The stakes of the Trump-Starmer summit
The key scheduled public focus of the trip will be Trump's summit with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, their fourth meeting this year. The two met at the White House in February, at the G7 in Canada in June, and also at the Nato summit in the Netherlands later that same month.
Top of the agenda for Trump and Starmer will be an attempt to finalise the US-UK tariffs deal package that has taken weeks of negotiations already. In particular, Starmer wants an agreement that exempts UK steel exports to the US from Trump's sectoral tariff regime for steel.
Reports suggest a UK disagreement with the US over whether Indian-headquartered Tata Steel's products produced in the UK would be covered by the US tariffs as the firm is currently finishing foreign-produced metal while blast furnaces are updated. Trump also reportedly has concerns about British Steel, which was acquired in 2020 by Chinese steelmaker Jingye Group before the UK government seized control of the assets in April this year.
Starmer and Trump appear to have struck up a good political relationship, but this steel issue could be a key test. If the UK prime minister secures key concessions, he will show himself yet again to be a skilful negotiator with the US president, despite their very different political personas and philosophies, including disagreements over Brexit.
Such a successful Starmer achievement would be especially noteworthy in a context where Trump has threatened to impose reciprocal tariffs on a wide range of nations on Aug 1. Beyond the UK, only Japan, Vietnam and Indonesia have so far cut a tariff deal with the US president, alongside China's so-called framework agreement that has eased tensions between Beijing and Washington. Given the negative market reaction to Trump's tariffs in April, many traders are growing increasingly uneasy as next week's deadlines near.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Yet, while Starmer and Trump may deepen their relationship in coming days, there is a significant possibility of diplomatic fireworks when the US president meets with Scottish First Minister John Swinney. To be sure, the US president is fond of Scotland, not least as his mother Mary Anne MacLeod Trump was born on Lewis in the Outer Hebrides before emigrating to the US when she was 18.
Still, Trump may have a score to settle with Swinney, who gave his support to Democratic presidential nominee, Kamala Harris, in last year's US election. Swinney's decision was described as an 'insult' by Trump International, the president's firm which owns two golf courses in Scotland – in Aberdeenshire and Ayrshire. Trump's son, Eric, went so far as to call Swinney's action 'nasty'.
This is not the only reason why the meeting with Swinney could go south. Trump has called Scotland the 'oil capital of Europe', urging the nation to 'get rid of the windmills and bring back the oil'. The president has long been an opponent of wind farms, objecting to a development off the coast of Aberdeen which can be seen from his golf course there. In his own words, 'the windmills are really detrimental to the beauty of Scotland and every other place they go up'.
Trump-Swinney challenges notwithstanding, the bigger picture is that Starmer may have – surprisingly – brought a potential spark back to the so-called US-UK special relationship. Despite some breakthroughs such as the Aukus military deal delivered by ex-president Joe Biden and former prime minister Rishi Sunak, there have been many years of ties failing to reach their potential.
Such was the case under successive prime ministers and presidents of all key parties. Indeed, the last UK prime minister who forged close ties with the US may have been Tony Blair with the Clinton administration over a shared 'third way' philosophy.
This isn't to suggest sky-high expectations are warranted for the Trump-Starmer relationship. Instead, the bar has simply been set low in recent years.
Moving forward, and building from the US-UK tariff deal, there remains an outside chance of a wider economic agreement, even though bilateral trade already stands at about £300 billion (S$518.8 billion). In recent years, the UK has been pursuing a multi-track approach, including seeking trade deals with specific US states.
Secondly, London has focused on targeted deals with Washington on key UK exports, for example, on Scottish whiskey. Another area of interest is critical minerals, key materials used in goods from electric cars to flat-screen TVs.
Starmer hopes to seize opportunities in the bilateral relationship while managing the risks posed by the president's notable volatility. However, it is far from clear that the good personal relations between the two leaders today can continue until January 2029, when Trump's second term ends.
What Starmer can strive to forge is a constructive UK-US partnership, building on the nations' traditional ties rooted in demographics, religion, culture, law, politics and economics. This will also be supplemented by the longstanding security cooperation that has been the relationship's core, reinforced by the Aukus pact with Australia.
