Sime Darby Property leads nation's first community solar rollout under NETR with TNB
Solar generation via leasing of rooftops from residential homes will be channelled to green consumers of nearby commercial and industrial properties, commencing with the City of Elmina.
PETALING JAYA: Sime Darby Property in collaboration with Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB), has become the first company in Malaysia to harness the power of solar energy under the country's National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR) via Malaysia's inaugural Community Renewable Energy Aggregation Mechanism (CREAM) initiative.
This initiative is part of the government's recently launched CREAM framework, introduced by the Energy Transition and Water Transformation Ministry (PETRA) in March 2025, to empower community-based renewable energy generation and promote wider access to green electricity through Local Energy Generators and Aggregators (LEGA).
Sime Darby Property's group managing director and chief executive officer Datuk Seri Azmir Merican said, 'Our participation in the CREAM initiative with TNB introduces a practical and scalable model to unlock solar generation capacity from within our townships.
'By leasing roof spaces from residential properties, without requiring homeowners to install panels, we enable clean energy generation that supports our nearby commercial and industrial developments.
'This approach complements our broader decarbonisation strategy, aligns with national energy objectives, and directly contributes to our emissions reduction targets.'
Azmir said participation in the CREAM initiative with TNB introduces a practical and scalable model to unlock solar generation capacity from within Sime Darby Property's townships.
By becoming the nation's first LEGA under the CREAM policy, Sime Darby Property underscores its commitment to inclusive, sustainable development in support of Petra's vision and the national renewable energy goals.
The company has committed to reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 40% by 2030 and achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050.
Working with TNB's solar subsidiary GSPARX Sdn Bhd, Sime Darby Property will enter into lease agreements with residential homeowners interested in participating in this programme, starting with those in the City of Elmina.
Rooftops of participating homes will be utilised to generate electricity, which will be exported via the local distribution line within a 5km radius for use at Sime Darby Property's commercial and industrial developments. This streamlined approach not only reflects the renewable energy efforts by the company but also supports the country's agenda to transition to green energy sustainably and efficiently.
The CREAM mechanism enables Local Green Consumers (LGC) such as businesses and commercial users to source electricity from LEGA participants through TNB's distribution network. It allows homeowners to lease rooftops to third parties who manage and aggregate these spaces into efficient solar photovoltaic power systems. This collaboration represents a tangible model for grassroots participation in clean energy and public-private synergy.
The latest collaboration between the two parties comes on the heels of a joint venture established by Sime Darby Property and TNB's GSPARX in July 2024, focusing on financing, developing and operating rooftop solar generation projects across selected assets and properties in the SDP's portfolio. This followed an MoU between the two parties in 2023 to explore sustainable energy infrastructure, including solar, EV charging and microgrid systems across the group's townships.
Through this pilot rollout, Sime Darby Property and TNB are contributing towards Malaysia's target of achieving 70% renewable energy capacity by 2050, as outlined under NETR and PETRA's strategic direction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BusinessToday
17 hours ago
- BusinessToday
Five Key Takeaways That Defined The 46th ASEAN Summit
The 46th ASEAN Summit, hosted in Kuala Lumpur (KL) under Malaysia's chairmanship, marked a critical juncture for the 10-member regional bloc as it confronts rising geopolitical headwinds, economic protectionism and internal instability. Held under the theme 'ASEAN Matters: Inclusivity and Sustainability', the summit brought together Southeast Asian leaders for high-level deliberations aimed at strengthening regional cooperation and preparing ASEAN for an increasingly complex global environment. Here are five key takeaways that defined the summit: Vision 2045: KL Declaration Sets Long-Term Strategic Roadmap A highlight of the summit was the adoption of the KL Declaration on ASEAN 2045: Our Shared Future, which lays out a long-term strategic vision for the bloc through the next two decades. The roadmap reaffirms ASEAN's foundational principles of non-interference and consensus while outlining enhanced ambitions in areas such as digital transformation, green development, economic resilience and security cooperation. The declaration aims to ensure ASEAN remains relevant and united in the face of shifting global power dynamics and disruptive technologies. It envisions a more adaptive and agile ASEAN that can act decisively on transboundary issues like climate change, cybersecurity and public health. ASEAN Responds to US Tariff Hikes with Unified Economic Front Recent tariff hikes by the US targeting exports from six ASEAN countries cast a shadow over the summit. In response, ASEAN leaders agreed to adopt a coordinated approach to trade negotiations with Washington, aiming to