logo
Can Marit Stiles save Ontario's sliding New Democrats?

Can Marit Stiles save Ontario's sliding New Democrats?

On the worst of election nights for the federal New Democrats, Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles sat at home with her husband, TV on blast, fluffy dogs underfoot, and watched her friends slide into historic defeat.
At a certain point, a bottle of Chardonnay appeared. Glasses were filled and finished but wine did little to soften the real-time destruction of party that
won a mere seven of its previous 24 seats.
'It was brutal,' Stiles recalls.
She was just as forceful in dismissing the suggestion that the New Democrats' dramatic national loss is dragging down the Ontario NDP, five months after Premier Doug Ford called a snap election that he won as a tariff-slaying Captain Canada, fighting the menace of U.S. President Donald Trump.
As Stiles sees it, the Ontario and federal elections of 2025 focused on the existential threat of economic warfare launched by Trump, not real-life concerns over hallway medicine or unaffordable housing.
And after much of the summer spent touring the province, Stiles says she heard a 'very strong sense of remorse' among some who voted outside party lines.
That sentiment will be heartening to diehard NDPers, particularly when delivered by a leader who, it appears, is very convincing.
But it does not explain how the most recent Abacus Data tracking poll found Ford's Progressive Conservatives reached a record high 50 per cent approval rating and Bonnie Crombie's Liberals holding steady at 28 per cent.
Whither the Ontario NDP?
It was at 13 per cent — its lowest-ever standing in an Abacus poll.
******
It's a sweaty night in July. Thunderclouds hang low. At Gracedale Park, near Finch and Islington Aves., an ice cream truck hired by the local New Democrat MPP Tom Rakocevic serves three options: vanilla, chocolate or vanilla-chocolate swirl.
Rakocevic, the incumbent, squeezed out a win here in Humber River—Black Creek, beating his Progressive Conservative challenger by just 193 votes.
It is a diverse riding, with many languages spoken and a blue-collar hard-working demographic, where the 2021 census said the unemployment rate was more than double the national average.
In 34C heat, an estimated 1,000 parents, children and locals stand in a long line winding through the trees deep inside the park, all waiting for one small free cone of soft ice cream.
As politicians do, Rakocevic chats with constituents. He's got a nice-guy vibe and introduces locals to Stiles, who was acclaimed as Ontario's NDP leader in February 2023. She's smiling, laughing and shaking hands, as politicians do.
Abdi Hassan stands alone at the park's edge, watching the scene. A few hours earlier, he picked up an award from Rakocevic and Stiles for his community work.
Hassan has been fascinated with Canadian politics since Jean Chrétien was prime minister. Despite the popularity of tonight's ice cream giveaway, he says it's obvious that support for the New Democrats is down.
'Their
message is not hitting the ground,' he says.
'A lot of people, especially the newcomers, they cannot identify the party line. What does this party stand for? I think if (the New Democrats) do a lot of grassroots education in this immigrant population, they could increase their numbers, because their ideas are connected to this community.'
But that means changing, or intensifying, the way the party connects with voters and, he says, broadening the base to include some from the business community.
If it holds tight to the status quo, Hassan believes the NDP risks being left behind as a 'relic, socialist kind of party.
'You have to grow,' he says. 'You have to change your attitude.'
A veteran party insider has a similar perspective.
The New Democrats' inability to pivot from their traditional social issues to salvation from the capricious Trump forced voters who fear America more than a hallway hospital gurney to pick the party that adapted and advanced with fraught times.
Ontario's election came first, on Feb. 27, a night of precarious wins and losses. It didn't help that some union leaders, once a lock for the NDP, embraced Ford, bleeding votes to his conservative party.
Guy Bourgouin, the NDP MPP for Mushkegowuk-James Bay, won his riding by nine votes. The NDP lost Sault Ste. Marie to the Progressive Conservatives by 114 votes, despite Ford's bungled response to the closure of a local medical clinic that left 10,000 residents without a doctor. Rakocevic's race was close, despite his incumbent status.