Amidst the uncertainties ahead, Starmer will want to make the relationship work as smoothly as possible based on such policy fundamentals. This may provide some protection for bilateral relations if personal dynamics, especially under Trump, sour or break down, as was the case with Trump and former UK prime minister Theresa May, as well as Biden and former UK prime minister Boris Johnson.
Starmer knows it will be wise not to overestimate the UK's ability to shape US power, under Trump's turbulent second presidency. Ultimately, Trump may well care little for fundamental UK interests, despite any personal fondness for the nation rooted in his mother's Scottish heritage.
The writer is an associate at LSE Ideas at the London School of Economics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
44 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Netherlands to start NATO's new Ukraine weapons finance scheme with $578 million payment
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Military equipment are pictured as the Dutch government presents plans to increase spending on defence to 2% of GDP in the wake of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, in Amersfoort, Netherlands, September 5, 2024. REUTERS/Piroschka van de Wouw/File Photo AMSTERDAM - The Netherlands will be the first contributor to NATO's new "Priority Ukraine Requirements List" (PURL) financing mechanism for Ukraine weapons with a 500 million euros ($578 million) payment, the Dutch defence minister said on Monday. "Ukraine needs more air defence and ammunition now. As the first NATO ally, the Netherlands will deliver a €500 million package of US weapon systems (including Patriot parts and missiles)," Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said in a statement on X. "This helps Ukraine to defend itself and the rest of Europe against Russian aggression," he added. In a statement posted on the Dutch defence ministry website, the ministry said that other countries have also pledged financing under the new mechanism. The defence ministry said that under the new scheme, Ukraine can draw on US military equipment stocks if these are funded by NATO allies. The United States is releasing military aid in packages worth approximately $500 million, it said, adding that the packages consist of air defence equipment, ammunition and other essential supplies tailored to Ukraine's needs. U.S. President Donald Trump said last month the U.S. would supply weapons to Ukraine, paid for by European allies, but did not provide details on how this would work. Reuters reported on Friday that NATO countries, Ukraine, and the U.S. were developing a new Ukraine weapons financing mechanism. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Tesla board awards ‘good faith' shares worth $37 billion to CEO Elon Musk
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Tesla has granted CEO Elon Musk shares worth about US$29 billion (S$37 billion) in a new pay deal aimed at keeping the billionaire entrepreneur at the helm during a crucial pivot from its struggling core auto business to robotaxis and humanoid robots. The company described the 'interim award' of the 96 million new shares as a first step, 'good faith' payment to honour Mr Musk's more than US$50 billion pay package from 2018 that was struck down by a Delaware court in 2024. Mr Musk can claim the new award if he remains in a top executive role for another two years and a court does not reinstate the 2018 package currently on appeal. He has to hold the shares for five years and can buy them for US$23.34 per share, the same as the exercise price of the 2018 award. Tesla will also put to vote a longer-term CEO compensation plan at its annual investor meeting on Nov 6. The move is meant to keep Mr Musk, the public face of Tesla and architect of its robotaxi strategy, focused on the electric-vehicle maker as it navigates a shift to cybercabs and robotics from its mainstay auto business. It also seems to quell any speculation that the board's patience with Mr Musk could be wearing thin because of the recent tumultuous months, including the CEO's foray into politics. The move to give Mr Musk greater control of the company suggests that directors still see him as best-suited to tackle Tesla's growing list of challenges in the years ahead. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy World Trump says he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases Singapore Strong S'pore-Australia ties underpinned by bonds that are continually renewed: President Tharman Singapore All recruits at BMTC will be trained to fly drones and counter them: Chan Chun Sing Sport Singaporean swimmer Gan Ching Hwee at 'crossroads' after World Aquatics C'ships display Singapore Ong Beng Seng to be sentenced on Aug 15, prosecution does not object to fine due to his poor health Singapore Pritam Singh had hoped WP would 'tip one or two more constituencies' at GE2025 Sales have been falling at the company due to its ageing vehicle line-up, tough competition and Mr Musk's right-wing political stances that have tarnished its brand. S&P Global Mobility data shared exclusively with Reuters showed on Aug 4 that Tesla's brand loyalty had plunged since Mr Musk