logo
Wells Fargo banker blocked from leaving China amid criminal probe, Beijing confirms

Wells Fargo banker blocked from leaving China amid criminal probe, Beijing confirms

Independent4 days ago
A senior Wells Fargo banker is barred from leaving China while authorities investigate a criminal case involving her, Beijing says, sparking fears among foreign businesses over the use of exit bans.
Chenyue Mao, Shanghai-born managing director at the US bank, landed in China recently on a business trip. She's not yet charged with any offence but is required to remain in China to cooperate with the investigation, according to the Chinese foreign ministry.
Her exit ban comes at a tense moment in US-China relations as the two countries wrangle over trade policies.
'Ms Mao Chenyue is involved in a criminal case currently being handled by Chinese authorities who have lawfully imposed exit restrictions on her,' ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said at a regular press briefing on Monday.
He didn't provide further details about the case or specify Ms Mao's alleged role in it. The case has not been publicly linked to any business dispute or specific allegations.
The exit ban on Ms Mao came amid growing diplomatic strain between Washington and Beijing and prompted Wells Fargo to halt all employee travel to mainland China, reported the Wall Street Journal.
The bank, headquartered in San Francisco, said in a brief statement that it was 'closely tracking this situation and working through the appropriate channels so our employee can return to the United States as soon as possible', CNN reported.
It was unclear if Ms Mao still held Chinese citizenship, Reuters reported, quoting unnamed sources as saying she was a US national.
Ms Mao has been at Wells Fargo since 2012. She leads the bank's international factoring business, a form of trade finance in which companies sell their receivables to third parties to obtain immediate cash. She advises multinational firms on working capital strategies for cross-border transactions.
Three weeks before the exit ban was imposed, she was elected chair of FCI, formerly Factors Chain International, a global trade finance association with nearly 400 members worldwide, including 48 in China.
'I am excited for what lies ahead,' she told an industry conference in Rio de Janeiro, according to a post on her LinkedIn, 'together we will go far.'
She travelled to China shortly after the conference but was prevented from returning to the US. She lives in Alpharetta, Georgia.
An automated out-of-office reply from her email continues to state she is travelling internationally.
Wells Fargo has a relatively limited footprint in China than other global banks but maintains offices in Beijing and Shanghai. According to two sources familiar with the matter, the company is quietly seeking clarification through diplomatic and legal channels, hoping to avoid further complications by maintaining a low profile.
Exit bans are not new in China but are increasingly drawing concern from foreign firms and governments. Often imposed without formal charges, such bans are used in a range of scenarios, including regulatory probes, civil disputes, or criminal investigations. The scope and legal grounds are rarely made public and the affected individuals are often left in legal limbo for extended periods.
Two individuals familiar with how exit bans are enforced in China said they were typically initiated by local authorities and could stem from anything ranging from financial disagreements to allegations of improper business conduct. Factoring, the financial service in which Mao specialises, can become legally complex in China due to strict capital controls and regulatory scrutiny over cross-border payments.
Ms Mao's case emerged alongside similar reports of foreign nationals facing travel restrictions. According to the Washington Post, a Chinese-American employee of the US Department of Commerce has been prevented from leaving China after failing to declare his government employment on a visa application. The man, who works at the US Patent and Trademark Office, had gone to visit family several months ago. Chinese authorities have not confirmed his identity or provided details of the case.
Beijing insists such exit restrictions are lawful and do not reflect a broader policy shift. 'This is an individual judicial case and China will continue to welcome people from all countries to visit and do business, while upholding their rights in accordance with the law,' the foreign ministry spokesperson said, according to CNN, referring to Ms Mao's case.
'Everyone in China, whether they are Chinese or foreigners, must abide by Chinese laws,' he was quoted as saying by Reuters.
However, business groups and rights organisations warn that the increased use of exit bans poses a serious reputational and operational risk for international firms.
'The signal it should send is that no one is safe when travelling to China,' said Laura Harth, China in the World director at Safeguard Defenders, a human rights advocacy group. 'Too often companies and countries prefer to remain silent in the hopes of improving or accelerating the process.'
The Wells Fargo case is the latest in a string of incidents involving foreign executives facing legal action or detention in China.
In recent years, senior personnel from AstraZeneca, the risk consultancy Kroll and Japanese pharmaceutical firm Astellas have all been restricted from leaving the country amid various investigations.
The US State Department currently advises American citizens to 'exercise increased caution' when travelling to China, citing the risk of arbitrary enforcement of local laws, including exit bans.
The advisory warns that individuals may be detained or barred from departing China without transparent legal procedures, particularly in cases involving state security or business disputes.
Chinese officials continue to maintain these are isolated incidents. Still, the steady rise in reported cases is expected to further unsettle executives and investors considering travel to the country, particularly those of Chinese descent with foreign passports, who may be more vulnerable to legal ambiguities under Chinese jurisdiction.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US condemns Hong Kong's arrest warrants targeting overseas activists
US condemns Hong Kong's arrest warrants targeting overseas activists

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US condemns Hong Kong's arrest warrants targeting overseas activists

WASHINGTON, July 26 (Reuters) - The United States on Saturday condemned Hong Kong's issuance of arrest warrants for activists based overseas, including some U.S.-based individuals. "We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on U.S. soil," U.S. Secretary of State Rubio said in a statement, adding that "the Hong Kong government continues to erode the autonomy that Beijing itself promised to the people of Hong Kong following the 1997 handover."

