&w=3840&q=100)
Russia suffered 1 million casualties to capture just 12% territory in Ukraine: Study
Russia has suffered 1 million troop casualties and lost a third of its Black Sea fleet and a third of its long-range bombers' and surveillance aircraft's fleets to capture just 12% of Ukraine's territory in the full-scale war since February 2022. read more
Russia has paid a disproportionately high cost in the ongoing war on Ukraine, according to publicly available data and a study published this week.
Since February 2022, when Russia launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine at the orders of President Vladimir Putin, the country's forces have just captured around 12 per cent of Ukrainian territories. But the costs have been huge.
In a study published this week, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) assessed that Russia has suffered around 1 million troop casualties since it launched the full-scale invasion in 2022.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Out of these casualties, around 250,000 soldiers were killed and the rest were injured, according to the study.
Do Russian costs outweigh benefits in Ukraine war?
Besides the soldiers, Russia's material costs have been huge as well.
In the ongoing war, Russia has lost nearly a third of its Black Sea fleet, including the flagship Moskva and at least one submarine, and Ukraine has killed some of the top Russian generals. In an audacious drone attack over the weekend, Ukraine also destroyed nearly a third of Russia's long-range, nuclear-capable bombers' fleet and also struck two of the six surveillance aircraft.
Moreover, Russia has lost strategic autonomy to China. After Western sanctions threatened to cripple the Russian economy, China came to Russia's aid and bought its energy exports and provided it with supplies needed to sustain the war and consumer goods as well. Far from being mutually-beneficial, the partnership is so lopsided that scholars say that China has become a subservient partner of China.
With such losses to manpower, equipment, and strategic autonomy, Russia has just captured 12 per cent of Ukrainian territory. Since January 2024, the pace of Russia's advance has been such that it has captured just 1 per cent of Ukrainian territory, as per the CSIS study.
Overall, Russia currently controls around 19 per cent of Ukrainian territory, according to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).
However, Russia has captured just 12 per cent of Ukrainian territory since 2022 and the rest 7 per cent territory was captured between 2014 and 2022.
In 2014, Russia invaded Ukraine's Crimea region, captured it, and annexed it after a sham referendum.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
During 2014-22, pro-Russia insurgents captured nearly a third of eastern Ukraine's Donbas regions, comprising Donetsk and Luhansk provinces.
Together, Crimea (around 4-5 per cent) and Donbas (2-3 per cent) contributed to around 7 per cent of Ukrainian territory that Russia captured during 2014-22.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Musk threatens to withdraw Dragon spacecraft, a key space station link for NASA
As President Donald Trump and Elon Musk argued on social media on Thursday, the world's richest man threatened to decommission a space capsule used to take astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. After Trump threatened to cut government contracts given to Musk's SpaceX rocket company and his Starlink internet satellite services, Musk responded via X that SpaceX 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.'It's unclear how serious Musk's threat was. But the capsule, developed with the help of government contracts, is an important part of keeping the space station running. NASA also relies heavily on SpaceX for other programs including launching science missions and, later this decade, returning astronauts to the surface of the moon. SpaceX is the only U.S. company capable right now of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. Boeing's Starliner capsule has flown astronauts only once; last year's test flight went so badly that the two NASA astronauts had to hitch a ride back to Earth via SpaceX in March, more than nine months after launching last June. Starliner remains grounded as NASA decides whether to go with another test flight with cargo, rather than a also uses a Dragon capsule for its own privately run missions. The next one of those is due to fly next week on a trip chartered by Axiom Space, a Houston company. Cargo versions of the Dragon capsule are also used to ferry food and other supplies to the orbiting lab. Russia's Soyuz capsules are the only other means of getting crews to the space station right now. The Soyuz capsules hold three people at a time. For now, each Soyuz launch carries two Russians and one NASA astronaut, and each SpaceX launch has one Russian on board under a barter system. That way, in an emergency requiring a capsule to return, there is always someone from the U.S. and Russia on board. With its first crew launch for NASA in 2020 — the first orbital flight of a crew by a private company — SpaceX enabled NASA to reduce its reliance on Russia for crew transport. The Russian flights had been costing the U.S. tens of millions of dollars per seat for has also used Russian spacecraft for cargo, along with U.S. contractor Northrop Grumman. SpaceX's other government launches. The company has used its rockets to launch several science missions for NASA as well as military equipment. Last year, SpaceX also won a NASA contract to help bring the space station out of orbit when it is no longer usable. SpaceX's Starship mega rocket is what NASA has picked to get astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon, at least for the first two landing missions. Starship made its ninth test flight last week from Texas, but tumbled out of control and broke apart.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Musk vs Trump: Did Vivek Ramaswamy 'Doge' a bullet by getting out in time?
