
Educational Closing the Gap targets, currently assessed as not on track by the Productivity Commission, were also aided by business ownership, the report said.
Seven-in-10 business owners said young people in their families were more likely to finish year 12, the same result as those who were more likely to complete a university or TAFE degree.
One business owner quoted in the report described themselves as a "role model to my children".
"They've seen the hard work that's gone into being a business owner for the last 16 years and now they are starting to see the benefits for me and for them," they said.
"I can support them to build their own careers (as well as provide for) education and travel."
The report called for more programs and funding to boost Indigenous entrepreneurship along with involving businesses in Closing the Gap priority reforms.
"All levels of government must prioritise practical support for the Indigenous business sector," Ms Russell said.
"Indigenous businesses right across Australia are making a real difference.
"They deserve to be backed."
13YARN 13 92 76
Indigenous businesses are creating billions of dollars of social value and helping towards progress on Closing the Gap targets.
A landmark report from Supply Nation found Indigenous businesses create $42.6 billion of social value each year and allow First Nations people more freedom to live on their own terms.
It's leading to better mental health outcomes, more pride among communities and a better connection to culture and Country, the report found.
Supply Nation, which provides Australia's biggest database of Indigenous businesses, said "social value" included things such as agency over life, expanded aspirations, financial security and physical and mental health.
Some $16.2 billion of the social value created was experienced by Indigenous employees.
Supply Nation chief executive Kate Russell launched The Sleeping Giant Rises report at a Business Sydney event on Monday, coinciding with NAIDOC Week.
"Trade and business are not new concepts to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples … a thriving economy existed long before colonisation," Ms Russell wrote in the report.
"Indigenous-owned businesses are contributing to the prosperity of all Australians and driving positive impact in their own communities.
"They create jobs, drive innovation, develop skills, and implement long-term sustainability initiatives."
Nearly 66,000 First Nations people are employed by Indigenous businesses, and 84 per cent of owners said those employees were better able to support families and feel positive about life.
Many owners reported more home ownership among staff, with more than six-in-10 believing employees were more likely to own homes.
Educational Closing the Gap targets, currently assessed as not on track by the Productivity Commission, were also aided by business ownership, the report said.
Seven-in-10 business owners said young people in their families were more likely to finish year 12, the same result as those who were more likely to complete a university or TAFE degree.
One business owner quoted in the report described themselves as a "role model to my children".
"They've seen the hard work that's gone into being a business owner for the last 16 years and now they are starting to see the benefits for me and for them," they said.
"I can support them to build their own careers (as well as provide for) education and travel."
The report called for more programs and funding to boost Indigenous entrepreneurship along with involving businesses in Closing the Gap priority reforms.
"All levels of government must prioritise practical support for the Indigenous business sector," Ms Russell said.
"Indigenous businesses right across Australia are making a real difference.
"They deserve to be backed."
13YARN 13 92 76
Indigenous businesses are creating billions of dollars of social value and helping towards progress on Closing the Gap targets.
A landmark report from Supply Nation found Indigenous businesses create $42.6 billion of social value each year and allow First Nations people more freedom to live on their own terms.
It's leading to better mental health outcomes, more pride among communities and a better connection to culture and Country, the report found.
Supply Nation, which provides Australia's biggest database of Indigenous businesses, said "social value" included things such as agency over life, expanded aspirations, financial security and physical and mental health.
Some $16.2 billion of the social value created was experienced by Indigenous employees.
Supply Nation chief executive Kate Russell launched The Sleeping Giant Rises report at a Business Sydney event on Monday, coinciding with NAIDOC Week.
"Trade and business are not new concepts to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples … a thriving economy existed long before colonisation," Ms Russell wrote in the report.
"Indigenous-owned businesses are contributing to the prosperity of all Australians and driving positive impact in their own communities.
"They create jobs, drive innovation, develop skills, and implement long-term sustainability initiatives."
Nearly 66,000 First Nations people are employed by Indigenous businesses, and 84 per cent of owners said those employees were better able to support families and feel positive about life.
Many owners reported more home ownership among staff, with more than six-in-10 believing employees were more likely to own homes.
Educational Closing the Gap targets, currently assessed as not on track by the Productivity Commission, were also aided by business ownership, the report said.
Seven-in-10 business owners said young people in their families were more likely to finish year 12, the same result as those who were more likely to complete a university or TAFE degree.
