HC stays gov resolution asking minority institutions to enforce quotas in FYJC admissions
Stating that social reservation should not be applicable to any seat in a minority educational institution, a division bench of justices M S Karnik and N R Borkar stayed the resolution and asked the state to update the FYJC admission portal. The court asked the state to respond in four weeks and scheduled the next hearing on August 6.
The order follows petitions filed by Solapur's APD Jain Pathashala, a minority institution that runs the Walchand College of Arts and Science and the Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce in Mumbai, and another petition by the Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions.
Senior advocate Milind Sathe, represented the petitioners, and said that according to the Constitution of India, minority educational institutes, both aided or unaided, need not have reservations for socially and educationally backward classes. He added that a similar government resolution issued in 2019 was also withdrawn after it was challenged in the court.
The court on Wednesday had asked government pleader Neha Bhide to check whether the government was willing to drop minority institutions from the scope of the resolution.
Bhide on Thursday told the court that she had not received any instructions from the government to change the resolution. She added that the resolution did not violate the Indian Constitution and said, 'It is only if the seats remain unfilled and are surrendered that the social reservation comes into place.'
The high court had, on Wednesday, questioned the resolution. The court had said that this could just be a mistake by the government for which a correction can be issued, and that an order from the court was not necessary when it came to making such corrections.
The Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions (MAMEI) had raised objections about the FYJC admission process for the academic year 2025-26 and said that minority colleges until recently followed a fixed seat distribution of 50% for minority quota, 10% for in-house students, 5% for management quota, and 35% for the rest, including the sports quota and ex-servicemen quota.
This year, the government changed the rules for admissions to minority institutions and imposed a reservation for SC/STs and OBCs on the 35% of seats which were in the open category. MAMEI said that the previous reservation structure was legally protected and upheld by the high court and the Supreme Court, and added that the latter had earlier dismissed a petition by the state which challenged the autonomy of minority institutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Haryana govt employee marked as dead, denied salary: human rights panel invokes Shakespeare's Julius Caesar to flag ‘administrative negligence'
The Haryana Human Rights Commission (HHRC) recently referenced William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar to criticise an administrative fiasco where a government employee in Rohtak was erroneously marked as deceased in official records, depriving him of his salary. The panel likened the situation to a 'grim inversion' of Shakespeare's idea that the dead sometimes wield greater influence than the living, underscoring how official records have inflicted 'indignity and avoidable hardship' on a hapless worker. The commission, on August 14, took suo motu cognisance of a news report about one Vijay Kumar, a resident of Valmiki Basti at Ramlila Parao, employed in the Public Health Engineering Department. Despite being alive and performing his duties, Kumar's record erroneously marked him as dead, leading to prolonged non-payment of wages since Covid. 'This is despite the fact that he is very much alive and continues to perform his duties regularly,' the order noted, highlighting the department's failure to update records on the portal of Haryana Kaushal Rojgar Nigam (HKRN), the agency streamlining the recruitment process for employees in various government departments. 'The Commission is reminded of the well-known sentiment from Shakespeare's play namely Julius Caesar, wherein it is suggested that the dead may, at times, wield greater influence than the living. The present matter, however, reflects a grim inversion of that idea—a person who is unquestionably alive and faithfully performing his duties has, for official purposes, been treated as deceased,' noted the order by the panel comprising Chairperson Justice Lalit Batra and Judicial Member Kuldip Jain. This erroneous classification, the order stated, not only deprived Kumar of lawful remuneration but also caused 'undue financial strain and emotional distress' to him and his family. The panel flagged it as a violation of human rights, particularly the right to livelihood and dignity under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, and Article 7 of the United Nations's International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which ensures 'just and favourable conditions of work, including remuneration that ensures a decent living'. Finding prima facie evidence of 'administrative negligence,' the panel observed a 'striking contradiction': the department's records declare Kumar 'deceased,' yet his 'daily presence at the workplace and faithful discharge of duties bear living testimony to the contrary'. Such inaction, it added, undermines a person's 'right to work with dignity and creates avoidable hardship and uncertainty'. The HHRC directed immediate action, calling for reports from the additional deputy commissioner, Rohtak, and the commissioner and secretary of the Citizen Resources Information Department (CRID), on updates to Kumar's Aadhaar card. It also instructed executive engineer Sandeep Kumar, engineer-in-chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Panchkula; and superintending engineer, Rohtak, to submit a detailed report within four weeks on correcting records, disbursing pending salaries, and ensuring departmental accountability. The case is listed for next hearing on September 23.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
INDIA bloc mulls impeachment motion against CEC Gyanesh Kumar amid Rahul Gandhi's ‘Vote Chori' row
