Readers sound off on Trump's policies, Barnard College protests and the gang database
You approve of Musk and his merry band of teenaged incel tech nerds rooting through our personal information in those computer databases? Letting kids barely out of high school fire thousands of civil servants? Well, at least they're trying to rehire the people responsible for the security of the government's nuclear stockpile and such. Except Musk's team apparently deleted the contact information for these workers, too. Oopsie.
By the way, White House claims of Musk finding fraud and waste are entirely without evidence, which doesn't bother the good folks at Fox News, where Trump's 'achievements' are being lauded by sycophants like Sean Hannity.
Trump has been effective at collecting his tribute, though. It's like the reception of a Mafia wedding — all the supplicants lining up to give their envelopes of cash. Except these are all billionaires seeking the president's favor. As one does in a democracy. It's only been a couple of weeks; reality will be setting in soon enough. Clyde Kerlew
Middle Village: Regarding the job justifications imposed by Musk, when corporate America runs (make that races) to our government with their tin cups looking for a handout or subsidy, will their upper management be asked to justify their jobs? John Puglisi
Massapequa, L.I.: On the news was Trump's first cabinet meeting with all his picks sitting around a table, along with Trump's idol, the muskrat. Musk was neither elected nor confirmed by the Senate, but there he was squirming his way into the meeting. Musk may be the world's richest man, but he should have spent a couple o' bucks on an etiquette class. Normally when a gentleman walks into a public building, he removes his hat — but not the muskrat, standing there wearing a black MAGA hat. Maybe he is bald like Trump, who could teach him to grow his hair and comb it over. They could look like twins. Ron Boehning
Brooklyn: Voicer John Dent asked if being 'semi-fired' is like being 'semi-pregnant.' I'd say it's more like Trump being semi-president. Ilsa Ruthen
Manhattan: Americans have always been generous when giving to charities. We all know these charities are meant to help people of lesser means and also to help the environment, education, cultural institutions and research, etc. It seems that politicians are cutting back on the role our government plays in this helping hand. For now, it is up to the individual taxpayer to fill the gap. To help them do this, I suggest we raise or eliminate the SALT deduction $10,000 limit. This will allow more taxpayers to itemize their deductions and encourage more gifts to charity. It would also be a good idea to extend the time limits for charitable deduction for 2024 into the early months of 2025 so that as we do our taxes, we can take advantage of the itemized deductions for charity for 2024. Let's make it easier to give more generously. Mary Smoke
Kings Park, L.I.: So, the most powerful man in the world can fire thousands of hard-working Americans at will but can't bring down the price of ordinary eggs. D.T., take note: Once your MAGA supporters come to the realization that they were conned and lied to and the only person who you care about is yourself, as the rest of us already knew, it will not be pleasant. Looks like the chickens are coming home to roost. John Karahalis
Astoria: Trump is being castigated for two supposedly outrageous proposals: developing Gaza into the Riviera of the Middle East and charging $5 million for paths to U.S. citizenship for the wealthy. The usual suspects whining don't see these ideas for what they are: thinking outside the box. Gaza is a bombed-out war zone. Conventional ideas have clearly never worked, but it's also prime real estate, so why not? For decades, hordes of low-skilled illegal aliens have been streaming over the border costing taxpayers billions, so why not the inverse? A multimillion-dollar cover charge for people who will bring the rest of their fortunes into our economy, and many will start businesses employing Americans. Win-win. Bradley Morris
Philadelphia: Voicer Josh Greenberger's accusing the left of 'gross dishonesty' while lauding Trump as 'one of the most honest and dignified human beings to occupy the White House' is the most hysterically funny right-wing projection I have read in a long time. Josh asks 'what kind of degenerates did the convicting' of convicted felon Trump? I'll tell you, Josh. Trump was indicted by a grand jury of 23 average Americans and unanimously convicted by another 12 members of a trial jury composed of average Americans. So stop trying to promote the ludicrous idea that the American justice system of trial by a jury of peers is comparable to the Russian justice system of trial by one judge and juror, Vladimir Putin. As far as Trump's honesty and dignity go, the number of certifiable, documented lies told by Trump during his first administration exceeded 30,000, an average of 21 lies a day. Duane Doberman