One business owner quoted in the report described themselves as a "role model to my children".
"They've seen the hard work that's gone into being a business owner for the last 16 years and now they are starting to see the benefits for me and for them," they said.
"I can support them to build their own careers (as well as provide for) education and travel."
The report called for more programs and funding to boost Indigenous entrepreneurship along with involving businesses in Closing the Gap priority reforms.
"All levels of government must prioritise practical support for the Indigenous business sector," Ms Russell said.
"Indigenous businesses right across Australia are making a real difference.
"They deserve to be backed."
13YARN 13 92 76
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
EV cuts loom while Aussies pay for ute tax
OPINION: We've all seen the headlines: electric vehicle (EV) tax breaks are costing taxpayers billions. According to Government modelling, the Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemption for EVs, alongside other related perks, is forecast to cost Australians $23.4 billion by 2036. That's a staggering figure, especially when you consider this policy only began in July 2022. As the Productivity Commission highlighted in its second report, the cost of the EV FBT exemption has blown out from an initial forecast of $55 million per year to a staggering $560 million, leading to calls to scrap it. But have you ever wondered about the figures for subsidising big, diesel and fuel-chugging utes over the past decade? Well, that number doesn't exist. While policymakers and commentators are lining up to slam EV incentives as 'inefficient' or 'costly', Australia's longstanding love affair with utes is being ignored. These vehicles, which make up four of the top five best-selling models in the country, are quietly driving away with generous tax perks – and Aussies are paying for it. Under Australia's tax system, commercial vehicles, such as dual-cab utes, can claim a Fringe Benefit Tax exemption, provided they're used 'primarily' for work. But the rules are so vague, that many use utes for personal reasons, which is allowed as long as it's 'minor, infrequent, and irregular'. In reality, many of these utes aren't ferrying tradies and tools. They're doing school drop-off, towing jet skis, and sitting in suburban streets. According to the Australian Institute, there are 1.5 times more utes on the road than there are actual tradies, which suggests a lot of people are claiming a tax break for a 'tool of trade' that's really just a big, comfy family car. It's not just FBT, utes also avoid the Luxury Car Tax, even if they cost well over six figures, because technically, they're not 'passenger vehicles'. So you can buy a RAM 1500 and avoid paying LCT, while someone buying a more efficient EV might get slugged. In 2023, high-end American-style utes alone cost Australians over $250 million in foregone revenue from the Luxury Car Tax, according to a report by the Australia Institute. That figure doesn't even count the tax revenue lost from the FBT exemption. Australia Institute research director Rod Campbell said Australia is subsidising 'big, dumb utes by hundreds of millions of dollars each year'. 'These vehicles are damaging roads, reducing safety and increasing emissions, yet they are given a massive tax break,' he said. I'm not ignoring the $23 billion figure attached to EV tax breaks, including FBT exemptions, import tariff relief, and other incentives but these tax breaks are designed to make EV ownership more accessible and affordable, particularly through novated leasing. According to the National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association, more than 100,000 Australians have taken up an EV novated lease since mid-2022. These policies are critical to making EVs accessible, especially as the upfront costs are a little higher than petrol and diesel equivalents. These EV tax breaks are part of a broader push by the Federal Government to reach net zero by 2050, with transport making up 20 per cent of national emissions. HALF-PREGNANT APPROACH But the Productivity Commission's report now recommends scrapping the EV FBT exemption, arguing it's too costly and now 'duplicative' with the New Vehicle Efficiency Standards (NVES). Sure … the (NVES) will encourage automakers to import cleaner cars into the market, but that's only half the battle. If consumers aren't incentivised to buy them, nothing changes. You need both; one brings supply, the other brings demand. As the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) noted, without continued consumer support, the 'continuation of current customer buying preferences will inevitably lead to the accrual of substantial penalties.' Automakers can't just absorb these costs; they will likely have to raise prices on popular models, reduce their availability, or exit the market altogether. Countries that have successfully transitioned to high EV adoption rates such as Norway, have almost always used both strong efficiency standards and generous consumer incentives. Relying solely on one or the other often leads to slower progress. So if we're serious about being fair and decarbonising the transport sector, then shouldn't we be looking at everything? Including utes. Talking about utes means comforting one of Australia's most beloved vehicle segments. Tradies vote and Aussies rely on them. If the Federal Government decides to pull EV tax breaks now, while leaving the ute loophole wide open, that's like turning off a light in a room and calling it a major win for energy efficiency.
