‘No Rafale shot down in combat, India lost one to technical malfunction, probe on': Dassault CEO
The report appeared in a French website Avion De Chasse saying the incident occurred 'at an altitude of over 12,000 metres during an extended training mission, with no enemy involvement or hostile radar contact'.
New Delhi: India has lost one Rafale fighter jet, but the incident, currently under probe, was due to a high-altitude technical failure and involved no enemy engagement, says a French report quoting Dassault Aviation Chairman and CEO Éric Trappier.
Last month, India's Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan, speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore had acknowledged that the IAF did suffer losses during Op Sindoor. However, he categorically denied Pakistan's claim of downing six Indian jets, including Rafales, calling the assertion 'absolutely incorrect'. In a separate interview with Reuters the same day, General Chauhan had further added, 'We rectified tactics and then went back on 7th, 8th and 10th—on the 10th in large numbers—to hit airbases deep inside Pakistan. (We) penetrated all their air defences with impunity and carried out precision strikes.'
Separately, India's Defence Attaché to Indonesia, Navy Captain Shiv Kumar, also acknowledged 'some' losses during Operation Sindoor. Speaking at a seminar in Indonesia, he was responding to a previous speaker who had cited Pakistan's claim that multiple Indian fighters, including three Rafales, were shot down. 'I may not agree with him that India lost so many aircraft. But I do agree that we did lose some aircraft, and that happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishments and their air defences,' Capt. Kumar said, referring to directives that restricted Indian military to targeting only terror camps.
Dassault Aviation Chairman and CEO Éric Trappier had earlier rejected Pakistan's claim of shooting down three Rafale jets during Operation Sindoor, calling the allegations 'inaccurate and unfounded'.
Refuting Pakistan's claims of downing six fighter aircraft, he had said then that, 'the Indians haven't communicated, so we don't know exactly what happened. What we already know is that what the Pakistanis are saying, three Rafales destroyed is inaccurate.'
In the French report published 25 June, Trappier, ahead of the Paris Air Show, had spoken from a technical angle to 'firmly reject any suggestion of operational failure.'
He, according to the report, said that the Rafale's SPECTRA electronic warfare suite had detected no signs of hostile engagement at the time. Adding that, data from friend-or-foe systems and flight logs shared with Dassault supported the conclusion that there were no combat-related losses.
Trappier had further framed the Pakistani claims as part of a broader disinformation strategy aimed at undermining the credibility of the Rafale fighter, especially as it competes in several ongoing international tenders, including in Colombia, Serbia and Malaysia. He noted that Dassault has never concealed operational losses, citing detailed public reporting from French military campaigns in the Sahel.
French intelligence officials further suspect that China played a key role in fueling skepticism around the Rafale's combat performance following Operation Sindoor. According to findings reported by the Associated Press on Sunday, classified intelligence assessments suggest that Chinese defence attachés actively lobbied foreign governments, especially Indonesia, urging them to reconsider additional Rafale purchases and instead opt for Chinese-made fighter aircraft. French military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, believe this effort was part of a broader strategy to undermine Rafale's export prospects.
(Edited by Viny Mishra)
Also read: Pakistan's claim on 3 Rafales shot down 'inaccurate', better than F-35 & Chinese fighters—Dassault CEO
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Baba Vanga's 2025-26 economic crisis warning - Is Donald Trump's trade war making it real?
Baba Vanga prediction 2025: Baba Vanga, the famous Bulgarian mystic, is believed to have accurately predicted some of the world's biggest events, including the 9/11 World Trade Centre attacks and the tragic death of Princess Diana. Among her many forecasts, she also warned of a major economic crisis between 2025 and 2026. Considering the recent trade moves by US President Donald Trump, many now believe this prediction could be on its way to becoming a reality. Trump has recently signed trade agreements with several countries, but at the same time, he has introduced average tariffs of around 20%. For Brazil and India, the tariff rate has been set as high as 50%, shaking global markets and creating uncertainty. Trump's Tough Stance on India Trump, who has often called himself a 'friend' of India, has now taken a strict approach. Not only has he imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, but he has also warned of penalties if India continues to buy oil from Russia. Experts say this move could hit India's energy supply and disrupt its import-export balance, leading to economic pressure. Targeting BRICS Nations The BRICS group – which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – has also been a target of Trump's sharp comments. He has repeatedly questioned the trade and economic policies of these countries, sparking further tension in the global trade environment. Analysts believe such aggressive remarks and actions could make international trade relations even more fragile. Global Markets React with Volatility Following these announcements, global stock markets have seen sharp fluctuations. Investors are becoming more cautious, and many national currencies are under pressure. Market experts warn that if this tariff conflict drags on, it could push the world towards the kind of economic crisis Baba Vanga warned about for 2026. Will Baba Vanga's 2026 Crisis Prediction Come True? Over the years, Baba Vanga's predictions have sparked debate, fascination, and fear. While not all her forecasts have been proven, the unfolding trade tensions have made many wonder if her warning about a massive financial downturn could soon become a reality. The coming months will show whether the world is heading towards one of the most challenging economic periods in recent history. To stay updated on the stories that are going viral, follow Indiatimes Trending.
