Uddhav already politically dead, declares Shinde
Mumbai: At
Shiv Sena
's foundation day celebration in Worli on Thursday, deputy chief minister
Eknath Shinde
criticised his former leader and current rival,
Uddhav Thackeray
, for alleged corruption within the BMC and for deviating from the late
Bal Thackeray
's ideology in his pursuit of the chief minister's chair.
Responding to Thackeray's "Come on, kill me" political challenge, Shinde took a dig at him as he said he might have watched English films during his foreign vacations. "Why kill someone who is already politically dead?" he said.
Shinde affirmed his adherence to the ideology, declaring, "Hindutva is our soul, and Marathi is our breath."
"They betrayed Balasaheb's ideology and Shiv Sainiks for the CM's chair. Is this how you become Balasaheb's heir?" Shinde said on the Shiv Sena (UBT) chief.
Shinde lauded his MP son, Shrikant Shinde, for leading a delegation of members of Parliament abroad and expressed gratitude towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the opportunity. Shinde's mention of his son during the Worli function indicated that Shrikant may play a pivotal role in the upcoming
BMC election
.
Shinde appealed to supporters to prepare for the elections and ensure that the party flag is displayed at the BMC headquarters, promising to reinstate the Marathi manoos who was displaced to neighbouring districts despite Shiv Sena's two-decade rule over the BMC.
The Shiv Sena split into two in 2022. One faction was led by Eknath Shinde and was able to retain the name, while the other was led by Thackeray and had to settle for the name Shiv Sena (UBT). Both claim to be the real Shiv Sena founded by Bal Thackeray.
Shinde asserted that Hindutva and Marathi pride are always with them but Shiv Sena (UBT) recognised it only during elections. Shinde asked Thackeray: "What have you done for Marathi manoos after Balasaheb? Mumbai's Marathi population was pushed to the outskirts during your rule in BMC.
You held the chair for over 20 years and still failed to protect them."
Shinde criticised Shiv Sena (UBT) for comparing the RSS with anti-national forces and accused Thackeray of jailing individuals for chanting the Hanuman Chalisa, after stating that it reflects his Hindutva.
Drawing an analogy to farmers awaiting rain for their harvest's well-being, Shinde criticised the Shiv Sena (UBT) for "chasing money" through alleged involvement in the khichdi scam during Covid, the body bag scam, the garbage scam, and the Mithi river desilting scam. "How much money will you need?" he asked.
He also referenced the ongoing investigation into the Mithi desilting scam, mentioning Dino Morea, a close associate of Shiv Sena (UBT) politician Aaditya Thackeray. Shinde suggested that Dino Morea's inquiry could expose the truth.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
China flexes chokehold on rare-earth magnets as exports plunge in May
China's exports of rare-earth magnets plummeted after it imposed controls on their overseas sale, emphasizing Beijing's dominance of a critical input into electric vehicles and jet fighters that has taken center stage in tensions with the U.S. Total export volumes of rare-earth magnets from China fell 74% in May from a year earlier, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of Chinese customs data. That was the biggest percentage decline on record dating back to at least 2012. Exports had fallen 45% in April in year-over-year terms. The 1.2 million kilograms of rare-earth magnets exported in May marked the lowest level since February 2020, during the Covid pandemic. Exports of rare-earth magnets to the U.S. slowed to a trickle, declining 93% in May from a year earlier to roughly 46,000 kilograms. That followed a 59% year-over-year drop in April. The figures released Friday are the first to show the extent to which Beijing's curb on rare-earth magnets further choked off supplies to the world in May, which drew the ire of the Trump administration and brought the two countries back to the negotiation table earlier this month. Beijing on April 4 began requiring licenses for exports of certain rare-earth metals and related products. That included some magnets made with rare-earth metals such as dysprosium and terbium that are essential to making a range of goods. The controls restrict exports to all countries, not just the U.S., but came during one of the most heated periods of the U.S.