Appeal against retention permission for tree removal at Tirlán premises
In May this year, Laois County Council received an application for retention planning permission from Tirlán for "the removal of existing trees and hedges to a 22.5m portion of the front boundary adjacent to the entrance gate and replacement of same with a 2.7m high paladin fence".
The application also noted "affixing" advertising signage along the front boundary fencing and entrance gate amounting to a total of 12m², and the erection of building signage onto existing structures within the site amounting to a total sum of 15.3m².
In the application, Tirlán outlined that the proposed development did not involve the demolition of any structure, is not inside a strategic development zone, and does not require a waste licence.
The company also stated that development did not consist of work to a protected structure, is not located within an architectural conservation area, and did not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement, or licence from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
During the process seeking retention planning permission, an objection was lodged by a nearby resident with several concerns.
The objection to the county council stated: "I live directly across the road from this premises. My family's house predates the establishment of the Tirlán commercial outlet.
"As pointed out in my correspondence... the removal of the trees and trees hedgerow late last year considerably affected me and my family.
"The present application makes no attempt to address the issues raised by the unauthorised development. The trees and hedging which were removed formed part of an existing hedgerow which was a field boundary going back to the time before the time the Tirlán premises was built," the letter of objection continued.
The neighbour outlined his belief that the proposed retention will do nothing to "prevent the visual intrusion, noise and dust nuisance" which he claimed operations on the premises create.
"I wish to be put back in the same position I was in before the unauthorised development took place, with a screen of mature evergreen trees reaching to the height of the remaining hedgerow along the front of the premises," he argued to Laois County Council.
However, despite the objections, Laois County Council in recent weeks decided to grant conditional retention planning permission to Tirlán.
The conditions included the planting, within three months, of trees and shrubs of species native to the area to form naturalised hedgerows similar to existing native hedgerows in the vicinity.
Another condition, was for a payment to Laois County Council's Development Contribution Scheme, in respect of public infrastructure and facilities.
The decision to grant retention permission has now been appealed by the same neighbour to the higher planning authority, An Coimisiún Pleanála, which has stated that a decision is due by November 24, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
6 hours ago
- Agriland
Appeal against retention permission for tree removal at Tirlán premises
An appeal has been lodged to An Coimisiún Pleanála about the removal of existing trees and hedges at Tirlán Farmlife, Graiguecullen branch, Co. Laois. In May this year, Laois County Council received an application for retention planning permission from Tirlán for "the removal of existing trees and hedges to a 22.5m portion of the front boundary adjacent to the entrance gate and replacement of same with a 2.7m high paladin fence". The application also noted "affixing" advertising signage along the front boundary fencing and entrance gate amounting to a total of 12m², and the erection of building signage onto existing structures within the site amounting to a total sum of 15.3m². In the application, Tirlán outlined that the proposed development did not involve the demolition of any structure, is not inside a strategic development zone, and does not require a waste licence. The company also stated that development did not consist of work to a protected structure, is not located within an architectural conservation area, and did not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement, or licence from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). During the process seeking retention planning permission, an objection was lodged by a nearby resident with several concerns. The objection to the county council stated: "I live directly across the road from this premises. My family's house predates the establishment of the Tirlán commercial outlet. "As pointed out in my correspondence... the removal of the trees and trees hedgerow late last year considerably affected me and my family. "The present application makes no attempt to address the issues raised by the unauthorised development. The trees and hedging which were removed formed part of an existing hedgerow which was a field boundary going back to the time before the time the Tirlán premises was built," the letter of objection continued. The neighbour outlined his belief that the proposed retention will do nothing to "prevent the visual intrusion, noise and dust nuisance" which he claimed operations on the premises create. "I wish to be put back in the same position I was in before the unauthorised development took place, with a screen of mature evergreen trees reaching to the height of the remaining hedgerow along the front of the premises," he argued to Laois County Council. However, despite the objections, Laois County Council in recent weeks decided to grant conditional retention planning permission to Tirlán. The conditions included the planting, within three months, of trees and shrubs of species native to the area to form naturalised hedgerows similar to existing native hedgerows in the vicinity. Another condition, was for a payment to Laois County Council's Development Contribution Scheme, in respect of public infrastructure and facilities. The decision to grant retention permission has now been appealed by the same neighbour to the higher planning authority, An Coimisiún Pleanála, which has stated that a decision is due by November 24, 2025.
