‘Confident he would pass' — Biden's staff still avoided his cognitive test in Feb 2024 over backlash fears: New book
Former US President Joe Biden's top staff privately discussed the idea of having him take a cognitive test early in 2024, amid growing concerns about his age and mental sharpness, according to a forthcoming book by three political journalists.
The book, 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America, is co-authored by a New York Times journalist and details behind-the-scenes discussions within the Biden camp.
'Biden's aides were confident that he would pass a cognitive test,' the book says, according to the New York Times. 'But they worried that the mere fact of his taking one would raise new questions about his mental abilities.'
The debate over the cognitive exam reportedly occurred in February 2024, while Biden was actively campaigning for a second term. Ultimately, the White House opted not to go forward with the test.
The decision would later come under renewed scrutiny after Biden's disastrous June 2024 debate against Donald Trump, which raised alarms even among loyal Democrats.
Biden's performance in the first debate stunned the political world, triggering calls from within his party for him to reconsider his campaign.
'I never saw that person — not a single time — that was on that debate stage,' former Press Secretary Jen Psaki said in a recent interview, distancing herself from the fallout. Psaki left the White House in 2022.
Under intense pressure following the debate, Biden ultimately suspended his campaign and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to take his place on the ticket. Harris went on to become the Democratic nominee — but lost to Trump in the general election.
The book suggests that early anxieties about Biden's age and fitness were known internally long before they exploded into public view.
The book adds to the growing number of post-election analyses that argue the Democrats' failure to confront Biden's vulnerabilities earlier cost them the White House. Biden's late-stage decision to run — and his eventual withdrawal — may have reshaped how his presidency will be remembered.
First Published: 5 May 2025, 03:03 AM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
42 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Mexican flag fuels debate amid LA protests over immigration raids
Los Angeles has been roiled in protests since Friday, when ICE officers conducted raids at several workplaces in the city's garment district ANI US Mexico's green, white and red flag has emerged as a defining symbol of the ongoing immigration protests in Los Angeles, CNN reported. Demonstrators have been waving the Mexican flag alongside those of other Latin American countries and the United States to express solidarity with immigrants and to protest against recent federal raids. Los Angeles has been roiled in protests since Friday, when ICE officers conducted raids at several workplaces in the city's garment district. While initially peaceful, the protests have led to dozens of arrests and some violent clashes. President Donald Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops and Marines, sparking outrage from Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who described the mobilization as an "illegal takeover" and a "blatant abuse of power." The Mexican flag has been a longstanding symbol in immigration protests, especially in LA, which is seen as the capital of the Mexican diaspora in the US. According to Census data, over 3.4 million people of Mexican heritage or birth live in Los Angeles County--more than any other US county. Republican leaders have criticized the prominence of the flag. "Insurrectionists carrying foreign flags are attacking immigration enforcement officers," Vice President JD Vance wrote on X. Senator Markwayne Mullin told CNN's Dana Bash, "They were literally out there protesting, carrying a foreign flag. That is absolutely insane. They're not just peaceful protesters. These are illegals." The Department of Homeland Security has circulated images showing protesters clashing with police while waving the Mexican flag. Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff for policy, described the demonstrators on social media as "foreign nationals, waving foreign flags, rioting and obstructing federal law enforcement attempting to expel illegal foreign invaders." Despite criticism, protesters and academics defended the symbolic use of the flag. Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda, a UCLA professor, said such demonization of symbols is a "well-documented move on the part of the Trump administration, knowing that every single demonstration of this type brings out the Mexican flag." Former Congressman Adam Kinzinger told CNN the optics were poor: "The visuals of the Mexican flag at protests are terrible, honestly... I just think that it would be much stronger if they were carrying American flags only." The flag's presence in protests has deep roots. Jorge Castaneda, former Mexican foreign minister, said, "This is something that goes back to the 1990s, when many people protested against Proposition 187," adding that most demonstrators today are likely American citizens. He noted it would be "quite reckless and foolish" for undocumented individuals to protest publicly due to deportation risks. Republican strategist Mike Madrid argued in the Sacramento Bee that waving the Mexican flag "transforms what should be a debate about American constitutional rights and due process into a conversation about foreign loyalty and cultural assimilation." However, others see the flag as a symbol of unity and identity. "The flags mean their families. The flags mean their communities. It's not about having an international invasion," Hinojosa-Ojeda said. Antonio Rodriguez, an organizer with the Brown Berets, said, "I don't necessarily think just because somebody has pride in their culture that they're un-American... Waving a Mexican flag, for us, is showing pride in our culture and our family. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's AI czar downplays risk AI chip exports could be smuggled
White House AI czar David Sacks on Tuesday downplayed the risk that coveted American AI chips could be smuggled to bad actors, and expressed concern that regulating U.S. AI too tightly could stifle growth and cede the critical market to China. "We talk about these chips like they could be smuggled in the back of a briefcase. That's not what they look like. These are server racks that are eight feet tall and weigh two tons," Sacks said at the AWS summit in Washington. "They don't walk out doors. It's very easy to basically verify that they're where they're supposed to be," he said. The comments indicated President Donald Trump 's approach to AI could be centered on expanding markets abroad for U.S. AI chips and models. Former President Joe Biden had emphasized policies that countered risks the chips could be diverted to China and used to bolster Beijing's military. "I do worry we're on a trajectory where fear could overtake opportunity and we end up sort of crippling this wonderful progress that we're seeing," Sacks said, citing a raft of bills in state legislatures seeking to regulate AI, as well as permitting challenges facing companies seeking to build the data centers that power AI. Trump rescinded Biden's executive order aimed at promoting competition, protecting consumers and ensuring AI was not used for misinformation. He also rescinded Biden's so-called AI diffusion rule, which capped the amount of American AI computing capacity that some countries were allowed to obtain via US AI chip imports. "We rescinded that Biden diffusion rule, diffusion a bad word. Diffusion of our technology should be a good word," Sacks said. The Trump administration and the United Arab Emirates also announced a plan last month for the Gulf country to build the largest artificial intelligence campus outside the U.S. after Biden in 2023 put in place rules that curbed most AI chip shipments to the region. Taking aim at that regulation, Sacks said, "What play are we giving them? We're basically going to push them into the arms of China." He added that if, in five years, AI chips made by sanctioned Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei were everywhere, "that means we can't let that happen." The need to remove hurdles to U.S. AI innovation is urgent as China has made important advances in its AI models, Sacks said. This year, the Chinese AI app DeepSeek shocked the world with its sophisticated, affordably trained model. "China is not years and years behind us in AI. Maybe they're three to six months," said Sacks. "It's a very close race." The White House later said he was referring to China's AI models, adding that Chinese AI chips are one to two years behind their U.S. counterparts.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
'Went Too Far': Elon Musk Regrets His Social Media Posts Against Donald Trump
Last Updated: Elon Musk admitted he "went too far" with his recent social media posts targeting US President Donald Trump. Posting on X, Musk expressed regret over his remarks made last week. Elon Musk on Wednesday expressed regret over some of his social media posts against US President Donald Trump last week, and said his posts 'went too far". 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote on X. Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the President's sweeping tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination". On Saturday, Trump said his relationship with Musk was over and that there would be 'serious consequences" if the world's richest man decided to fund US Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the tax and spending bill. Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. About the Author