Brooklyn: Three cheers for Gov. Hochul for standing up to Trump and defending what is best for New York ('Hochul won't give in to fed push to kill tolls,' Feb. 27). Not only was the governor decisive in defending the program, but she showed a clear understanding of what ordinary New Yorkers struggle with when our transit system fails. May she be this courageous in Albany. There's an array of excellent bills that need her support, like the NY HEAT Act, that will build the clean energy infrastructure New York needs statewide. And there's the added bonus of showing Washington what good government can accomplish. Get it done for us, governor! Sara Gronim
Margate, Fla.: Voicer Michele P. Brown ignores the fact that the Arabs (they didn't call themselves Palestinian until 1964) rejected an independent state in 1937, 1947, 1948, 1967, 1994, 2000, 2008, 2019 and 2020. The only obstruction to Palestinian self-determination for nearly a century is Arab rejectionism. Richard Sherman
West Barnstable, Mass.: The brazen seizure of Barnard College's Milbank Hall by dozens of masked pro-Hamas agitators is a grotesque assault on civilized discourse and a chilling threat to Jewish students. These radicals, cloaking their thuggery in the garb of activism, have crossed a Rubicon, disrupting academia with drumbeats of hate and flyers glorifying violence against Israel. Their demands to reinstate expelled peers and dismantle disciplinary norms reveal a deeper rot: a rejection of accountability masquerading as moral superiority. This isn't protest, it's anarchy. A conservative lens sees through the veneer — where liberals might dither over 'free expression,' we recognize a clear line: When speech becomes a battering ram against reason and safety, it forfeits legitimacy. Israel, a democratic ally besieged by terror, deserves unwavering support, not campus vilification. Barnard must act decisively: Permanently expel and arrest every occupier. Anything less emboldens this mob, imperiling education and emboldening Jew-hatred. Ronald Beaty
Hamden, Conn.: The street gang database is an essential intelligence tool used by police departments everywhere that street gangs are active ('Gang database battle,' Feb. 25). Information in the database aids in ongoing investigations. The public advocate and City Council are entirely wrong in their push to stop the NYPD from using and even having it exist. Their excuse to get rid of it defies rational explanation, except that they are pro-crime. Chris Lyons
Hallandale Beach, Fla.: Truly saddened to hear about the passing of Gene Hackman, one of my all-time favorite actors — an absolute legend, a versatile entertainer. Hollywood has lost one of its greatest, but his performances will live on forever. Rest in peace, Gene. You'll be deeply missed. Paul Bacon
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What a weaker dollar means for inflation
The US dollar ( has fallen this year, and that can have big implications for inflation. RSM chief economist Joe Brusuelas talks about that connection and when the impact of tariffs may start to show in the US economy. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime. turning out to the dollar index, it's seen many swings we know amid economic uncertainty. Joe, you highlight what the moves in the currency mean for inflation? Walk us through that. All right. When you get a sustained 10% decline in the value of the dollar, typically, you should expect to see a 1/2 of 1% increase in inflation over the next 6 to 12 months. We clearly are at that point, even though we had a nice rebound. I think it was 3.3% for the month of July, strongest month for the greenback this year, but nevertheless, the policy mix out of the administration, all points towards a weaker dollar, and I think that's what we're going to get. Moreover, when you take a look at import prices, especially import prices ex petroleum, it tells the tale. We're going to see more inflation and a weaker dollar going forward. Does Trump want a strong dollar? I would think he does, and I think, well, I think like all politicians, he wants to have his cake and eat it, too. He doesn't want de-dollarization, clearly, but he wants a weaker dollar because A, it really tends to juice the tech sector, and B, it will provide relief to the beleaguered manufacturing sector that's been in an effective recession for the past couple of years. Is it too soon to say the kind of impact the softer dollars had during this earnings season, particularly what it's meant for the multinationals? It's way too early to jump on that bandwagon. I think we're really going to be talking in the fourth quarter earnings, and then next year. Moreover, a lot of those firms that he wants to help are actually having real problems with the tariff issue because, you know, 45% of everything we import goes into domestic manufacturing. So policies at a cross purposes, a good portion of the time this year, which is why that economy slowed to 1.2% growth in the first half of the year, and we think it's not going to do much better. Our forecast for this year is 1.1%. Can I ask you when we talk about these tariff policies? We've been talking about them all show. There's the near to intermediate impact, but how long do we have to wait to see what the long-term impact