-China trade conflict, with the two superpowers trading tit-for-tat tariff increases. China's move to restrict rare-earth magnets was felt acutely through the global automotive, electronics and defense industries. China has a near-monopoly on rare earths production. It mines around two-thirds of global rare-earth minerals and processes about 90% of the world's supply. A trade truce between the U.S. and China in Geneva in mid-May in which both sides agreed to reduce tariffs for 90 days was expected to ease the flow of these magnets. But rare-earth exports remained constrained, and U.S. automakers warned they could face production stoppages as a result. The U.S. accused Beijing of slow-walking license approvals. China blamed the Trump administration for breaking the Geneva agreement. That brought trade representatives from the U.S. and China to London this month to get the trade truce back on track. The two countries created a framework to restore the agreement reached in Geneva, subject to final approval from President Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. The framework is expected to ease curbs on rare-earth exports from China, in exchange for the U.S. relaxing some restrictions on certain exports to China. The deal appears to allow China to keep the export-control system for rare earths in place, which would allow Beijing to curb supplies again in the future. Licenses for U.S. manufacturers to import rare earths from China would have a six-month limit, people familiar with the deal said. A spokesperson for China's Commerce Ministry said Thursday that China has been accelerating its review of rare-earth export license applications and has approved a certain number of compliant applications, without giving specific numbers. JL Mag Rare-Earth, a Chinese supplier of rare earth magnets for Tesla, Bosch, General Motors and others, said in a June 13 analysts call that it has gradually started to obtain export licenses for destinations including the U.S., Europe and Southeast Asia. The company, based in the southeastern province of Jiangxi, has benefited from government grants over the years. Last year, government grants accounted for as much as 45% of JL Mag's net profit, according to its latest annual report. On Thursday, Beijing Zhong Ke San Huan High-Tech, another magnet manufacturer, also announced that it received export licenses for some of its orders. Both JL Mag and Zhong Ke have increased their reliance on overseas buyers in recent years as margins at home dwindle. In 2024, JL Mag and Zhong Ke's overseas sales accounted for roughly 18% and 60%, respectively, of company revenue. Direct exports to the U.S. accounted for less than 10% of revenue at each of the two companies. Chinese customs data released earlier this month showed China's overall export growth slowed last month, with shipments to the U.S. sinking 35% from a year earlier in dollar-denominated terms, the biggest such decline in percentage terms since February 2020. Write to Hannah Miao at and Rebecca Feng at
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Decode Politics: Why ‘Hindi imposition' row is back again in Maharashtra
A Maharashtra government order issued earlier this week has brought back the 'Hindi imposition' conversation in the state. In April, following a barrage of criticism, the Maharashtra government withdrew its decision to make Hindi the mandatory third language for Classes 1 to 5 in Marathi and Hindi-medium schools under the state board. In the new Government Resolution (GR) issued on Tuesday, the state government removed the word 'mandatory', but because of restrictive conditions on alternatives to Hindi as a third language, many are claiming this is a 'new push' for Hindi. However, the state government still insists Hindi is just an 'optional' language. The new GR is a revision of the earlier order that said three languages would be taught from Class 1 in Marathi and English-medium state board schools, with Hindi as the mandatory third language. The established practice for these schools in Maharashtra has been to introduce a third language to students in secondary school or after Class 5. The order was withdrawn after criticism from political parties and education experts, and an assurance was given that a new resolution would be issued to clarify that Hindi would just be an 'option' as a third language. The latest GR states, 'Hindi will generally be the third language for classes 1 to 5.' If students wish to 'study any other Indian language instead of Hindi as their third language', they will be permitted to do so if a 'minimum of 20 students from the same class in the same school' express 'interest in learning that particular language'. If not, the GR says, 'language will be taught through online methods'. The inclusion of the word 'generally' has sparked fresh criticism. The revised order, according to the critics, fails to provide any options or alternatives to Hindi apart from stating that it has to be an Indian language. They say that there are multiple Indian languages and the state has to clarify what can be taught and define the curriculum. Educationist Kishore Darak also identified the need for a structured curriculum for third languages. 'Teaching pedagogies for languages are different. The assumption is that those who can teach Marathi can teach Hindi … The script of the two languages is similar but that does not mean no extra effort by children or teachers in terms of learning,' he said. Teachers have also questioned how the government plans to make arrangements for students when they want to study an alternative language. Some have even raised objections about the need for 20 students per class as a prerequisite to studying another language. Senior educationist Vasant Kalpande said that 'over 80% government-run schools' in Maharashtra would not be able to meet the criteria, thereby automatically making Hindi the default third language. 'A lot of government-run schools have a total enrollment of less than 20 students in a class. Hindi will then become, by default, the third language. And with no curriculum, no textbooks and no teachers (for other languages), no government-run school will be able to provide an option to Hindi,' Kalpande said. Girish Samant, the chairman of the Shikshan Mandal Goregaon, which runs a popular Marathi medium school in suburban Mumbai, flagged issues with the direction on online teaching. 'This is very unclear as the government is asking schools to seek online platforms to teach languages alternative to Hindi without providing a curriculum, textbooks or any other support. The main problem stands… The government does not justify how language can be taught online to Class 1 students.' After the revised GR sparked a heated debate, state school education minister Dada Bhuse issued a clarification on Wednesday evening. 'Marathi will be a compulsory subject in all schools, regardless of the medium of instruction. Strict action will be taken against schools that do not teach Marathi,' Bhuse said, doubling down on the importance given to Marathi. An official from the school education department said detailed guidelines would be issued soon on alternatives to Hindi. After the original order was issued in April, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) president Raj Thackeray took the most aggressive stand on the issue, joined by his cousin and Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray. The state Congress, too, joined the regional parties to staunchly oppose the alleged imposition of Hindi in state schools. The MNS, whose core plank is built around Marathi identity politics, has again strongly criticised the new GR and warned that such a move threatens the cultural and linguistic identity of the state. 'Why is Hindi being forced only in Maharashtra? Are you going to teach Marathi as the third language in Bihar or elsewhere in the country?' Raj Thackeray asked at a press conference on Wednesday. The MNS chief has also written to school principals, advising them against implementing the order. The Congress targeted the government, saying the latter 'was merely playing with words'. 'This is a part of the RSS's strategy of imposing Hindi on all regions and destroying the regional culture,' alleged Maharashtra Congress chief Harshvardhan Sapkal. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said the three-language formula is as per the recommendations of the New Education Policy (NEP). 'We are backing English but hating Indian languages. This is not appropriate. Indian languages are better than English… Earlier, we had said that the third language should be Hindi. Now we have removed the 'mandatory' clause. Students can learn any other third language, but there should be 20 students in a class. We will provide teachers. We will also provide online teaching,' Fadnavis said.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Maharashtra govt reconstitutes committee to resolve border dispute with Karnataka
The Maharashtra government has reconstituted the high-powered committee to resolve the State's border dispute with neighbouring Karnataka. According to a government resolution (GR) issued on Thursday (June 19, 2025), the committee, headed by Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, was reconstituted because crucial decisions regarding the border dispute need to be taken with consensus by a non-partisan and representative body. From time to time, the committee has been reconstituted as new governments took office. A similar exercise had been carried out on November 22, 2022, months after the then Mahayuti alliance took charge with Eknath Shinde as the Chief Minister. The committee has now been reconstituted following the formation of the new government, with Mr. Fadnavis as the CM, after last year's assembly polls. Mr. Fadnavis heads the 18-member committee, which also includes his deputies Mr. Shinde and Ajit Pawar and former CMs Narayan Rane, Sharad Pawar and Prithviraj Chavan. NCP (SP) MLAs Rohit Patil and Jayant Patil, Ministers Chandrakant Patil, Shambhuraj Desai, Prakash Abitkar, Suresh Khade, BJP legislators Sudhir Gadgil, Sachin Kalyan Shetty, leaders of opposition in the legislative assembly and council are among the other members of the committee. The Maharashtra assembly currently does not have a leader of opposition. Shiv Sena (UBT) and Congress legislators do not figure in the high-powered committee. The border issue dates back to 1957 after the reorganisation of states on linguistic lines. Maharashtra sought to include Belagavi, which was part of the erstwhile Bombay Presidency, as it has a sizeable Marathi-speaking population. It also laid claim to over 800 Marathi-speaking villages that are currently in Karnataka. Karnataka maintains the demarcation done on linguistic lines as per the States Reorganisation Act and the 1967 Mahajan Commission Report as final.
