Israel to Place $500 Million, US-funded Order for Boeing Aerial Refueling Tankers
It said it would sign the contract with the US government once an Israeli ministerial committee for defense procurement grants its approval. The US government oversees foreign military sales and transfers to other nations.
The military already operates four Boeing-made KC-46 aerial tankers, the defense ministry said in a statement.
Ministry Director General Amir Baram said in the statement that the aircraft would strengthen the military's long-range strategic capabilities, enabling it to operate farther afield with greater force and with increased scope.
Israel used such aerial refueling tankers during its 12-day air war against Iran in June.
The statement said the contract would include equipping the planes with Israeli systems, which it did not specify.
Washington provides its close ally Israel with billions of dollars each year to purchase American weapons and equipment.
"The contract's scope is estimated at approximately half a billion USD (US dollars) and is funded through US aid," the ministry statement said.
Recently, some US Republicans and Democrats have questioned whether the government should continue giving Israel military aid, citing its war in Gaza and concerns over whether taxpayer dollars might be better spent on domestic priorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
6 minutes ago
- Arab News
Riyadh deputy governor reviews latest development projects
RIYADH: Riyadh Deputy Gov. Prince Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Abdulaziz, accompanied by Saudi Minister of Transport and Logistics Services Saleh Al-Jasser, toured the streets of Riyadh in a self-driving vehicle on his way to King Khalid International Airport. Last month, the Transport General Authority launched the first phase of self-driving vehicle services in several locations in Riyadh, aiming to advance smart and sustainable mobility. The deputy governor, along with Al-Jasser, toured the airport operations control center. He received a detailed explanation about the center's pivotal role in making real-time decisions in cooperation with all bodies operating at the airport, with the objective of enhancing operational flow (to and from the airport) and improving the passenger experience by leveraging the latest artificial intelligence systems.
Arab News
6 minutes ago
- Arab News
Netanyahu's plan to reoccupy Gaza is a deadly delusion
Benjamin Netanyahu is once again playing with fire — only this time it threatens not just Gaza, but Israel itself, the broader region, and what remains of a fragile international order. The Israeli leader's reckless scheme to reoccupy Gaza is not merely shortsighted; it is criminal in intent, catastrophic in consequence, and dripping with the arrogance of a man who believes he can bend history to his will. Let us be clear: The idea of reoccupying Gaza is not about security. It is not about peace. It is about one thing and one thing only: Netanyahu's desperate bid to cling to power, evade accountability for his corruption charges, and present himself to the Israeli public as a strongman at a time when his leadership is defined by chaos, failure, and bloodshed. Gaza, once again, is being used as a pawn in his political survival game. Netanyahu sells the illusion that sending Israeli tanks back into Gaza will somehow bring security to Israel. But history has already written the verdict: Occupation breeds resistance. The decades-long suffocation of Gaza has done nothing but radicalize new generations who see no horizon, no dignity, no life worth living under perpetual siege. Does Netanyahu truly believe that by reoccupying Gaza, by tightening the noose around 2 million people, he will extinguish their will to resist? On the contrary, he will ignite a firestorm of resistance fiercer than ever before. The Israeli military may occupy land, but it cannot occupy hearts. And the more brutal the occupation, the deeper the rage, the stronger the determination, the longer the conflict burns. Security built on the graves of starving children and bombed-out families is not security; it is barbarism masquerading as defense. What makes Netanyahu's plan especially vile is his willingness to weaponize humanitarian suffering. Gaza today is already enduring famine conditions. Children are wasting away as food and medicine are deliberately withheld. Hospitals are reduced to rubble. Entire neighborhoods are flattened. And still, Netanyahu talks of 'managing' Gaza, as though human beings can be managed like cattle. What he proposes is not management; it is subjugation. It is the calculated use of hunger, displacement, and despair to force a population into submission. It is collective punishment on a scale that meets every definition of a war crime. Justice will never emerge from the barrel of an occupying tank. Hani Hazaimeh The Israeli leader dares to cloak his scheme in the language of 'stability.' But whose stability? Certainly not Gaza's. Not the region's. It is only the stability of his grip on power that he seeks. The tragedy is not Netanyahu alone. It is the silence — or, worse, the complicity — of the so-called international community. Washington mumbles about 'restraint,' but continues to bankroll the very bombs raining down on Gaza. Europe, forever haunted by its own guilt, lectures about 'two states,' while rewarding Israel with trade deals and diplomatic cover. A reoccupation of Gaza would be the match that lights this regional powder keg. Israel may think itself powerful, but no army, however advanced, can withstand the cumulative fury of millions pushed to desperation. What Netanyahu offers is not a vision but a nightmare. He would reduce Gaza to an open-air prison policed directly by the Israeli army, stripped of any semblance of autonomy, permanently dependent on Israel's