Rejecting rhetoric and tokenism, and embracing transformative thinking
'As Mandela Day Approaches – Let us reject rhetoric and tokenism, and embrace transformative thinking echoed in Random Acts of Kindness and Deliberate Acts of Restoration.'
As we approach 18 July 2025, let us pause—not merely to commemorate, but to reflect with integrity and purpose.
This is not the time for soothing rhetoric or symbolic gestures that serve only as temporary pain relief for our nation's deeper wounds.
Our people deserve more than ceremonial empathy.
They deserve bold action rooted in justice, courage, and dignity.
The legacy we inherit was paved by sacrifice, not convenience. It was not built for comfort, but carved through blood, resilience, and the unwavering dream of a liberated, dignified, and equal South Africa.
Truth be told, Tata Madiba never lived for applause. He didn't crave glory and was never fixated on his name being used to celebrate a single day.
What made him extraordinary was his unwavering insistence that others must thrive.
He lived together with the other departed struggle heroes for something far greater: a country united in its commitment to dignity, justice, and the Constitution. And if we are conscious, that mission remains unfinished.
Yes, we honour the legacy, but let us do so with courageous leadership, a long-term vision, and real, measurable change—not with rehearsed speeches or symbolic gestures.
It must become a national habit of giving, building, and transforming beyond our own needs. And that's where our perspective must shift.
It should call each of us as citizens, leaders, and institutions to act in ways that honour the Constitution, not in speech, but in deeds.
Among us are the Madibas, who may never be known, whose names will never appear in headlines-yet they serve, they sacrifice, and they build quietly.
They are educators, nurses, caregivers, municipal workers, professionals in the built environment, economists, scientists, transport drivers, bakers, cleaners, mortuary workers, police officers, court workers, community leaders, job creators, entertainers, news anchors, recyclers and ordinary citizens who rise with selfless purpose every day.
Let us salute them because Mandela's legacy lives not in statues, but in the quiet strength of those who continue to build despite the odds.
To those who may no longer believe in Mandela Day, for whatever reason, I urge you: still participate.
Not for symbolism or performance, but because selfless giving and sacrifice still matter. Even one act of deliberate kindness can restore faith, dignity, and hope.
This is not a day of branding; it is a day of becoming better neighbours, more ethical leaders, and more conscious builders of the nation.
The real question is not what we will do for 67 minutes, But what will we do with the 364 days that follow? Because the soul of Mandela Day lies not in what we give away for a moment, but in what we build, protect, and transform for generations to come. In that spirit, we must be careful not to reduce this day to ribbons, branded t-shirts, or food parcels.
These are appreciated, but we must not confuse temporary relief with long-term transformation.
It is easy to perform well. It is harder to build well. Yet, that is precisely what our country needs: systems, institutions, and leadership that outlive applause.
Let us take on this challenge moving forward: to use our platforms and resources to restore dignity where it has been denied. We must drive transformation that is structural, not merely symbolic.
Our leadership must be defined not only by strategy, but by conscience.
We do not lead for compliance; we lead for meaningful, generational impact.
This calls for asking the difficult questions:
Are we building generational capacity, or simply ticking off compliance boxes that soothe our conscience but make no lasting change? Are our interventions enabling dignity and self-reliance, or are we creating dependency under the guise of goodwill?
Because if Mandela Day means anything, it must mean this: Leadership without moral imagination is not leadership at all. It is administration without vision, authority without purpose, and influence without integrity.'.
Today, I challenge each of us, whether in government, business, education, or civil society, to step beyond words and symbolism.
Let us commit to actions that restore dignity, open doors, and build lasting opportunities. Let us hold ourselves accountable not only on Mandela Day, but in the decisions we make every day thereafter.
