RingCentral, Monday.com, Semrush, AppLovin, and Angi Stocks Trade Down, What You Need To Know
This move is far more than a typical trade dispute; it targets the United States' largest and most deeply integrated trading partner. Canada is not merely a neighbor but a critical component of North American supply chains, particularly in sectors like automotive, energy, and critical minerals. This move has sparked concerns about potential retaliatory actions and a wider impact on the North American economy, leading to a risk-off sentiment among investors. The S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and Nasdaq all opened lower, pulling back from recent record highs and heading for their first weekly loss in three weeks.
The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks.
Among others, the following stocks were impacted:
Video Conferencing company RingCentral (NYSE:RNG) fell 4.5%. Is now the time to buy RingCentral? Access our full analysis report here, it's free.
Project Management Software company Monday.com (NASDAQ:MNDY) fell 5.4%. Is now the time to buy Monday.com? Access our full analysis report here, it's free.
Listing Management Software company Semrush (NYSE:SEMR) fell 4.7%. Is now the time to buy Semrush? Access our full analysis report here, it's free.
Advertising Software company AppLovin (NASDAQ:APP) fell 3.1%. Is now the time to buy AppLovin? Access our full analysis report here, it's free.
Gig Economy company Angi (NASDAQ:ANGI) fell 4%. Is now the time to buy Angi? Access our full analysis report here, it's free.
Monday.com's shares are very volatile and have had 29 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business.
Monday.com is up 23.2% since the beginning of the year, but at $284.61 per share, it is still trading 13.2% below its 52-week high of $327.92 from February 2025. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Monday.com's shares at the IPO in June 2021 would now be looking at an investment worth $1,591.
Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's How Long $1 Million in Retirement Savings Will Last You After Age 70
How long $1 million in retirement savings will last as a 70-year-old depends on a number of factors, including where you live, what type of lifestyle you lead, how healthy you are and how much insurance coverage you have. Here's a look at how these factors affect how long your savings will last, using Bureau of Labor Statistics data regarding average expenses in that age group. Check Out: Read Next: BLS Statistics The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics conducts an annual survey of the average annual expenditures of Americans across various age groups. The most recent data, for the year 2023, shows that Americans 65 and older — of which 70-year-olds are obviously a part — spent an average of $60,087 for the year. Using a straight mathematical average, this would suggest that for the average 70-year-old, $1 million would last approximately 16.64 years, or until they are nearly 87. Watch Out: How Health and Insurance Play a Role Generally speaking, healthcare costs increase after you retire. Even if you consider yourself relatively healthy, there's no telling how many injuries, illnesses or chronic conditions you may have to deal with as you get older. While genetics and personal lifestyle choices can prolong your life, there are no guarantees when it comes to health. Obviously, frequent trips to doctors and hospitals can quickly add to your expenses, shortening the duration of your $1 million. This is one of the reasons why good health insurance is essential in terms of the survival of your $1 million nest egg. If you have to pay out of pocket for your healthcare as you age, you could quickly increase that 'average' $60,087 annual spend to $100,000 or more, rapidly depleting your savings. Another factor to consider is that if you actually remain healthy and live a long life, you'll need to stretch that $1 million in retirement savings even further. A nest egg that only lasts for 17 years after average spending won't do you much good if you're going to live 30 years or more in retirement. In that scenario, you'll either need to boost your savings or learn how to live off less. Budgeting and Lifestyle Factors The way you live your life can have a huge effect on how long your money will last in retirement. Assuming an 'average' lifestyle, a pot of $1 million would last you about 17 years. But few retirees living in Manhattan, for example, could get by on $5,000 per month, even if they consider themselves frugal. In that scenario, $1 million may only last 10 years or less. But if you live a simple life in a rural community in Mississippi, for example, your money might last 30 years or more. The key to making your retirement savings last is to create a realistic budget. It's this simple — if you can live well beneath your means, then your $1 million will last longer. If you live a rockstar lifestyle, it will last less. The Importance of Investment Returns Very few people with $1 million simply keep it 'under a mattress,' or in an account that doesn't earn any interest. At the very least, most people with seven-figure account values keep that money in a low-risk, low-return investment