
Most New Cars in Norway Are Evs. How a Freezing Country Beat Range Anxiety.
New cars parked at a port in Drammen, Norway.
FINNMARK, Norway – Just a few years ago, almost no one drove electric vehicles up here. In this remote region north of the Arctic Circle – where reindeer outnumber people, avalanches can bury roads in winter and sunlight disappears for weeks – 'range anxiety' takes on a new meaning.
Today, however, nearly all new car sales in Norway are electric. That's true even in Finnmark, the northernmost region in Europe's northernmost country.
Norway is 'an unlikely place for a transportation revolution,' acknowledged Christina Bu, head of the Norwegian Electric Vehicle Association.
At the Skoda dealership in Alta, Finnmark's largest city, salesman Orjan Dragland marveled at the transformation – how five years ago, every car on the showroom floor had a combustion engine, and now the inventory is all EVs.
In 2024, nearly 90 percent of new passenger cars sold in Norway were fully electric. Of the cars sold last month, the EV share was 97 percent.
By comparison, EVs last year accounted for 8 percent of new car sales in the United States, 13 percent in the euro zone and 27 percent in China.
'What happened' in Norway? Dragland said. 'The government happened.'
Norway has one of the world's most ambitious climate targets. It is aiming to become carbon neutral by 2030, and cutting emissions from road traffic is an important part of that. While the push for EVs has played to people's green sensibilities, the real driver, arguably, has been economic: Generous government incentives, supported at least indirectly by the country's fossil fuel profits, have brought down the cost of owning and operating an EV.
'It's very cheap to drive,' said Ailo Haetta, 43. He had just driven his sister and her new husband to their wedding – which explained his traditional Sami dress and the 'Just Married' sticker on his electric Volkswagen.
More-affordable EVs helped accelerate other aspects of Norway's effort to decarbonize its car fleet. Private entities became more willing to take the risk of installing charging stations. And as charging stations began to blanket the country, Norwegians grew more comfortable with EVs.
'The Norwegian experience is really about building confidence,' said transportation research scientist Simen Rostad Saether.
Making EVs the more affordable choice
It has taken 25 years for Norway to get this far. The government began championing EVs in the early 1990s, with the hope of growing a domestic EV industry while cutting carbon emissions.
The Norwegian EV-makers failed. Norway today imports all of its electric vehicles.
But Norwegian drivers proved eager to buy EVs souped up by government incentives.
Most significant, the government made EV purchases and leases exempt from a 25 percent value-added tax (VAT) – cutting thousands of dollars from the sticker prices – as well as from import and registration taxes.
As EVs began to outnumber gas-powered cars on the road, the government scaled back some of the perks. VAT is now assessed over a certain purchase price. EV owners no longer get out of paying city parking fees and annual road taxes. Exemptions from highway tolls and ferry fares have been replaced by discounts.
Still, many EVs in Norway are cheaper than or comparable in price to combustion cars – and they cost less to maintain, especially in the context of Europe's high fuel prices (which in Norway incorporate a carbon tax).
Elsewhere on the continent, gas-powered cars tend to be subject to lower taxes, and EVs often remain the more expensive choice. Felipe Munoz, an automotive expert at JATO Dynamics, noted that the price of compact electric cars averaged 32,700 euros in the euro zone last year, vs. 19,000 euros for gas ones.
'When you have these big gaps, you understand why people make the decisions they do,' he said.
Norway's EV experiment has been made possible by something of a paradox: The country is Europe's largest oil and gas producer, which helps support Norwegians' aspiration to live green. Norway has invested its fossil fuel profits into what has become the world's largest sovereign wealth fund, a nest egg worth $1.7 trillion. Returns from that fund help cover government expenses, which in turn makes it easier to accommodate climate-friendly tax exemptions.
The government estimates that between 2007 and 2025, it will have forgone approximately 640 billion kroner (about $62 billion) in various vehicle-related taxes, mostly because of EVs.
Norway's wealth means its EV model may not be easy to replicate everywhere. But countries seeking to boost EV adoption wouldn't have to spend as much now, said Rostad Sæther, who is part of the SINTEF research institute. With EV prices dropping globally, he said, other countries could focus less on the cost of cars and more on encouraging infrastructure and trust.
