How Fed Chair Powell has used Jackson Hole to signal what's next
Powell
on Friday will walk through the Jackson Lake Lodge's expansive lobby, past the taxidermied grizzly bear, and into a ballroom lighted with elk-antler chandeliers to deliver a speech at the global central bankers' influential symposium in Wyoming. In his seven previous
Jackson Hole
speeches, Powell has touched on a range of issues, from esoteric economic concepts and monetary policy history lessons to pledges of policy support through the COVID-19 pandemic and the central bank's determination to win the inflation war that followed.
Each speech, too, has included some measure of preview for the
Fed
's next interest rate moves, and that above all else is why Powell will have the world's attention at 10 a.m. EDT (1400 GMT) on Friday.
Here is what he has previously said, and what happened next:
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
How much is your car worth? Take a look here
Cars | Value
Click Here
2018: STARS AND RATE HIKES AHEAD
Powell's first - and longest - Jackson Hole speech set out his approach to policymaking, focused on "navigating by the stars" - the economics world's shorthand for concepts like the natural rate of unemployment and neutral interest rate. He did, though, offer a view on what was coming down the pike.
Live Events
What Powell said: "Let me conclude by returning to the matter of navigating between the two risks I identified - moving too fast and needlessly shortening the expansion, versus moving too slowly and risking a destabilizing overheating. ... I see the current path of gradually raising interest rates as the FOMC's approach to taking seriously both of these risks." What the Fed did: Following the two quarter-percentage-point rate hikes in the first half of the year, the central bank's policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee delivered two more quarter-percentage-point hikes before the end of the year.
2019:
TRUMP TARIFFS
1.0 AND RATE CUTS
Part history lesson and part dissection of the trade policy moves in Trump's first term in the
White House
that were starting to blur the outlook, Powell's 2019 speech was met within hours by the U.S. president asking on social media "who is our bigger enemy" - Powell or Chinese leader Xi Jinping?
What Powell said: "We have been monitoring three factors that are weighing on this favorable outlook: slowing global growth, trade policy uncertainty, and muted inflation. ... we will act as appropriate to sustain the expansion, with a strong labor market and inflation near its symmetric 2% objective." What the Fed did: It followed a quarter-percentage-point rate cut that July with two more such reductions in borrowing costs in September and October, far less than what Trump had demanded. Then the pandemic arrived, and everything changed.
2020: 'INCLUSIVE' EMPLOYMENT, AVERAGE 2% INFLATION
Delivered remotely because of the pandemic, Powell's speech in 2020 laid out a new approach to policy that placed greater weight on defending the Fed's employment mandate.
What Powell said: "Our revised statement emphasizes that maximum employment is a broad-based and inclusive goal. ... Employment can run at or above real-time estimates of its maximum level without causing concern, unless accompanied by signs of unwanted increases in inflation or the emergence of other risks that could impede the attainment of our goals. ... Following periods when inflation has been running below 2%, appropriate monetary policy will likely aim to achieve inflation moderately above 2% for some time."
What the Fed did: In September it adopted a new three-part test, seen at the time as an outgrowth of the new framework, for raising interest rates: the attainment of maximum employment and 2% inflation, and indications that inflation will "moderately exceed 2% for some time." The promise helped support the economy's recovery from the pandemic shock, but the stringent hurdle for restarting rate hikes was later blamed for slowing the Fed's response to inflation the following year.
2021: NO RATE HIKES NEEDED FOR NOW
In a second straight virtual appearance, Powell dismissed signs of the coming inflation wave as "transitory" - a word he has come to regret ever uttering.
What Powell said: "Current high inflation readings are likely to prove transitory ... If a central bank tightens policy in response to factors that turn out to be temporary, the main policy effects are likely to arrive after the need has passed ... Today, with substantial slack remaining in the labor market and the pandemic continuing, such a mistake could be particularly harmful."
What the Fed did: It began slowing its asset purchases in November and held the policy rate steady at the near-zero level until March 2022. Critics at the time, and most Fed policymakers since, have said the assessment of inflation as "transitory" was a mistake that delayed the start of the rate hikes needed to fight inflation.
2022: RATE HIKES, AND PAIN, AHEAD
Mincing no words in his shortest Jackson Hole speech, Powell made clear the Fed's intent to bring inflation to heel, no matter the pain it might cause.
What Powell said: "While higher interest rates, slower growth, and softer labor market conditions will bring down inflation, they will also bring some pain to households and businesses. ... At some point, as the stance of monetary policy tightens further, it likely will become appropriate to slow the pace of increases. Restoring price stability will likely require maintaining a restrictive policy stance for some time." What the Fed did: It delivered two more 75-basis-point rate increases to follow the two it had done in the meetings before Powell's speech, and then increased the policy rate in smaller increments until it reached the 5.25%-5.50% range in July 2023.
