
ACA insurers propose biggest premium hikes since 2018 as Trump policies take hold
Insurers are asking for a typical rate increase of 15% with more than a quarter proposing hikes of 20% or more. KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group, looked at 105 Obamacare insurers in 19 states and the District of Columbia that have filed rates so far.
Steep rate increases in 2018 were also fueled by Trump administration policies, which were focused on weakening the ACA during the president's first term after Republicans in Congress failed to repeal it in 2017.
While rising health care costs account for about half of the coming year's proposed increases, two other forces under the control of President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans are also driving up rates, KFF found.
The expiration of the enhanced ACA premium subsidies at the end of this year is prompting many insurers to hike rates by an additional 4%, on average. Insurers are concerned that the disappearance of this beefed-up assistance will prompt many, largely healthier consumers to drop their coverage — leaving sicker, costlier policyholders on the exchanges.
Initially created by the Democrats' American Rescue Plan Act in 2021, the enhanced premium subsidies enable lower-income enrollees to sign up for coverage with very low or no monthly premiums. Also, middle-income Americans can qualify for assistance for the first time. The Biden administration repeatedly said the more generous subsidies allow the majority of enrollees to select plans that cost less than $10 a month.
The enhanced subsidies helped drive Obamacare signups to a record 24 million people for 2025. Most enrollees qualify for subsidies, which greatly lower their monthly premium payments. But once the beefed-up assistance lapses, those payments are expected to spike by 75%, on average, KFF said.
Trump and GOP lawmakers did not include an extension of the subsidies in their 'big, beautiful bill' and it remains to be seen whether they push for it in subsequent legislation. However, the clock is ticking since insurers are currently finalizing their rates, and the Obamacare federal and state exchanges need time to prepare for open enrollment, which starts on November 1.
Several states are highlighting the looming loss of the enhanced subsidies as driving up insurers' proposed rates on their exchanges.
In Maryland, for instance, carriers have requested an overall average premium change of 17.1%, the highest since 2019. If Congress extends the enhanced subsidies, the rate increases would be 7.9%, on average, according to the Maryland Insurance Administration, which is looking into creating a state-sponsored subsidy to offset some of the premium increases.
Also, some insurers are pointing to the tariffs that the Trump administration has promised to impose on pharmaceutical imports, KFF said. Those that cite tariffs say the levies will add 3% to their premium proposals.
The rate filings, however, do not mention specific impacts of the 'big, beautiful bill' because insurers generally had to submit their proposals prior to the bill being signed into law on July 4. Those that mention it point to the uncertainty it is causing, said Cynthia Cox, director of KFF's Program on the ACA.
'We're going to be watching over the next few weeks whether insurers come back and say, 'the big, beautiful bill passed, and here's how we think that might affect our premiums,'' she said.
The filings also don't take into account the provisions in a rule that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services finalized in late June that will make several changes to Obamacare, including shortening the open enrollment period, increasing verification requirements and limiting the ability of low-income Americans to sign up for coverage year-round. The measures are a 'mixed bag' for insurers in terms of how it might affect premiums, Cox said.
One major insurer has already announced its departure from the Affordable Care Act in 2026. Aetna said in May that it would stop selling plans on the individual market because 'it became clear we would not be able to provide the same level of value we've offered in prior years,' the company said on its website. The insurer also left the Obamacare exchanges in 2018 but later returned.
Insurers' 2026 rates are preliminary and are subject to change, particularly in states that run their own exchanges, where state regulators have more of a say in setting the final rates. The final rates should be published later this summer, and consumers will be able to view plan premiums shortly before open enrollment starts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump files libel lawsuit against Wall Street Journal over Jeffrey Epstein story
President Donald Trump has filed a libel lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch and others over the Thursday report about Trump's alleged birthday message sent to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. Trump has denied to the Wall Street Journal that he wrote the letter. ABC News has not been able to confirm the existence of the letter. Trump filed the suit in the Southern District of Florida. The Journal did not immediately comment. "I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper, the WSJ. That will be an interesting experience!!!" the president wrote on his social media platform Friday morning. Earlier Friday, Trump suggested there is no "smoking gun" in the Epstein files as he seeks to downplay a case that's long animated his MAGA supporters. "If there was a 'smoking gun' on Epstein, why didn't the Dems, who controlled the 'files' for four years, and had Garland and Comey in charge, use it? BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!" Trump wrote on his conservative social media platform. The post comes after Trump announced Thursday night that he was ordering Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of additional Epstein material. MORE: Bondi says she'll try to unseal Epstein grand jury records Trump said he asked Bondi to "produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval." Bondi, in response, said action could come in court as soon as Friday. But the release of any grand jury materials could take longer, subject to a legal process to consider impact on victims and ultimately approval of a federal judge. The move from Trump to order the attorney general to seek the release of additional grand jury material comes after a week of intense pressure from his MAGA supporters to do more on Epstein following a brief memo from the Justice Department and FBI stating no further disclosure "would be appropriate or warranted." The memo stated a review from the DOJ and FBI found no evidence that Epstein kept a so-called "client list" of associates or that he blackmailed any prominent individuals, and also confirmed the disgraced financier died by suicide in prison while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Bondi days ago had said the "memo speaks for itself." MORE: The times Trump's name appeared in the Epstein files the DOJ has already released Between then and now, Trump has tried to tamp down intrigue into Epstein that's been fueled by right-wing figures for years, including conspiracy theories of a "deep state" protecting the country's elites. He has called the Epstein files a "Democratic hoax" against him and those Republican supporters who are questioning his administration's handling of them as "stupid" and "foolish." But his administration has shut down the idea of appointing a special prosecutor in the Epstein case. "The idea was floated from someone in the media to the president. The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case. That's how he feels," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at Thursday's briefing. Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, penned three separate letters to Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino to raise questions about discrepancies concerning the Epstein files and about the July 7 memo from the administration concerning Epstein. Durbin wrote that his office received information that Bondi "pressured the FBI" to enlist 1,000 personnel, along with New York field office personnel, to review approximately 100,000 Epstein related records and to "flag" any records in which Trump was mentioned. He asked Bondi to respond to a number of questions concerning her personal review of the Epstein documents. ABC News' Allison Pecorin contributed to this report.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Transgender woman sues Princeton for 'humiliating' removal from track meet
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — A transgender woman has sued Princeton University claiming she was illegally removed shortly before her race in a school-hosted track meet in May due to her gender identity. An attorney for Sadie Schreiner filed the complaint in New Jersey Superior Court on Tuesday, listing the school along with athletic director John Mack and director of track operations Kimberly Keenan-Kirkpatrick as defendants. The lawsuit also lists New York-based Leone Timing and Results Services as a defendant in its role of handling official timing for organized track and field events. The lawsuit comes more than five months after the NCAA changed its participation policy for transgender athletes to limit competition in women's sports to athletes assigned female at birth. That change came a day after President Donald Trump signed an executive order intended to ban transgender athletes from girls' and women's sports. Schreiner, who had transitioned during high school, had previously run for Division III Rochester Institute of Technology but was set to compete as an athlete unattached to any school or club in the Larry Ellis Invitational. The complaint seeks unspecified damages for a 'humiliating, dehumanizing and dignity-stripping ordeal' in front of family and friends. The complaint cites New Jersey anti-discrimination law barring discrimination for being transgender, with schools considered areas of 'public accommodation.' 'We stand by the allegations in the pleading,' Schreiner attorney Susie Cirilli told The Associated Press on Friday. 'As stated in the complaint, the defendants' individual actions were intolerable in a civilized community and go beyond the possible bounds of decency.' Princeton's media and athletics officials as well as Leone Timing did not return emails from the AP seeking comment. According to the complaint, Schreiner originally signed up to run the 100- and 200-meter races before later declaring only for the 200 despite registering and qualifying for both races. The complaint says she learned 15 minutes before her race that her name had been removed from the official list of competitors, then raised the issue with Leone Timing officials before being directed to Mack and Keenan-Kirkpatrick. During that exchange, the complaint states, Keenan-Kirkpatrick said, 'I do not want to assume, but you are transgender.' Additionally, Keenan-Kirkpatrick 'further suggested that she had tried to organize a separate segregated event just for Sadie so that she could run' while Schreiner provided a birth certificate and driver's license recognizing her as a female, according to the complaint. According to her Instagram page, Schreiner said she was 'barred' from running in a February track event at Boston University as an unattached athlete following the Trump order and NCAA policy change. The nationwide battle over transgender girls on girls' and women's sports teams has played out at both the state and federal levels as Republicans have leveraged the issue as a fight for athletic fairness. More than two dozen states have enacted laws barring transgender women and girls from participating in certain sports competitions. Some policies have been blocked in court. ___ AP sports: The Associated Press
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump files lawsuit against Murdoch, WSJ and NewsCorp over Epstein birthday card expose
Donald Trump has filed a defamation lawsuit against right-wing media mogul Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal's parent companies News Corp and Dow Jones following the newspaper's publication of the president's alleged birthday letter to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. A complaint to be filed in federal court in Miami was not immediately available. A case summary indicates the president is suing Murdoch as well as the two WSJ journalists whose bylines appeared on the story. Following the publication of the story on Thursday night, the president fired off several lawsuit threats against his once-former ally, whose massive News Corp media conglomerate owns WSJ as well as Fox News and The New York Post, among other titles. The newspaper published his alleged 50th birthday greeting to Epstein in 2003, which was described as including a sexually suggestive drawing and a reference to 'secrets' both men shared. 'I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social on Friday morning. 'That will be an interesting experience!!!' Donald Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch and news conglomerates News Corp and Dow Jones following The Wall Street Journal's publication of an alleged birthday card the president sent to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump also is suing the two journalists whose bylines appear on the report (Getty Images) The president has denied ever writing such a greeting to Epstein or even drawing 'pictures of women,' though the allegations arrive in the middle of his administration's attempts to dismiss the so-called Epstein files as a Democratic 'hoax' after his Department of Justice announced it found no evidence to support conspiracy theories about the sex trafficking case. The Justice Department's attempt to draw the investigation to a close has renewed scrutiny into the president's relationship with Epstein, who was accused of sexually abusing dozens of minors before he was found dead in his jail cell in 2019. 'The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Thursday night. 'These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures. I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper.' Roughly one hour earlier, in a lengthier post, Trump said he 'personally' warned Murdoch against publishing the story, 'and, if they print it, they will be sued.' 'Mr Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so,' Trump said. This is a developing story