
Blak-cladding: ACBF cops $3.5 million fine for misrepresenting it was Aboriginal-owned
ACBF Funeral Plans Pty Ltd (also known as Youpla) was exposed during the 2018 banking royal commission for using predatory sales practices in Indigenous communities.
The $3.5 million penalty handed down to ACBF on Thursday comes in addition to the $1.2 million penalty ordered in September 2023 over another misrepresentation that consumers would receive a lump sum payment when this was not the case. This brings the total penalties ordered against ACBF to $4.7 million. First Nations advocates from the Save Sorry Business Coalition welcomed the $3.5 million penalty imposed on ABCF, pointing to the court finding that the company misled the community about their business being Aboriginal-owned by using Aboriginal imagery on their contracts, clothing, ads and business cards.
Save Sorry Business Co-ordinator Bettina Cooper said they welcomed the substantial penalty for a company falsely representing it was Aboriginal-owned and that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has shown other businesses that it will take action against this conduct.
'This penalty doesn't help the thousands of people who were deceived into thinking they were buying a funeral plan from an Aboriginal-owned business," she said. "But it very clearly warns other businesses that, if you claim or imply you are a First Nations business in order to make money and advantage of community and you are not, you will be held to account." ASIC chair Joe Longo said the penalty is a strong deterrent to anyone who tries to mislead Aboriginal consumers by falsely claiming Aboriginal ownership or management.
"It is one of ASIC's enduring priorities to tackle misconduct targeting First Nations people and our work in this case shows exactly why," he said.
But ASIC is not to enforce either penalty without leave of the Court because ACBF is in liquidation. In handing down his decision, Justice Scott Goodman agreed with ASIC's submission that the making of the representation that ACBF was Aboriginal-owned or managed when it was not was deliberate and callous and involved egregious conduct. The penalty decision comes after ASIC's successful appeal to the full Federal Court, overturning part of an earlier Federal Court decision in relation to ACBF and Youpla Group Pty Ltd (Youpla), handed down on February 29, 2024.
ACBF, a wholly owned subsidiary of Youpla, offered, promoted and sold the Aboriginal Community Funeral Plan, a funeral expenses insurance policy, primarily to Aboriginal consumers.
ACBF customers who purchased the funeral plan paid fortnightly premiums so that their nominees, such as their family members, would be covered for funeral related expenses up to a selected benefit amount. Youpla Group (then ACBF Group Holdings Pty Ltd) was the subject of a case study in the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. In October 2020, ASIC commenced proceedings against ACBF. But in March and April 2022, ACBF and Youpla both went into liquidation.
ASIC sought leave to continue the proceedings due to the importance of general deterrence in relation to the defendants' conduct.
In September 2023, the Federal Court found that ACBF misrepresented to plan holders that they would receive a lump sum payment of their chosen benefit amount, when in fact they would only be reimbursed for funeral related expenses up to the benefit amount upon production of proof that those expenses had been incurred. The court ordered a $1.2 million penalty against ACBF. But the Federal Court found that ASIC had not made out its case in relation to the other alleged misrepresentations, including that they had falsely claimed they were Aboriginal-owned.
In February 2024, the full Federal Court upheld ASIC's appeal, finding that ACBF had also misrepresented to Aboriginal consumers that it was Aboriginal-owned or managed when that was not the case.
Ms Cooper thanked ASIC for appealing the decision regarding misrepresenting Aboriginal ownership. "Government agencies should continue to identify and take action against black-cladding, so legitimate First Nations owned organisations are able to flourish and support their community," she said. For 30 years, the Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund (ACBF), trading as Youpla, aggressively sold poor-value funeral plans to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people across Australia, frequently taking premiums directly out of Centrelink payments through Centrepay. The Save Sorry Business Coalition is a First Nations-led campaign seeking fair resolution for First Nations people harmed by the misleading and deceptive conduct of Youpla and the failure of government and regulators over two decades. The Federal Government's Youpla Support Program began on July 1, 2024, to support people affected by the collapse of ACBF/Youpla.
Policy holders eligible for a payment would receive either 60 per cent of all the payments they made, or the benefit amount on the ACBF certificate, whichever is lower.
"The Save Sorry Business Campaigns commends the government for this program but notes that many of the estimated 14,000 people who suffered a loss may not be eligible under the program because their involvement was so long ago, nor will many people fully recover their losses in full," the Save Sorry Business Coalition said. ASIC has also taken penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against former directors of ACBF and Youpla Ronald Joseph Pattenden, Jonathan Law, Bryn Elwyn Jones and former officers Michael Brendan Wilson and Geoffrey Peter Clayton for breaches of their duties.
