Murder: Man's jail term cut to 35 years, caning
Published on: Friday, June 20, 2025
Published on: Fri, Jun 20, 2025
By: Jo Ann Mool Text Size: The charge was framed under Section 302 of the Penal Code, and following an amendment to Section 302, the court can impose a jail term of not less than 30 years and not exceeding 40 years on offenders if not given the death sentence. Kota Kinabalu: A 36-year-old man escaped a hangman's noose after the Court of Appeal Thursday commuted his death sentence to 35 years in jail and 12 lashes of the cane for murdering a teenage girl in Semporna, seven years ago. A panel of three judges, consisting of Datuk Azman Abdullah, Datuk Azhahari Kamal Ramli and Datuk Noorin Badaruddin, after hearing Alkadzman Maksidi's appeal against the High Court decision, dismissed his appeal against the conviction.
Advertisement The appellate court set aside the appellant's death sentence and substituted it with 35 years' imprisonment plus 12 strokes of the cane. Alkadzman was ordered to serve the jail sentence from the date of his arrest on Nov 29, 2018. He was on Nov 23, 2022 sentenced to death by the Tawau High Court after he was found guilty of murdering a 14-year-old girl on Nov 29, 2018 at 2.30pm, in a mango orchard in Pulau Gaya, Semporna. The charge was framed under Section 302 of the Penal Code, and following an amendment to Section 302, the court can impose a jail term of not less than 30 years and not exceeding 40 years on offenders if not given the death sentence.
Advertisement Male offenders shall also be punished with whipping of not less than 12 strokes. Earlier, counsel Mervyn @ Hasan Sainy, representing the appellant, appealed for the sentence to be substituted for life imprisonment of 30 years. He submitted, among other things, that following the abolition of the Mandatory Death Penalty in 2023, and based on the facts of the present case, the circumstances did not fall within the category of the 'rarest of the rare' principle. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
39 minutes ago
- The Star
At least 14 injured in Russia's overnight attack on Ukraine's Odesa
KYIV (Reuters) -At least 14 people were injured when Russian drones attacked the Ukrainian Black Sea city of Odesa overnight, damaging high-rise buildings and railway infrastructure, local authorities said on Friday. Odesa is Ukraine's largest Black Sea port, key for imports and exports, and has been under constant missile and drone attacks by Russia since the war began. "Despite the active work of air defence forces, there is damage to civilian infrastructure, including residential buildings, a higher education institution, a gas pipeline and private cars," local governor Oleh Kiper said on Telegram messenger. Kiper released photos of burning houses and charred high-rise buildings. Local emergencies service said that during the attack there were at least 10 drone strikes on residential buildings, causing massive fires. Ukraine's air force said on Friday that Russia had launched 86 drones on Ukraine overnight. The military noted its air defence units shot down 34 drones while another 36 drones were lost - in reference to the Ukrainian military using electronic warfare to redirect them - or they were drone simulators that did not carry warheads. However, the military reported that drones hit 8 locations. Ukrainian state railways Ukrzaliznytsia reported that Odesa railway station was damaged during the attack, with power wires and rails damaged. Russian drones also attacked Kharkiv in northeastern Ukraine overnight, damaging several private and multi-storey houses, Kharkiv officials said. (Reporting by Pavel Polityuk; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)
Sinar Daily
2 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Najib granted DNAA in RM27 million SRC case
KUALA LUMPUR - The High Court here today granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) to former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak over three money laundering charges involving RM27 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. Justice K. Muniandy made the decision after allowing Najib's application for the DNAA. The High Court here today granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) to former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak over three money laundering charges involving RM27 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. - Bernama photo A DNAA means the accused is temporarily discharged from the charges, but may still be prosecuted for the same offences in the future if the prosecution decides to reinstate them. In his ruling, Judge Muniandy noted that the case against Najib has been pending since 2019 without a single witness being called. Instead, it has been marked by persistent postponements, indicating that the prosecution is not prepared to proceed. "Yet the prosecution is still not prepared to prosecute the case in the near future, as it has yet to procure and gather the necessary documentary proof to be used as evidence against the accused. The prolonged wait for trial has become a drawn-out ordeal for the accused, denying him a timely resolution," he