'Decolonization is not only a long-standing political and epistemological movement aimed at liberation and freedom for those people who experienced colonialism and who are today…' — Sabelo J. Ndlovu-Gatsheni
Together, let us safeguard what we fought so hard for. This legacy is not guaranteed. It is fragile, and it is urgent. It must be preserved, protected, and passed on to future generations. Let us honour the legacy by carrying forward the mission. Let us lead with courage. Act with conscience. Live the Constitution in practice, not just in theory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
10 hours ago
- The Citizen
SA's electricity price is soaring: Why protests are often the only way for people to be heard
Electricity prices have skyrocketed over the last twenty-five years at approximately four times the rate of inflation. Millions of unemployed South Africans, many of whom survive on a Social Relief of Distress Grant government grant of R370 (about US$21) per month, are not able to pay for electricity and still afford food and shelter. In the working class community of Thembisa in South Africa's industrial heartland of Gauteng, the local government recently tried to make all families pay a fixed monthly fee of R126 (US$7) for electricity. But the residents could not afford this and in late July, occupied roads and shut down the area. Within a day, the mayor scrapped the electricity fee. Luke Sinwell, a scholar of popular history and grassroots mobilisation in South Africa, explains how protests might just be the only way for working class South Africans to make their voices heard. Is electricity affordable in South Africa? No. Electricity prices have skyrocketed over the last twenty-five years at approximately four times the rate of inflation. It is also crucial to view electricity prices in a socio-economic context. For example, the cost of electricity needs to be assessed relative to the disposable income of the household buying it. Low-income families spend up to twenty percent of their household income on energy, making electricity very unaffordable. ALSO READ: Thembisa protest raises risk of national unrest About half of all South African households (approximately 15 million people) don't have nearly enough food to eat. This means that the heads of impoverished or working class households (mostly women of Colour) are forced to decide between putting ideally nutritious food on the table and lighting their houses at night. They're forced to choose between using energy for heating to keep warm during winter or ensuring that their limited fresh food supplies stay cold so that they do not spoil. I'm part of a group of researchers who use the term energy racism to describe the systemic oppression that prevents Black working class people from accessing the electricity they need to survive and prosper. South Africans have been protesting for decades about high electricity prices. Why hasn't the problem been solved? There are weaknesses in South Africa's democratic process. Municipalities (local government) responses to the concerns and demands of communities tend to be shortsighted and inadequate. Currently, the major political parties in South Africa focus mainly on obtaining consensus at the polls through elections every five years. The South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, is overseeing a 'National Dialogue' which he claims will allow the voices of ordinary people to be heard in the corridors of power. It's been designed to appear as an inclusive and democratic process. However, based on my previous research, I believe that hidden beneath the surface, government has largely already decided the agenda and a set of policies that the dialogue will recommend. The South African government is continuing to rely on market-oriented, neoliberal policies which serve profit at the expense of the working class. READ MORE: Experts warn of unintended consequences of giving in to Thembisa demands This guarantees that electricity prices will remain extremely high. It also means that the government will continue to lack interest in proactively engaging those very communities about the cost of electricity. It is useful to remember what happened in September 2011 in Thembisa. About 2 000 residents went to the streets to protest against electricity cuts. Schools were closed, at least 100 residents arrested for public violence, and rubber bullets fired at protestors by police. When the residents of Thembisa shut down their area again recently, the mayor, undoubtedly aware of this history, wanted to avoid a similar situation. This gave residents an advantage – they were aware that protests would jolt the authorities into a favourable response. This means that when local government does not take the initiative to discuss important matters like the price of electricity with residents, communities will inevitably create their own formations through which to mobilise and influence local politics and beyond. How effective are protests against high prices of basic services? Protests are often an immediate response to desperate communities faced with an acute economic crisis. The recent protest in Thembisa is also part of a broader trend of protests and collective action around the lack of electricity in townships and informal settlements in other parts of Gauteng. For example, my research over six years in the informal settlement of Thembelihle in the south west of Johannesburg, found that people burned to death in their shacks because local government had failed to provide electricity. Residents had no alternative but to rely on imbawula (a homemade brazier). This was coal and wood in an oven or