Donald Trump demands NFL football team Washington Commanders, Baseball team Cleveland Guardians name change. Owners have other ideas
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Washington Commanders, Cleveland Guardians
FILE - Washington Commanders jerseys are displayed at an event to unveil the NFL football team's new identity, Feb. 2, 2022, in Landover, Md. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, file)
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Jul 20, 2025; Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Cleveland Guardians shortstop Brayan Rocchio (4) rounds third base en route to scoring on a hit by designated hitter David Fry (not pictured) during the fourth inning against the Athletics at Progressive Field. Mandatory Credit: Ken Blaze-Imagn Images
FAQs
President Donald Trump wants Washington's football franchise Washington Commanders and Cleveland's baseball team Cleveland Guardians to revert to their former names. Josh Harris, whose group bought the Commanders from former owner Dan Snyder in 2023, said earlier this year the name was here to stay. Not long after taking over, Harris quieted speculation about going back to Redskins, saying that would not happen. Guardians president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti indicated before Sunday's game against the Athletics that there weren't any plans to revisit the name change.President Trump said Sunday on his Truth Social site that 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!'Both teams have had their current names since the 2022 seasons. Washington dropped Redskins after the 2019 season and was known as the Washington Football Team for two years before moving to Commanders.Cleveland announced in December 2020 it would drop Indians. It announced the switch to Guardians in July 2021. In 2018, the team phased out "Chief Wahoo' as its primary logo.The name changes had their share of supporters and critics as part of national discussions about institutions and teams to drop logos and names considered racist.The Guardians are the fifth name for Cleveland's baseball franchise. It joined the American League in 1901 as one of the eight charter franchises as the Blues. It switched to the Bronchos a year later and used the Naps from 1903 through 1914 before moving to the Indians in 1915.Washington started in Boston as the Redskins in 1933 before moving to the nation's capital four years later.Washington and Cleveland share another thing in common. David Blitzer is a member of Harris' ownership group with the Commanders and holds a minority stake in the Guardians.A1. Washington's football franchise is Washington Commanders.A2. Cleveland's baseball team is Cleveland Guardians.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
25 minutes ago
- India.com
How Much Money Did Divya Deshmukh Win At The FIDE Women's World Cup 2025?
photoDetails english 2938299 At just 19, Divya Deshmukh made history by winning the 2025 FIDE Women's World Cup, defeating veteran Grandmaster Koneru Humpy in a thrilling final. With this victory, she earned $50,000 in prize money and became the fourth Indian woman to achieve the prestigious Grandmaster title. However, the stark pay disparity between the men's and women's chess tournaments drew sharp focus—Divya's prize was less than half of what the Open category champion receives. Her triumph has reignited discussions on gender pay inequality in chess and spotlighted India's growing dominance in global women's chess. Learn more about Divya's remarkable journey and earnings. Updated:Jul 29, 2025, 08:26 AM IST 1. Divya Deshmukh Won $50,000 for Her Historic Triumph 1 / 13 By winning the 2025 FIDE Women's World Cup, 19-year-old Divya Deshmukh earned a top prize of $50,000 (approx. ₹41.6 lakh) — the highest payout in the women's tournament. 2. Koneru Humpy Took Home $35,000 as Runner-Up 2 / 13 Veteran grandmaster Koneru Humpy, who finished second, received $35,000 (approx. ₹29.1 lakh) — showcasing a steep drop from the winner's purse but still a significant reward. 3. Women's Winner Earns Less Than Half of Open Champion 3 / 13 Despite similar formats, the Open World Cup winner receives $110,000, while the Women's World Cup champion gets just $50,000 — highlighting a glaring gender-based pay gap. 4. Total Women's Prize Pool Was $691,250 4 / 13 The FIDE Women's World Cup 2025 had a total prize pool of $691,250, distributed across all rounds. This amount remains smaller compared to the Open section's multimillion-dollar pool. 5. D Gukesh Earned 22 Times More for Winning the World Championship 5 / 13 In contrast, D Gukesh earned ₹11.45 crore (approx. $1.37 million) for winning the 2024 FIDE World Championship — making Divya's $50,000 less than 4% of his prize. 6. FIDE's Structured Payout Rewards All Round Participants 6 / 13 Prize money is awarded progressively — starting from $3,750 for Round 1 and rising through each stage, ensuring every player in the knockout format is compensated for performance. 7. Prize Money Has Remained Stagnant Since 2021 7 / 13 While the 2025 Women's World Cup saw a minor increase in the total prize pool, the top prize of $50,000 remains unchanged since 2021 — raising concerns over FIDE's financial prioritization. 8. Women Can Compete in Open Events — But Few Do 8 / 13 Although female players can qualify for the Open World Cup, most opt for the women's section due to fewer slots and stiffer competition in the open category, affecting their earnings potential. 9. Equal Format, Unequal Pay: The Debate Grows Louder 9 / 13 Both men's and women's events follow the same format and time control, yet offer unequal rewards. This continues to fuel demands for equal prize money in global chess events. 10. Divya's Win Has Sparked National Discussion on Pay Parity 10 / 13 Divya Deshmukh's earnings and the visible gap with male counterparts have reignited the debate on gender equity in sports — making her victory both a personal and political milestone. 11 / 13 12 / 13 13 / 13
