Ban parents from calling children ‘naughty', says Kate Silverton
Parents should be banned from calling their children 'naughty', according to Kate Silverton.
Mrs Silverton, the child therapist and former BBC newsreader, said it is harmful for children because they 'internalise' the message of the word, and it reinforces a belief that it is 'who I am', leading to more problematic behaviour.
Mrs Silverton, 54, also said it is a 'fallacy' to use the word because it is 'not scientifically correct' as their brains are too immature.
The counsellor called for parents to 'change the language'.
'Our children internalise every day,' she told the Netmums podcast.
'They're taking in messages from us, from their friends, from their teachers. And words carry such weight of meaning. 'Oh, stop being silly. Oh, you are so naughty. Oh, he's the naughty one'.
'We all fall into that trap, but our children are paying very close attention to how we think of them.
'And we might dismiss it as a comment – 'oh, he's so untidy. Oh, she's always late. She's a bit of a scatterbrain'.
'They are internalising. And what they're internalising, because, again, they don't have that fully formed rational brain.
''I'm bad. I'm naughty.' And then it becomes: 'That's me. That's who I am'.
'And you may well end up with a child that then thinks, well, 'that's who I am so I may as well just be that'. You know, that's where sort of delinquency comes from.'
'Labels are not who our children are,' Mrs Silverton added.
'So we might say, 'I didn't like that behaviour', but it's not 'I don't like who you are'. And that's really important.'
Mrs Silverton added: 'It's just a fallacy to call children naughty.
'They're not making conscious choices for the majority of the time. They are driven by a very, very immature brain and a nervous system that very often is being triggered because they're coping with a lot during the day.
'It's just not scientifically correct. It's not, it's just, as I say, it's a fallacy.
'And I'd really like to change that language.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘Just Good Manners' Review: Mind Your Mores
In the James Cameron film 'Titanic' there's a brief scene in which a young girl gets poked in the back so that she'll sit up straight, like a lady. Viewers are given to understand that they're seeing how etiquette crushes the spirit, the way a corset crushes the ribs. We are a long way from 1997, when the movie came out (let alone from 1912, when the ship sailed and sank), and the likelihood today of any young person getting lessons in deportment has dwindled. Slouching is in, formality is out, and the sight of more than two forks on the table is enough to make a dinner guest break out in hives. Yet people persist in wanting to know and understand the correct forms, even if their details seem antiquated or obsolete. Who, amid widespread cultural flux, can advise them? Emily Post became the American maven of manners in 1922, advocating gentility and founding a dynasty that is still consulted by the socially anxious to this day. Judith Martin became a hit as Miss Manners in the newspaper column she launched in 1978. In the U.K., Debrett's has long advised Britons on such matters.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
The Paranoia Trap In Remote Work And Why It's So Hard To Shake
For many (me included!) the shift to remote work was a breakthrough. No commute. More autonomy. Fewer distractions from hallway politics. But for others, especially high-achieving professionals used to being seen and heard, working from home quietly unearths a troubling mental pattern: when the feedback loop goes silent, the mind fills in the blanks. And more often than not, it fills them with fear. What begins as a quiet sense of disconnection can spiral into a gnawing belief that something is wrong. That a colleague is orchestrating something behind your back. That your name has come up in a meeting you weren't invited to. That you're about to be caught off guard. It sounds irrational. And yet, when you're in it, it feels real. The strangest part? The moment you step back into the office, the feeling dissolves. A quick chat in the hallway, a casual laugh in a meeting, or just hearing your name spoken without suspicion—that's all it takes. You don't uncover a plot because there was never one to begin with. You simply re-enter a space where context makes paranoia unnecessary. Remote work is productive, but it can also be psychologically disorienting. What stabilizes people at work isn't just a clear job description or a defined workflow. It's the invisible network of signals we trade throughout the day. Things like nods, smiles, spontaneous feedback. These signals remind us where we stand. They offer micro-confirmations that we're still part of something. Take them away, and the mind starts to scan. Not for data, but for danger. Humans are wired to interpret uncertainty as risk. In the absence of feedback, we don't usually assume everything is fine. We assume we're in trouble. That's negativity bias in action—the cognitive reflex to prioritize potential threats over neutral or positive cues, especially when the situation is ambiguous. The brain starts drafting stories to explain the silence. That delayed email? It must be bad