is? Meaning, do I have to wait till does it have to be August 2026, and Joe and Josh are back on set for me to really know, okay, it's really boosted manufacturing job. It's really opened up all these new markets for American business. It's really raised this much revenue. It's a little worse, actually. So as of midnight last night, on once we get to October 5th, we're going to have an effective 18.3% tariff. The real problem is we won't really understand what any of this means, not till October 5th, 2026, but more like October 5th, 2027. Why? Why do you say that, Joe? Because it takes so long to pass through the tariff costs. You know, there are four points along the chain. You've got your retail, you've got your consumers, you've got your importers, and you've got your exporters. At each point of the supply chain, you're going to see a bit of it absorbed, a bit of it eaten. When we went through this in 2018, for example, we didn't see the full price of the increase in the price of washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers caused by tariffs show up on consumers' balance sheets until about two years later. Turned out 90% of that cost was eaten entirely by consumers. So when we talk about whether where the cost falls falls on the value chain, and there was this big debate, maybe it's really the key debate inside the Fed. Tell me if I'm wrong, but this debate about whether the the the tariff induced inflation is one time or transitory persistent. Even if it's one time, it could go on for some time. Is that part of the point? Well, that's right, and that's why they've been counseling patients because you just don't know. Right now, for all of the noise, right? The tariff rate that's showing up, which is causing revenues to rise, right? And from the Trump administration's point of view, that's an absolutely good thing. It's about 8.85%. It's not 30, it's not 50, it's not 15. But as we get into mid-October, it'll be closer to 20 is my sense because we're still not done with Mexico, and we're still not done with China, and then USMCA has to be renegotiated next year. So this is going to be a variable target. It's going to be a moving target, but nevertheless, if you cause the average price of goods imported in the United States to rise by 18.3%, that's going to be eaten. And here's why we say that. There's a lot of talk that, well, foreign exporters are just eating the price. You know, they're going to engage in invoice pricing. If that was the case, import prices would be falling significantly. They're not. They're actually rising. So that's just not happening. So that means it's not the exporter, it's going to be the importer, the retail, or the consumer. Those points on the chain where those are going to be eaten. Joe, I can honestly say that given the news flow today, you were the perfect guy to be sitting in that chair. That's very kind of you to say. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Thank you so much, Joe.
New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary
From the right: Dems' Grim Outlook for '26 'November 2026 may not go the way conventional wisdom suggests,' and Dems may lose, warns the Washington Examiner's Michael Barone. During midterm elections, 'the president's party almost always loses the House and, slightly less often, Senate seats.' But this time around, 'it looks like the Democrats' baggage, especially from the Biden years, is heavier than the loads Trump Republicans must juggle.' Black marks like 'the Russia collusion hoax, COVID-19 school closings, 'transitory' inflation, the Hunter Biden laptop, and open borders immigration' have too deeply damaged' Dems' credibility. Trump and Republicans are also becoming widely popular, with 'Republican gains' being 'widespread while Democratic gains are scarcely visible.' 'Nothing's inevitable in politics, but so far, the Democrats have not gotten up off the floor.' Mideast beat: 'Palestine' Is a Made-Up Cause Advertisement Westerners should 'understand that the George Soros-funded agents of Jew Hate and chaos' in the streets 'have zero to do with the overwhelming majority of Muslims around the world,' argues Christopher Messina at Messy Times. As Dalia Ziada, an Egyptian political analyst notes, protesters claim ' 'Palestine' is the cause of all Muslims,' but there's 'no trace of anything called 'Palestine' or anything similar to it in the Quran or the Prophetic Hadiths!' Indeed, the 'Palestinian Cause' was 'invented by the Pan-Arabist communists,' who 'attached it to Islam' to 'fool ordinary Muslims' and gain 'legitimacy' to commit crimes against nations 'in the East and the West.' 