The Opposition INDIA bloc is planning to move an impeachment motion against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar. The move will escalate the Opposition's confrontation with the Election Commission amid Rahul Gandhi's 'Vote Chori' allegation. Congress Rajya Sabha MP Syed Naseer Hussain told news agency ANI that the party is ready to use all democratic tools, including an impeachment motion if needed, though no formal discussions have been held so far. "If there is a need, we will use all the weapons of democracy under the rules. We have not had any discussions (about impeachment) as of now, but if needed, we can do anything," Hussain told ANI. While the Congress and other parties are in the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament, a 14-day notice period is a requirement for initiating an impeachment process against a President or Vice President in India and the CEC, as per the law. The Monsoon Session of Parliament resumed after Independence Day break on Monday. The INDIA bloc continued to protest against issued, including Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR). 'The ECI cannot relinquish its Constitutional duty and evade genuine queries of political parties. The 'Right to Vote' is the most important right, given to us by the Constitution of India. INDIA will protest any attempt to stifle Democracy,' Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said in a post on X. The decision comes a day after Kumar rebuked Rahul Gandhi over his 'Vote Chori' allegation and urged the Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in Lok Sabha to either sign an affidavit or apologise to the nation for his remarks, which he described as an 'insult' to the Constitution of India. The Election Commission's remarks came on a day when Rae Bareli Member of Parliament (MP) Rahul Gandhi launched his 1,300 km-long 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' from poll-bound Bihar's Sasaram to step up the Opposition INDIA bloc's campaign against its 'Vote Chori' (vote theft) claims. The CEC can only be removed in the same manner as a Supreme Court judge, requiring a motion of impeachment by Parliament, according to Article 324(5) of the Constitution. On 7 August, Rahul Gandhi had alleged 'vote chori (theft)' of 1,00,250 votesin an assembly of a Karnataka Lok Sabha constituency, with 11,965 duplicate voters in the segment, 40,009 voters with fake and invalid addresses, 10,452 bulk voters or single-address voters, 4,132 voters with invalid photos. After Sunday's press conference by CEC, the Opposition, Congress leader Pawan Khera said the remarks sounded like those of a BJP functionary rather than an independent constitutional authority. 'It seemed like BJP was speaking today. Did he give any response about the one lakh voters we exposed in Mahadevapura?' Khera asked. RJD leader Manoj Jha accused the Commission of ducking 'burning questions' while JMM MP Mahua Maji asked the poll body to clarify the authenticity of documents presented by Gandhi in his press conference. The INDIA bloc had moved an impeachment against former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar in December. The motion was rejected. Dhankhar quit as Vice President on 21 July. Key Takeaways The opposition is mobilizing against perceived electoral misconduct. Impeachment motions are a significant political tool in India, reflecting the gravity of electoral disputes. The ongoing tensions may lead to heightened political unrest and scrutiny of the Election Commission's actions.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Opposition parties likely to bring impeachment motion notice against CEC: Sources
New Delhi: Amid the ongoing allegations of 'vote theft,' opposition parties are likely to bring an impeachment motion in the monsoon session of Parliament against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar , sources said. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency Congress Rajya Sabha MP Syed Naseer Hussain also spoke on the matter and said that the party is ready to use all democratic tools, including an impeachment motion if needed, though no formal discussions have been held so far. "If there is a need, we will use all the weapons of democracy under the rules. We have not had any discussions (about impeachment) as of now, but if needed, we can do anything," Hussain told ANI. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like China Cuts Supply - Aussie Miners Set to Jump Fat Tail Daily Learn More A day earlier, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar refuted all the recent "vote theft" claims made by Congress MP Rahul Gandhi on the Election Commission of India (ECI) while addressing a press conference in the national capital. He termed allegations of bias by the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabhas an "insult" to the Constitution of India. CEC also asked Congress MP Rahul Gandhi to either furnish a signed affidavit or apologise to the nation for his remarks. Live Events "An affidavit will have to be given or an apology should be made to the country. Teesra koi vikalp nahi (There is no third option.) If the affidavit is not received within seven days, it means that all these allegations are baseless." CEC Gyanesh Kumar said while addressing mediapersons. Rahul Gandhi, who is the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, hit back at the CEC Gyanesh Kumar alleging that the ECI is asking for an affidavit from him but doesn't from BJP MP Anurag Thakur when he makes the same allegations." "The Election Commission asks for an affidavit from me. But when Anurag Thakur says the same thing that I am saying, it does not ask for an affidavit from him," Rahul Gandhi said. Meanwhile, today, Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju called on Congress and other opposition parties to refrain from creating disruptions in Parliament over issues related to the Election Commission. Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju on Monday called on Congress and other opposition parties to refrain from creating disruptions in Parliament over issues related to the Election Commission.
