Lawmakers Push for Osprey Safety Report to Be Added to Annual Defense Funding Bill
House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., and Rep. Glenn Grothman, R-Wis., wrote a letter to the leadership of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense on Friday, asking for language to be added to the fiscal 2026 appropriations bill that would shed more light on historic mechanical failures with the aircraft.
"These servicemembers are heroes, and their legacy should reflect their decorated careers, bravery and service to this nation," the letter says. "There is no question that our service members deserve better than to be protecting our country in an aircraft with known mechanical issues."
Read Next: Pentagon Diverts $1 Billion from Army Barracks to Fund Border Mission
Emmer and Grothman's letter follows a deadly Air Force Special Operations Command Osprey crash in November 2023 in Japan that killed eight airmen during a training mission. Military.com exclusively reported last year, after reviewing privileged safety information, that the crash was caused by issues in the tilt-rotor aircraft's gearbox -- specifically a fractured single high-speed planetary pinion gear.
That internal Safety Investigation Board report detailed that other failures in the gearbox were first flagged back in 2013, a decade prior to the deadly crash, and concerns were raised at the Pentagon. Additionally, the company that made the part that failed has been plagued with a history of manufacturing issues.
Emmer and Grothman's letter cited Military.com's past reporting and specifically asks for language to be included that will examine past safety reports that probed failures, including that gear from the Japan crash.
The letter asks the defense appropriator subcommittee to request "a report that includes the results of any safety investigation pertaining to any crash of the CV-22 Osprey since the introduction of the aircraft or other mishap involving the failure of the single high-speed planetary pinion gear."
The language would require the defense secretary to submit the safety information within 30 days of the passage of the appropriations bill.
Jason Gagnon, a spokesperson for Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Calif., the chair of the defense appropriations subcommittee, said the congressman would be working with other lawmakers on Osprey safety.
"Chairman Calvert looks forward to working with Majority Whip Emmer and other colleagues on this issue," Gagnon said in an emailed statement. "The safety of our service members remains one of the top priorities of the Defense Subcommittee."
Notably, almost a year ago, Grothman led a House Committee on Oversight and Reform subcommittee hearing into the safety record of the V-22 Osprey. Military.com reported earlier this month that the investigation had stalled with the Republican-led committee, which angered Gold Star families who lost loved ones in the crash and are still hoping for answers.
"I'm beyond disappointed, to say the least, that these oversight efforts seem to have stalled or disappeared," Amber Sax, the wife of John Sax, a Marine Corps pilot who died in a 2022 Osprey crash, told Military.com earlier this month.
Grothman blamed the previous administration for a lack of transparency. He signed the letter alongside Emmer, calling for safety reports two weeks after Military.com's reporting pointing out the lack of progress.
Air Force Special Operations Command spokesperson Lt. Col. Rebecca Heyse told Military.com in an emailed statement that they "continue to welcome congressional interest and oversight" on the Osprey program.
"We maintain close coordination with the V-22 Joint Program Office to ensure resourcing and funding are prioritized to maximize readiness and safety of the CV-22, like we do for all our aircraft," Heyse said.