Building the charging network
Gjermund Pleym Wik is such an evangelizer for EVs that he has organized electric-car convoys through remote, mountainous areas in the far north to ease people's range concerns.
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post
A taxi driver charges his electric car at a station in Alta, Norway
'Yes, you need to stop and recharge, but it works,' he said, jabbing his finger at a map on a blue display board at Alta's largest charging station.
Norway is a long, narrow country with 60,000 miles of roads that snake around fjords and mountainous terrain.
Wik, who works in public health, admits that he once miscalculated the distance of a trip and had to unplug a stranger's Christmas lights to recharge. But EV fans say that shouldn't be any more of a deterrent than the prospect of running out of gas.
Norway has worked to ensure that drivers are never far from a charging point. Most people charge their EVs at home, and a legal 'right to charge' guarantees access for apartment dwellers. The country also has an extensive charging network – powered almost entirely by renewables – with 9,771 fast chargers in 1,684 locations, according to Lars Lund Godbolt, who maintains the government's database.
Godbolt said the longest distance between two fast-charging stations in Finnmark is about 80 miles, and officials say Norway easily bests the European Union target of 60 km (37 miles) between fast chargers on major roads.
In one sense, that might not be so hard to achieve in a nation the size of New Mexico. But consider that New Mexico has only 419 fast charging ports, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
In terms of population numbers, Norway is close to South Carolina. But when it comes to fast EV chargers, the gap is yawning: South Carolina has 633 fast charging ports, according to the federal database – around 11 per 100,000 people. Norway, on the other hand, boasts 174 fast chargers per 100,000.
The lack of charging infrastructure remains a major barrier to EV adoption in the United States. And that hesitancy, in turn, is deterring private investment in infrastructure to support EVs. Building and maintaining chargers is expensive, and in many areas, there isn't enough driver demand to make stations profitable.
To speed up deployment, the Biden administration launched the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program, allocating $5 billion to help states build chargers along key highway corridors, with the goal of reaching 500,000 stations by 2030. The Trump administration, which opposes federal support for electric vehicles, has frozen funding for the program – a freeze that remains in effect although the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office has said withholding the funds approved by Congress is unlawful.
In Norway, the government played an active role in initially establishing the charging network. In some cases, to ensure that chargers were placed at regular intervals on main roads, it subsidized up to 100 percent of the installation costs through competitive tenders from 'charging operators.' But since June 2022, new passenger EV charging stations have been built entirely on a commercial basis. (The government continues to support the charging infrastructure for heavy-duty vehicles.)
As more charging stations appeared, consumer confidence grew. And as EV ownership expanded, more private entities were willing to take on the risk of building stations. With so many people driving EVs, charging operators could count on a healthy level of business.
Some of the stations The Washington Post visited in Oslo offered WiFi and hot food in a small cafe – a place where customers charging their EVs could spend time, and money.
Will Norway reach 100 percent?
In 2017, Norway set a goal that by 2025 it would have 100 percent zero-emission new car sales. It is close but may fall a few percentage points short.
Some climate advocates argue for a ban on imports of fossil fuel cars, like the one Ethiopia introduced last year. Others say reaching a percentage in the high 90s is good enough.
'There's a lot of debate over: 'Do we really need the last 2 or 3 percent? Could those people have a hybrid? Should we use our energy to fight the last percent?'' Rostad Sæther said.
Norway still has a ways to go in transitioning its fleet of vehicles on the roads. Last year, it became the first country where EVs outnumber gas cars. But as a result of past encouragement of diesel as a transition fuel, diesel vehicles account for about a third of all cars and trucks – and those may last for years.
Some Norwegians have bought an EV not as a replacement but as a second car – to test it out. Askill Halse, an economist at TØI, a transportation research center, said Norway has seen a 'big increase' in car ownership and a modest uptick in overall traffic, despite other policies aimed at reducing driving. Environmentalists argue that the goal should not be more electric cars, but simply fewer cars.
In Finnmark – known for its northern lights, striking fjords and vast tundra expanses – there is lingering discomfort with EVs. Last year, 74 percent of new car sales in the region were electric, lagging the national numbers.
Proposed copper mining projects, vital for EV batteries, have drawn criticism from Indigenous Sami communities and environmentalists.