said. The judge also noted that the charges relate to offences allegedly committed in 2014, and yet, as of 2025, the case has still not proceeded to trial, a delay the court viewed with concern. "By virtue of these factors, the most appropriate order was for this court to discharge the accused without acquitting him, so that he is not burdened with the charges currently preferred against him. "In fact, there is no prejudice to the prosecution with this discharge, which in common parlance, is referred to as a DNAA, as it may still proceed with the case once it is ready to do so," he said. Last week, deputy public prosecutor Mohd Ashrof Adrin Kamarul informed the court that the Attorney-General's Chambers had rejected Najib's representation to drop the charges. However, he requested the court to set longer trial dates to allow time for compiling the voluminous trial documents. In response, Najib's counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, suggested that the court grant his client a DNAA in the interest of justice, noting that the trial has been repeatedly postponed since 2019. Speaking to the press after the proceedings, Muhammad Shafee said Najib welcomed the court's decision, as it meant fewer charges now hanging over him. "Najib said he can now focus on the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) case," he said. Najib was present in court today. On Feb 3, 2019, Najib claimed trial to three charges of money laundering by accepting illegal proceeds amounting to RM27 million through his three AmPrivate Banking accounts at AmIslamic Bank Berhad, AmBank Group Building, Jalan Raja Chulan on July 8, 2014. The former Pekan MP was charged under Section 4 (1) (a) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001, which is punishable by a maximum fine of RM5 million or imprisonment of up to five years, or both upon conviction. Najib is currently serving a jail term in Kajang Prison for the misappropriation of RM42 million in the SRC International funds case. On Sept 2, 2022, he filed a petition for a royal pardon, which led to the Pardons Board halving his jail term from 12 to six years and reducing the fine from RM210 million to RM50 million on Jan 29, 2024. - BERNAMA
![[UPDATED] 'Fewer cases hanging over him': Najib happy with SRC DNAA](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FDATUK_SERI_NAJIB_TUN_RAZAK_1750387182.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] 'Fewer cases hanging over him': Najib happy with SRC DNAA](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] 'Fewer cases hanging over him': Najib happy with SRC DNAA
KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Najib Razak is happy that he had been given the discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) over three money laundering charges RM27 million linked to SRC International Bhd. Najib's lawyer, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, said the former prime minister is pleased with the decision of High Court judge K. Muniandy, who had issued the DNAA order today. "He is happy simply because there are not too many cases hanging over his head. He has been asking for a DNAA for sometime. "He can concentrate on the 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) case now," said Shafee in a press conference after court proceedings. Shafee said the prosecution cannot appeal against Muniandy's decision today. "If they are ready, then they can recharge. But, we hope they do not. "There is enough prejudice on Najib. We implore the Attorney-General to use his good office and discretion to close this matter," he said. Najib, however, will return to prison. "For this case, he is freed. But because he is serving another jail term, he goes back to jail," Shafee added. Shafee said Najib was charged in 2019 but the case was postponed multiple times over the years despite close to 30 days of trial set for proceedings. "At last, the judge said the prosecution had conveyed to him in May that although they want to proceed with the case, they are not ready yet. "This is because there are many documents, up to 500 pages, not in their hands because those documents are also required in the other SRC case, SRC civil case and cases involving others, so it (the documents) is everywhere. "So when the judge asked if the documents could be obtained as soon as possible, the prosecution could not commit because they do not know when themselves," he said. Shafee said Najib should have been charged for the offences in the first case of SRC involving RM42 million, where he was later sentenced to 12 years jail and fined RM210 million. However, the Federal Territories Pardons Board reduced Najib's fine to RM50 million and halved his 12-year jail term to six. "These three charges came later from the first SRC charge. Otherwise, Najib could have had a different outcome and he does not have to face a double journey. "The prosecution should have known whether the charges were connected. In fact, they knew, but somebody forgot to bring it up to the same court for one joint case. "As we know, money laundering charges cannot stand on their own. It has to be always associated with a predicate offence," he said.