mitigate the impact on regional supply chains and economic recovery. Malaysian Prime Minister (PM) and ASEAN Chair Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim announced the formation of a regional task force to study and negotiate on the matter, emphasising that ASEAN would not allow external economic pressure to divide the bloc. The move signals a maturing ASEAN that seeks to collectively defend its economic interests amid growing global trade tensions. Deepening Strategic Ties with China and the GCC The summit also served as a platform to enhance ASEAN's external partnerships. Notably, it hosted the 2nd ASEAN-Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-GCC-China Summit, reflecting ASEAN's intent to diversify economic partnerships beyond traditional Western allies. Anwar mentioned in his opening remarks during the ASEAN-GCC Summit that, in 2023, the GCC was ASEAN's seventh largest trading partner, with total trade reaching US$130.7 billion and foreign direct investment inflows were US$390.2 million. Anwar then stressed a stronger ASEAN-GCC relationship will be key to enhancing interregional collaboration, building resilience and securing sustainable prosperity for the peoples. The same sentiment was echoed by Chinese Premier Li Qiang who urged for closer collaboration, citing the untapped potential between ASEAN, the GCC and China as the trade value is expected to experience an average growth of 30%, reaching a total of US$18 billion by 2032. Despite accounting for nearly a quarter of the world's population and economic output, the three regions only account for 5% of global trade. Hence, the leaders agreed to boost infrastructure investment, trade liberalisation and cross-border connectivity, including in areas like digital finance and green energy. ASEAN Reaffirms Commitment to Peace in Myanmar The summit reiterated ASEAN's central role in resolving the protracted crisis in Myanmar. The ASEAN leaders supported expanding the fragile ceasefire and called for inclusive political dialogue among all stakeholders in Myanmar. The Five-Point Consensus, first introduced in 2021, was reaffirmed as the framework for peace. ASEAN continues to walk a delicate diplomatic tightrope, balancing engagement with the Myanmar military junta while maintaining credibility with the international community and pro-democracy groups. The summit also called for sustained humanitarian aid and endorsed greater involvement from ASEAN's special envoy in facilitating conflict resolution. Toward a Larger ASEAN: Timor-Leste and Papua New Guinea in Focus The summit reaffirmed ASEAN's commitment to expand its membership, recognising the progress made by Timor-Leste toward full accession. Malaysian PM Anwar suggested that Timor-Leste could officially join as early as the next ASEAN Summit in October 2025. Meanwhile, Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto proposed opening membership talks with Papua New Guinea. The proposal sparked interest but also debate, as some member states raised concerns about readiness and institutional capacity. Nonetheless, the conversation signalled ASEAN's growing ambition to broaden its geopolitical footprint and enhance its global relevance. Overall, the 46th ASEAN Summit concluded with a strong message of unity and forward-looking resolve. As global uncertainties mount, from geopolitical rivalries to economic nationalism, ASEAN's leaders demonstrated a renewed commitment to regional solidarity, strategic foresight and external diversification. While challenges such as the Myanmar crisis and trade friction with the US persist, the summit's outcomes suggest a bloc that is increasingly confident in shaping its own path on the global stage. As Malaysian PM Anwar aptly summarised, 'ASEAN must not just react to global events, it must help shape them'. Now all eyes will be on the upcoming 47th ASEAN Summit in October 2025 to find out what will be unfold. Related
Daily Express
a day ago
- Daily Express
Sabah may stay poor due to GLCs
Published on: Sunday, June 08, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jun 08, 2025 By: Datuk John Lo Text Size: Badly managed GLCs is one of the worst economic problems of Sabah. The GLCs have become a bottomless pit. No matter how much extra revenue the GRS Government can generate or how much more funding it can get from the Federal Government or how much more investments it can attract, Sabahans will remain poor. All these money cannot cover this ever-expanding hole by badly managed GLCs. Advertisement Singapore's GLCs [e.g. SIA, DBS, Capital Land] are big economic boosters, making profits in billions. Sabah's GLCs are big liabilities, losing billions over the years. Sabah's GLCs make outsiders rich, impoverish Sabahans. They practice 'Sabah for NON-Sabhans', NOT 'Sabah for Sabahans'. GRS Government has started the GLC Transformation. The GRS Government has started the GLC transformation because it has realized this bottomless GLC problem. It must be plugged or else Sabah will remain poor always. Advertisement Well known fact that Sabah's GLCs have: [1] Proliferated in number since the mid-1980s. [2] The increase in number has little economic logic or strategy. more for expediencies and political accommodation. Chairman appointments of big GLCs are special reserves for warlords. Senior management jobs for relatives and macai. [3] The number of GLCs has grown to more than 250. The Assistant Minister of Finance has confirmed this number in the press. [4] Big majority of GLCs have in total lost billions over the years, some are still heavily debt ridden, poorly managed and lack governance. [5] The