Stalin targets Centre over Presidential reference, calls for united legal fight to defend Constitution
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin on Thursday sharply criticised the Union government over the Presidential reference seeking the Supreme Court's opinion on the Governors' powers over state Bills, calling it a 'desperate attempt to weaken democratically elected state Governments'.
Left parties, too, have criticised the move.
In a strongly worded statement, Stalin described the Presidential Reference under Article 143 as an assault on the Constitution and a direct challenge to the Supreme Court's authority.
'I strongly condemn the Union Government's Presidential reference, which attempts to subvert the Constitutional position already settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Tamil Nadu Governor's case and other precedents,' he said in a post on X.
The DMK, which has been locked in multiple tussles with Governor R N Ravi over pending Bills, had earlier hailed the top court's ruling on deadlines for Governors as a landmark victory for states' rights. Stalin's latest statement appears to reopen that battle.
'This attempt clearly exposes the fact that the Tamil Nadu Governor acted at the BJP's behest to undermine the people's mandate,' Stalin said, accusing the Centre of seeking to paralyse Opposition-led legislatures through gubernatorial overreach.
The Presidential Reference comes weeks after the top court held that Governors must act within a reasonable time when a Bill is presented. The President has now sought the court's opinion on whether Governors and President are justiciable and whether timelines can be imposed on them in the absence of any such provision in the Constitution.
In a post on X, CPI(M) general secretary M A Baby quoted Stalin's post and said his party is opposed to the move. 'The governors are acting at the behest of the ruling party BJP and obstructing the functioning of opposition-led state govts. They are violating the federal principles enshrined in our Constitution. All the non-BJP state govts should condemn this move and join together in the fight against centralisation of powers at the cost of states' rights,' he said.
CPI general secretary D Raja too criticised the Presidential reference, posting on X: 'The judgment came in response to repeated, undemocratic delays by governors in opposition-ruled states like Tamil Nadu and Kerala — where the British Raj relic of governor's office is being weaponised to block the will of the people.'
Stalin, meanwhile, warned of broader implications for federalism, saying: 'This directly challenges the majesty of law and the authority of the Supreme Court as the final interpreter of the Constitution.'
He posed pointed questions to the Centre: 'Why should there be any objection to prescribing time limits for Governors to act? Is the BJP seeking to legitimise its Governors' obstruction by allowing indefinite delays in Bill assent? Does the Union Government intend to paralyse non-BJP State Legislatures?'
Calling the development a 'grave circumstance,' Stalin asserted that the move revealed 'the BJP-led Union Government's sinister intent to distort the Constitution's basic distribution of powers and incapacitate the State Legislatures dominated by opposition parties.' He said this posed 'a clear exigent threat to State autonomy.'
Stalin urged leaders of all non-BJP ruled states to stand united in a legal battle to uphold the federal spirit of the Constitution. 'In these grave circumstances, I urge all non-BJP states and party leaders to join this legal struggle to defend the #Constitution,' he said. 'We will fight this battle with all our might. Tamil Nadu will fight — and #TamilNadu will win!'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Congress to hold mashal marches across Maharashtra
The Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee will organise mashal (torch) marches across the state between June 12 and 14 to protest what it calls a systematic erosion of democratic processes under the BJP regime. The party has questioned the election commission's credibility and has hit out at Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis for 'sidestepping serious concerns' raised by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi over alleged electoral manipulation. Congress state vice president and former MLA Mohan Joshi announced the agitation on Tuesday, saying, 'Rahul Gandhi's recent newspaper article exposed the BJP's blueprint of vote theft in Maharashtra. It has rattled the ruling party. Instead of the Election Commission responding, Fadnavis jumped in with a reply that deflects from the core issue and misleads the people.' In his article published Saturday, Gandhi had described the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections as a 'blueprint for rigging democracy,' alleging a pattern of electoral 'match-fixing' that could soon be replicated in Bihar. The Election Commission dismissed the claims as 'absolutely absurd' and accused Gandhi of defaming the institution after an unfavourable result. Responding the next day, Fadnavis said, 'Rahul Gandhi consistently insults the democratic process. He repeatedly disrespects the public mandate. People have rejected Rahul Gandhi, and in retaliation, he is rejecting the people. This will only push the Congress party further into decline.' Joshi, however, accused Fadnavis of avoiding the real concerns raised by Gandhi. 'Instead of addressing the serious irregularities, he launched a personal attack. Why is the chief minister responding on behalf of the Election Commission? That itself raises suspicion,' Joshi said. He pointed out that Gandhi had questioned the process through which the Modi government amended the Constitution to remove the Chief Justice of India from the committee that appoints election commissioners, replacing the seat with Union Home Minister Amit Shah. 'This move gave the ruling party complete control over the selection of commissioners—this is where the electoral fraud begins,' Joshi said. He added that Congress governments had always followed a transparent process in appointing election commissioners, with no political interference. 'No one questioned the integrity of the commissioners we appointed. But Fadnavis, in his article, avoided these facts and instead chose to make shallow accusations,' Joshi said. Joshi also raised concerns over the unusual spike in voter numbers during the 2024 Assembly elections and reports of polling continuing beyond official hours in certain constituencies. 'Fadnavis has deliberately ignored these issues. His silence on this reinforces doubts about the fairness of the process,' he said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘We cannot seek justice for the past': Ram temple's officer-architect-in-chief Nripendra Misra