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Most influential of the last decade': Former India head coach Ravi Shastri singles out former India captain
Former India Head Coach Ravi Shastri talks to then captain Virat Kohli during the 4th Test between India and England in 2021 in Ahmedabad (Photo by) Ravi Shastri , one of Indian cricket 's most prominent voices, has once again expressed his admiration for Virat Kohli , calling him the most influential player of the last decade. In a recent video posted on Stick to Cricket, the former India head coach was asked to name the best player of the modern era. Without hesitation, Shastri responded, "It's a young brigade at the moment, but the best player, the most influential player of the last decade – Virat Kohli. " Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Shastri, who coached India during some of Kohli's most successful years as Test captain, has long been an open admirer of the 36-year-old. His latest praise adds to a string of accolades he has directed towards Kohli in recent years. During a quick-fire segment, Shastri was also asked to name a current bowler he'd least like to face. His answer: Jasprit Bumrah . He also cheekily addressed a question about whether he'd prefer hitting six sixes or winning a World Cup—reminding viewers that he had done both in his career, before picking the World Cup win as more special. Old Trafford cricket ground: A stadium tour of the iconic venue in Manchester Earlier, Shastri, in a discussion with cricketing greats like Phil Tufnell, Sir Alastair Cook, David Lloyd, and Michael Vaughan, while talking about the ongoing five-Test series in England, named his top five Indian cricketers of all time. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why Seniors Are Snapping Up This TV Box, We Explain! Techno Mag Learn More Undo Shastri picked legends across eras, saying, '(Sunil) Gavaskar, Sachin (Tendulkar), Virat definitely. I'm looking at the most influential players of that era. MS (Dhoni) again. So these will be the five.' Poll Who do you think is the most influential Indian cricketer of the last decade? Virat Kohli MS Dhoni Rohit Sharma Jasprit Bumrah He later completed the list by adding Kapil Dev. Shastri's continued praise for Kohli underlines the lasting impact the batter has had on Indian cricket, both statistically and as a leader. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
'2 Brilliant Hundreds Will Be Remembered, Not Brook's 37mph Ball': Legend Calls Out England's Manchester Farce
Alastair Cook says India's decision to continue batting despite Ben Stokes' offer for a draw was the right one and the hosts were simply frustrated. The 4th Test in Manchester will be remembered for the fightback shown by India after being pushed into a corner by England. Aiming for an unassailable lead in the five-match series, England did everything right – from winning the toss and keeping India to 358-all out to posting a mammoth 669 in reply. They then took a giant step towards winning the contest by getting rid of two India batters for 0. From 0/2 and trailing by 311 runs, India showed grit and determination to save the contest and ensure it ended in a draw. Shubman Gill (103) and KL Rahul (90) stabilised the innings after the early jolts before Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar struck centuries to seal the fate. However, the spotlight seems to have been stolen, for now, by England venting their frustration at India not accepting Ben Stokes' handshake for a premature draw. With the play entering the final hour and two well-set India batters facing almost no trouble from the English bowlers, Stokes offered to end the game early, but Jadeja and Sundar refused. An irritated Stokes took a dig and asked if Jadeja will be like scoring hundred against the bowling of part-timers Harry Brook and Ben Duckett. Later, the England Test captain doubled down on his reaction claiming that 10-11 extra runs wouldn't have taken away anything from the superlative efforts of Jadeja and Sundar. 'It was the right decision for them to carry on for the momentum they'll gain from it. When you're out on the field, when you have been out there for 140 overs, you get frustrated. So there's a little bit of frustration for England," Cook said on BBC Sport. The contest was reduced to a farce by England with Harry Brook tossing up lollipops with no intention to land the ball in the right spots. Cook said in few years, the world will only remember the brilliant centuries scored by Indian batters to save the contest and not what Brook did when asked to bowl. 'I understand why India did it. Five years down the line, you look at the scorecard, you'll see two brilliant hundreds to save the game. Plus, Shubman Gill's as well. So, it will be forgotten about Harry Brook's 37mph ball," he said. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