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
The crude oil market bets Trump's India threats are hollow
The crude oil market 's rather sanguine reaction to the U.S. threats to India over its continued purchases of Russian oil is effectively a bet that very little will actually happen. President Donald Trump cited India's imports of Russian crude when imposing an additional 25per cent tariff on imports from India on August 6, which is due to take effect on August 28. If the new tariff rate does come into place, it will take the rate for some Indian goods to as much as 50per cent, a level high enough to effectively end U.S. imports from India, which totalled nearly $87 billion in 2024. As with everything related to Trump, it pays to be cautious given his track record of backflips and pivots. It's also not exactly clear what Trump is ultimately seeking, although it does seem that in the short term he wants to increase his leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their planned meeting in Alaska this week, and he's using India to achieve this. Whether Trump follows through on his additional tariffs on India remains uncertain, although the chances of a peace deal in Ukraine seem remote, which means the best path for India to avoid the tariffs would be to acquiesce and stop buying Russian oil. But this is an outcome that simply isn't being reflected in current crude oil prices. Global benchmark Brent futures have weakened since Trump's announcement of higher tariffs on India, dropping as low as $65.81 a barrel in early Asian trade on Monday, the lowest level in two months. This is a price that entirely discounts any threat to global supplies, and assumes that India will either continue buying Russian crude at current volumes, or be able to easily source suitable replacements without tightening the global market. Are these reasonable assumptions? The track record of the crude oil market is somewhat remarkable in that it quickly adapts to new geopolitical realities and any price spikes tend to be shortlived. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent crude prices hurtling toward $150 a barrel as European and other Western countries pulled back from buying Russian crude. But within four months the price was back below where it was before Moscow's attack on its neighbour as the market simply re-routed the now discounted Russian oil to China and India. In other words, the flow of oil around the globe was shifted, but the volumes available for importers remained much the same. Different this time? But what Trump is proposing now is somewhat different. It appears he wants to cut Russian barrels out of the market in order to put financial pressure on Moscow to cut a deal over Ukraine. There are effectively only two major buyers for Russian crude, India and China. China, the world's biggest crude importer, has more leverage with Trump given U.S. and Western reliance on its refined critical and other minerals, and therefore is less able to be coerced into ending its imports of Russian oil. India is in a less strong position, especially private refiners like Reliance Industries , which will want to keep business relationships and access to Western economies. India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, or about 37per cent of its total, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler . About 90per cent of its Russian imports came from Russia's European ports and was mainly Urals grade. This is a medium sour crude and it would raise challenges for Indian refiners if they sought to replace all their Urals imports with similar grades from other suppliers. There are some Middle Eastern grades of similar quality, such as Saudi Arabia's Arab Light and Iraq's Basrah Light, but it would likely boost prices if India were to seek more of these crudes. If Chinese refiners were able to take the bulk of Russian crude given up by India, it may allow for a re-shuffling of flows, but that would not appear to be what Trump wants. Trump and his advisers may believe there is enough spare crude production capacity in the United States and elsewhere to handle the loss of up to 2 million bpd of Russian supplies. But testing that theory may well lead to higher prices, especially for certain types of medium crudes which would be in short supply. It's simplistic to say that higher U.S. output can supply India's refiners, as this would mean those refiners would have to be willing to accept a different mix of refined products, including producing less diesel, as U.S. light crudes tend to make more products such as gasoline. For now the crude oil market is assuming that the Trump/India/Russia situation will end as another TACO, the acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. But the reality is likely to be slightly more messy, as some Indian refiners pull back from importing from Russia, some Chinese refiners may buy more and once again the oil market goes on a geopolitical merry-go-round.
India.com
9 minutes ago
- India.com
Modi's govt's masterstroke to shock China! prepares Rs 60000000000 plan for rare earth magnet, no more dependency on…
India-China China has recently stopped the supply of rare earth magnets and has created a crisis for Indian industries. The government has already started taking multiple measures to address the situation of acquiring rare earth assets abroad. As part of this effort, the government is set to introduce changes to mining laws this week. After these changes it will become easier for the companies to raise funds for acquiring critical mineral assets overseas. What's Govt's Plan To Obtain Rare Earth Magnets? A senior official told The Economic Times that the proposal has already been approved within the government. The amendment bill to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act may be tabled in Parliament as early as Monday. The government plans to use funds from the National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) for purchasing these assets abroad. The trust currently holds over Rs 6,000 crore, collected from mining leaseholders who contribute 2% of their royalty payments to it. According to the proposal, the trust's name will be modified to include the word 'Development,' and expand its role in the exploration, acquisition, and development of critical mineral resources overseas. The goal is to improve the supply of essential minerals. The last amendment to this law was made in 2023. This revision will address the shortage of raw materials for critical minerals and also help to fund new acquisitions. The government is also planning to allow the one-time sale of mineral waste generated from captive mines. How Will It Help Industries? The amendments will allow states to permit the sale like waste from leased areas for an additional fee. Other proposals are to simplify the rules like if a new mineral is discovered, it can be added to an existing mining lease upon payment of a fee. Similarly, if a leaseholder has rights to deep-seated mineral resources, they may apply to include adjoining areas in their lease. This option can be used only once, and the lease area cannot be expanded by more than 10%.