In Washington's latest episode of Tech Titans vs MAGA Caesar, D onald Trump has turned on Elon Musk —his former bromantic partner-in-disruption, SpaceX messiah, and self-appointed guardian of Western civilisation. The trigger? Musk labelled Trump's much-hyped One Big Beautiful Bill 'a disgusting abomination' and warned that America was hurtling toward 'debt slavery. ' Trump, never one to take offence lightly—or privately—responded with a MAGA-flavoured blitzkrieg. Contracts for Musk's companies? At risk. His reputation in conservative circles? Torched. 'Just another whiny billionaire,' Trump sneered, 'who forgot who made him matter.' As the Trump-Musk bromance dissolves faster than a Tesla on Autopilot in Washington traffic, one man watches the fireworks from a safe, well-lit distance—sipping Perrier, adjusting his campaign blazer, and thanking his stars he got out early, having clearly absorbed Sun Tzu's timeless wisdom: 'The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.'—Vivek Ramaswamy. Once the philosophical darling of the new right, Ramaswamy was handed a shiny new toy in Trump's second term—DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency. A meme-ified federal Frankenstein, DOGE was Trump's idea of bureaucratic reform through Silicon Valley swagger. Musk was the co-head. Vivek was the 'sane one.' Together, they were meant to revolutionise Washington. Or at least yell at it until it agreed to be disrupted. But like any startup built on vibes and vague mission statements, DOGE began to implode before it launched. Musk wanted to fire half of Washington via app. Trump wanted press conferences with golden eagles and fog machines. And Vivek? Vivek quietly disappeared. Officially, he left to run for Ohio governor. Unofficially, insiders suggest he saw the writing on the Twitter wall —that DOGE was less a reform movement and more a digital kamikaze mission, powered by ego, caffeine, and libertarian hallucinations. And now, in hindsight, his exit looks less like a career pivot and more like a Sun Tzu manoeuvre. Because while Musk is now battling Trump, Congress, and his own booster-fuelled paranoia, Ramaswamy is free to reinvent himself as a centrist tech-whisperer in the Rust Belt. MAGA enough to get the base. Moderate enough to avoid the madness. Except MAGA, like any self-devouring revolution, doesn't forget. Or forgive. Since stepping away from DOGE and softening his Trumpian rhetoric, Ramaswamy has found himself in the crosshairs of the same base that once anointed him their biotech Brahmin. Hardcore influencers have branded him a traitor. Conservative meme accounts now photoshop him next to Liz Cheney. And in the subterranean rage economy of right-wing internet culture, he's been rebranded from 'America First entrepreneur' to 'globalist plant with a Harvard tongue. ' The irony? The same mob now grilling Ramaswamy for 'disloyalty' is turning on Musk for 'disrespect.' In MAGAland, loyalty is a zero-sum blood sport, and the only acceptable exit is the one through public execution. DOGE, predictably, has become a political punchline. It was doomed from conception—run like a Reddit thread, branded like a crypto coin, and staffed by men who confuse spreadsheets with scripture. The only surprising thing is how quickly it crashed. Musk thought he could out-Trump Trump. But in MAGA-land, there can only be one sun god—and he's orange, not emerald-mined. Ramaswamy, to his credit, didn't wait around to become collateral damage. He understood what Musk didn't: that proximity to Trump is radioactive. Stay too long and you mutate. Get out early and you might just survive. The result? Musk is in political freefall. Trump is in attack mode. And Ramaswamy? He's in Ohio, sipping Perrier and talking about 'innovation in public policy'—while ducking MAGA Twitter grenades and hoping they forget he ever existed. Call it foresight. Call it cowardice. Or just call it good political hygiene. Because as Sun Tzu said—he will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight. And in the dystopian sitcom that is American politics, that makes Vivek Ramaswamy the guy who ghosted the group chat before the firestorm—and lived to run another episode.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Ukraine's drone attack exposes Achilles' heel of military superpowers
Ukraine's audacious drone attack wounded and embarrassed Moscow, but it also exposed a threat to Kyiv's Western allies: Low-cost, high-tech strikes can deliver an increasingly potent punch to even the most heavily defended world powers. Inexpensive drones such as those Kyiv used to attack dozens of Russian warplanes parked at airfields far from Ukraine on Sunday have become a cornerstone of what strategists call asymmetric warfare, where two sides square off with mismatched military power, resources or approaches. For years, the U.S. and its partners in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization prevailed in that imbalance thanks to their wealth and advanced technologies. Now, a combination of technological advances and innovation-spawning armed conflicts has flipped the equation, leaving Washington and its allies behind on developments. For military commanders, the pace of change has meant an upheaval on a scale unseen since World War II. 