And in Toronto—St. Paul's, a riding New Democrat incumbent Jill Andrew had held since 2018, Liberal Stephanie Smyth won by 3,988 votes.
Now, as Ontario's party faithful prepare for their September convention in Niagara Falls, the insider says there is only one question that matters:
Can the NDP rebuild?
'The game has changed because we have lost so much ground to the Liberals and the Conservatives, it seems unthinkable,' says the insider, who spoke confidentially in order to discuss internal party deliberations.
'Part of that is the party has an identity crisis. They don't know who they are or what they stand for anymore because a lot of the unions or other constituents are now looking at and voting for the other two parties — and that's a problem.'
From the perspective of Mike Layton, the Ontario party should embrace the qualities that Stiles brings and not worry about the Ford bravado that gets attention.
Stiles's power is found in the personal connections she makes with people, says Layton, a long-time Toronto city councillor who left politics for philanthropy at Second Harvest. (Layton's father, Jack, led the national NDP to a record 103 seats in the House of Commons.)
'It comes across in a more compassionate way,' he says. 'It doesn't make headlines, but I think it has a lasting impact on people's impressions.'
It may be early days for Stiles but her warmth with potential voters didn't help in the Abacus summer poll, nor did it offset the steep decline in popular vote to 18.5 per cent during the winter election.
But still, under Stiles, the party won 27 seats and kept its Official Opposition status which, theoretically, allows Ontarians to see a lot more of the new leader.
And that, says the insider, is the best shot for a resurgent Ontario NDP.
'Marit is a smart, authentic and deeply rooted New Democrat.'
*****
No worries here, Stiles says, in her Queen's Park office.
'
I have learned over many years that polls are a snapshot in time,' she says, 'and I think we are in a very strange and unique time.'
Justin Trudeau's Liberals were facing imminent defeat last year and look how that turned out, she notes.
Still, Stiles knows that going into the 2025 election she was relatively unknown, having been unopposed when she ran for the NDP leadership two years earlier, and thus not benefiting from a race that might have raised her profile.
Once the debrief on the winter election was done, Stiles says her informal summer campaign began. She has been travelling across the province meeting voters, grateful that the campaign flights through raging northern Ontario snowstorms are now a thing of the past, best left to party lore.
While September's convention will include a mandatory vote on whether to have a leadership review, party members believe Stiles is safe.
Still, Stiles needs to present the NDP faithful with a legitimate plan to compete against the vote-stealing Progressive Conservatives and Liberals who will be making promises on similar issues, especially if, by some miracle, the threat from Mar-a-Lago settles down.
The party's blueprint for the future, Stiles says, starts with evidence and empathy.
Health care with a focus on public health investment and prevention. The housing plan, Stiles says, calls for homes that are 'truly, deeply affordable.' Upload some transit costs from municipalities to the province. Offer wraparound services to older adults. And for the young, a new focus on education.
Local riding associations, she says, need a commitment to support workers and create a presence in communities, the nurturing years.
What about the views of boots-on-the-ground observers such as Hassan, the community advocate, at the ice cream party in Humber River—Black Creek?
'I hear the same sort of things from other people saying they think the NDP needs to focus
less
on the middle class and
more
on the working class,' Stiles says.
But Hassan spoke about the need for all-encompassing plan to expand the appeal.
'I completely agree with him there,' she says. 'If
we can tap into and get even a fraction of the people who have not voted in the last few elections to vote and, to vote for us, great!
'I
want to give people a reason to vote. I want to give them a reason to hope again.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Demetrios Nicolaides: Setting the record straight on Alberta's school library standards
Demetrios Nicolaides: Setting the record straight on Alberta's school library standards