'Maybe they should search somewhere where the people aren't as close to the nature,' said Ann-Kristine Bongo, 48, a reindeer herder who drives an EV.
Interviews with locals highlighted other concerns: inconvenient charging apps, long waits at charging stations and reduced winter range.
The Norwegian Automobile Federation determined that EVs have an average range loss of about 20 percent in cold weather. Opting for a heat pump to warm the cabin, rather than relying on the battery, can help. One driver said he wears a snowsuit on exceptionally cold days to save battery on cabin heat.
Carpenter Tormod Simonsen, 21, said he didn't yet trust an EV for traveling to the mountains. 'I've gotten stuck many times – road closures, avalanches,' he said, filling up his gas-powered Volvo at a gas station in Alta. 'If I just drove in the city, okay. But in the mountains? You need to trust your ride.'
A growing number of Norwegians, though, are being won over, with many citing cost as the primary motivator. Taxi driver Tommi Olsen estimated that switching to an EV has cut his expenses by about 20 percent. Alta's main taxi company is now 75 percent electric, aiming for 100 percent by October.
Even electric snowmobiles are appearing. Tour guide Jørgen Wisløff tested one for northern lights tours at his 'ice hotel.' But it costs $6,000 more than the gas version. So he said he'd consider buying it if the government offered tax breaks to make the price more competitive.
Wisløff said he's happy, though, with his white electric Ford Mustang, which he noted was cheaper to buy than its gas equivalent. It gets 400 km on a full charge in winter and 500 km in summer – or about 250 miles and 310 miles. With charging points every 70 km (45 miles) or so on his journeys, he said, he rarely worries.
'That's why it's working here in Norway,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Yomiuri Shimbun
6 days ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Told Norwegian Minister He Wants Nobel Prize, Newspaper Says
OSLO (Reuters) — When U.S. President Donald Trump called Norway's finance minister last month to discuss tariffs, he also told him he wanted the Nobel Peace Prize, Norwegian business daily Dagens Naeringsliv reported on Thursday. Several countries including Israel, Pakistan and Cambodia have nominated Trump for brokering peace agreements or ceasefires, and he has said he deserves the Norwegian-bestowed accolade that four White House predecessors received. Out of the blue, while Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg was walking down the street in Oslo, Donald Trump called, Dagens Naeringsliv reported, citing unnamed sources. He wanted the Nobel Prize — and to discuss tariffs.


Japan Today
6 days ago
- Japan Today
Trump told Norwegian minister he wants Nobel Prize, newspaper says
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump takes a question from the press during a visit to the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 13, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo When U.S. President Donald Trump called Norway's finance minister last month to discuss tariffs, he also told him he wanted the Nobel Peace Prize, Norwegian business daily Dagens Naeringsliv reported on Thursday. Several countries including Israel, Pakistan and Cambodia have nominated Trump for brokering peace agreements or ceasefires, and he has said he deserves the Norwegian-bestowed accolade that four White House predecessors received. "Out of the blue, while Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg was walking down the street in Oslo, Donald Trump called," Dagens Naeringsliv reported, citing unnamed sources. "He wanted the Nobel Prize - and to discuss tariffs." In a comment to Reuters, Stoltenberg said the call was to discuss tariffs and economic cooperation ahead of Trump's call with Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Stoere. "I will not go into further detail about the content of the conversation," he added. Several White House officials, including U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were on the call, Stoltenberg added. The White House and the Norwegian Nobel Committee did not reply to requests for comment. With hundreds of candidates nominated each year, laureates are chosen by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, whose five members are appointed by Norway's parliament according to the will of Swedish 19th-century industrialist Alfred Nobel. The announcement comes in October in Oslo. The Norwegian newspaper said it was not the first time Trump had brought up the prize in conversation with Stoltenberg, a former secretary general of the NATO military alliance. The White House on July 31 announced a 15% tariff on imports from Norway, the same as the European Union. Stoltenberg said on Wednesday that Norway and the United States were still in talks regarding the tariffs. © Thomson Reuters 2025.