tin connected to a makeshift pipe to let smoke out. Many shacks caught fire as a result. They negotiated with authorities for more than 10 years. READ MORE: Traffic delays after residents shut down Thembisa over electricity tariff hike [VIDEO] Still, Thembelihle residents had no effective way to access the levers of decision-making authority which could electrify their homes. So they accessed power on their own terms, forcing authorities to the negotiating table using protest. Following a three-week occupation in 2015, the government conceded to the basic demands to formally electrify a relatively small piece of land where they lived. A sizeable amount of R323 million would electrify 7000 homes. The politics of a community struggle which had once been criminalised and excluded from the halls of power was now enshrined in policy. What does the recent Thembisa electricity price protest tell us? It demonstrates that the most effective way for people to get the government to implement pro-poor decisions is not by voting or attending national dialogues hosted by presidents and parliamentarians. It is by organising in communities and engaging in mass actions which force those in power to concede to the people's demands. The recent protest also tells us that impoverished and working class residents cannot and should not be forced to pay more than they can afford for basic services. READ MORE: Land invaders erecting shacks dispersed with rubber bullets and stun grenades near Makhanda The municipality held Integrated Development Plan and budget meetings with residents a few months before the protests where they revealed the new electricity prices. But these meetings did not seem to acknowledge that the people of Thembisa could not afford to pay. The mayoral decision to suspend the new electricity charges in Thembisa demonstrates that when basic services fail communities, protests work. They also just might be the only reliable means by which ordinary people can access the levers of government policy. This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
ConCourt declares appointment of 5 CGE commissioners invalid due to limited public participation
The CGE acknowledged the ruling in a brief statement on Friday. The Constitutional Court (ConCourt) has ruled that the appointments of five commissioners to the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE) are invalid, citing Parliament's failure to ensure adequate public participation in the selection process. The ruling follows a legal challenge brought by the non-profit organisation Corruption Watch. The respondents in the matter included the speaker of the National Assembly, the president, the Information Regulator, and the five CGE commissioners. ALSO READ: Reserve Bank unlawfully interfered in Absa chair appointment, says court Media Monitoring Africa was admitted as amicus curiae (friend of the court). Corruption Watch contested the appointments of CGE commissioners chairperson Nthabiseng Sepanya-Mogale, deputy chairperson Prabashni Subrayan Naidoo, Thando Gumede, Bongani Ngomane, and Leonashia Leigh-Ann Van Der Merwe, all of whom took office in March 2023. These appointments, for terms of up to five years, were made by the president upon recommendation by Parliament. CGE commissioners' appointment process challenged The nomination process was led by Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities. It began in June 2022 and closed nearly a month later. A shortlist of four candidates was compiled in late August, while public comment was invited between 2 and 16 September. Submissions were to be made via an online form linked through Parliament's website. The link led to a spreadsheet listing candidates' names and qualifications, but their full CVs were not published. READ MORE: Initiation schools: Commission wants answers on why recommendations haven't been carried out Despite Corruption Watch requesting an extension of the public comment period to 30 days, the removal of the character limit on submissions, and the release of CVs, the National Assembly proceeded with its recommendations to the president following candidate interviews. The appointments were announced on 25 February 2023, and the commissioners assumed office on 1 March. Corruption Watch then brought its application before the ConCourt under section 167(4)(e) of the Constitution, which grants the court exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the National Assembly has failed to fulfil a constitutional obligation. The organisation argued that Parliament's process was flawed due to the limited public access to information about candidates, a 2 000-character restriction on submissions, and the short 14-day window for public comment. (4/4) CCT 333/23 Corruption Watch (RF) NPC v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others August 1, 2025 The speaker defended the process, stating it was reasonable and consistent with past procedures. It was argued that the 14-day period was sufficient, that public comments were properly considered, and that CVs could not be published without candidates' consent in accordance with the Protection of Personal Information Act (Popia). However, the Information Regulator clarified in an affidavit that such consent is not required when the information is needed for the performance of public duties. ConCourt judgment In a unanimous ruling delivered on Friday, the ConCourt sided with Corruption Watch and found that the public participation process was insufficient. 