whims for survival. He would condemn generations of Palestinians to lives of humiliation and despair, and in so doing, guarantee that Israelis themselves would never know peace. Because peace is not built on domination. It is built on justice. And justice will never emerge from the barrel of an occupying tank. The world must not allow this scheme to succeed. To reoccupy Gaza would be not only a moral abomination but also a strategic disaster that ensures endless conflict. Those who claim to stand for human rights must prove it now, by cutting the weapons shipments, conditioning aid, holding Israel accountable in international courts, and refusing to normalize relations with a government that tramples every principle of humanity. And for the Israeli people, the question is this: How long will you allow one man's delusions to drag your nation into perpetual war? Netanyahu does not act for your security. He acts for himself. The blood that will be spilled — Palestinian and Israeli alike — will stain his hands, but history will not forget the silence of those who allowed him to carry on. Netanyahu's plan is not just a policy, it is a declaration of perpetual war. It is an attempt to suffocate a people into nonexistence. And it is a gamble that will fail, as every attempt to crush the Palestinian spirit has failed before. But the cost of his failure will not be borne by him alone. It will be borne by the starving children of Gaza, the grieving families of Israel, and the stability of an entire region already teetering on the edge. This is the hour of reckoning. Netanyahu's delusions must be confronted with clarity, courage, and unyielding resistance — political, legal, and moral. The world has a choice: to stand by as Gaza is dragged back into the abyss of occupation, or to draw a line and say, enough. For the sake of justice, peace, and our shared humanity — enough. • Hani Hazaimeh is a senior editor based in Amman. X: @hanihazaimeh
Arab News
6 minutes ago
- Arab News
Germany's shift on Israel
Some call the German shift on Israel fatal and disappointing; others applaud it. Chancellor Merz's decision to halt weapon deliveries to Israel has sparked a new debate in Germany. While commentators grapple with the domestic consequences of the decision, Germany tries to reopen the door for a political path together with the international community. To understand how Arab countries can respond to the new messaging from Berlin, looking at the shared history between Israel and Germany, and its complexity and interdependence, is crucial. While many commentators describe the decision as surprising, the sudden shift of German foreign policy is more consistent than it seems. It is the consequence of what German Chancellor Merz said already back in spring, shortly after coming to power: 'The military advantage of Israel's strategy is no longer existent.' After weeks of back-door diplomacy behind the public, when German politicians and officials tried to have a sincere conversation with the political leadership from Israel about the future of Gaza, Germany was left disappointed by insufficient responses from Tel Aviv. By shifting its policy, Berlin sent a new message: Germany's political support for Israel has a limit. Sacrificing the hostages, annexing Gaza and perpetual warfare in the strip are exceeding it. Berlin's policy shift Merz's announcement came on Friday morning as a direct response to the decision of the Israeli security cabinet to further escalate its military activities in Gaza. While the cabinet decided not to occupy all of Gaza immediately, it announced a new military operation to take control of Gaza City. The new operation has little support in Israel. Not only are the families of the hostages against prolonging the war, the military elite and the security establishment also see little advantage in further escalating the conflict. In fact, the open letter signed by hundreds of analysts, former officials, generals and politicians calling for the end of the war was mentioned by Chancellor Merz himself when defending his new policy in an interview on Sunday afternoon. Criticism rained down immediately, especially from the Junge Union, the Young Christian Democrats, as well as the Bavarian branch of the CDU, the CSU. The Young Christian Democrats, usually known for their alignment with the mother party, commented on Merz's decision with harsh words, claiming that it is 'in breach with the fundamentals of the party.' In the interview from Sunday evening with 'Tagesthemen,' Merz replied to his critics, assuring that German policy toward Israel remains unchanged. As he explained, Germany has 'one disagreement with the Israeli government, and that concerns Israel's military action in the Gaza Strip.' But 'a friendship can withstand that,' he added. However, it is clear that this is a shift of policy indeed — if not a fundamental one, it is at least a shift of Merz's very personal stance: When discussing German weapon deliveries to Israel in the parliament back in October 2024, the former opposition leader challenged Chancellor Scholz about reports saying the government is withholding weapons to Israel: 'What are your expressions of solidarity with the state of Israel actually worth if you are denying the country essential aid in its precarious situation at the same time,' Merz asked. However, contrary to what the public debate may suggest, the question of German arms deliveries is less black-and-white than it seems. The German law differentiates between 'weapons of war' and general armaments. While the former are subject to strict regulations and authorized by the federal government directly, the latter are regulated more freely and authorized by the agency BAFA, the general authority for economic affairs and export control. While Germany has authorized the export of many defense goods to