logo
Family of Indian student seeks Centre's help to bring her body back from Canada

Family of Indian student seeks Centre's help to bring her body back from Canada

Hindustan Times29-04-2025
Chandigarh, The shocked family of a 21-year-old Indian student, who was found dead in Canada's Ottawa, on Tuesday urged the Centre for assistance in bringing back her body to Punjab.
Vanshika Saini was found dead three days after she went missing. She is the daughter of Aam Aadmi Party leader Davinder Saini in Punjab's Mohali district.
Vanshika had gone to Canada two years ago to pursue higher studies after completing her senior secondary in Dera Bassi. Her father said she had always been a topper in her school and wanted to do something big in her life.
Davinder said he did not know what happened to her, adding that the family was told that the cause of death could be known only after a postmortem examination.
"It is a great loss for the family and a tough time for us," said Davinder, who is the A's block president and is associated with A MLA from Dera Bassi Kuljit Singh Randhawa.
"I want that my daughter's body be brought back here," he said.
Vanshika's death was confirmed by the Indian High Commission in Ottawa in an X post on Monday.
"We are deeply saddened to be informed of the death of Ms. Vanshika, student from India in Ottawa," it said, adding that authorities concerned have taken up the case, which is now under investigation.
Vanshika went missing last Friday after leaving her residence at 7 Majestic Drive in Ottawa at around 8-9 pm to view a rental room, according to a social media post by an Indo-Canadian association linked by the High Commission.
According to the post, her phone was switched off at approximately 11.40 pm that night and she missed an important exam the next day, which it said was "completely out of character" for the student.
A MLA Randhawa also expressed grief over the death. He said that efforts were being made to bring back the body here.
Randhawa said A MP Raj Kumar Chabbewal and Rajya Sabha MP Balbir Singh Seechewal had been approached for their help in bringing back the body here.
He said that the MPs have contacted the Indian embassy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High levels of Russian crude imports may not last forever, says govt
High levels of Russian crude imports may not last forever, says govt

Business Standard

time2 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

High levels of Russian crude imports may not last forever, says govt

The increased levels of Russian crude imports into India may not last forever, and public-sector oil refineries are, therefore, continuing with term contracts with other suppliers and regions for firm and optional volumes to secure the country's refinery requirement in case of any volatile market situation, the government has said. 'Prior to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Russian crude oil was largely exported to Europe and China. The conflict and the resulting sanctions on Russian crude oil have resulted in increased flows of Russian crude into India due to attractive discounts,' the oil ministry told the parliamentary standing committee on petroleum and natural gas. The ministry was commenting on a recommendation by the panel on imports of crude oil from Russia according to the report of the panel tabled in Parliament today. The committee appreciated the government's decision to purchase crude oil from Russia and recommended that it should keep the energy security of the country in mind while taking decisions on the import of crude oil. India imports crude oil from various locations, including West Asia, Africa, North America, and South America. In 2021-22, the top six countries accounted for 80 per cent of the total crude imports, and the shipments from Russia were low. After the Ukraine-Russia conflict began, and economic sanctions were announced by the United Nations, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and the US, with the price cap imposed on Russia, India increased its Russian crude imports. The committee had earlier recommended an overall review of the policy on crude oil imports, including enlarging the Indian crude basket, diversifying the sources and types of crude oil, and implementing reforms in the pricing of crude oil to ensure energy availability at a reasonable price.

Modi should strongly oppose U.S. imposing 50% tariff, says Chief Minister Stalin
Modi should strongly oppose U.S. imposing 50% tariff, says Chief Minister Stalin

The Hindu

time2 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Modi should strongly oppose U.S. imposing 50% tariff, says Chief Minister Stalin

Chief Minister M.K. Stalin said in Chennai on Tuesday that the BJP-led Union government and Prime Minister Narendra Modi should strongly oppose the U.S. imposing 50% tariff on Indian imports and both should be open about their position. He was speaking at an event organised jointly by the National Committee of Solidarity with Cuba in India and the CPI(M). When five rounds of trade negotiations between India and the U.S. were completed and a date was being finalised for the sixth round, 'Why should U.S. President [Donald] Trump arbitrarily announce the imposing of additional tariff?', Mr. Stalin asked. Referring to the repeated claims of Mr. Trump that he was behind the ceasefire between India and Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, Mr. Stalin said: 'When the Opposition parties raised queries over that in both Houses of Parliament, Prime Minister Modi did not answer at all. It symbolises his weakness.' Observing that there was a crisis across the world, where there is a need to crush imperialism, Mr. Stalin said imperialist conspiracies did not mean only wars. 'The U.S. imposing 50% tariff on imports from India is also one such conspiracy,' he asserted. 'The BJP-led Union government should strongly oppose this. The Centre and Prime Minister Narendra Modi should provide a transparent reply to this,' Mr. Stalin said. Takes a dig at EPS Talking about the politics in Tamil Nadu, Mr. Stalin said AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami had developed a new found love for the Communists in recent days. Contending that people spoke about random topics, Mr. Stalin asked whether Mr. Palaniswami could speak about 'slavery'. 'I want to tell him that none is a slave to nobody. Everyone is wondering if Mr. Palaniswami reads newspapers. Even so, you would surely not read Theekkathir [considered a mouthpiece of the CPI(M)]. If you had read it, you would not be speaking like this. I read Theekkathir every day,' he said. Mr. Stalin said he listened to what Communist leaders spoke whenever he had time. 'They have not stopped flagging issues just because we are in an alliance, and I have not ignored the issues that they have highlighted. Because, half of us are communists. After all, my name is Stalin,' he asserted. Mr. Stalin added: 'We know how to distinguish pointing out with a friendly demeanour from deliberate defamation with ulterior motives. Even this stage symbolises our ideological clarity and friendship.' Minister P.K. Sekarbabu, Cuban Ambassador to India Juan Carlos Marsán Aguilera, CPI(M) leaders M.A. Baby, K. Balakrishnan, U. Vasuki, and P. Shanmugam, CPI State secretary R. Mutharasan, Director of The Hindu Publishing Group N. Ram, former MP T.K. Rangarajan, National Committee of Solidarity with Cuba's State secretary A. Arumuga Nainar were present.