endorsed US President Donald Trump last summer. Mr Musk's involvement in politics and his wider business empire, including AI startup xAI, have also sparked concerns about his devotion to Tesla, the main source of his wealth. Mr Musk has threatened to leave unless he gets more control over Tesla. The new stock award will take his Tesla stake, already the largest, to more than 15 per cent from the 12.7 per cent currently, according to Reuters calculations based on data compiled by LSEG. Before Aug 4's grant, Mr Musk had no active compensation plan and Tesla said he had not received meaningful pay since 2017. With the legal fight over his 2018 package expected to continue, the board said it moved to retain Mr Musk's 'extraordinary talent.' Talent magnet 'While we recognise Elon's business ventures, interests and other potential demands on his time and attention are extensive and wide-ranging... we are confident this award will incentivize Elon to remain at Tesla,' said a special committee Tesla formed this year to consider Mr Musk's compensation. It consists of chair Robyn Denholm and independent director Kathleen Wilson-Thompson. The company said it would not record compensation expense for the award as it does not currently expect the performance condition to be 'probable of being met.' It will re-evaluate and recognise the expense if it determines the award is likely to be met, including after the two-year vesting period. The new shares will also be forfeited or offset if the Delaware courts fully reinstate the 2018 stock award, ensuring there is no 'double dip,' the special committee said. Investors and analysts welcomed the news, with Tesla shares rising nearly 2 per cent in early trading. The stock has lost a quarter of its value this year, as of last close. 'Under normal circumstances, a compensation package in the billions would raise some eyebrows. (But) clearly investors have benefited from Musk's stewardship of Tesla,' said Camelthorn Investments adviser Shawn Campbell, who owns Tesla shares. 'This stock grant will bind Musk to Tesla for the next two years.' Battle for pay The Delaware ruling on Mr Musk's 2018 pay package, the largest in Corporate America, had cited flaws in the board's approval process and unfairness to investors. Mr Musk kicked off an appeal against the order in March, claiming a lower court judge made multiple legal errors in rescinding the record compensation. He has argued that the package resulted in spectacular growth for Tesla and yet was determined by the lower Court of Chancery to be unfair to shareholders, who voted twice to approve the plan. Tesla shares have risen nearly 2,000 per cent over the past decade, far outperforming the around 200 per cent rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index in the same period. 'This is simply a repackaged version of what was done years ago and was ruled improper by a judge. It renders the Delaware court decision effectively meaningless,' said Mr Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Centre for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. 'You don't have to incentivise him to stay. If he leaves, he throws away 13 per cent of the company, which is still a huge part of his net worth, said Mr Elson, who had filed amicus briefs supporting the court's decision to void Mr Musk's 2018 award. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
German minister: EU must become stronger in Trump tariff talks
WASHINGTON - German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil said the European Union had been too weak during trade negotiations with the United States and it should become stronger, as much still needed to be clarified on the deal the two sides struck last month. "Overall, as Europeans, we must become stronger," Klingbeil said in Washington ahead of a meeting with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. "Then we can also stand up to the U.S. with more self-confidence. Not against the U.S., but in dialogue with the U.S." Klingbeil said there needed to be a quick solution to the trade conflict with the U.S. as companies needed planning certainty. "Even though I am not the one negotiating today — that is the task of the European Commission — a close line of communication between me and Scott Bessent can help clarify things," he said, emphasizing the importance of the Transatlantic relationship. Apart from tariffs, Klingbeil and Bessent will discuss how to deal with cheap Chinese goods that are flooding the markets in both the U.S. and Europe, as well as the G20 presidency that the U.S. will take at the end of the year. "I believe it is important that we, from the German side, keep sending a clear signal: We want to work closely with the American government, we seek dialogue, we do not shy away from difficult topics and are looking at how we can solve problems together," Klingbeil said. The EU's trade deal with Trump in July was greeted with a mix of relief and anger, with tariffs set at 15% for most products but negotiations continuing for certain sectors, including steel and aluminium, which carry tariffs of 50%. Klingbeil would advocate for a quota system on steel exports to be included in the trade deal, he told reporters. REUTERS
