
BBC documentary breaches editorial guidelines over Hamas link, says review
The documentary 'Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone', was removed by the broadcaster from its streaming service in February, following revelations that its 13-year-old narrator, Abdullah, was the son of Ayman Alyazouri, a Hamas official who served as the deputy minister of agriculture.
A review found that the independent production company, Hoyo Films, responsible for creating the documentary, did not share the 'critical information' of the narrator's family background with the BBC before broadcast.
The probe concluded that Hoyo Films bore the majority of the responsibility for this oversight, although it was deemed unintentional.
Following the controversy, Britain's media regulator Ofcom said that it would launch an investigation into the matter and probe the documentary under a specific rule that mandates factual programmes to avoid 'materially misleading the audience'.
'Regardless of how the significance or otherwise of the Narrator's father's position was judged, the audience should have been informed about this,' said the report by Peter Johnston, BBC Director of Editorial Complaints and Reviews.
BBC Director-General Tim Davie said that the report had identified a crucial failing concerning accuracy.
'We will now take action on two fronts – fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated,' Davie said in a statement.
Will 'improve processes and prevent similar problems', says Hoyo Films
After courting controversy over the documentary, the production company Hoyo Films released a statement apologising for the breach and affirmed its commitment to 'improve processes and prevent similar problems'.
'We take the findings in Peter Johnston's report on Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone extremely seriously and apologise for the mistake that resulted in a breach of the (BBC) editorial guidelines,' the statement read.
'We are pleased that the report found that there was no evidence of inappropriate influence on the content of the documentary from any third party. We appreciate the rigorous nature of this investigation, and its findings that Hoyo Films did not intentionally mislead the BBC, that there were no other breaches of the editorial guidelines in the programme, and that there was no evidence to suggest that the programme funds were spent other than for reasonable, production-related purposes,' it said.
'Hoyo Films welcomes the report's recommendations and hope they will improve processes and prevent similar problems in the future. We are working closely with the BBC to see if we can find an appropriate way to bring back to iPlayer the stories of those featured in the programme,' the statement added.
'We didn't run those questions to ground, ' says BBC News chief
Chief executive of BBC News and Current Affairs Deborah Turness, in an interview with BBC Radio 4, said the broadcaster has taken the matter 'incredibly seriously' and it will share the action plan that has been put in place in order to ensure that this kind of 'mistake' does not happen again.
'We've said we're sorry, and I am sorry,' Turness said.
'At BBC News, we are fully accountable,' she said. 'And we didn't run those questions to ground.'
'Yes, they should have known because their questions should have been answered at the many times of asking' by the production company, she added.
The BBC's coverage of the war has faced intense scrutiny, with critics on both sides – pro-Israel and anti-Israel – accusing the broadcaster of failing to strike the right balance.
(With inputs from BBC, Reuters and AP)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Miracle in medical world! Baby born from 30-year-old frozen embryo — doctors say it's like a Sci-Fi movie
A baby boy named Thaddeus Daniel Pierce was born to a couple in Ohio from an embryo that was frozen for over 30 years, possibly setting a new world record. Lindsey Pierce, 35, and Tim Pierce, 34, had tried to have a baby for seven years before they adopted the embryo, which was originally created in 1994. The baby was born from an embryo that belonged to Linda Archerd, 62, who made it with her then-husband through IVF three decades ago. Back in 1994, Ms Archerd created four embryos — one became her daughter, and the other three were kept frozen in storage for years, as per the report by BBC. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Design Thinking Product Management PGDM Healthcare Public Policy Cybersecurity others Data Analytics Project Management CXO Management Operations Management Digital Marketing Leadership Data Science MCA MBA Data Science Degree Others Finance Artificial Intelligence healthcare Technology Skills you'll gain: Duration: 22 Weeks IIM Indore CERT-IIMI DTAI Async India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 25 Weeks IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK PCP DTIM Async India Starts on undefined Get Details ALSO READ: Ozzy Osbourne's burial site revealed — stunning lake and symbolic tribute break hearts Woman keeps embryos frozen for 30 years Even after she split from her husband, Ms Archerd didn't want to destroy or donate the embryos anonymously, because they were biologically linked to her daughter. She spent thousands of dollars each year to keep the embryos stored, hoping to find a good family one day. She finally chose to use a Christian embryo adoption agency called Nightlight Christian Adoptions, through their 'Snowflakes' program. This program lets donors pick the family and even set preferences like religion, race, and nationality — Ms Archerd wanted a married, Caucasian, Christian couple from the U.S, as stated by the report by BBC. Live Events How the Ohio couple got chosen That's how she matched with the Pierces, who were looking to adopt an embryo and just wanted to have a child. The IVF procedure was done at Rejoice Fertility in Tennessee, which said they try to transfer any embryo, no matter how old. Ms Pierce said they weren't trying to break any records, they only wanted a baby and were lucky to be chosen. Doctors say this is the longest an embryo has ever been frozen before leading to a live birth — the last record was in 2022 with twins from embryos frozen in 1992. ALSO READ: NYT lies, Gaza dies: Protesters vandalize iconic New York Times headquarters over controversial article Ms Archerd hasn't met the baby yet, but says she already sees similarities between Thaddeus and her daughter. Ms Pierce's family described the experience as something out of a sci-fi movie, amazed by the miracle of modern medicine, as per the report by BBC. FAQs Q1. How old was the embryo used to have the Ohio baby in 2024? The embryo was frozen for over 30 years before the baby was born in 2024. Q2. Who donated the 30-year-old embryo used for the baby born in Ohio? Linda Archerd donated the embryo she created in 1994 through IVF.