Yomiuri Shimbun
10-08-2025
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Expands Use of Tariffs to Reach National Security Goals
President Donald Trump's freewheeling use of tariffs as a tool of American power may have been more extensive than was publicly known, encompassing an array of national security goals as well as the interests of individual companies, according to internal government documents obtained by The Washington Post. This month, State Department officials considered demanding that U.S. trading partners vote against an international effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by the oceangoing container ships that are the backbone of global trade. In a draft 'action memo,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio was told that department officials had sought 'to inject this issue into the ongoing bilateral trade negotiations' with maritime nations such as Singapore. That move came after administration officials this past spring debated broadening trade negotiations with more than a dozen nations, including by requiring Israel to eliminate a Chinese company's control of a key port and insisting that South Korea publicly support deploying U.S. troops to deter China as well as Seoul's traditional rival, North Korea, the documents said. Administration officials saw trade talks as an opportunity to achieve objectives that went far beyond Trump's oft-stated goal of reducing the chronic U.S. trade deficit. In the first weeks after the president paused his 'reciprocal' tariffs April 9 to allow for negotiations, officials drew up plans to press countries near China for a closer defense relationship, including the purchase of U.S. equipment and port visits, the documents said. 'This is the first time I've seen that type of request in a trade agreement. When you're sitting at the negotiating table, you're not talking about this stuff,' said Wendy Cutler, who spent more than a quarter century in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and is now vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute in Washington. The latest sign that Trump views tariffs as the Swiss Army knife of diplomacy came this week, when he threatened to impose a 50 percent tariff on Indian goods to compel New Delhi to halt Russian oil purchases that the U.S. says support Russia's war in Ukraine. In an eight-page list of 'supplemental negotiating objectives,' U.S. officials acknowledged that potential accords would cover issues, including military basing, 'not traditionally found in a trade agreement.' Officials also discussed pressing other nations to provide concessions for individual companies including Chevron, one of the world's 10 largest oil producers, and Elon Musk's Starlink. The negotiating document contained suggestions from other Cabinet departments in response to a request by the office of U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and bore a handwritten notation indicating that it was a May 1 draft. It is not clear whether the provisions were discussed in the negotiations. Trump has announced several framework trade agreements with the European Union, Japan, Vietnam and others. But the administration has not released formal texts. A USTR spokesperson declined to comment. 'The document sent shock waves through the government,' said one State Department employee who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the press. 'This isn't normally how it works.' Trump on several occasions has publicly mixed trade and unrelated issues. In January, the president said he would impose tariffs on Colombian goods unless that country's leader agreed to accept deported migrants, which he eventually did. Last month, Trump threatened 50 percent tariffs on imports from Brazil if the government did not halt its prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro for allegedly fomenting a coup. On April 2, Trump described his tariffs as a response to other nations' unfair trade practices that would reduce the $1.2 trillion U.S. merchandise trade deficit. The import taxes could be lowered for countries that 'align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national security matters,' his executive order said. As U.S. negotiators scrambled to prepare for simultaneous talks with 18 top trading partners, suggestions poured in from across the administration. The South Korean government should be urged to endorse a change in the positioning of U.S. troops stationed there under the U.S. Forces Korea command, according to an early draft of a U.S.-Korea agreement. Among the goals listed was a requirement that 'Korea will issue a political statement supporting flexibility for USFK force posture to better deter China while continuing to deter [North Korea],' it said. The U.S. also wanted Seoul to boost defense spending to 3.8 percent of GDP, up from 2.6 percent last year, and to increase its $1 billion-plus contribution to cover the annual costs of basing the roughly 28,500 American troops in South Korea. In a July 28 press briefing, Woo Sang-ho, South Korea's senior secretary for political affairs, confirmed that defense issues were 'on the negotiation list.' But they were not in the agreement that Trump announced two days later. Trump nodded to his concerns over allied burden-sharing tariff remarks April 2 in the Rose Garden, during what he dubbed 'Liberation Day.' 