The court has listed the matter for trial to begin on February 9, 2026.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Premier Jacinta Allan says 'Nazis' will not be tolerated after protest group marches through Melbourne CBD
More than 100 men dressed in black — who the premier has described as "Nazis" — marched through Melbourne's CBD early on Saturday morning, carrying Australian flags and chanting. Police responded to what they described as a "pop-up protest" about 12:40am. In a video shared on TikTok, a man can be seen carrying a placard while the masked group walks through Bourke Street Mall. On Saturday morning, Premier Jacinta Allan said: "Nazis don't belong in this country and they know it. That's why they hide behind masks in the dark." An altercation allegedly occurred during the protest, when a man confronted the group and was assaulted, police said. The man was taken to hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. Ms Allan thanked police for maintaining public order. "It's clear they need more powers, and we're giving it to them," she said. "Our criminal anti-vilification laws come into effect next month. We will introduce powers for police to unmask cowards at protests after that. "We're not afraid of these goons — but we won't tolerate them, either." Victoria Police said no arrests were made during the protest, with police maintaining a strong presence throughout. "Victoria Police respects the right to protest; however, there is absolutely no place for antisemitic, racist or hate-based behaviour in our society and police will not tolerate such activity." Anyone with information has been urged to contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or via

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Thirlmere, NSW: Man charged after ‘mystery explosions' rocked town for months
A man has been charged after a semirural town in Sydney's Macarthur region was rocked for months by a series of 'unknown explosion type noises at night'. The noises, centred around Thirlmere, prompted much public discussion over what the noises could be. Wollondilly Shire Mayor Matt Gould took to social media last week in response to community concerns. 'Over the last couple of months there have been a series of unknown explosion type noises at night that have been heard in Thirlmere and surrounding areas,' he said on July 29. 'This has understandably led to a fair few concerns and questions from residents so I wanted to try and give a quick update on the current state of play as far as these explosions and what we know. 'Unfortunately the short answer is we still don't have any idea what these explosions/noises actually are, although we think we've ruled out what some of what it isn't.' Mr Gould said council inquiries had ruled out activity on the rail lines or nearby coal mine and urged residents to report incidence of the 'bangs' to police. 'We're also not aware of any other kind of industrial or agricultural activity in the areas reporting these explosions that should be making these noises, certainly not at night and with the frequency they now seem to be happening,' he said. 'The scale of the area that seems to be hearing them is also far to big for fireworks or the like as well.' On Saturday, NSW Police said officers had been called to Estonian Rd in Thirlmere following reports of a 'large explosion'. The following day, investigators raided a Estonian Rd property where a 40-year-old man was arrested. He was later charged with one count of possess, supply or make explosive for unlawful purpose. 'A man has been charged following an investigation into reports of numerous alleged explosions being heard in the Thirlmere area,' a police spokesman said. 'Officers attached to Camden Police Area Command were made aware of reports from Wollondilly Council that explosions have been heard in the Thirlmere area over the past few months.' According to police a number of items were seized from the home, including gel blasters, stun devices, knives and a blow dart gun.


SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Facebook posts, allegedly poisoned pasta: The evidence Erin Patterson jury didn't hear
Convicted mushroom killer Erin Patterson's estranged husband, Simon, believed she had tried to poison him four times before a fateful lunch in 2023 in which she poisoned his parents, aunt and uncle. Simon's parents, Don and Gail, 70, would die in hospital along with Gail's sister Heather, 66, days after eating the meal Patterson cooked. Simon Patterson — who told his estranged wife he would not be attending the lunch the night before — said he suspected Erin had tried to poison him from as early as 2021 during a pre-trial hearing last year. The media had been banned from reporting on pre-trial hearing evidence to allow Patterson time to appeal, but the suppression order was lifted on Friday. Allegedly poisoned penne Simon told pre-trial hearings he believed he was first poisoned the night before a planned camping trip in November 2021. He ate penne bolognese made by Patterson and vomited at her home the next morning, as well as on the way to the campsite, he said. Simon Patterson said he believed Erin Patterson tried to poison him several times, from as early as 2021. Source: AAP / Diego Fedele Patterson arranged accommodation for them instead of camping, and the following day he felt like he was "going downhill" and needed to go to hospital. Simon assumed it was gastro and was transferred to Monash Hospital, where he stayed for five days, as a doctor was concerned about his kidneys. Simon detailed three other suspected alleged poisonings that he said occurred during 2022, with Patterson accused of serving him poisoned dishes of chicken korma curry and a vegetable wrap. Prosecutor Nanette Rogers alleged Patterson deliberately "allocated certain foods" to Simon in each suspected poisoning, much like she did in choosing different plates for her beef Wellington lunch guests than for her own. But defence lawyers claimed it was not clear whether Simon assisted in preparing some of the meals and said Patterson had eaten the same food. Simon told his GP, Christopher Ford, about the alleged poisonings and removed Patterson from his medical power of attorney about five months before she served up the poisonous beef Wellingtons. "He thought that Erin was trying to poison him," Ford told pre-trial hearings. When Simon told Ford his family was in hospital on the day after the July 2023 lunch, the GP called and alerted his medical colleagues at Leongatha and Korumburra hospitals. During pre-trial, Patterson's barrister Colin Mandy said the claims involving Simon could not be proven on the medical evidence and Patterson denied all attempted murder charges. Justice Christopher Beale ruled Patterson should face two trials, one for the murders and one for Simon's alleged attempted murder. However, prosecutors discontinued the latter charges and focused their trial on the murderous lunch. 'My cat chewed on this mushroom' One of the most bizarre pieces of evidence that did not make it to the trial was a Facebook post to a poisons help page. Prosecutors alleged Patterson uploaded a photo of a cat eating mushrooms about 18 months before Simon claimed he was first poisoned by his estranged wife, in November 2021. "My cat chewed on this mushroom just now," the post said, according to pre-trial evidence. "He is having a vomit. Was in grassland near trees, I'm in Victoria, Australia." Patterson owned a dog but did not own a cat. Prosecutors alleged the post was fake and they planned to use it in the trial to show the killer's long-held interest both in poisons and wild mushrooms. Prosecutor Jane Warren said it showed Patterson's interest in mushrooms was "in the poisonous properties". Defence successfully argued against the post being permitted as evidence in the triple-murder trial. "The prosecution is at pains to establish the accused did not have a cat and therefore that this post was dishonest," Mandy told a pre-trial hearing. "That will reflect poorly on the accused if that's admitted to evidence." The post might have been manipulated by the person who provided it to police, Mandy said, as he argued they should have been called to give evidence in the trial. "The witness who produced the screenshot had previously manipulated screenshots in the Facebook group using Photoshop," the defence barrister said. "Its reliability on the face of it is questionable." Ultimately, Beale ruled it out of evidence before the trial began. Penchant for poisons A number of other items of evidence revealed Patterson's alleged penchant for poisons. These were found by Victoria Police digital officers, who trawled through thousands of pieces of data found on devices seized from Patterson's home. The digital investigators used keywords including "death", "mushroom" and "poison". An appendix from a 2007 book called Criminal Poisonings was found on a Samsung tablet. It listed the colour, odour, solubility, taste and lethal dose of poisons including antifreeze, arsenic and cyanide. Prosecutors alleged in pre-trial hearings Patterson had access to the document in October 2019. However, defence lawyers successfully argued prosecutors could not prove she accessed the file just because it was found on the device as there was no evidence she had downloaded it or read it. Mandy said it would be prejudicial to Patterson in her trial and claimed Patterson's children might have been using the tablet when the file was downloaded. "And 2019 is too remote to be relevant to these allegations," Mandy told pre-trial. Another PDF titled "An overview of fungi in Melbourne" was found on a device at Patterson's home with an unknown date. But the defence claimed it had limited probative value as it did not mention poisonous mushrooms. The document had death cap mushrooms on the second page. "There's lots of people who are widely read, but don't read about poisonous mushrooms," Beale commented on the document. The jury was told about Patterson ditching the dehydrator she used to dry out the deadly mushroom after she left Melbourne's Monash Hospital on 2 August 2023. However, they were not told about her first visit to Koonwarra transfer station — on the same day as the beef Wellington lunch — where she disposed of cardboard. Prosecutors told pre-trial hearings Patterson was seen going to the tip on 29 July 2023. She also put her rubbish bins out for collection on the day of the lunch — which prosecutors alleged was incriminating conduct — but the jury was not told that either. Patterson will return to the Supreme Court on 25 August for a pre-sentence hearing.