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Demetrios Nicolaides: Setting the record straight on Alberta's school library standards

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) wrote an op-ed that has completely mischaracterized the new school library book policy recently announced. They have labelled these policies that are intended to ensure young students are not exposed to explicit sexual content as a 'book ban.' This is a blatant and deliberate misrepresentation of the standards. This was never about banning books; the government has no will, want or ability to ban books. This policy is about ensuring young students are not exposed to graphic sexual content in a school library book. Full stop. Before I dive deeper into the false narratives being pushed by the CCLA, I want to set the record straight that books containing information and images regarding puberty, breast development, menstruation and other important biological information will not be restricted for any students, contrary to incorrect reporting from numerous news outlets. The CCLA has stated that critically acclaimed books like George Orwell's 1984 and Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale will be banned from all school libraries— a completely false and shockingly deceptive claim from an organization that claims to be committed to integrity. When I was asked during a press conference about this policy having unintended consequences on books such as the aforementioned, I made it clear that this is not the spirit, intent or wording of the policy. If a book contains images or passages that have explicit sexual content such as acts like masturbation, penetration, ejaculation, or the use of artificial sex organs, it will not be permitted in school libraires. I, along with parents, educators and Albertans, agree that these images should not be available to students, and we will not bend to falsified statements concocted by the CCLA, an organization that seems hellbent on defending these graphic images being available for young students. The CCLA has also claimed that the definitions in the standards are subjective, particularly in how 'explicit sexual content' is defined. This is simply not the case. The policy lays out clear definitions of both 'explicit' and 'non-explicit' sexual content. Materials with non-explicit sexual content may be accessible to students in Grade 10 and above, if age-appropriate. Materials selected and used by a teacher to support curricular outcomes are not affected by the standards. For example, students will learn about consent (outside a of a sexual context) in Grade 4, which provides the foundation to understand consent in a sexual nature when students are of an age to discuss that topic. We trust the teachers and educators in our school system to teach a well-rounded, age-appropriate sex-ed curriculum. The government's role is to set the standards; it is up to school boards to apply them. I also want to address the narratives regarding how these changes are apparently targeting the LGBTQ community. As LGBTQ advocate Blaine Badiuk put it, 'books with LGBTQ themes absolutely have a place in school libraries, as long as they do not contain explicit sexual content. To suggest that LGBTQ representation must include sexual content is a disservice to the community and it reinforces the harmful stereotypes that LGBTQ identities are inherently sexual.' I fully agree with Blaine. Students should be curious, inquisitive and, exploratory about themselves and the world around them without being exposed to sexual content. The CCLA has concealed the true intent of the policy by generating fictional realities. Their blatant spin on the standards has created confusion around a balanced policy that protects students from explicit sexual content. The CCLA believes that their actions are based in virtue and the common good, when in fact their actions have culminated into a massive disservice to the public. I'd like to ask the CCLA: Do they, in fact, support allowing explicit sexual content in school libraries? Would they be willing to post the graphic images we found in school libraries on their website, and explain to their readers why they think they should be available to students? And a final question to Albertans: If the media has to censor the images we found in school libraries in order to show them on the five o'clock news, why would they ever be appropriate for young students in a school library book? Demetrios Nicolaides is Alberta minister of Education and Childcare.

Opinion: If Trump's trade target is a customs union, Canada will have a big decision to make
Opinion: If Trump's trade target is a customs union, Canada will have a big decision to make

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: If Trump's trade target is a customs union, Canada will have a big decision to make

