&w=3840&q=100)
Manipur shuts down to mourn victims on 2nd anniversary of ethnic violence
Shutdown called by various groups on Saturday to mark two years of the ethnic strife in Manipur affected normal lives in both the Maitei-controlled Imphal Valley and the Kuki-dominated hill districts.
Meitei group Coordinating Committee on Manipur Integrity (COCOMI) called a shutdown in the valley districts, while the Zomi Students Federation (ZSF) and the Kuki Students Organisation (KSO) have imposed the shutdown in the hill districts.
It was on this day in 2023 that ethnic clashes broke out between the Meteis and Kukis, which left over 260 people killed, 1,500 injured, and over 70,000 people displaced, according to officials.
Markets were shut, public vehicles remained off the roads, and private offices remained closed across the state. A few private vehicles were seen on the roads in the morning.
Schools, colleges and other institutes were also shut.
Security forces have also been deployed at key locations to prevent any unwanted activities, officials said.
COCOMI will hold 'Manipur Peoples' Convention' at Khuman Lampak Stadium in Imphal. It has urged the people to attend the public meeting in large numbers.
A candlelight march will also be held in the evening in Imphal to pay homage to those who died in the violence.
The Kuki community in the hill districts of Churachandpur and Kangpokpi districts are observing 'Day of Separation', demanding a separate territory.
A programme will be held at the 'Wall of Remembrance', which has been built in Churachandpur town in memory of those killed in the ethnic violence, at 11 am. Another programme is scheduled at the Sehken Burial site, where some of the Kuki people killed in the violence have been buried, from 2 pm.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Manipur violence was not spontaneous, but planned, ethnically targeted and facilitated by state failures: report
Apart from historical factors such as ethnic divisions, socio-political marginalisation and land disputes, what led to escalation of feelings of mistrust and enmity between the warring Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities were the systematic hate campaign played out through digital media and statements made by the political leadership in the prelude to the conflict, said Independent People's Tribunal's report on the ongoing ethnic conflict in Manipur, which was released in Delhi on Wednesday (August 20, 2025). The report also highlighted that the violence was not spontaneous, but planned, ethnically targeted and facilitated by state failures. The tribunal, constituted by the People's Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) in 2024, was chaired by Kurian Joseph, former judge, Supreme Court, also had members who were former High Court judges, ex-IAS officers, ex-IPS officers, advocates, authors, professors, journalists, human rights activists, among others. In its 694-page report, the jury stressed that more than 60,000 internally displaced people still remain in camps in Manipur with no end in sight. High Court directive The tribunal said the Manipur High Court's March 27, 2023 directive, recommending Scheduled Tribe (ST) status for Meiteis served as a vital trigger, as it was perceived by the tribal groups, including the Kuki-Zo groups and the Nagas, as a threat to their constitutional protections. This in turn sparked protests across all tribal districts, leading to a major protest programme on May 3, 2023 in all the hill districts. While by and large the protests ended peacefully, violence erupted in a few places, which soon engulfed the whole State. Another contending narrative was the involvement of Kukis in poppy cultivation, in line with the then Chief Minister Biren Singh's 'war on drugs', which translated into popular propaganda against Kukis, the report stated. After meeting people from all walks of life, including the survivors and victims in different districts of Manipur, including Bishnupur, Churachandpur, Imphal East, Imphal West, Kakching, Kangpokpi, Senapati followed by sittings in Delhi, the tribunal recorded the testimonies of the survivors, which, it says present a stark picture of the failure of the state authorities and institutions to protect them, leaving them to fend for themselves. The tribunal also notes the failure of the Central government to fulfil its constitutional responsibility to ensure that Manipur remained under the regime of both rule of law and the Constitution. The overwhelming evidence placed before the tribunal lays bare the gruesome and systemic nature of the violence, the role of the radical groups, the failure of state institutions and the immense humanitarian fallout that followed, it said. The report also attributed a significant role to the media in the conflict, which actively shaped public perception and escalated tensions. While the print media was partisan and lacked investigative rigour, digital channels and social media were used to spread unverified and inflammatory content. From poor arrangements in camps to dismal healthcare, the tribunal's report painted a poor picture of relief and rehabilitation in violence-hit Manipur. The tribunal suggested that India's judiciary, Parliament and civil society must come forward to reclaim their duty and ensure that Manipur does not become a template for future impunity. It also demanded a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into the conflict and emphasised that lasting peace in Manipur requires structural changes, community dialogue, legal accountability and sustained moral leadership.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Texas GOP poised to approve map as redistricting fight escalates - The Economic Times Video