news. That skipped video call? Maybe you're being excluded. If you're someone who has navigated environments where trust was scarce or reputations were fragile, the leap from silence to suspicion is even shorter. But this isn't just a glitch in reasoning. It's often a response to identity friction. For people who derive meaning from being visible, influential, or at the center of things, remote work can feel like a form of professional invisibility. Without recognition, your self-narrative begins to fray. You start mistaking the absence of affirmation for the presence of rejection. Here's what's quite fascinating: the moment we're physically back among colleagues, the imagined story loses its grip. You see your manager smile. You overhear a conversation that confirms you're still in the loop. You remember that most people are too busy with their own priorities to scheme about yours. Suddenly, you're not being targeted. You're just back in the room. That shift isn't just a mood swing. It's a recalibration of social identity. According to social identity theory, a big part of how we maintain self-worth is by feeling recognized and accepted in groups that matter to us. Work is one of the most important of those groups. Without shared physical space, the group becomes harder to see, and easier to feel excluded from. Even video calls, though helpful, often fall short. They compress emotional bandwidth. They filter out body language, subtle tone, even the spontaneity that makes us feel truly connected. In that vacuum, the brain tries to simulate the missing social data. And in the process, it often gets the story wrong. This is why some of the most outwardly confident professionals feel unsettled at home but unexpectedly calm the moment they re-enter a shared office. It's not just that they miss people. It's that they miss the psychological GPS that tells them where they are in the team's social landscape. In-person cues don't just clarify communication. They restore belonging. The most common mistake leaders make is assuming that silence is neutral. It's not. Silence is a story waiting to be written. And if leaders don't supply the story, people will write their own. Sometimes it's optimistic. Often, it's catastrophic. This is especially important in hybrid workplaces, where some people thrive on autonomy while others quietly unravel without regular interpersonal signals. What looks like flexibility for one employee might feel like exile to another. And the employees who seem the most competent and self-sufficient on paper are not always the most psychologically steady. High achievers often carry a high cognitive load, not just to perform, but to predict and pre-empt every social cue they can no longer see. This explains why remote work doesn't just create logistical complexity. It creates relational ambiguity. And ambiguity is rarely neutral ground. It's not enough for leaders to check in about deadlines. They need to check in about direction and connection. People want more than clarity about the task. They want to know where they stand, whether they're still trusted, still seen, still included. This isn't insecurity. It's a need for psychological visibility. And research in self determination theory suggests that relatedness, not just competence or autonomy, is one of the core drivers of motivation. If that need is unmet, even the best performers can spiral. If you're someone who starts imagining the worst when working remotely, the first step is to recognize the pattern. Your brain isn't telling you the truth. It's trying to keep you safe. But in doing so, it may be creating a threat that isn't there. Instead of letting the story spin, interrogate it. What do you actually know? What are you guessing? If something feels off, reach out. Don't wait for validation to come to you. Sometimes, a three-minute call is enough to reset your entire mental state. Leaders can help by reducing the distance between perception and reality. That means being transparent about decisions, proactively acknowledging contributions, and noticing the emotional signals that don't show up in project plans. It also means understanding that for many people, a lack of contact is never just a logistical absence. It's a psychological gap. In a world increasingly defined by screens, the most important gesture may be the simplest one: making people feel remembered. Not just needed, but noticed. Not just looped in, but genuinely seen. So the next time you start believing that you're being excluded, sidelined, or quietly targeted, pause. You're probably just out of sync. And more often than not, that's all it is. Not a conspiracy. Not a downfall. Just the mind, searching for context in the silence.
Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
A tiny church in Denmark celebrates community and coziness within 12 walls — one for each apostle
COPENHAGEN, Denmark — The latest addition to the Copenhagen skyline is a tall, 12-sided wooden building proudly bearing the sign 'Denmark's First Tiny Church .' The 76-square-meter (818-square-foot) construction was unveiled Sunday in the Nordhavn — 'North Harbor' — district on the outskirts of Copenhagen. After months of construction, it's now an outpost of the local Evangelical-Lutheran Hans Egedes Church.