With a guilty verdict overturned, will Etan Patz's murderer ever be punished?
With a guilty verdict overturned, will Etan Patz's murderer ever be punished?

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

With a guilty verdict overturned, will Etan Patz's murderer ever be punished?

Decades after six-year-old Etan Patz disappeared while walking to school in New York City, stirring widespread public fear in the US about leaving children unattended, his family felt they got some justice when Pedro Hernandez was convicted of murder in 2017. Now that closure has also vanished. On 21 July, a federal appeals court overturned the guilty verdict. The court stated that the judge in the murder trial was 'clearly wrong' and 'manifestly prejudicial' in his response to a jury note concerning Hernandez's alleged confessions. Hernandez should either face a new trial or be released, the court ruled. And so, it is again an open question of whether there will ever be a resolution to Etan's case, which was a seminal event in US criminal history as it started a movement to help find missing children and caused many Americans parents to watch their kids more closely. 'This case has endured for so many decades, it's almost like there are generations of people that learn about it all over again,' said Lisa R Cohen, a journalist who wrote After Etan: The Missing Child Case That Held America Captive. 'It's going to have an effect on any young parent,' Cohen added. On 25 May 1979, Etan's mother, Julie, allowed him, for the first time, to walk to a bus stop just a couple of blocks away in Manhattan's SoHo neighborhood. After he didn't come home at 3.30pm, Julie learned he never made it to school and reported him missing. Police spent weeks searching for him. His body has never been found. 'I'm not sitting around doing nothing but mourning and thinking of revenge,' Etan's father, Stan, said, according to an excerpt from Cohen's 2009 book. 'But I've also waited 30 years to get justice for Etan. I'll wait as long as it takes.' The stories of Etan and another child, Adam Walsh, inspired a movement to prevent the abduction and murder of adolescents, according to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. In 1983, then president Ronald Reagan marked the anniversary of Etan's disappearance by declaring the date National Missing Children's Day. Etan's face also appeared on billboards and milk cartons. Before Etan's disappearance, 'kids played after school and came home for supper and no one was tracking every move', Cohen said. 'And then there is the time after Etan, when everything changed. It was a zeitgeist moment.' A suspect, Jose Antonio Ramos, emerged a few years after Etan went missing, but law enforcement officials initially declared that he was not connected to the crime. A federal prosecutor later treated him as a prime suspect and pursued him. A convicted pedophile, Ramos admitted that he tried to molest the child but said he did not kill him. He was never charged with Etan's disappearance, but his parents won a $2m wrongful death lawsuit against Ramos in 2004. Then, in 2012, Hernandez, who worked at a bodega near the Patz's home, confessed that he lured Etan to his store by promising him a soft drink and took him to the basement and strangled him. His parents became convinced that Hernandez, not Ramos, was the killer, A jury deadlocked on the Hernandez murder trial in 2015, but in a 2017 retrial, the jury found him guilty. 'The Patz family has waited a long time, but we've finally found some measure of justice for our wonderful little boy, Etan,' Stan Patz said at the time. 'I'm really grateful that this jury finally came back with which I have known for a long time that this man, Pedro Hernandez, is guilty of doing something really terrible so many years ago.' But during the investigation, Hernandez had initially confessed after seven hours of questioning from police, who did not read him his Miranda rights against self-incrimination, according to court documents. Only afterwards did police issue them, and he then repeated his confession. During the second trial, the jury asked the judge to explain whether, if the jury found that Hernandez's first confession was not voluntary, it must disregard the later confessions. The judge said no. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion The appeals court ruled that the directive was wrong. David Schwartz, a former prosecutor in New York, said the judge's answer 'was certainly not harmless error' and 'really is contrary to the law of confessions'. 'You certainly want justice to be done for this tragic case, but on the other hand, we have to uphold the integrity of the criminal justice system and fair trials,' he said. Etan's parents have not commented on the case since Hernandez's conviction, the New York Post reported, and it does not appear that they have responded publicly to the appeals court ruling. Louis K Meisel owned an art gallery on the block between the Patz's home and the bus stop and knew the family 'very well', he said. 'It's one of the biggest mysteries, and we're never going to know the end and the answers,' Meisel said. Cyrus Vance Jr, the former Manhattan district attorney who oversaw the two trials, told the New York Times after the ruling that he was 'surprised and saddened for the Patz family'. 'I was certainly convinced myself that Pedro Hernandez killed Etan Patz, and I think that today,' Vance said. Emily Tuttle, a spokesperson for the Manhattan district attorney said: 'We are reviewing the decision.' Schwartz, the former prosecutor, thinks the district attorney would have a difficult time retrying Hernandez. 'The confession was really at the heart of the case,' Schwartz said. 'Unless there is new evidence somehow, which is very unlikely, I'm not sure they are going to be able to retry.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store