Hello, Mr Trump? Hello? Why New Delhi's outreach isn't reaching the only man who matters
Hello, Mr Trump? Hello? Why New Delhi's outreach isn't reaching the only man who matters

Economic Times

time2 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Hello, Mr Trump? Hello? Why New Delhi's outreach isn't reaching the only man who matters

'The number you've dialled is currently busy' It didn't have to come to this. India-US relations are in desperate need of Operation Salvage and a restorative touch. Donald Trump's insults and excessive tariffs on India totalling 50% are threatening to bury the relationship, a fate neither side can say that this too shall pass, and India will ride it out, but decisions made now, when tempers are high and vision is clouded, can affect the relationship for years to come. The famed friendship between Trump and Narendra Modi is already a casualty of the crisis. It's clear that Trump makes all the major decisions - be it to bend, to mend or to upend relations with other countries. He is the only one who matters, but India appears to have no effective channel to him that one can detect. It's proving to be the biggest gap in India's diplomacy. Meanwhile, Asim Munir was on his second visit to the US in less than two months, allegedly issuing nuclear threats against India and attending the farewell of the Centcom commander, Michael Kurilla, on the Delhi, clearly out of favour with Trump, is reduced to looking for a side door entry into Washington. MEA's adroit welcoming of Trump's peace-making efforts with Vladimir Putin and with Armenia and Azerbaijan was dip in relations comes against the backdrop of growing anti-India feeling within the MAGA ecosystem. Prominent MAGA voices are spewing venom against Indians on social media as job stealers, brown hordes, builders of 'pagan temples' and followers of strange-looking gods. It's ugly. Anger against H-1Bs - always present - has burst into the open. Trump's top political and immigration adviser, Stephen Miller, is leading the charge - there's little political price to pay for denigrating who think Trump will stand in the way because of economic compulsions may be in for a shock. He won't irk his base for India, especially when he feels aggrieved by Indian officials say multiple channels are at work to reach the president. But no breakthrough is discernible. The vast tech ecosystem has not been mobilised. Ditto for the diaspora and Indian-American donors, one of whom has gone public with offers of help. Asha Jadeja Motwani, one of the biggest donors with close to $2.5 mn to the Republican National Committee, who knows J D Vance and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick, has repeatedly said on X she can intervene on India's behalf. But she hasn't heard from the Indian embassy, she into Trump's inner circle should have ideally been made during the campaign and continuously broadened after he won. Assumptions that India can 'manage' Trump, depend on China hawks to keep the balance, and make tactical concessions on trade to keep Trump in good humour have proven painfully re-engagement with Pakistan came as a shock. Yes, the US has a long history with Pakistan, but the latest phase caught India unawares. Not knowing meant no preventive diplomacy and no chance for a counteroffensive. One can take refuge under the umbrella that everything about this president is crazy, all countries are suffering, and India is no exception - all true - but the fact remains that some countries have done better than some resentment against India in the aftermath of Op Sindoor has proved to be the main problem that compounds with each passing day. After the third time Trump claimed credit for the ceasefire, it should have become clear his umbrage was real and required a political touch. Perhaps it was unwise to dismiss it as 'Trump being Trump' as most of us did. Early outreach might have helped, but diplomatic wisdom ordained others have said, Modi could have called, finessed the whole thing, and acknowledged him as a 'peace president' without ceding ground on third-party mediation in Kashmir. This is not an argument for 'kissing the ring', but a call could have been used to creatively pull Trump into India's corner, thank him for 'pressuring' Pakistan into a ceasefire, and to remind him he has always been against terrorism and that peace in South Asia depends on ending cross- border that hindsight is 20/20, and no one can predict how Trump would have responded. But a more innovative approach was worth a try. Instead, Trump's capriciousness and extractive tactics, combined with India's stern diplomacy, have pushed the relationship to an uncertain place. Ignoring the personal has come at a heavy price, with Trump going the extra mile to punish India, to say nothing of the negative on both sides claim that apart from Trump, the relationship continues 'apace', citing bilateral activity as proof. Frankly, it doesn't ring true. This has been a reality check, and unless something changes dramatically, the coming three years under Trump with this level of difficulty will be hard. Riding it out with an actively hostile president in the White House? (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre Why are mid-cap stocks fizzling out? It's not just about Trump tariffs. The airport lounge war has begun — and DreamFolks is losing Stock Radar: UNO Minda eyeing fresh 52-week high in next few weeks; check target and stop loss for long positions Buy, Sell or Hold: Antique recommends buy on Siemens; Avendus upgrades SBI to Buy post June quarter results Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and upside potential of up to 25% Weekly Top Picks: These stocks scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store