OBSERVING THAT there are 'limits' to correcting historical wrongs, Nripendra Misra, Ayodhya Ram temple's officer-architect-in-chief, has said that once people 'realise that the time has gone by and once they realise the dream of the future while living in the present, society will be more positive and look towards the issues of development.' Misra, who served as the Principal Secretary to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his entire first term, and was appointed the Chairman of the temple construction committee in February 2020, also said the Ram Mandir 'was accepted by all only because it was (a judgement) by the Supreme Court', but one 'cannot seek justice for the past' in all such conflicts. In an interview with The Indian Express two days after the consecration of the statue of Ram as the king of Ayodhya, Mishra said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was emphatic that the message people take away from the temple is not 'negative'. 'Nowhere have we used the name that such and such came and destroyed the temple. The message was, please do not discuss negative thoughts. He (the PM) kept mentioning that if you make that a prominent message, the younger generation would feel small. He did not want the younger generation to suffer from these temporary shocks that Sanatan Dharma failed. The younger generation should know how we have regained and conserved,' he said. Asked whether the completion of the Ram temple would encourage those who agitated for it to move on, or if more claims would arise for temples in different places, he said, 'I place this responsibility not so much on the government. It will have to be of various social groups, representatives, elected or not elected – they must recognise. They have limits on correcting issues. We all know that the time which has gone does not come back. We do not keep it in clutches. Once they realise that the time has gone by and once they realise the dream of the future while living in the present, then society will be more positive, and will look towards the issues of development.' 'After all, there is another agenda. You and I are worried. There is 7% growth. Will I maintain it? I am going to be the third country in terms of economic power very soon. Why can't I become number 2 or 1? China is always in our memory; that they are far ahead of us. If these are the challenges, we weaken society by disintegration. We should rather strengthen the society to divert this energy to development. In politics, there are different sets of opinions; sometimes you believe in it, sometimes you create. But they are all audible. Social leaders of my country have a great responsibility,' he said. On what the country should focus on now that it's on course to replace Japan as the fourth-largest economy, he said, '… we may have crossed (Japan) but they don't have so many poor, they don't have problems with proper nourishment. They don't have problems with education and health. I may say that I produce maximum milk, but does everyone take milk? The answer is no. So, my target should not be that I am maximum (at these parameters). My target should be, am I giving each individual the gains of my growth? I put health, wellness, hospitals at number 1, education at number 2, and third and most important, is empowering rural women. My agenda will be to achieve these goals.' Asked about instances like the Jama Masjid row in Sambhal, where a local court had granted permission for a survey in November last year, leading to clashes between protesters and the police, he said, 'It's a problem. Certain issues are in some manner localised. I always say the judgment on the Ram temple was accepted by all only because it was by the Supreme Court. Everything got normalised. Everyone was then following daily routines. We cannot seek justice for the past. It has to be forgotten.'
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Policy that excluded Mahl, Arabic from Lakshadweep schools deferred by Kerala High Court
In an interim order, a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court deferred the implementation of a policy under which Mahl and Arabic were excluded as optional languages at schools in the Union Territory of Lakshadweep. The Bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji acted upon a public interest litigation moved by Ajas Akber, the president of the Lakshadweep unit of the National Students Union of India. He had sought orders to the islands' administration to desist from terminating or removing Arabic and Mahl as optional languages under the three-language formula. The court said the order on the language was issued without conducting any study, and so its implementation is deferred. 'The position which has existed so far (in respect of CBSE and non-CBSE schools) in the Union Territory of Lakshadweep shall continue,' the court said. The new language policy was set to be implemented at schools on the islands from July 1. The petitioner had argued that the decision was taken by the director of education without consultation with stakeholders and without conducting any study on its implications on the education system in Lakshadweep. The education system in Lakshadweep for the past 70 years had the option of Arabic or Mahl as a third language. With regard to Minicoy Island, the Mahl language holds a distinct cultural identity. The court said it is open to the Union Territory conducting a study of the local conditions in the context of the prevailing education policies and to engage with all the stakeholders through a meaningful process of consultation. The Lakshadweep administration told the court that no study had been carried out before issuing the controversial order. The administration made reference to the National Education Policy 2020 issued by the Union Ministry of Human Resource Development, the National Curriculum Framework for the Foundational Stage 2022, and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education 2023.