Related: Osprey Safety Investigation Stalls in Congress, Angering Gold Star Families
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
a few seconds ago
- Indianapolis Star
Gov. Mike Braun on Trump's redistricting pitch: 'I'm listening to the legislators'
Gov. Mike Braun says he will lean on the will of the legislature when it comes to President Donald Trump's push for mid-decade redistricting in Indiana. Already some of those legislators are making their ill feelings known. Vice President JD Vance made the pitch to Braun, House Speaker Todd Huston and Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray in a closed-door meeting at the Statehouse last week. The latter two said nothing after the meeting, only releasing vague statements that didn't mention redistricting. Braun said the meeting went "pretty good." It would be up to Braun to call a special session in order to redraw the congressional maps. He said Aug. 12 that Huston and Bray are consulting with their caucuses, and he is waiting to see what the legislature wants to do. "I think it's going to be a methodical process, and I think each leader is going to take his time on getting to that point where they say what they want to do," he said. He acknowledged that even if he called a special session, the legislature, if they are at odds with the idea, could very well just gavel in and gavel right out. "I'm listening to the legislators," he said. The political conundrum is this: Indiana leaders are facing the ultimate loyalty test to Trump while balancing the reality that carving up their very few Democratic congressional districts could make some incumbent Republicans' races tighter. Plus, redistricting for an overtly partisan purpose of giving Trump a more favorable midterm election in 2026 isn't a very popular idea with voters, some lawmakers are saying. More: Top Indiana Republicans met with VP on redistricting. Only Democrats are talking about it There's also the risk of diluting votes if new maps are drawn based on five-year-old Census data that won't account for any more recent population shifts. This is one point new state Rep. Danny Lopez, R-Carmel, made in a post on X Aug. 12. "We should stand by that work," he wrote, while also saying he is a "hard no" on mid-decade redistricting. Another "hard no" comes from Republican Rep. Jim Lucas of Seymour, who on Facebook called the idea "highly unusual and politically optically horrible." He also said Republicans shouldn't "stoop to the level of Democrats on this issue," which could be a reference to the criticism that Illinois Democrats' map is gerrymandered. "If there are seats that need targeted, we should do it the old fashioned way and campaign harder in those districts," Lucas wrote. Mooresville Rep. Craig Haggard, a Republican running for the 4th Congressional District, could very well be drawn out of that district. He told the Indiana Capital Chronicle that he's not hearing any "appetite" for redistricting right now. Sen. Jim Tomes, R-Wadesville, has also said he doesn't think redistricting is needed, WEHT reported. Rep. Becky Cash, R-Zionsville, responded to a voter's question on her Facebook page about redistricting and said that she does not support nor "know of any reason why Indiana should redistrict." The prospect of mid-decade redistricting drew at least 100 protestors to the Statehouse and to the governor's mansion last week, with those gathered characterizing the concept as "cheating."
Miami Herald
28 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Lawyers in Hope Florida Medicaid settlement distanced clients from rushed deal
As DeSantis administration officials scrambled last year to craft a Medicaid overbilling settlement that diverted millions to the Hope Florida Foundation, lawyers for healthcare contractor Centene and the Florida Attorney General's Office tried to distance their clients from the agreement, a trove of newly released records shows. Over 22 days in September, then-Chief Deputy Attorney General John Guard repeatedly removed references to his office in drafts of the settlement passed among negotiators. Centene's lawyers inserted language emphasizing that the company was 'directed by the state' to donate $10 million of its $67 million settlement to the foundation. The attorneys insisted that Florida's Office of Inspector General or attorney general be mentioned in the agreement. And they inserted language absolving the company from liability in 'any dispute that may arise' from how the money was used. The haggling was prescient. When the settlement was revealed this year, it ignited a firestorm among Republican lawmakers. Nearly all the $10 million donation to the state-created Hope Florida Foundation was diverted to a political committee created by Gov. Ron DeSantis' then-chief of staff James Uthmeier to run ads opposing last year's recreational marijuana ballot initiative. A top GOP lawmaker accused the DeSantis administration of illegally laundering federal Medicaid funds, and former federal prosecutors have said the transactions may have been illegal. Prosecutors in Tallahassee launched a criminal investigation related to the claims. The agreement had ramifications in Washington, as well. Guard, who eventually signed the settlement, has seen his nomination by President Donald Trump for federal judge held up after Republican U.S. Sen. Rick Scott said he should face questions about it. Guard declined to comment. Emails and draft settlement agreements included among 1,000 pages of records reviewed by the Herald/Times detail how DeSantis' administration crafted the unusual legal settlement last fall, as mail-in ballots were set to go out to voters. At the time, DeSantis was crisscrossing Florida and spending millions of taxpayer dollars on ads to defeat an initiative that would legalize recreational marijuana. Centene and outside lawyers had asked the state repeatedly since 2021 to settle the company's claims