'We take care of countries all over the world. We pay for their military. We pay for everything they have to pay. And then when you want to cut back a little bit, they get upset that you're not taking care of them any longer,' the president said. The negotiating document showed that administration officials planned to push several governments including Taiwan, India and Indonesia to increase their defense spending or to buy more U.S. military hardware. Such national security considerations may help explain why most countries did not retaliate against the U.S. with their own tariffs on American goods, said Phil Luck, director of the economics program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'They don't think this is just an economic competition. They're concerned we will escalate above that [and] pull out of NATO or change troop deployments,' said Luck, who served as the State Department's deputy chief economist in the Biden administration. Indeed, some Trump officials envisioned using the trade negotiations to contain Chinese strategic influence. Administration officials hoped that Trump's threat of a 49 percent tariff on Cambodian goods would persuade government officials in Phnom Penh to allow the 'U.S. Navy to conduct annual (or bi-annual) ship visits and training exercises at Ream Naval Base' in southwestern Cambodia. Washington had grown concerned over a Chinese naval presence at the facility, which offers direct access to the contested South China Sea. The U.S. wanted the Cambodian government to prohibit Chinese military 'deployments outside of Ream,' the document said. Israeli officials were to be pushed 'to remove Chinese port ownership in Haifa,' a coastal city in northern Israel. In 2015, China's Shanghai International Port Group, a majority state-owned company, won a 25-year contract to operate a new automated container-handling facility there. U.S. concerns over the Chinese presence in Haifa date to the Biden administration. U.S. Navy vessels have often docked at an Israeli navy base that is adjacent to the commercial port. U.S. officials also worried about another port under Chinese control in the northern Australian city of Darwin, which hosts about 2,500 U.S. Marines on a rotational deployment. China's Landbridge Group signed a 99-year lease to operate the Australian port in 2015. U.S. negotiators wanted a 'signal' from the Australian government of its 'intent to revisit its arrangement on the operation of the Port of Darwin by a China-backed firm.' During the Australian election campaign this year, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged to return the port to local ownership. But port worries were just one element of a broader anti-China proposal. In East Africa, the administration wanted Madagascar to refuse to permit 'China to establish military bases and expand military cooperation.' Another East African nation, the tiny island of Mauritius, should conduct a study on removing telecom equipment made by China's Huawei, ZTE and Hikvision from its telecom and surveillance networks. And officials wanted Argentina to consult with U.S. experts about implementing 'control measures' at Chinese space installations in that country to 'ensure their exclusively civilian use.' The draft also suggested ways the U.S. government could prioritize the interests of specific companies. In Lesotho, a poor southern African nation that Trump had threatened with 50 percent tariffs, negotiators wanted the government to finalize deals with 'multiple U.S. firms.' OnePower, a renewable energy start-up, should be granted 'a five-year withholding tax exemption' and a license to develop a 24-megawatt project. Regulators should waive a legal requirement for Starlink, Musk's satellite-based internet provider, to provide a physical address in Lesotho before conducting business there, the document said. In mid-April, Newsday, a newspaper in Maseru, the capital of Lesotho, reported that there was no evidence of a Starlink office at the location the company had given as its registered address, 'raising serious legal and regulatory concerns.' In Israel, U.S. officials wanted the government not to 'proceed with any draft regulations or potential plans to force Chevron to sell its interests or status as operator in one of its offshore natural gas fields.' The Houston-based energy company has been operating in Israel since 2020. 'Chevron engages regularly with government officials and key stakeholders at home and abroad as a normal course of business. While we do not discuss details, our conversations always focus on the benefits we believe we bring to the communities where we operate, including the Eastern Mediterranean,' Chevron said when asked if it had requested U.S. government help. The administration continues to leverage trade talks for broader gains. McCoy Pitt, the senior official in the State Department's international organization affairs bureau, wrote the secretary of state this month about linking trade talks with hopes of killing a global climate change deal. Pitt urged Rubio to approve a strategy before a scheduled October vote by members of the International Maritime Organization on limiting greenhouse gas emissions by large container ships. The U.N. agency in April approved draft regulations, which the State Department memo described as a 'global carbon tax.' Pitt's memo, titled 'Protecting U.S. Shipping Interests by Defeating the International Maritime Organization's 'Net-Zero Framework,'' said that as part of any trade deal with the U.S., countries 'are instructed' or 'would be expected' to vote against the IMO proposal. Through an online portal, the State Department said: 'We do not comment on purportedly leaked documents. We do, however, look forward to the story on how the Trump Administration is using reciprocal trade negotiations to benefit and fight for the American people.'