GLCs have incurred huge liabilities for the many past lopsided agreements signed by GLCs and Malayan companies. [6] The GLCs have produced most failed and/or delayed JV projects with Malayan companies. There are 7 or 8 in KK alone as testimonies of the GLCs' failures. One GLC has failed to launch a major tourism project for more than 10 years. Sabah GLCs love Malayan companies, sideline Sabah companies. No love for 'Sabah for Sabahans.' They love 'Sabah for Malayans'. [7] Return on capital and assets are poor, mostly negative! [8]. The non-performing GLCs have not helped to build up Sabah's economy. Instead, they are destroying it. The GRS government, for the first time in Sabah's history, has initiated transformation after many public warnings by Hajiji and Masidi on the unsatisfactory and sad situation in the GLC. Already announced are these big moves. First, AG Brenndon and MOF Assistant Minister have confirmed the formation of the Oversight Committee. This is an important first step. Second, AG Brenndon has confirmed that all agreements to be signed by GLCs must be referred to and vetted by his Chambers before submission to the Cabinet. Knowing Brenndon, he would not tolerate any lopsided agreement at Sabah's expense. Many Sabahans are extremely concerned about the poor performance of GLCs. This is common talk among folks in Sabah. Not in complimentary tone. Reflective of this sentiment, more than 70, 000 viewers have visited the podcast by SABAR on GLCs in the Kopitiam Council's YouTube platform. It is very positive that Hajiji and Masidi have started to solve Sabah's GLC-massive-headache. Likewise, other leaders should consider offering their ideas/solution in the run up of the 2025 election. Better still, include their plan to transform the GLCs in their manifestos. The GLC problems, no doubt very tough, must be resolved because they are bleeding Sabah dry. GLCs dominate every important economic sector in Sabah. Simple logic. GLCs' combined failure to perform in these sectors has inflicted Sabah's overall economy like CANCEROUS CELLS. All Sabahans, especially the vulnerable B40 suffer. The GLCs are depriving future generations of their economic opportunities. Followings are some token samples: [1] GLCs are in control of Sabah's Financial Institutions [SDB, SCC]. [2] GLCs are in effective control of many natural resources: mining/minerals [SMM], timber and FMUs [Innoprise, SOFODA]. [3] GLCs hold many monopolistic rights: Cement [Sabah Cement Industries], Ports [Suria, POIC Sandakan and POIC LD], Water [Jetama]. Fishing landing rights [SAFMA]. [4] GLCs have been granted practically free and extremely prime land, most of them at RM1,000 premium. [Innoprise, SUDC of SEDCO, Suria, SICC, Sabah Energy, TAED.]. [5] GLCs have been granted vast acreage of valuable agriculture land for free or at nominal premium. [Sawit Kinabalu, KPD, Sabah Softwood.] [6] GLCs have been granted cheap and valuable land for industrial park [KKIP, SOGIP, POIC Sandakan and POIC LD, ASEAN Supply Base in Labuan] [7] GLCs have been granted concession rights in oil and gas, river and sea sand [Sabah Energy, Sabah Gas, SMJ Energy, SEDCO]. [8] GLCs are in hotels, resorts and jungle resorts [Innoprise, SEDCO and Sabah Air] [9] GLCs have been granted exclusive JV preference mostly with Malayan companies. Summary: you name it, GLCs are in it. GLCs control it. GLCs are the preferred choice for almost every economic activity in Sabah. GLCs are given priority in any new business, depriving opportunities for Sabahan businessmen. Despite of all the huge advantages, most of them are doing very badly. The GLCs are in competition Sabah's private sector in the most unfair manners. They are killing our Sabahan investors, entrepreneurs, and even small SMEs. Chairmen, Directors, Senior Management would have been sacked in the Private Sector. All business conglomerates would NOT have tolerated the bad governance/management of the board of directors, senior management of Sabah's GLCs. They would have been sacked long time ago. The shareholders would not tolerate such persistent non-performance and abuses. The GLCs can afford to continue with their perennial state of abuses, bad-performances, losses and giving perks away is because Sabahans, you and me, our future generations are paying for their perpetual good lives. Does Sabah need 250 GLCs? How may officers and staff needed by GLCs Pertinent questions. I would not venture to guess. However, one thing is certain, a great number of them are existing to give jobs, perks and political accommodation or favours. Will not surprise if majority of them would not be able to justify their existence in a proper revamp exercise. As can be seen in the list above, badly managed monopolies, special concessions granted by the government, land given for free, duplication, competition against each other are common features among these GLCs. Pertinent question 2. After years and years of losses, the iron rice bowl mentality is as strong as ever. Petronas has reduced 10% of its work force because petroleum prices are dropping. No iron rice bowl in Petronas. A thorough revamp, transformation and rationalization is long overdue. Let the leaders in this election answer this question. Good leaders will give you the right and logical answer. Solve the GLCs Problems, 50% economic Sabah's problems are Solved. Why is this? Because the GLCs are burdening down, big liabilities in almost all the sectors of Sabah's economy. If the GLCs can be transformed to perform, all the sectors that they are in will create an economic boom in Sabah. Imagine: [1] If each GLC, on average, can create 100 jobs, 25,000 Sabahans will have employment. Sabah's unemployed graduates will be over. [2] If each GLC, on average can make RM10m, total will be RM2.5b, RM20m, it will be RM5b. Given all the freebies like land, monopolies, concessions and no capital cost, such profits can be within easy reach. SMJ Energy's profit is already RM250m in 3rd year of existence. KPJ Hospital [Johor SEDCO] makes RM350m a year. [3] Sabah GLCs should emulate KPJ Hospital, expand beyond Sabah or go international. This is possible when there is a proper Board of Directors and good senior management. Hajiji and Masidi have appointed the right people in some GLCs already. Vast improvements in their performance. 