like a high-yield savings account or a U.S. Treasury bill. Those with a bit more risk tolerance may keep some or even all of that amount potentially higher-yielding investments like intermediate-term bonds or dividend-paying stocks. Either way, it's highly likely that by taking on even a little bit of risk you can earn much more than 0% on your $1 million nest egg in retirement — and with higher returns, you can greatly extend the life of your nest egg. As shown above, it would take roughly 17 years for the average 70-year-old American to spend $1 million. But if you could earn even a 3% return on the $1 million, it could instead last for about 21 years. Boosting that return to 6% would nearly double the time that your money would last, to over 33 years. This simple example shows the immense power of investment returns when it comes to the longevity of your nest egg. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on Here's How Long $1 Million in Retirement Savings Will Last You After Age 70 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Earnings Release: Here's Why Analysts Cut Their Columbia Sportswear Company (NASDAQ:COLM) Price Target To US$57.50
Columbia Sportswear Company (NASDAQ:COLM) just released its latest second-quarter results and things are looking bullish. Revenues beat expectations coming in atUS$605m, ahead of estimates by 2.9%. Statutory losses were somewhat smaller thanthe analysts expected, coming in at US$0.19 per share. Following the result, the analysts have updated their earnings model, and it would be good to know whether they think there's been a strong change in the company's prospects, or if it's business as usual. With this in mind, we've gathered the latest statutory forecasts to see what the analysts are expecting for next year. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. Following last week's earnings report, Columbia Sportswear's nine analysts are forecasting 2025 revenues to be US$3.39b, approximately in line with the last 12 months. Statutory earnings per share are expected to decline 17% to US$3.40 in the same period. Yet prior to the latest earnings, the analysts had been anticipated revenues of US$3.40b and earnings per share (EPS) of US$3.48 in 2025. The analysts seem to have become a little more negative on the business after the latest results, given the minor downgrade to their earnings per share numbers for next year. See our latest analysis for Columbia Sportswear It might be a surprise to learn that the consensus price target fell 12% to US$57.50, with the analysts clearly linking lower forecast earnings to the performance of the stock price. It could also be instructive to look at the range of analyst estimates, to evaluate how different the outlier opinions are from the mean. There are some variant perceptions on Columbia Sportswear, with the most bullish analyst valuing it at US$79.00 and the most bearish at US$40.00 per share. Note the wide gap in analyst price targets? This implies to us that there is a fairly broad range of possible scenarios for the underlying business. Of course, another way to look at these forecasts is to place them into context against the industry itself. These estimates imply that revenue is expected to slow, with a forecast annualised decline of 1.6% by the end of 2025. This indicates a significant reduction from annual growth of 5.8% over the last five years. By contrast, our data suggests that other companies (with analyst coverage) in the same industry are forecast to see their revenue grow 5.6% annually for the foreseeable future. So although its revenues are forecast to shrink, this cloud does not come with a silver lining - Columbia Sportswear is expected to lag the wider industry. The Bottom Line The most important thing to take away is that the analysts downgraded their earnings per share estimates, showing that there has been a clear decline in sentiment following these results. Fortunately, the analysts also reconfirmed their revenue estimates, suggesting that it's tracking in line with expectations. Although our data does suggest that Columbia Sportswear's revenue is expected to perform worse than the wider industry. The consensus price target fell measurably, with the analysts seemingly not reassured by the latest results, leading to a lower estimate of Columbia Sportswear's future valuation. With that said, the long-term trajectory of the company's earnings is a lot more important than next year. We have estimates - from multiple Columbia Sportswear analysts - going out to 2027, and you can see them free on our platform here. You should always think about risks though. Case in point, we've spotted 2 warning signs for Columbia Sportswear you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Investing in Carbon Markets As Climate Policy Shifts
As US climate policy retreats under renewed political pressure, private markets are stepping in to fill the gap. Firms like Rubicon Carbon are aiming to scale voluntary carbon credit markets into investable funds despite a market that remains a fraction of its projected potential. With growing corporate demand and institutional backing, the question now is whether markets alone can drive meaningful climate impact. (Source: Bloomberg)