'In the circumstances, the appointment process conducted by the National Assembly therefore did not comply with the obligations imposed by section 59(1)(a) of the Constitution and is therefore invalid,' the summary of the 1 August judgement reads. The declaration of invalidity has been suspended for 12 months from the date of the order, giving Parliament time to conduct a constitutionally compliant appointment process and allowing the president to make appointments. Reactions The CGE acknowledged the ruling in a brief statement on Friday. 'The commission remains committed to its legislative mandate and will continue to discharge its responsibilities while Parliament undertakes its processes. 'The commission will not make further public pronouncements or respond to media enquiries on this matter,' the statement reads. In addition, Corruption Watch welcomed the outcome. 'South African citizens have a right to participate fully in these processes, particularly where such institutions are at the forefront of ensuring justice and enforcement of human rights in the country. 'The opportunity for people to have their say in the appointment of representatives to Chapter 9 institutions like the CGE, is an important example of that process,' the organisation said in a statement. The CGE operates under section 187 of the Constitution, with a mandate to promote and protect gender equality. In March last year, six other commissioners – Seeham Samaai, Mulalo Grace Nemathaheni, Mfundo Nomvungu, Yanga Malotana, Kamohelo Rodney Teele, and Marion Lynn Stevens – were recommended by Parliament and subsequently approved by the president. NOW READ: MK party and Zuma suffer blow as ConCourt rules in Ramaphosa's favour
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
The shadows of human trafficking loom large in South Africa
This week, the recent observance of World Day Against Trafficking in Persons has amplified calls for urgent action against human trafficking in South Africa, a crime that is claimed to take advantage of the most vulnerable members of society. In a significant effort to address this critical issue, Deputy Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development Andries Nel recently launched Local Task Team Offices, aimed at bolstering anti-trafficking initiatives at ports of entry. This initiative is backed by a newly established policy framework designed to enhance the country's collective response to trafficking. Highlighting the impact of ongoing efforts, Nel pointed to the rescue of 234 identified trafficking victims over the past year. 'These are 234 lives saved, and there are many more whose lives are affected by trafficking,' he emphasised. The urgency of the situation is reflected in alarming global statistics; the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reported a 25% increase in detected trafficking victims worldwide in 2024, with children making up 38% of those affected. According to Nel, Africa has become a significant source and destination for trafficking, with South Africa serving as both a source and transit hub. 'As a source country, South Africans are trafficked domestically and internationally. As a transit country, traffickers use our borders to move victims from neighbouring countries to other destinations,' Nel stated. He said in an encouraging development, South Africa's efforts to combat trafficking have led to an upgrade in its status from Tier Two Watch List to Tier Two in the 2024 US Department of State's Trafficking in Persons Report. In the current financial year alone, 32 new trafficking prosecutions have been initiated, with 67 ongoing cases involving 156 accused individuals currently before the courts. The collaborative ethos of this fight was echoed by Jason Cogill, CEO of the National Freedom Network (NFN), during this year's Human Trafficking Awareness Week, who emphasised the need for shared commitment: 'To effectively combat human trafficking, strategic networking, collaboration, and partnership are needed. Together, we are stronger. Together, we can end trafficking.' One story that highlights the gravity of the issue shared with the Saturday Star is of a young woman named Thandi, given to protect her identity from a small town in the Eastern Cape. Thandi was lured by a false promise of a job in the city and found herself trapped in a brothel, her freedom violently taken. After several harrowing months, she was identified as a trafficking victim during a police raid and brought to safety. "Those first weeks, I was so scared and broken. But the social workers and ladies at the safe house, they became like my sisters. They helped me see I still had a future," she shared her harrowing experience. Rescue was just the beginning of Thandi's road to recovery. Through the NFN's network, she entered a specialised aftercare shelter where she received medical attention and trauma counselling to begin healing the invisible wounds of abuse. Dr. Juliet Sambo, a lecturer at the Department of Social Work and Criminology at the University of Pretoria, shed further light on the complexities of trafficking. Sambo notes that economic disparity, alongside inadequate law enforcement, creates an environment where organised crime thrives. 'Official statistics are unreliable, obscuring the true scale of trafficking,' she explains, noting that women and children are disproportionately affected, making up 55.5% and 44.5% of victims, respectively. The horrific case of six-year-old Joshlin Smith, who went missing in February 2024, starkly illustrates the crisis. Sambo warns that trafficking is intimately tied to other illicit activities, with the internet playing a pivotal role in recruitment and exploitation. 'Human trafficking persists in South Africa due to a combination of gender inequality and economic instability,' she argued. Saturday Star