3 myths that must be dispelled. First: Sabah does not have the right people to manage the GLCs properly. Not true. Remove the useless ones, good Sabahans can be found. Second: GLCs cannot be turned around. Appointing right chairmen, directors and senior management, the turn-arounds will be possible. Examples: [1] SDB is being revamped. Lim Haw Kuang, former Executive Chairman of Shell in China and Director BNM has been appointed as Executive Chairman. The Board of Directors are credible people. No political interference. RAM has just given SDB top rating! [2] SMJ Energy is performing exceptional well with a highly regarded Board of Directors and well qualified senior management team. Its profit in 2024 is RM250m. [3] Sabah Energy Corporation, Sabah Credit Corporation are being managed professionally. They are doing very well. SEC may become the biggest gas aggregator in Malaysia! SCC has proven that it can do some social financing and be profitable! [4] Hajiji has appointed James Wong as GGM to revamp SEDCO. [5] POIC LD has been turned around with Yong Teck Lee as Chairman and Fredian Gan CEO. It is now undertaking a major expansion that will make POIC LD a marine hub for Sabah. POIC LD is showing the way that it can monetize its landed assets, FZ approval from Federal MOF and its deepest ports in this region. [6] Innoprise has been transformed, vastly improved by forward looking executive chairman Jasnih and a professional team. Thirdly, GLCs can make sizeable profit [in hundreds of millions of RM]. E.g. SMJ Energy. GLCs in plantations, GLCs with monopolies and GLCs give free land have potential to make a lot more. Let's pray Leaders of all Parties will Focus on GLC Transformation. Yes, Sabahans better pray hard that Sabah leaders will focus on transformation of GLCs. Successful GLC transformation will mean prosperity. Failure? Continue poverty. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
New Straits Times
2 days ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: When commuting is a walk in the park
UNLESS people live off the grid, they would want homes near basic conveniences. With access to government services, supermarkets, schools and clinics, people also prefer living near bus or taxi terminals or commuter train stations for easy travel to the city. Residential areas near such transportation hubs have been fortunate to have infrastructure built around them. In the future, the plan is to reverse this: the National Transport Policy 2019–2030 (NTP) states that new housing projects will be developed on or near public transport stations. This concept, exemplified by the Kota Madani housing project, offers residences for low-income groups seeking a sustainable and organised urban lifestyle. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, in introducing the concept, said it might require changes to existing regulations, as such housing projects promote broader use of the public transport system. Anwar's announcement is timely, as public transport usage stands at only 20 per cent nationwide, significantly below the 40 per cent target set in the NTP. The challenge, said Transport Minister Anthony Loke, is ensuring that the NTP achieves its goals. Anwar's initiative marks a significant step toward addressing low public transport usage. Building homes near transit stations could help resolve this issue. Still, as Loke said, the challenges are entrenched. Low public transport usage stems from inconvenient routes, unreliable service, frequent delays, poor last-mile connectivity, and the social perception of car ownership as a status symbol. Since the mid-1980s, Malaysia's push into industrialisation spurred domestic car production, making private vehicle ownership easy, affordable and widespread. The obsession with cars is exemplified by the six million vehicles entering Kuala Lumpur daily, 2.2 million during peak hours. For public transport to succeed — like Hong Kong's MTR or Singapore's MRT — the government must make tough policy decisions to reduce driving and incentivise bus and train usage. One approach would be to impose a congestion charge for city entry to encourage greater use of buses and trains. Other than limited parking, the measure most hated by motorists is paying to enter the city. Inconsistent schedules, Delays and overcrowding — though frustrating — are issues of management and efficiency, not infrastructure failure. The same applies to poor last-mile connectivity, inadequate waiting areas, and substandard bus infrastructure. In short, there must be a competent system — or artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solutions — to manage scheduling and operations. As for those living off-grid or in remote areas, an AI-enabled e-hailing service could offer a practical mobility solution. Balancing these complex factors — improving public transport while managing urban traffic congestion — remains the ultimate challenge.