Sydney Morning Herald
11 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Two-thirds of voters want the right to work from home protected
About two-thirds of voters support proposals for a new right to work from home and a four-day work week, including most Coalition supporters, proving the political upside for Labor governments and unions advancing the ideas of contested economic benefit. Union leaders put up the idea of a four-day work week before Treasurer Jim Chalmers' economic reform summit this week, and Victorian Labor Premier Jacinta Allan rekindled debate by pledging to give workers the guaranteed ability to work two days a week from home. On the eve of the roundtable, Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood dismissed the need for government intervention in flexible work, suggesting bosses and workers were finding a 'sweet spot' on hybrid work. But the Resolve Political Monitor showed widespread support for both ideas. Sixty-four per cent said they backed the idea of using legislation to lock in flexible work arrangements. Nineteen per cent were unsure when asked about the proposal, while 17 per cent were opposed. Of Labor voters, 74 per cent backed the idea, as did 51 per cent of Coalition voters, a reminder of why former opposition leader Peter Dutton was forced to ditch his pre-election push to force public servants back into the office. The Coalition proposal was pounced on by Labor, which used Dutton's public sector policy to stoke fears that private sector workers would also be ordered back to the office full-time. Allan's pitch to legislate the right to two days working from home was built on the successful political campaign against Dutton's plan. The Resolve survey showed 89 per cent of those who currently work from home supported Allan's idea. Just under two-thirds of those who never worked from home also backed it.
Sydney Morning Herald
11 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
I've changed my mind about red tape, but cutting it won't solve everything
Another favourite supposed productivity booster would be for the Albanese government to reverse the industrial relations changes it made in its first term, which were intended to shift the balance of bargaining power away from employers and towards employees. Business's third idea is for governments to cut back all the 'red tape' that has tied business up in knots and to improve planning and the approval of major projects. It's not hard to see how this would make businesspeople's lives a lot easier and add a bit to their profits. Loading But here's the thing: it's equally easy to see that reducing excessive regulation and speeding up the approval of major investment projects and even ordinary homes could indeed make a probably small but worthwhile improvement to the economy's productivity. Certainly, those hard-nosed folk at the Productivity Commission are convinced. In her speech on Monday, the commission's boss, Danielle Wood, gave some hair-raising examples of excessive regulatory requirements. One provider told the commission it is required to complete 15 separate accreditation processes across the health and social care services. Another said it was accountable to 350 pieces of legislation and regulations, and has a minimum of 16 program audits every three years – many of which require them to provide the same information over and over. Yet another service provider said the cost of repetitive audits and accreditation processes runs into the hundreds of thousands of dollars each year. Loading Elsewhere, businesses complain of delays extending to years for the approval or rejection of major construction projects, and many months for ordinary homes. Now, I used to be sceptical of demands to get rid of red tape, fearing they were disguised demands by business fat cats to be able to damage the natural environment wherever they saw fit and build housing anywhere and everywhere. But the greater specificity of the latest proposals has convinced me there's a real problem that is indeed wasting a lot of the private sector's time and money. Part of the problem is government agencies responsible for protecting the environment, or occupational health and safety, or public safety who, in their zeal, set the highest standards without regard for all the other things we need to protect – including our standard of living. They're like the French teacher who wants their students to spend all their time preparing for their French test, at the expense of all the other subjects they're being tested on. But a further complication is overlap between our three levels of government. If businesses in particular fields are being regulated by federal, state and local government, with overlapping and conflicting regulations and separate forms to fill in, this is confusing as well as wasteful. Loading And then you've got the sad truth that government departments and agencies are constantly temped to abuse their power over the rest of us, and often do. We know how private monopolies commonly overcharge and give their customers poor service. They do this for no other reason than that they can. But the government is also a monopoly, and its departments and agencies are just as commonly able to abuse their power over us. They are the law, we can't take our business elsewhere, and if it suits them to wait many months for their approval to build something, that's your problem, not theirs. They save a little by employing too few workers to keep the approval process to time, and you bear the cost of the delay. The more you think about it, however, the more you realise that streamlining regulation, so that a better trade-off between the many conflicting objectives of government is achieved, and the many cases of overlap between the three levels of government, won't be easily or quickly done. Maybe it would take a royal commission, with a continuing monitoring authority, rather than a three-day roundtable.