'We're going to have to be more agile. Drones are going to constantly change," U.S. Army chief of staff Gen. Randy George told a conference on Monday. Ukraine's attack was 'a really good example of just how quickly technology is changing the battlefield," he said. Thanks to cheap commercial drones and other digital devices, rebels, terrorist organizations and threadbare militaries like Ukraine's can achieve returns on military investments of a scale almost unimaginable a few years ago. Ukraine said it launched 117 small drones in Sunday's attacks on four Russian bases. The drones it employed sell for about $2,000 apiece. Even including the operation's other expenses, Kyiv still probably spent well under $1 million to destroy aircraft that would cost well over $1 billion to replace—something Russia has little ability to do in the near future. Kyiv amplified the impact through propaganda, releasing video images of the attack hours after it was carried out. The ease with which information spreads online now gives covert operations a potentially destabilizing element of psychological warfare previously impossible on a global scale. Widespread deployment of dual-use technologies—including commercial drones and networking software similar to that used by ride-sharing services—has played a big role in allowing Ukraine to thwart Russia's initial large-scale invasion in 2022 and hold on against a much larger military power. Some of what the Ukrainians have learned was on display in the recent attack. Kyiv's spy agency was able to execute the covert operation largely thanks to their grasp of the latest developments in military uses of civilian technologies, such as apparently using public cellphone networks to guide drones. During the war, both Russia and Ukraine have made leaps in drone design, defenses against them and electronic warfare. That face-off has presented other countries with a case study in the intensity—technological and military—of future conflicts. 'We are trying to learn every single lesson that can possibly be learned about modern warfighting and how quickly it can evolve and how we must innovate and be technologically nimble to address those threats that evolve over time," said U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker on Wednesday. The Army plans a massive increase in its use of drones, part of a broader shift in the Pentagon from large, expensive systems. The U.S. in Iraq and Afghanistan deployed with great effect sophisticated uncrewed aircraft including the RQ-4 Global Hawk—which has a wingspan similar to a Boeing 737 passenger jet—and the MQ-9 Reaper, which can launch rockets designed for use by jet fighters. Both cost millions of dollars per aircraft. Now the U.S. is rolling out a fast-changing array of smaller, expendable units and applying lessons from attacks like Ukraine's. Ukraine has made leaps in drone design during the war. 'It's another example of how warfighting technology continues to advance and evolve, allowing armies to reach deeper with offensive capabilities, reducing an adversary's critical assets, and reducing the cost curve of deterrence," said Army Gen. Christopher Donahue, commander of U.S. Army Europe and Africa, who is helping lead the change. Similar efforts are under way across NATO countries, including Germany, Europe's largest economy but long home to one of the alliance's slowest-changing armed forces. German Chief of Defense Carsten Breuer, the country's highest-ranking military officer, said that a pivotal lesson of the war in Ukraine is the need to speed up and shorten the innovation cycle. 'In Ukraine they have a direct link between industry and the front line," he said in an interview. 'We have to do this without having a front line." He said that in late March the German military decided to acquire a type of drone, and that the so-called loitering munitions should be deployed with troops by year-end, marking a dramatic acceleration. But procurement and distribution are only a start. Ukraine's attack also showed advances in operations and military tactics. Iraq was one of the first places where commercial drones were turned into weapons. Irregular warfare is hardly new. Though the Ukraine war is highlighting how armies can use technological advances and covert operations to get a leg up on more powerful opponents, terrorists and other rebel groups have for years employed such tactics against their enemies. The terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, were the most extreme example of irregular, asymmetric warfare: They had historic repercussions at minimal financial cost for the organizers. Even so, they required suicidal assailants. Drones and other new technologies allow potentially massive impact for attackers who remain anonymous and out of danger. 'What it comes down to is, how can we remove the human and let a piece of technology do it instead?" said Mike Monnik, chief executive of DroneSec, a threat-intelligence company tracking drone attacks worldwide. Ukraine's strikes are part of a worldwide trend, said Monnik. Among the first fighters to turn commercial drones into weapons were Islamic State forces in Iraq, roughly a decade ago. Early in its attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas sent slow, inexpensive drones to neutralize Israel's sophisticated automated guard towers along its border with Gaza. Houthi rebels in Yemen have used relatively simple uncrewed systems to inflict costly damage on world shipping and Western navies. Many more drone attacks go unnoticed. In Myanmar, rebels modified a $600 agricultural drone bought on Alibaba with unguided rockets, making it 'almost a miniature attack helicopter," and a criminal gang in Israel exploded a drone packed with explosives outside the 13th-floor window of a rival gang leader in an assassination attempt, Monnik said. Ukraine used comparable innovation with the added twist of quickly posting videos as evidence of success for maximum international impact. 'It really is that psychological element," said Monnik of the videos. The goal is to rally support for Ukraine's cause and to scare Russia into thinking, 'now we need to search every truck or protect every air base" because no target is out of the small systems' reach, he said. Advanced wireless technology doesn't only benefit underdogs. Israel last year carried out hugely sophisticated covert attacks on Hezbollah militants in Lebanon by detonating explosives hidden in their walkie-talkies and pagers. It triggered the explosions remotely. A funeral in Lebanon last year after Israel staged an attack on Hezbollah by detonating explosives hidden in pagers and walkie-talkies. Write to Daniel Michaels at