The Canadian government failed to reach a trade deal with the United States before the Aug. 1 deadline. As a result, U.S. President Donald Trump increased the blanket tariff on imports of Canadian goods from 25 per cent to 35 per cent, while tariffs on steel, aluminum and some automotive imports have remained unchanged. Crucially, the so-called 'CUSMA exemption' on goods that are compliant with the existing Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement has also remained in place. Many have pointed out that the lack of a deal makes Canada an outlier among U.S. trading partners. The EU, the U.K., South Korea, Japan and many others managed to clinch a deal before the deadline. Even Mexico, which did not reach a deal, was given a formal 90-day extension. But looking at the U.S. agreements with other countries, one can genuinely question whether Canada could have successfully lowered its effective tariff rate, even with a deal. So far all the trade deals reached by the U.S. include some tariffs. More importantly, no country has escaped the 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum, except for the U.K., which faces 25 per cent tariffs. With little chance that Canada could have avoided tariffs on steel and aluminum, reducing the effective tariff rate would have been a tall order. Moreover, the extreme focus on the state of current negotiations and the need for an immediate deal to avoid tariffs overlooks a much bigger threat to Canada: The CUSMA renegotiation scheduled for Summer 2026. Considering that, any deal reached now might only be a band-aid that will be ripped off next year — and it may hurt. The importance of CUSMA for Canada cannot be overstated. Canada's effective tariff rate on exports to the U.S. is one of the lowest in the world, primarily due to the CUSMA exemption. What if CUSMA changes drastically following the renegotiation next year? President Trump is likely to use this opportunity to tackle the trade irritants that have been bothering him, notably Canada's supply management. However, I think Canadian negotiators need to consider that the U.S. approach to the negotiations could be much broader. The Trump administration has referred in the past to the idea of creating a 'Fortress North America' as a means of counteracting the threat from China. As such, a major trade irritant for the U.S. has been third countries' use of Canada and Mexico to circumvent tariffs, with China, for example, making significant investments in manufacturing in Mexico, evidenced by the foreign direct investment data. With that in mind, one of the aims of the U.S. administration with the CUSMA renegotiation could be to move from a Free-Trade Agreement to something that more closely resembles a customs union. Such an arrangement would mean that Canada and Mexico would have to commit to match the tariffs the U.S. imposes on every other country, potentially leading to a difficult choice for Canada. In addition, further integration between Canada and the U.S. is likely still an objective for President Trump, even though he has stopped referring to Canada as the 51st State. Nevertheless, it's important to remember that the European Customs Union, established in 1968, was a cornerstone in the creation of what is now the European Union. A customs union would mean further integration with the U.S., guaranteeing access to its market, but it would come at the expense of lost independence. As such, Canada's current free-trade agreements with other countries, such as CETA, the TPP and others, would no longer be valid. Moreover, Canada would lose its ability to negotiate free trade deals with other countries, and would likely face retaliatory tariffs from international partners, similar to the ones China has imposed on canola after Canada matched U.S. tariffs on the imports of Chinese electric vehicles. If the government chooses this option, Canada would be doubling down on its reliance on the U.S. and forgoing the opportunity to diversify trade away from the Americans. On the other hand, if Canada rejects a customs union, we would remain in control of our trade destiny, with the ability to pursue free trade deals with other countries. However, that freedom would likely come at the cost of facing the same kind of blanket U.S. tariffs that other countries are facing, leading to a sharp rise in our effective tariff rate. With exports to the U.S. representing about 20 per cent of Canadian GDP, the economic impact would be significant. Basically, the choice boils down to either 'short-term gains for long-term pain' or 'short-term pain for long-term gains.' In the current context of tensions with the U.S., it is unclear where the general opinions, whether from politicians, business leaders or voters more generally, would be on the subject: further integration or increased diversification. Does Canada still deserve to be considered a 'trading nation'? William Watson: A lament for the postwar trading system There are likely to be strongly opposed views across provinces and industries. Charles St-Arnaud is the chief economist at Alberta Central. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Poilievre says of B.C. Premier Eby that 'one man can't block' pipeline proposal
Poilievre says of B.C. Premier Eby that 'one man can't block' pipeline proposal

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Poilievre says of B.C. Premier Eby that 'one man can't block' pipeline proposal

CALGARY — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre says Canadians, including British Columbians, want a new oil pipeline and Premier David Eby can't be allowed as one man to block the project. Poilievre says the country can't wait for complete agreement on the idea, calling it a "basic fact" that a new pipeline is needed. Eby has repeatedly said there's no point discussing or supporting a pipeline that is being pushed by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and others, until there is a proponent for such a project. Poilievre, speaking in Calgary, says that's a "chicken and egg problem," because the reason there's no proponent is there has been inadequate government support. Eby could not immediately be reached for comment, but deputy premier Niki Sharma says in a statement that there is still no prospective buyer for the existing TMX pipeline, which is owned by Canadian taxpayers. She says provinces across Canada have shovel-ready projects with proponents and funding already in place, "real projects that we can all support." "In B.C., we have major projects that will grow our economy, support trade between provinces and help protect workers and businesses from the harmful tariffs imposed by the Trump administration," Sharma said in the statement Thursday. Poilievre said he had nothing against Eby but "one man can't block a project." "British Columbians want a pipeline, Albertans want a pipeline, Canadians want a pipeline. We can't wait till everybody's onside," he said. "There are some people out there who don't think Elvis is dead. We can't get everybody to agree on any basic fact, even the basic fact that we need a pipeline. So, you're going to need national leadership," he said. Poilievre was speaking at a news conference to announce that the Opposition Conservatives will introduce a bill in Parliament called the Canadian Sovereignty Act, which would repeal "Liberal growth-blocking laws." Poilievre, who lost his Ottawa riding in the general election, is seeking to return to Parliament via a byelection in the rural Alberta seat of Battle River-Crowfoot. Advance polls in the Aug. 18 byelection open on Friday. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 7, 2025. The Canadian Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store