that it overbilled Florida for prescription drugs, records show, but Florida's Agency for Health Care Administration didn't take action until a phone call with the company on Sept. 5, 2024. The initial draft of the settlement made no mention of the Hope Florida Foundation. Agency officials prepared to brief the governor's office on the settlement on Sept. 10. Whether the meeting happened, or who attended, is not reflected in the records. But the next day, the Agency for Health Care Administration's general counsel sent a version to Secretary Jason Weida that required Centene to give $5 million of its settlement to the Hope Florida Foundation. More changes followed. A draft sent to Guard on Sept. 12 removed all references to the state's Office of Inspector General. Guard pushed back. The agreement required the attorney general, instead of the Agency for Health Care Administration, to handle the remaining $62 million. Guard also questioned how much would have to be paid to the federal government, which oversees and mostly funds Medicaid. The agreement 'is different than I have seen in a settlement with Medicaid monies,' Guard wrote. He did not question the diversion of $5 million to the Hope Florida Foundation. The Agency for Health Care Administration's general counsel agreed with Guard and changed the settlement to make the agency receive and distribute the money on behalf of the state. He also increased the donation to the foundation to $10 million before sending another round of changes to Centene. The records do not show why the donation to Hope Florida Foundation was added to the drafts, or why it was doubled. The Agency for Health Care Administration did not answer questions asked by the Herald/Times. Centene's general counsel responded six days later with more changes apparently designed to protect the company. Money from Medicaid-related legal settlements belongs to state and federal taxpayers, and diverting it to charities or political committees could amount to theft of federal funds or other crimes, four former federal prosecutors told the Herald/Times in May. Centene held a phone call with the state's lawyers to discuss the changes on Sept. 20. The company's version of the settlement stated that the 'Attorney General directs' the company to donate the $10 million and that Centene wasn't responsible for how the money would be allocated. Centene lawyers also wanted to mention that the Office of Inspector General was one of the state entities authorizing the settlement. It's not clear why, as the office isn't typically a party to legal settlements. Centene resolved similar overbilling claims with at least 20 states, and only one other settlement that is publicly available mentions inspectors general, according to a Herald/Times review. 'We would like FL OIG to continue to be explicitly listed,' one of their attorneys wrote. When the Attorney General's Office received the newest draft, Guard balked. On Sept. 24, he deleted seven references to the Attorney General's Office and clarified that the Agency for Health Care Administration, not the attorney general, was directing the company to make the donation. 'I get that they [Centene] negotiated this in every other state with the AG,' Guard wrote to the agency's general counsel. 'But, they are negotiating this agreement with AHCA [Agency for Health Care Administration] and it is going to have to look slightly different.' After the health agency's attorney made most of the changes, Guard still seemed less than enthusiastic. He wrote that he didn't really want to represent the state in the legal settlement, 'but I am fine with this.' The assurances from the attorney general's office — the state's top law enforcement entity — seemed crucial to Centene's lawyers, however. On Sept. 27, they sent a draft that added back nine references to the office. Each reference clarified that both the Agency for Health Care Administration and the attorney general were directing Centene's payments. 'I think we are down to one real issue,' wrote Centene's general counsel, Chris Koster, the former attorney general for Missouri. 'I agree that we are down to one issue,' the agency's general counsel, Andrew Sheeran, responded. The two held a phone call later that afternoon, and Centene backed down. The final version, signed later that day, did not include the additional references to the attorney general or the inspector general. Centene declined to answer questions and pointed to its past statements on this issue. 'The terms in the settlement document speak for themselves,' the company said. 'Centene had no part in or knowledge of any decision by the Hope Florida Foundation regarding the subsequent use of any Foundation funds.' 'Red flags' DeSantis' administration kept the settlement secret until April this year, when Republican lawmakers and the Herald/Times obtained copies of the Hope Florida Foundation's Oct. 14 meeting minutes. The minutes showed the foundation received $10 million as a result of 'a longstanding dispute with the Agency for Health Care Administration.' Herald/Times reporting previously revealed that for years, the charity didn't keep meeting minutes, had no budget or bylaws and didn't file its tax returns. And the money did not stay with the foundation , a state-created charity designed to support the state's Hope Florida program to move people off government assistance. Within days, it was routed to two political nonprofits, which gave nearly all of it to a political committee controlled by Uthmeier that was dedicated to defeating the marijuana amendment. The leader of one of the nonprofits said Uthmeier called her to request the money from the foundation, according to a Republican lawmaker who investigated the matter. The nonprofit director later said that Uthmeier 'had limited involvement' and never told her what to do with the money. DeSantis has defended the settlement, saying that Centene's donation was