Israel since Oct. 7, 2023, all in all worth more than half-a-billion dollars, only 2 percent were reportedly weapons of war. Since March 2025, the government has not authorized any weapons of war exports. The newly announced official halt of weapons to Israel is therefore more symbolic — especially because it concerns only weapons that may be used in Gaza. Many analysts would say that not sending weapons of war to Israel that can be used in Gaza is a legal requirement, as German law forbids transfers if the government knows of potential violations of international law. In fact, if officials and politicians fail to follow the law, they could be subject to harsh court rulings at a later stage. Israel's repeated breach of international law and its assault on civilians in Gaza is widely recognized — what is discussed by experts is more the extent and scope of it. One could say, cynically, that Merz's decision is German at its core: It follows the law, yet as the numbers indicate, little will change. But politics is more than numbers — and the symbolism behind the new policy matters a great deal. German solidarity with Israel As Merz asked back in October 2024, the question of what German solidarity with Israel really means is being debated again. Much of the debate stems from the words of Chancellor Angela Merkel during her visit to Israel back in 2008, when she gave a speech in the Knesset. The Middle East was as fragile as ever: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad regularly used hostile rhetoric against Israel, Lebanon was still unstable and rockets from Hamas' Al-Qassam Brigades reached Israel multiple times. In January 2008, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said that 'all options are on the table' regarding Iran's nuclear program. In Merkel's historic speech, famously held in German, she congratulated Israel for its 60th anniversary, articulated Germany's position in the Middle East and support for the two-state solution, and made it blatantly clear that it is on Iran to prove that its nuclear program was strictly civil in scope. In her conclusion, Merkel explained Germany's legacy: 'Every chancellor before me has committed to Germany's special historical responsibility for Israel's security. This historical responsibility is part of my country's raison d'etat.' Germany's ideal scenario was a diplomatic solution. But as Merkel made clear: Israel's security is never negotiable for Germany. Since then, the idea of Israel's security being Germany's raison d'etat has become a widely accepted concept, despite the undemocratic genealogy of the term. It depicts the unique relations Germany has with Israel after Nazi Germany killed 6 million of Jews through extermination camps, massacres and forced labor. When visiting Israel in May 2025, Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul put a wreath in the hall of the Yad Vashem, saying that 'it is with horror and shame that I stand here as Germany's foreign minister. The monstrosity of the Shoah was ordered in German, planned by Germans and carried out by Germans.' This year, Germany and Israel celebrate 60 years of diplomatic relations after Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol met German Chancellor Ludwig Erhard in 1967. The meeting was not the first instance of ties: Already back in the 1950s, Germany and Israel were developing their relations, and ratified in 1952 the Luxembourg Agreement that formalized the first German reparations to Israel. It took another 13 years for these relations to become diplomatically formalized. Regarding Israel-Palestine, Germany's position has always been relatively clear: Full diplomatic support of the two-state solution, resulting in the recognition of Palestine once negotiations for the two-state solution are settled, and German military support for Israel at the same time. Germany reminded Israel multiple times that the two-state solution is the sole legitimate framework for the Palestinians. But at the same time, Germany would not lead such a process, despite the relatively good relations with the Palestinian Authority and important neighbors such as Egypt and Jordan — nor will it enforce it. Looking forward Today the reality is a different one. Looking at the West Bank and Gaza, any implementation of the two-state solution seems to be more unlikely than ever. However, countries like France and Saudi Arabia have tried to lay out a road map for a new political path for Israelis and Palestinians, starting with recognition of Palestine by more European countries. For Germany, such a step is unrealistic. Neither will Germany isolate Israel — in fact, Merz made it clear that Germany is still ready to fend off pressure against the Israeli government within the EU. Still, there is a chance for a new diplomacy: This became clear when one week before the new announcement Johann Wadephul again visited Israel. Before his departure, he made it clear: 'Germany is convinced that a negotiated two-state solution remains the only sustainable solution. For Germany, recognition of a Palestinian state is more likely to be the end of the process. But such a process must begin now.' And more directly, he added: 'Germany will also be forced to respond to unilateral steps.' Whether or not Germany is fully ready to use its political weight to push the two-state solution and prevent Israel from further annexing Palestinian land is for many experts doubtable. But now that the German pressure on Israel is both official and public, it can be a window of opportunity for new partnerships for both Europe and the Arab world. • Pascal Bernhard is a political officer for the Candid Foundation, a think tank focusing on the Middle East. The views and opinions expressed in the content are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the Candid Foundation's position.
