Government receives plea to cut 28% GST on aerated drinks
The meeting is already set to review a broader rate rationalisation framework, with officials indicating that certain slabs and cesses may be simplified or merged.Carbonated drinks fall under the so-called 'sin goods' category—alongside tobacco and pan masala—which invites the highest GST rate and a cess. Industry players have long argued that such classification is outdated, especially for low-sugar and fruit-based carbonated products.Recent court rulings have also put pressure on the current tax structure. The Gauhati High Court had ruled that certain fizzy fruit drinks, if primarily juice-based, should be taxed at 12% instead of 28%. However, this has not led to a broader reclassification.While some states may resist the change due to the revenue implications of scrapping the cess, the Centre is reportedly open to exploring alternatives as part of a wider reform to make the GST system more predictable and investment-friendly.Any revision in GST rates or cess removal would likely translate into lower prices for consumers and improved margins for beverage makers.- Ends
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
J&K an exception, no delimitation exercise prior to 2026 Census: SC
NEW DELHI: Acknowledging an exception carved out for Jammu and Kashmir , the Supreme Court on Friday said delimitation exercises for other states cannot be conducted prior to publication of data of first census after 2026 as that would be against the mandate of Article 170(3) of the Constitution. "The delimitation process is, by design, a legislative and executive function. If the SC were to compel carrying out of delimitation exercise (in a particular state) through a judicial fiat, it would likely be construed as an interference in the policy-making prerogative of the Executive," said a bench of Justices Surya Kant and N K Singh. Writing the judgment for the bench, Justice Kant said, "The Constitutional edifice carefully balances institutional roles, and any disruption of that equilibrium would undermine both the legitimacy and functional integrity of the democratic process." The bench said the constitutional mandate under Article 170(3) bars any delimitation exercise concerning states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana or any other state. It dismissed a writ petition challenging the Centre's decision to conduct delimitation only for J&K and not for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, saying the constitutional mandate - delimitation exercise based on first census after 2026 - does not apply to UTs. The petitioner's counsel Rao Ranjit said that though J&K Reorganisation Act was passed in 2019, the delimitation exercise was carried out under the 2020 notification, but even though the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act was passed in 2014, the delimitation exercise had not been carried out for these two states even after a decade. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Blood cancer is taking our curious baby away from us! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo Solicitor general Tushar Mehta along with ASG K M Nataraj for the Centre said as per the mandate of Articles 80 and 170 of the Constitution, no readjustment of seats or divisions of states into territorial constituencies can be undertaken until the relevant data from first census conducted after 2026 is published. For the Election Commission, senior advocate Maninder Singh said the EC has no jurisdiction to opine on the validity of delimitation exercise as its role is only to facilitate implementation of the process. The SC accepted the Centre's stand and said the AP Reorganisation Act is subject to the constitutional provisions, as expressly provided in the Act itself. If delimitation exercise is allowed to be carried out in some states, then it would open a flood gate of similar demands from the other states, he said. The bench said the petitioner cannot seek to draw delimitation parity between states of AP and Telangana with that of the Union Territory of J&K, to which Article 170(3) has no application. Though it acknowledged legitimate expectations of people of the two states for delimitation exercise, it ruled that such expectations cannot override constitutional mandate.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
No proposal for Bhubaneswar Metro to Centre: MoS
1 2 Bhubaneswar: The Bhubaneswar Metro rail project is notably absent from the list of metro rail proposals either received or sanctioned by the Centre, according to a reply by Union minister of state for housing and urban affairs, Tokhan Sahu, in the Lok Sabha on Friday. Over the past five years, the Centre received 17 proposals, including those submitted this year, but Bhubaneswar's project is not among them. In response to a query from Bharat Mathukumilli, Sahu informed the Lok Sabha that 24 metro projects are currently at various stages of implementation, in addition to the 17 approved by the Centre. Odisha's housing and urban development minister, Krushna Chandra Mahapatra, explained that the previous BJD govt did not submit a proposal for Bhubaneswar Metro because it intended to undertake the project independently, without central assistance. However, the current BJP govt plans to seek the central aid and will submit a proposal in due course. Mahapatra emphasised that the govt is earnestly planning a viable Metro project for the state capital, clarifying that the absence of a proposal submission to the Centre does not indicate lack of seriousness. "We have reimagined the Metro train project differently from the past govt's plan, which was not feasible. We aim to execute it as a joint venture with the Centre's help," Mahapatra said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like IQ Worldwide - Test your Intelligence, know your IQ Score Try Now Undo The previous govt had announced a fully state-funded project worth more than Rs 5,000 crore, intended to connect Biju Patnaik International Airport with Trisulia Square. However, Mahapatra questioned the viability of such a route. "Why would people travel from the airport to Trisulia Square?" he asked. An inter-ministerial committee meeting on the new plan has already taken place, with a second review scheduled. "Once the committee meets and finalises, the next steps will be determined. It cannot proceed without the Centre's assistance," Mahapatra added.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Goa CM Sawant hits back at Karnataka deputy CM Shivakumar in row over diversion of Mahadayi river water
BELAGAVI: The long-standing dispute over the diversion of water from Goa's Mahadayi river for Karnataka's Kalasa-Banduri project has escalated into a fresh political standoff, with top leaders from both states engaging in sharp verbal exchanges to defend their respective positions. On Friday, Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant hit back at Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar, who had earlier remarked that Sawant had "lost his mental balance." Shivakumar's criticism came in response to Sawant's statement in the Goa Legislative Assembly, where he claimed that the Centre had assured Goa it would not permit the implementation of the Kalasa-Banduri project. 'Shivakumar is revealing his party's true colours. I don't wish to dignify his remarks with a response. He is free to say what he wants, but one thing is clear that my fight to protect the Mahadayi will never stop,' Sawant asserted.