Time of India
15 hours ago
- Time of India
Huda Beauty founder's anti-Israel conspiracy rant deleted from TikTok amid backlash
TikTok has officially removed a video posted by Huda Kattan, the founder of global cosmetics empire Huda Beauty, after the influencer made a string of inflammatory and conspiratorial claims about Israel. The Iraqi-American business mogul shared the now-deleted clip with her 1.7 million followers on Sunday, asserting that Israel was behind nearly every modern global catastrophe, from World War One to the 9/11 terror attacks and even the October 7 Hamas assault. TikTok takes down Huda Kattan's rant over anti-Israel video Kattan stated she had a 'feeling' Israel had orchestrated all major wars and events, adding, 'Yes, behind September 11th? Absolutely.' The clip was swiftly condemned for spreading hate and misinformation before TikTok took it down on Tuesday, citing a breach of community guidelines. Jewish organisations slam Huda Beauty founder's 'antisemitic tropes' The American Jewish Committee reacted sharply, accusing the beauty mogul of pushing age-old antisemitic conspiracy theories under the guise of political commentary. A spokesperson from the group stated the video was not mere criticism of Israel but a 'repackaged form of centuries-old hate,' adding that such rhetoric, especially coming from a high-profile brand, was not just ironic, it was dangerous. The Anti-Defamation League also weighed in, calling the claims 'historically baseless' and warning of the dangers posed by such a massive influencer normalising antisemitic ideas to millions of followers. No response from Huda Beauty as pressure builds Neither Huda Kattan nor her brand have issued any public comment following the uproar. The silence has only intensified criticism from the public and Jewish advocacy groups. Huda Beauty, which boasts over 57 million followers on Instagram and is a staple name in the beauty industry, is now facing mounting pressure to address the situation. Kattan, who was once celebrated on the BBC's 100 Women list and named one of Forbes' top online creators, is now under fire for what many view as a reckless misuse of her influence during a highly sensitive time in global politics.


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Prince Harry's ‘desperate' attempt at reconciliation: Offers to share his official schedule
Image credits: Getty Images The news that Prince Harry wants to reconcile with his family, at least his father, is not new. The Duke of Sussex even told the BBC that he "would love a reconciliation" with the Royal Family. However, his most recent olive branch has many confused and questioning King Charles' response. According to the UK's Daily Mail, Prince Harry quietly extended a hand forward to the royals by offering to share his official schedule of engagements. As per the outlet, this would help ease tensions between him and his father, King Charles III, who is known to be battling an undisclosed form of cancer. The sharing of the schedule will allow more transparency and help avoid conflicts between the engagements of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the British royal family. Additionally, it will also squash any rumours that the estranged pair is trying to overshadow the royal family. "Harry is now desperate," British royals expert Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital. "While this self-serving gesture is notable, it won't do much to mitigate suspicion and caution on the royal side," Fordwich claimed. "King Charles III is now more guarded than ever, indeed somewhat traumatized by a string of betrayals." Image credits: Getty Images He also noted that according to palace insiders, the king "has expressed being 'cautious and wary' regarding fearing further unsavoury leaks, (especially) private royal family gatherings being publicised yet again." Prince William's camp is still doubtful of the younger prince, he added. "He considers any reconciliation at all as a 'grave mistake.' His senior royal courtiers are understood to be just as wary and immensely protective of the future monarch. They only see [a reconciliation] as creating more bombshells, as well as instability." "The only way for Harry to ever have any chance of repairing this ghastly rift is by his actions," Fordwich insisted. "Harry would have to show discretion for many years to demonstrate any respect at all for protocol, privacy, as well as the family institution." In addition to a smooth schedule of events, Harry sharing his diary could also spark conversations about the father-son duo meeting in person again. They met briefly last in 2024 after Buckingham Palace announced the monarch's cancer diagnosis. While things might not get sunny immediately, royal experts state that the move can be a positive one in the long run. "This represents a gesture of goodwill," said royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams to Fox News Digital. "The Sussexes should always respect the royal calendar, where natural care is taken to avoid clashes whenever possible. … This is a practical move that will be appreciated. It appears the Sussexes are getting some good advice. "