a 'cherry on top' of what the company owed. Uthmeier, who was appointed attorney general by DeSantis this year, said he had nothing to do with the final settlement talks. He was involved in meetings with Centene in 2021, records show. Neither has disputed that the $10 million was used for political purposes. Uthmeier's office hadn't released any records about the transactions until last week, when it gave hundreds of pages to Politico Florida 'exclusive for the next two weeks,' according to copies of text messages between a reporter and Rep. Alex Andrade, the Republican representative who probed Hope Florida. The messages were obtained by the Herald/Times. Uthmeier's spokesperson, Jeremy Redfern, emphasized two things about the records, according to the texts from the reporter to Andrade: That they showed Guard was initially concerned about the legality of the settlement but eventually 'got it,' and that the money sent to the state in the settlement 'was more than three times the size of the state's actual financial loss.' The Attorney General's Office last week released 390 pages of documents – many of which were requested in April – after the Herald/Times threatened to sue. Reporters also obtained hundreds of pages of emails and draft settlements from sources. Redfern did not answer questions about the settlement or why the state first gave the records to Politico. He also said Uthmeier 'never participated in any settlement negotiations and doesn't know anything about' the scheduled September 10 meeting last year regarding the draft agreement. 'Your questions demonstrate that you are deliberately misreading the public records our office provided you on a very expedited basis,' Redfern wrote in an email. Medicaid statutes allow states to recover as much as three times damages. Centene's records show that other states received settlements based on the same formula. Part of that formula also included a baseline of $10.8 million to encourage states to settle with the company and not litigate their claims. Regardless, that doesn't mean the money can be divided for purposes that aren't related to Medicaid, Andrade said, pointing to 2008 federal guidance. 'It looks very much like red flags were raised by the attorney general's office and by Centene,' Andrade said after reviewing the records himself. 'They were at the 10-yard line. And while they had some heartburn about it, it wasn't sufficient to blow the whole thing up.' He added: 'The CYAs [Cover Your Asses] were evident.' Andrade said it was also clear the state understood the money transferred to the foundation belonged to Medicaid, which would restrict how it could be spent. When the agency's lawyers inserted the donation into the agreement, they also justified it by referencing how the Hope Florida program was expanding into Medicaid. The justification that remained in the final agreement was crafted by one of Centene's lawyers: the state Agency for Health Care Administration 'desires an expanded role for Hope Florida in the Medicaid program.' 'That says it all,' Andrade said.
Buzz Feed
28 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Lisa Kudrow's Viral MAGA Impression Stuns Viewers
A resurfaced clip of Lisa Kudrow doing a satirical impersonation of a far-right Republican spokesperson failing to debunk claims against the party is going viral thanks to a new tweet insisting she "nailed" the character. The impersonation comes from Kudrow's role in the Netflix mockumentary Death to 2020. And though the film released in that same year, people online can't help but feel striking similarities between Kudrow's character and the Trump administration today. To start, in the video, Kudrow, aka "Un-Official Spokesperson" Jeanetta Grace Susan, tells cameramen, "The whole impeachment thing was baseless, OK? So, the Democrats claim that Trump pressured Ukraine into digging up dirt on the Biden family. And their only real evidence of that is a transcript of him doing it." Someone offscreen asks Jeanetta what was said on the transcript, to which the character replies, "What transcript?" She's then pressed about the transcript she just mentioned, but Jeanetta doubles down by insisting, "Check your tape, I said no such thing." Later, she's asked, "In March, the president said the pandemic would simply get out of the way, didn't he?" By the end of the video, which has been viewed nearly one million times since it was shared on X, Kudrow claims she has "never supported Trump." In light of recent flip-flopping on the 'Epstein files' — you know, when Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed to have a "client list" of Jeffrey Epstein's on her desk, ready for review, only for the Department of Justice to release a memo stating there is no evidence of a client list — internet users latched on to the clip. The original tweeter said the clip reminded them of "literally every Republican." Others thought the clip reminded them of a very specific Republican: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Mostly, people thought the similarities between the satire and real life were "hysterical and depressing at the same time." On person wrote, "Oh my God! This is my experience of trying to reason with a MAGA, fact-check with a MAGA, and even trying to do some critical thinking with a MAGA. I have given up. I don't know what is up in their heads, but it is not brains or the gift of reason. I am beginning to believe that they are not just stupid and ignorant, but they just do not take in any information that is going to challenge their current mindset." "We literally listen to this everyday. MAGA believe and stake their lives on memes, but call any reporting or data into question and often see document records as a compelling reason to believe the opposite of what they indicate," another agreed. Overall, life felt better when this was all just a parody. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments.