2023: RATE HIKES STILL POSSIBLE
In remarks that were less stern than those delivered the previous year, Powell held out the possibility of more rate hikes while acknowledging the signs of progress in reining in inflation.
What Powell said: "We will proceed carefully as we decide whether to tighten further or, instead, to hold the policy rate constant and await further data. Restoring price stability is essential to achieving both sides of our dual mandate. ... We will keep at it until the job is done."
What the Fed did: It held the policy rate in the 5.25%-5.50% range, set just weeks before Powell's speech, for a little over a year.
2024: RATE CUTS COMING SOON
Risks had now shifted from inflation to employment, and Powell sent a clear signal that rate cuts were coming.
What Powell said: "My confidence has grown that inflation is on a sustainable path back to 2%. ... We do not seek or welcome further cooling in labor market conditions. ... The time has come for policy to adjust."
What the Fed did: It ended the year-long hold on the policy rate by cutting it by half of a percentage point in September 2024, and by another half a percentage point over the final two meetings of 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
21 minutes ago
- India.com
Is Trump Ready To Risk Key Ally India For His America-First Agenda? Nikki Haley Sounds Alarm
Washington: 'To achieve America's foreign policy goals of outcompeting China, few objectives are more critical than getting relations between Washington and New Delhi back on track,' wrote Nikki Haley, U.S. President Donald Trump's fellow Republican and former U.N. ambassador, in an op-ed for Newsweek. She urged that India must be treated 'like the prized free and democratic partner that it is, not an adversary like China, which has thus far avoided sanctions for its Russian oil purchases, despite being one of Moscow's largest customers'. She warned that undoing decades of diplomatic momentum with the only Asian power capable of balancing Beijing would be a 'strategic disaster'. She also highlighted India's role in shifting supply chains away from China. 'While the Trump administration works to bring manufacturing back to our shores, India stands alone in its potential to manufacture at a China-like scale for products that cannot be quickly or efficiently produced here, like textiles, inexpensive phones and solar panels,' she said. Add Zee News as a Preferred Source Haley described New Delhi as a 'crucial asset to the free world's security', stressing that unlike authoritarian China, a rising democratic India strengthens the global order. Trump, however, has unsettled both allies and critics by threatening to impose an additional 25 per cent tariff on India for importing discounted oil from Russia. The measure comes on top of a similar levy already rolled out this month, taking the total duty to 50 per cent. Once hailed as Washington's counterweight to China, New Delhi now finds itself grouped with Brazil, whose President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has already threatened retaliation. Beijing, the largest buyer of Russian crude, has been spared from similar penalties. 'Biggest Mistake' Geopolitical analyst Fareed Zakaria joined the wave of criticism. Speaking to CNN, he called the tariff push 'America's biggest foreign policy mistake', warning that even if Trump walks back the decision, 'the damage is done'. According to him, India now views the United States as 'unreliable, its willingness to be brutal to those whom it calls its friends' and may deepen its ties with Russia while easing tensions with China. 'Stupidest Tactical Move' Economist Jeffrey Sachs struck a similar note. On 'Breaking Points' with Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti, he said the White House is effectively binding the BRICS bloc closer together. He branded the tariffs 'the stupidest tactical move in U.S. foreign policy' and labelled Trump 'the great unifier of BRICS'. 'Tariff Tantrum' The pushback has reached Capitol Hill as well. Senior Congressman Gregory Meeks, a Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, denounced the policy as a 'tariff tantrum' that risks dismantling over two decades of strategic, economic and cultural ties. 'We have deep strategic, economic and people-to-people ties. Concerns should be addressed in a mutually respectful way consistent with our democratic values,' he said.