'I am a Muslim,' but Palestine 'will never be my cause,' because it hinders 'peace' — 'a divine obligation of all Muslims.' Former U.S. President Joe Biden speaks at the National Bar Association's 100th Annual Awards Gala in Chicago on July 31, 2025. REUTERS Capitol watch: Rep's War on DC Dementia Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) wants a 'way for Congress to evaluate whether some politicians are no longer fit to serve,' reports The Free Press' Gabe Kaminsky. Most Dems 'would rather talk about anything other than the Biden cover-up — and the wider problem of the gerontocracy that runs the party and Washington.' But, Gluesenkamp Perez is pushing'an amendment that would direct the Office of Congressional Conduct to develop a standard to determine House members' 'ability to perform the duties of office unimpeded by significant irreversible cognitive impairment.' ' Some Democratic colleagues took her move 'personally,' and it 'failed in her first attempt to tuck it into a federal spending bill, with Democrats and Republicans all voting against its inclusion.' But her office is 'still exploring avenues to build a coalition.' Advertisement Liberal: Democrats' Best Way Back 'The Democratic Party faces a conundrum,' observes the Liberal Patriot's John Halpin. Despite President Trump's struggles with voters on 'his overall job approval rating' and among specific issues, 'Democrats are doing even worse with Americans.' They've tumbled 'from roughly a 3-point net unfavorable rating just before [Joe] Biden was elected in 2020 to a 30-point net unfavorable rating today.' With polls showing more than half of voters believe 'Congress isn't doing enough to keep Trump in line,' a 2026 message 'arguing for divided government to stop Republican overreach' may help 'Democrats to retake the House.' Ahead of 2028, Democrats should offer 'new voices without cultural baggage' and a message of 'economic uplift for America's working- and middle-class families.' Advertisement Foreign desk: Chinese Dam's Regional Threat China has 'officially acknowledged' that it's building 'the biggest dam ever conceived,' gasps Brahma Chellaney at The Hill. The structure will 'generate nearly three times as much hydropower' as the massive Three Gorges Dam but 'portends a looming geopolitical and environmental crisis.' The new dam 'is on a geologic fault line — a recipe for catastrophe.' Moreover, 'capturing silt-laden waters before they reach India and Bangladesh, the dam will starve' farmers of crucial riparian nutrients. While China's dam-building 'has long alarmed downstream nations, from Vietnam and Thailand to Nepal,' this project 'raises profound questions about regional stability.' By seizing control over regional water, 'China is methodically locking in future geopolitical leverage.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
USA Today
15 minutes ago
- USA Today
What does TACO mean? What to know when Trump issues new tariffs after 2 delays
President Donald Trump signed an executive order to issue a new slate of tariffs on July 31, the latest in a long saga of policy changes for imports from countries around the world. Reciprocal tariff rates for 70 countries will range from 15% to 41%, set to go into effect seven days from the order. Trump also separately raised the tariff rate on imports from Canada from 25% to 35%, which is set to go into effect Aug. 1. Tariffs are a tax on goods from other countries that importers pay, and economists generally agree it leads to higher prices for consumers. Trump began imposing tariffs on imports from the U.S.'s top trade partners in February, only to change their effective date, scope or rate over the following months. The on-again-off-again tariffs have been a theme of Trump's second term, leading to the creation of the term TACO. Here is what to know: Live updates: Trump fires head of labor statistics bureau after weak jobs report What does TACO mean? Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined "TACO trade" in May, describing how some investors anticipate market rebounds amid Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policies. The acronym stands for "Trump always chickens out." Armstrong describes TACO trade as many investors' strategy to buy into the market that dips when Trump announces steep tariffs on the assumption that he will back off his tariff order, and the market will rebound. Trump hit back at a reporter who asked about the term on May 28, saying, "you ask a nasty question like that. It's called negotiation." Trump's tariffs have been on-again-off-again Back in February, Trump announced a 25% tariff on goods from top trade partners Mexico and Canada and 10% on goods from China. Such was the start of a series of delays and negotiations that left Canada and Mexico relatively untouched when Trump expanded steeper tariff orders to the rest of the world in April. China and the U.S. were caught up in an intense trade war where the economic powerhouses retaliated until both sides issued tariffs in the triple digits. They reached a truce in May and have discussed extending the 90-day pause while they work out a deal. Trump on April 2 announced widespread tariffs in what he called "Liberation Day." Shortly after, he paused the climbing rates for 90 days. That pause was set to expire on July 9, but instead of the tariffs going into effect, Trump extended the deadline. That deadline was Aug. 1, and Trump had said the deadline would not change, but the recent order gives it another week. Mexico remains at 25% while it continues to work on a trade deal for the next 90 days, Trump said. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @
