Argentina's Congress Launches Probe Into LIBRA Fiasco
In a special session called by the 'Democracy Forever' bloc, deputies passed three resolutions: the formation of an investigative commission, the summons of top government officials, and a formal request for information from the executive branch.
Among those summoned are Chief of Cabinet Guillermo Francos, Economy Minister Luis Caputo, Justice Minister Mariano Cúneo Libarona and the head of the National Securities Commission, Roberto Silva, according to the official release from the Chamber of Deputies in Argentina. The resolutions passed with a comfortable majority but faced strong opposition, revealing a split across party lines.
'The time has come for Congress to audit whether there is any harm to Argentina: we have a commitment to the truth,' said Deputy Pablo Juliano, one of the initiative's backers. Others, like Deputy Nicolás Mayoraz of the ruling La Libertad Avanza (LLA), pushed back, accusing lawmakers of assuming 'powers that belong solely to the Judiciary' and politicizing the issue.
From the Civic Coalition, Deputy Maximiliano Ferraro said that society 'has the right to know the truth' and that Congress' duty was to 'demand and investigate it.' Ruling party bloc leader Gabriel Bornoroni, at the close of the debate, suggested opposition lawmakers were 'putting on a show.'
'I think it bothers them that we had a fiscal surplus throughout 2024 and that we'll have one this year too — and that inflation continues to fall every month,' Bornoroni said. The LIBRA memecoin fiasco, research shows, destroyed over $250 million in investor wealth.
The token's price surged shortly after being launched in early February after Milei promoted the project on X, saying it would 'focus on encouraging the growth of the Argentine economy, funding small businesses, and Argentine ventures."
Milei's promotion saw various crypto addresses move in, allowing insiders to offload massive amounts of tokens on these investors to the point the token's market capitalization then endured a 90% drop.
Disclaimer: Information gathered for this article was translated with the use of artificial intelligence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
4 minutes ago
- CNBC
Student loan forgiveness remains unavailable under popular repayment plan
The Trump administration paused student loan forgiveness on a popular plan earlier this summer. It has not yet resumed the debt cancellation, and this week, lawmakers urged it to do so. The U.S. Department of Education said earlier this summer that it was pausing the loan discharge component on the Income Based Repayment, or IBR, plan. That freeze remains in place. It's a setback to families who have been expecting — and are legally entitled to — the aid, lawmakers, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., wrote to Education Secretary Linda McMahon on Monday. "At a time when Americans across the country are struggling to meet the costs of health care, food, housing, child care and other basic needs, it is unacceptable for the Trump administration to take any action that delays or denies legally mandated debt relief," the lawmakers wrote. More from Personal Finance:Trump floats tariff 'rebate' for consumersStudent loan forgiveness may soon be taxed againStudent loan borrowers — how will the end of the SAVE plan impact you? Tell us There are currently 1.97 million federal student loan borrowers enrolled in IBR, according to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. Here's what borrowers should know about the plan's paused loan cancellation. IBR is one of the Education Department's income-driven repayment plans, also called IDRs. Congress created the first IDR plans in the 1990s with the goal of making student loan borrowers' bills more affordable. Historically, the plans cap people's monthly payments at a share of their discretionary income and cancel any remaining debt after a certain period, typically 20 years or 25 years. IBR will be one of only a few manageable repayment options left to millions of borrowers, after recent court actions and the passage by Congress of President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill." That legislation phases out several income-driven repayment plans. Under the terms of IBR, borrowers pay 10% of their discretionary income each month — and that share rises to 15% for certain borrowers with older loans. Debt forgiveness is supposed to come after 20 years or 25 years, depending on when you took out your loans. (Older loans are subject to the longer timeline.) The U.S. Department of Education told CNBC it paused loan forgiveness under IBR while it responds to recent court actions involving the Biden administration-era SAVE, or Saving on a Valuable Education, plan. The department said that the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in February, which blocked the SAVE plan, had other impacts on student loan repayment. For example, under the rule involving SAVE, certain periods during which borrowers postponed their payments would count toward their forgiveness timeline. With SAVE blocked, borrowers no longer get credit during those forbearances. Ellen Keast, deputy press secretary at the Education Department, said in a late July statement that IBR discharges would resume "as soon as the Department is able to establish the correct payment count." The Department did not immediately respond to questions about why the pause continues. "The federal government does not move very quickly, but I would have expected some progress by now," said Kantrowitz. The hold on IBR discharges shouldn't impact student loan borrowers who are still years away from debt forgiveness, experts said. In fact, since IBR became available only in 2009, the soonest many borrowers could qualify for forgiveness would be 2034, Kantrowitz said. The current delay in debt erasure would most likely impact borrowers who'd previously been enrolled in another IDR plan — Income-Contingent Repayment, or ICR — and later switched to IBR. If you're pursuing debt forgiveness under IBR, your payments made under the plan (or another income-driven repayment plan) will still be bringing you closer to debt cancellation, as long as you are enrolled in IBR when you become entitled to that relief. If you expected your debt to be forgiven shortly, you should continue making payments, Kantrowitz said. You don't want to be flagged as late, and any overpayments should be refunded to you, he added.
Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Fox News Hosts' Texts Revealed in Lawsuit—5 Bombshells
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Newly unredacted filings in the $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit brought by voting technology company Smartmatic against Fox News have revealed private messages sent by Fox personalities and executives in the weeks after the 2020 presidential election. The communications, disclosed through court filings, shed light on how some of the network's most prominent figures discussed the fraud claims they later covered on air. Fox News has consistently denied Smartmatic's allegations. In court filings and public statements, the network has argued that it was reporting on "newsworthy" statements made by the president and his lawyers, not endorsing them. Why It Matters The newly disclosed text messages go to the heart of Smartmatic's defamation case against Fox News, highlighting a disconnect between the private doubts of network hosts and the on-air amplification of election fraud claims. For Smartmatic, the contrast supports its argument that Fox acted with "actual malice" by prioritizing ratings and audience retention over verified reporting. For Fox, the lawsuit tests its defense that covering statements from a sitting president and his lawyers was protected, newsworthy journalism. The case follows Fox's earlier $787.5 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems in 2023, which also centered on the network's coverage of election fraud claims. Unlike Dominion, Smartmatic operates primarily outside the United States, but the company alleges that Fox's broadcasts caused significant reputational and financial harm. The outcome could have broad implications for how courts weigh press freedom against accountability for misinformation in high-stakes political coverage. What the Texts Showed Fox News host Jesse Watters appears on air during the Fox News Special prior to President Trump's Joint Address to Congress. Waters was broadcasting from Fox News' D.C. Bureau on March 4, 2025 in Washington,... Fox News host Jesse Watters appears on air during the Fox News Special prior to President Trump's Joint Address to Congress. Waters was broadcasting from Fox News' D.C. Bureau on March 4, 2025 in Washington, D.C. MoreJesse Watters on Ratings and "Stop the Steal" One of the most widely cited revelations concerns Fox News host Jesse Watters. On December 5, 2020, Watters allegedly texted colleague Greg Gutfeld: "Think about how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL." The comment, included in Smartmatic's filings, appears to suggest Watters was weighing the ratings implications of amplifying election fraud narratives. According to The Washington Post, Watters later testified under oath that he had seen "no evidence that Smartmatic Technology switched votes in the 2020 Election in the United States." In another November 2020 exchange with producer Megan Albano, Watters described "an audience uprising vs. Fox like I've never seen" after the network's decision to call Arizona for Joe Biden. In separate texts to colleagues, he referred to Trump lawyer Sidney Powell as having "lost it" and being "radioactive now" because "[w]hat she is peddling is out there." The now-U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. Jeanine Pirro holds a press conference at the Patrick Henry Building on August 12, 2025 in Washington. The now-U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. Jeanine Pirro holds a press conference at the Patrick Henry Building on August 12, 2025 in Pirro Texts About 'Helping Trump' Smartmatic's filings also reference messages from other Fox figures. Jeanine Pirro, then hosting Justice with Judge Jeanine, allegedly texted in November 2020 about "helping Trump while at Fox News," according to the company's motion. "I work so hard for the party across the country," Pirro texted then-Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel, according to the court filing. "I'm the Number 1 watched show on all news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and party." Bret Baier's Desire to 'Fact-Check' Bret Baier, anchor of Special Report, expressed concerns over misinformation, the court filing said. In a November 2020 text, Baier wrote Fox News Media president and executive editor Jay Wallace that "None of that is true as far as we can tell," when confronted with fraud allegations being promoted on-air. "We need to fact-check this crap." Fox News Skepticism Other hosts expressed skepticism about Powell. According to the filings, Sean Hannity referred to her assertions as "insane," while Laura Ingraham texted Hannity and Tucker Carlson that Powell was "a complete nut" and said, "no one will work with her." Maria Bartiromo shared claims from Trump's legal team about Smartmatic with Fox colleagues while acknowledging privately that the information was "not verified." Rupert Murdoch, chairman of Fox Corporation, texted an executive in November 2020 that it was "really bad" Giuliani was allowed on air with unverified claims about Smartmatic. Fox's Response In court filings and public statements, Fox has argued that it was reporting on "newsworthy" statements made by the president and his lawyers, not endorsing them. In May 2025, the Associated Press reported that a New York appeals court allowed Fox to access Smartmatic records related to a bribery case in the Philippines, which the network has argued supports its defense that Smartmatic's reputational issues predate its 2020 election coverage. What People Are Saying Fox News said in a statement: "The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on FOX News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech. Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms." Smartmatic alleges the network: "amplified false election fraud claims as a strategic response to viewer backlash" after calling Arizona for Joe Biden. What Happens Next The case, still moving through New York courts, will test the limits of defamation law as it intersects with political coverage and press freedom. No trial date has yet been set, but proceedings could extend into 2026 given the scope of evidence and pre-trial motions.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republican Bragging About Tipping Scolded for Tiny Tip
Iowa congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks has gone viral for sharing a photo of her tiny tip on a meal, while praising the impact of Trump's new No Tax on Tips legislation. The 69-year-old Republican shared a photo from a Monday meal at Iowa's Sundown Bar and Grill in an X post on Tuesday, which has had over 6 million views. 'I got to celebrate No Tax on Tips with our wonderful server, she's thrilled about this provision and excited to keep more of what she earns!,' Miller-Meeks wrote. The photos include not only her lunch of a Philly steak sandwich and corn nuggets, but her receipt, which appears to show the congresswoman tipping $3 and small change on an $18 bill. A 20-percent tip on the bill would have been $3.40. She had also hand-written, 'No tax on tips!' on the bill. Comments on Miller-Meeks' post debated whether $3 for the server was an appropriate tip for the meal, especially considering the wage of a member of Congress, which totals $174,000. A spokesperson for her office, Anthony Fakhoury, told Iowa's News Now that Miller-Meeks tipped more than $3. 'The Congresswoman left a 20% tip, and unlike Democrats, she did not vote to increase taxes on hardworking Iowans. No Tax on Tips means more money in the pockets of servers, not the IRS,' Fakhoury said. The Daily Beast has contacted Miller-Meeks' office and the Sundown Bar and grill for further comment. The venue's website states, 'Our staff is always friendly, and our beer is always cold. You'll enjoy great food and great company at the Sundown Bar and Grill.' Miller-Meeks had stopped for lunch during a "Made in America" manufacturing tour, where she visited Iowa manufacturers promoting their American-made production. She said Trump's bill had offered workforce training, tax breaks and incentives for investment. 'One of the criticisms of the reconciliation bill was that it would not spur economic growth. And what I hear when I visit businesses large and small is exactly the opposite,' Miller-Meeks said on Tuesday. Congress passed Trump's No Tax on Tips provision last month, as part of his One Big Beautiful Bill. It aims to put more cash in the pockets of workers, who will be able to deduct $25,000 in tips each year from their taxable income. Tips will be federally taxed beyond that figure. Critics of the provision state that low-wage workers already may pay minimal income tax, so the exemption could favor those who earn higher tips. The viral post comes as Democratic candidate Christina Bohannan, who was only beaten by within 1,000 votes last year, has claimed she will try for a third time to beat Miller-Meeks in the 2026 midterms, where Democrats are focused on Iowa to take control of the House. She accused Miller-Meeks of putting 'partisan politics over Iowans.' Last month, Bohannan said 'From cutting Medicaid, to siding with DOGE's devastating cuts to Social Security, to enabling unelected, unaccountable billionaires like Elon Musk-Miller-Meeks has forgotten about us,' Bohannan said. 'It's time someone put Iowa first.'