News18
32 minutes ago
- News18
US court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Trump
Agency: PTI Last Updated: New York, Aug 22 (AP) A New York appeals court has thrown out President Donald Trump's massive financial penalty while narrowly upholding a judge's finding that he engaged in fraud by exaggerating his wealth for decades. The Thursday's ruling spares Trump from a potential half-billion-dollar fine but bans him and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Trump, in a social media post, claimed 'total victory" in the case, which stemmed from a civil lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. 'I greatly respect the fact that the Court had the Courage to throw out this unlawful and disgraceful Decision that was hurting Business all throughout New York State," the Republican wrote. James, a Democrat, focused on the parts of the decision that went her way, saying in a statement that it 'affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud." The ruling came seven months after Trump returned to the White House, his political fortunes unimpeded by the civil fraud judgment, a criminal conviction and other legal blows. A sharply divided panel of five judges in the state's mid-level Appellate Division couldn't agree on many issues raised in Trump's appeal, but a majority said the monetary penalty was 'excessive". A lower-court judge, Arthur Engoron, had ordered Trump last year to pay $355 million in penalties after finding that he flagrantly padded financial statements provided to lenders and insurers. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. Additional penalties for executives at his company, the Trump Organisation, including sons Eric and Donald Trump Jr, have brought the total to $527 million with interest. 'While harm certainly occurred, it was not the cataclysmic harm that can justify a nearly half billion-dollar award" to the state, Judges Dianne Renwick and Peter Moulton wrote in one of three opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. They called the penalty 'an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution." Both were appointed by Democratic governors. Engoron's other punishments, upheld by the appeals court, have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and the president was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. Donald Trump Jr celebrated the decision by mocking James, who had periodically posted a running tally of the fraud penalty, with interest. Over a post from James in February 2024, when the tally was nearly $465 million, Trump Jr wrote: 'I believe you mean $0.00. Thank you for your attention to this matter." The five-judge panel, which split on the merits of the lawsuit and Engoron's fraud finding, dismissed the monetary penalty in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for an appeal to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. In the meantime, Trump and his co-defendants, the judges wrote, can seek to extend the pause to prevent any punishments from taking effect. While the Appellate Division dispatches most appeals in a few pages in a matter of weeks, the judges weighing Trump's case took nearly 11 months to rule after oral arguments last fall and issued 323 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions with no majority. Rather, some judges endorsed parts of their colleagues' findings while denouncing others, enabling the court to rule. Two judges wrote that they felt James' lawsuit was justifiable and that she had proven her case but the penalty was too severe. One wrote that James exceeded her legal authority in bringing the suit, saying that if any lenders felt cheated, they could have sued Trump themselves, and none did. Another wrote that Engoron erred by ruling before the trial that James had proven Trump engaged in fraud. In his portion of the ruling, Judge David Friedman, appointed by a Republican governor, was scathing in his criticism of James for bringing the lawsuit. 'Plainly, her ultimate goal was not market hygiene' … but political hygiene, ending with the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction of his real estate business," Friedman wrote. 'The voters have obviously rendered a verdict on his political career. This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business." Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. At the conclusion of the civil trial in January 2024, Trump said he was 'an innocent man" and the case was a 'fraud on me". The Republican leader has repeatedly maintained the case and the verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney Abbe D Lowell has said investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign". Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defence also noted bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing last September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old and that James had misused a consumer protection law to sue Trump over private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said that while Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, his exaggerations led lenders to make riskier loans and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net worth numbers. The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. top videos View all And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider. Trump still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. Trump also is appealing a subsequent verdict that requires him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for additional defamation claims. (AP) SCY SCY (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: August 22, 2025, 04:45 IST News agency-feeds US court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Trump Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Help These Green Warriors Help You
1 2 An economist, a software engineer, a law student and a retired IRS officer walk into a… No, this isn't the lead-up to that joke. They walk into ward offices all over the city, sit through hours of discussions and debates, and fight tooth and nail to protect every single tree they can from being felled. For the past two years, under the ChaloPMC initiative, citizens who are part of the Pune Samvad group have attended several tree-felling hearings to give each tree a fighting chance. There are about five to six of these hearings every month, spread across the city. But there are only a handful of participants, most of whom also have day jobs. While many people attend the hearings for bigger projects like the Riverfront Development (RFD), smaller dockets and ward-wise meetings get ignored. The group is trying to rectify this. You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune | Gold Rates Today in Pune | Silver Rates Today in Pune Economist Ameet Singh, who founded Pune Samvad, estimated that the city has lost 30,000 trees – and counting – to development projects since 2021. "Data collected by us shows that over 95% of tree cover has been removed since the 2000s only for roads. Many of these trees are over 50 years old. According to the 2021 amendment to the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act of 1975, any tree estimated to be over 50 years must be declared a heritage tree," Singh told TOI. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "However, the slaughter of trees to build buildings, bridges and roads has continued unabated. There is a difference between growth and development, which is that of quantity versus quality. The faster we understand the difference, the more trees we can protect," he added. In 2023, Singh filed a petition in the Bombay high court against Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) for blatant felling of trees. The HC then passed an order that not only directed PMC to follow the Tree Act but also ordered it to draw up guidelines pertaining to the release of a docket. A docket is a list of trees set to be felled, along with their age, species and location (see graphic). "We created a docket format in collaboration with PMC. After a docket is released, a meeting is held with the tree authority officer, who is the ward officer for the area. Before this, we send our objections to the proposal and at the meeting try to find the best way to save as many trees as possible," Singh said. Citizens' Involvement Is Key "It boils my blood to see trees cut unnecessarily. We are losing very crucial city foliage for absolutely no reason or sheer negligence to follow the rules. Every single tree and every citizen who fights for these trees matters. It's important that citizens think of their immediate surroundings," said software engineer and Chalo PMC member Sanaa Shaikh. "Power is in numbers. We need more citizens to join the fight. " A neighbourhood approach is crucial to solving the problem as the current participants, few in number, cannot be present everywhere, especially after tackling their full-time jobs. Besides, most of these hearings are held during PMC's office hours. Learning and development professional Vijaya Suratkal, another member of the group, said she has seen the decline in the city's green cover over the years. "The city used to be lined with large banyan and peepal trees, but now we have lost most of them to roads." "Only a handful of citizens show up at tree hearings now. When there are just a few of us, it is difficult to convince those petitioning to cut trees to explore alternative paths. People from all walks of life must step forward to join us as protecting trees is the easiest and cheapest way to save the city from worsening air pollution. As citizens, we must take ownership of the trees in our wards," she added. Law student and IT professional Moin Pathan spends his free time attending tree hearings and helping the team run surveys on the ground. "There is a great deal of confusion about tree-felling and tree-trimming permissions. Most apply for tree-felling even if there is a small bend in the tree. But there is a lot that can be done before a tree needs to be completely hacked off," he said. "The goal at these hearings is to find alternative designs and plans that can ensure maximum trees are saved. However, that can only happen once citizens become aware of the rules and participate in the process. " Every Tree Matters According to Singh, the rampant construction boom in 2014, the Metro project (sanctioned in 2016) and the RFD (which started operations in 2017) put thousands of trees at risk. "In such a situation, not only must citizens fight to protect the trees in these spaces, also they must fight for every other tree at risk, either from road widening, a bridge or a redevelopment project. Trees are crucial not just to maintain the city's temperature but also to prevent flooding and regulate air pollution, all problems Pune is dealing with today," Singh said. Better SOPs Are A Must "How will I breathe, or sustain increased temperatures, if all trees get cut down eventually," asked Rekha Joshi, a retired IRS officer who was employed with the central GST office. Joshi attends every meeting she can, irrespective of the area. "When the designs are planned, there is no consideration for saving trees or to take a sustainable approach to felling requests, which is disappointing. Officials who attend these meetings have no response to our queries and they don't even take the help of experts to address our issues. Each time, we must take the route of RTIs to get more information. This is nothing but an administrative gap," Joshi added. Attending these meetings is also a way to keep authorities accountable, as often, data falls through the gaps and citizens are none the wiser. Better vigilance from the public is an urgent need, said another member of the group. "During meetings, officials agree to transplant trees, but we don't know yet if it is done. We are currently collecting data to understand this, but the number of people working on it is not enough. We have to co-ordinate within the group and with officials, and then consistently follow up. We need more citizens to join the movement," Singh said. "We were able to save 236 trees in Yerawada earlier this year. It was only possible because we followed up constantly. But, to do this, we need people." If you've ever wondered why the big tree around the corner from your house or the one that you sheltered under on a hot summer day has suddenly disappeared, and wished you could do something about it, then you're the person the group is looking for. Saving trees is no joke. What happens at the tree hearings? - The ward office releases a docket or list of trees to be felled or transplanted, with their age and species listed - In case of transplantation, the proposal must also include where the trees will be transplanted, the number and the species as well - At the hearing, the tree officer listens to objections and then decides if amendments to the proposed docket need to be made or grants permission - In case permission to chop trees is granted, the stakeholder petitioning to fell them must provide land space and funds for compensatory plantation - A hearing is held with all stakeholders present _________________________ Duties of the Tree Authority/Officer Tree Officer: Area Ward Officer | Tree Authority Municipal Commissioner 1. Preservation of all trees in all lands within their jurisdiction 2. Development and maintenance of nurseries and supply of seeds, saplings and trees for new or compensatory plantations 3. Transplanting trees necessitated by construction of new roads or widening of existing roads 4. Planting and maintaining such number of trees as it considers necessary according to the prescribed standards on roads, in public parks and gardens and on banks of rivers or lakes 5. Where permission to fell a tree is granted, the tree officer may do so on the condition that the applicant shall plant another tree of the same or other suitable species, on the same site or other suitable place within 30 days from the date of felling _____________________________ Other Rules - No completion or occupation certificate should be issued for new constructions until compensatory plantation or transplantation conditions have been followed - Punishment for felling a tree without following due process: Rs1,000 per offence - Punishment for felling a tree in public premises without following due process: 3 months imprisonment or a fine Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
