Do Ukrainians want a ceasefire almost 3 years into its war with Russia?
The fighting in Ukraine has not let up since Russia launched its full-scale invasion nearly three years ago. CBS News senior foreign correspondent Holly Williams reports on what Ukrainians think about a possible ceasefire. Then, former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor joins "The Daily Report" to discuss how a pause in U.S. foreign aid could affect the war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump can leverage Ukraine's 'badass' strike to make Putin blink
President Donald Trump has privately talked of Ukraine's drone operation deep inside Russia as 'strong' and 'badass,' Axios reports. He's right on that — but not so much, we'd suggest, in his worries that the attack will make it harder to reach a cease-fire. Consider: Kyiv once again targeted the enemy's military assets, specifically Moscow's long-range bombers — including nuclear-capable planes central to Russia's atomic deterrent. In that, the Ukrainians not only served their own cause, but made the whole world a bit safer. Advertisement And Vladimir Putin's response in the days that followed was simply more blitzing of Ukrainian civilians — no different from what he'd been doing before that, indeed has done from the start of his invasion. That is, Vlad didn't truly 'escalate' because he's already pulling out every stop he dares to. (All the hints of going nuclear are bluffs: Doing that would be a risk orders of magnitude beyond any he's ever taken.) Advertisement In short, the Kremlin has no more chips to add: Fearsome as its current war machine may be, it's at its limit. And it's not remotely free: Russia's losses far exceed any price it's paid since Stalin was fighting Hitler; much lower casualties in Afghanistan were a major blow to the USSR regime, hastening its end. So Putin will need to recalculate if the war continues as a near-stalemate — and, yes, think about limiting his losses if his risks grow. This is why Sen. Lindsey Graham's 'secondary sanctions' bill is a likely game-changer — threatening, as it does, Putin's vitally needed China trade. Advertisement And why US military aid to Ukraine should continue. Weeks of American diplomatic efforts have made it unmistakable that Putin is the barrier to any cease-fire: It costs him nothing he cares about to keep the war going, with an excellent chance he can score a full victory if Trump decides America has done enough — and no real chance his position will weaken anytime soon. The 'badass' gambit should have him rethinking his downside risks; the sanctions bill would reinforce that. Add clear signs that sudden victory is off the table, and Putin finally has to blink. Team Trump doesn't need to put any more work into seeking peace; it only needs Moscow to realize the game has changed.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett Advocates for Balanced Trade Over Tariffs. Could Import Certificates Provide a Better Path for the Stock Market?
Buffett thinks import certificates would be better than tariffs. With Buffett's idea, U.S. exporters would receive import certificates that they could sell to companies importing goods to the U.S. His idea would likely be better for stocks because it would remove the uncertainty associated with the Trump administration's trade policy. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Warren Buffett has been in the business world for more than seven decades. He also reads voraciously. It shouldn't be surprising, therefore, that the legendary investor has an opinion on tariffs. In a nutshell, he doesn't like them. In a March 2025 interview with CBS News' Norah O'Donnell, Buffett called tariffs "an act of war, to some degree." However, the Oracle of Omaha put forward an intriguing alternative to tariffs years ago that's still garnering attention today. In 2003, Buffett wrote an article for Fortune magazine warning about the U.S. trade deficit. He noted that trade deficits began to concern him going back to 1987. Buffett wrote, "We were taught in Economics 101 that countries could not for long sustain large, ever-growing trade deficits." Buffett didn't just point out the problem, though. He presented a potential solution that he called import certificates. His idea was to issue these import certificates to all U.S. exporters. The exporters would get import certificates equal to the dollar value of the products they exported to other countries. They would then be able to sell their import certificates to anyone wanting to import products into the U.S. For example, let's suppose Acme Corporation exports $1 million in products from the U.S. to other countries. Acme would receive $1 million worth of import certificates that it could sell to any other company seeking to export products from other countries to the U.S. The end result would be a trade balance. Buffett acknowledged, "My remedy may sound gimmicky, and in truth it is a tariff called by another name." However, there are major differences between his proposed import certificates and the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. For one thing, Buffett's idea doesn't try to protect specific industries as the president's steel tariffs do. Nor do they attempt to punish specific countries like Trump's initial calls for exceptionally high tariffs on China and the European Union. What happened after Buffett proposed import certificates in 2003? Nothing. Fortune reposted the article in 2016. Buffett said then that he still agreed for the most part with what he originally wrote. However, he acknowledged that the problem of trade deficits had "diminished a bit" thanks to lower oil prices and increased domestic production of oil. Does Buffett still like the idea of import certificates? He told Berkshire Hathaway shareholders at their annual meeting in May 2025 that the idea is "certainly better than what we're talking about now." Buffett expressed concern about the impact the Trump administration's tariffs are having on other countries' views of the U.S. He said at the Berkshire shareholder meeting: [I]t's a big mistake when you have 7.5 billion people who don't like you very well, and you have 300 million people crowing about how well they've done. I don't think it's right, and I don't think it's wise. The more prosperous the rest of the world becomes, it won't be at our expense -- the more prosperous we'll become and the safer we'll feel and your children will feel someday. The 94-year-old multibillionaire argued, "The main thing is that trade should not be a weapon." He continues to believe that "balanced trade is good for the world." You might have noticed a pattern with the stock market in 2025. News about increased tariffs or tariff threats from the Trump administration has usually caused stocks to sink. But any hints that tariffs will be eased or delayed, even temporarily, have typically caused stocks to rise. It doesn't take an investing guru to see that tariffs have been perceived as bad for stocks. Would Buffett's import certificates pave a better path for the stock market? I think so. If nothing else, Buffett's idea would remove the animosity that punitive tariffs could create with major U.S. trading partners and be much less likely to ignite a trade war that could cause economic harm. Perhaps more importantly, though, Buffett's proposal would remove much of the uncertainty that has been prevalent with President Trump's tariffs. Buffett developed a logical and structured market-based approach to address trade deficits. Instead of on-again, off-again tariffs with rates that change frequently, investors would know what to expect. However, Buffett didn't seem to have much hope that his import certificates would gain traction at Berkshire Hathaway's recent shareholder meeting. He joked, "[D]on't expect my import certificate idea to go down in history with Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations." Investors might wish otherwise. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $363,030!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,088!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $674,395!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Keith Speights has positions in Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Warren Buffett Advocates for Balanced Trade Over Tariffs. Could Import Certificates Provide a Better Path for the Stock Market? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
8 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Ukraine's Strike Deep Inside Russia Revives Fighting Spirit
By Welcome to the weekend issue of Brussels Edition, Bloomberg's daily briefing on what matters most in the heart of the European Union. Join us on Saturdays for deeper dives from our bureaus across Europe. More than three years into Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and with enemy troops grinding forward, apathy and pessimism had started to spread across the war-torn country. But one day and one daring operation was enough to stun the world and give the nation much-needed hope.