Irish Times
23-07-2025
- Irish Times
Galway farmer granted permission to challenge Greenway purchase decision ‘splitting' his farm
A Galway farmer has been granted permission to challenge a compulsory purchase order (CPO) made by An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) to construct a cycleway that he says would run across his land and 'split' his farm. He has claimed the route built under the Connemara Greenway Project would make his farmlands – in his family since the 1940s – 'unmanageable and landlocked'. At the High Court, lawyers for Oliver Joyce, of Emloughmore, Clifden, Co Galway, successfully applied to Ms Justice Emily Farrell to challenge the ACP's decision to grant a May 2025 compulsory purchase order (CPO) to Galway County Council relating to lands he owns at Doireliagh, Doireclunlaigh, Clifden, in Co Galway. The project aims to install a cycle and walkway going from Galway city to Clifden over 76km (47 miles) that would go through 'the backbone' of Mr Joyce's property along the old Galway-to-Clifden railway line, he claimed. READ MORE Mr Oliver has taken the challenge against ACP's decision to approve the compulsory acquisition, with Galway County Council named as a notice party. In court papers, Mr Oliver said he was conscious that his farmlands were located in a 'highly sensitive environment', which includes marshland and hilled areas that form part of the Connemara Bog Complex SAC, a conservation area. The plaintiff submitted the practice of farming the lands through generations of his family was done 'in perfect symmetry with the environment' and that he is 'very passionate and concerned about this'. Mr Oliver claimed that when the project was first proposed by the council, it was to be carried out on a permissive basis such that the council would be facilitated in accessing the lands, but the lands would remain in his ownership and open so stock could travel across both sides of the farm. He submitted that his lands have a mix of soil types and this variety was essential, in that each part is integrated and grazed with the marshy area providing water during dry periods and the hilly areas providing respite during inclement weather conditions. Mr Oliver said the project, as approved by the granting, was different from the original, in that it now envisages a wider walk and cycleway. He submitted that he was assured by the council that the lands would remain open for stock to travel and that any fencing would only be constructed when they were required by the landowner and that the application to ACP was one based on his permission. Mr Oliver claimed he understood the project to initially comprise of a 2.5m-wide (8.2ft) 'informal track of a type that one would see in the countryside', but that the more recent, larger scheme now involved a 3.5m-wide (11.5ft) asphalt track with full fencing involving 'sheep wire and barbed wire'. The plaintiff said he was 'shocked' that after an initial agreement on the scheme, Galway County Council then said they would 'accept nothing less than full ownership' and sought the CPO. Mr Oliver argued that the 'fundamental basis of the scheme has been turned on its head' by the CPO and that the decision to do so was 'taken without cause or justification'. He further claimed that environmental assessments carried out and submitted to ACP related to the original scheme and that the new elements that arose in the CPO scheme were not previously considered for environmental impact. Ms Justice Farrell granted leave for the judicial review to Michael O'Donnell BL, instructed by Harrington & Co solicitors – for Mr Oliver – and adjourned the matter to September.
Irish Independent
21-07-2025
- Irish Independent
Plans for Wicklow solar farm refused over visual impact
Located in the townland of Ballymoney, just off the M11, the proposed development – which had a 40-year lifespan - was the second planned by BNRG in the area after receiving consent for a solar farm on a neighbouring 19-hectare site in 2019. The latest application proposed to construct PV panels mounted on metal support structures along with a battery energy storage system (BESS), with access provided via the neighbouring, approved solar farm. The solar farm, battery energy storage system BESS and main infrastructure, including inverter stations, MV stations, new access tracks, underground cabling, a temporary construction compound and a substation, would occupy five fields of agricultural land currently being used for arable farming, with perimeter fencing surrounding it, 16 CCTV cameras and access gates. Refusing the application, a senior executive Wicklow County Council planner noted three reasons for the decision, including the overall scale of the proposed development within a designated Coastal Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, its visibility from the surrounding road network and the 'cumulative effect of a number of permitted solar farms within the immediate area'. 'It is considered that the proposed solar farm would be contrary to the objectives of the County Development Plan, would result in a significant visual impact due to the local landscape appearing industrialised and would negatively impact on this scenic coastal rural area,' the planner wrote. Noting the potential detrimental impacts on the amenities of residential property in the area, the loss of established agricultural land and the lack of supporting information, the planner commented that the local authority is 'not satisfied that the proposed development would not seriously injure the amenities of the area'. Commenting on how it was 'not possible to fully assess the potential impact on the amenities of the area', the planner highlighted the lack of sufficient information submitted, including a fieldwork-based archaeological impact assessment, decommissioning costs, plans outlining appropriate riparian buffer zones and a report on the potential impacts of a cumulative loss of agricultural land in the area'. BNRG has four weeks from the decision date (July 9) to appeal the decision to An Coimisiún Pleanála.