Watch live as the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature is expected to pass a new congressional map creating five winnable seats for the GOP.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
The Democrats who find 'abundance liberalism' threatening
The Democratic Party could use a makeover. Donald Trump's victory in November showed that the party can no longer rely on bashing him to win elections. The Republican president is trusted more than Democrats, whose approval rating is the lowest it's been in 35 years. Democrats are searching for a positive vision to inspire voters, and leading the pack, at least among party elites, is the brand of 'abundance'. Popularised in a recent book by journalists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson, abundance types advocate for overhauling a decades-old liberalism of bureaucratic red tape with one that builds clean energy, infrastructure and, above all, affordable housing. Even Zohran Mamdani, the socialist Democratic nominee for New York City mayor who wants to freeze rents, has given the abundance wing of the Democratic Party a few nods. But the high-powered Maryland suburbs outside Washington suggest the politics of abundance can be treacherous. Montgomery County is one of the 30 richest counties in America. Nearly 75% of its 1m residents voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. When the Democratic-controlled county council entertained a plan last autumn to rezone large swathes of exclusively single-family-home neighbourhoods—allowing for multi-unit dwellings, townhouses and apartment buildings—liberal suburbanites rained hell. 'This is a radical change that will be the death of single-family communities,' said one man, as hundreds gathered to mock and boo council members in a high-school auditorium. 'There was massive resistance,' recalled Will Jawando, a council member. 'People were apoplectic.' That backlash helped whittle down the proposed rezoning to little more than 1% of single-family homes along main thoroughfares, which the council passed this July, over more boos and groans. Left-leaning suburbanites have many reasons to oppose rezoning, from concerns about overcrowding their high-performing schools to parking, wastewater management and traffic. But they boil down to one: they like the suburbs. 'There is always a reason for why housing shouldn't be built,' says Andrew Friedson, the council member behind the rezoning reform. To dislodge the 'country-club mentality' thwarting rezoning in Montgomery County, he intends to ask homeowners how their children and grandchildren could afford to live there. 'When it comes to housing, expanding the supply of homes will reduce the rapid acceleration of housing values. That is what abundance is supposed to do,' says Richard Kahlenberg, author of the book 'Excluded' and director of housing policy at the Progressive Policy Institute. When Donald Trump took the White House in 2016, yard signs began to pop up with platitudes like 'Black Lives Matter', 'No Human is Illegal' and 'Science is Real'. 'None of that requires an ounce of sacrifice on the account of progressive elites,' says Mr Kahlenberg, a county resident. 'Voters who are completely opposed to building a wall with Mexico are quite comfortable building walls around their communities.' Homeowners naturally reject the charge of elitism. They see so-called affordable housing as a Trojan horse—a means by which developers can lay claim to the suburbs. 'No developer giveaways at our expense,' read yard signs outside quaint million-dollar homes on the drive into Washington. Far from making housing more affordable, residents expect the arrival of luxury developments to raise their home values. They can point to a house in the town of Chevy Chase that sold for $1.6m and was converted into three luxury townhouses, each listed for more than $3m. 'It's a total scam to benefit developers instead of representing the people that live here,' said Gerald Smith, an interior architect, who is among the dozens protesting the rezoning effort on Connecticut Avenue, a thoroughfare into Washington. Democratic infighting has fuelled a competition for progressive virtue. Kim Persaud, a community activist from the heavily Hispanic town of Wheaton, called rezoning a 'racist policy' and 'blatant injustice' that would displace black and Hispanic renters so wealthy white people can live in luxury condos. She said the majority of those for rezoning are 'young white kids who come from privilege' and whose parents could gift them a down payment. During a county hearing, one self-described white, privileged young renter said that the rezoning proposal was necessary to house 'the thousands of queer people, people of colour and immigrants who live in dangerous, conservative states and need to move to our sanctuary county'. It's not as if rezoning's opponents despise all of abundance liberalism. Marc Elrich, the county's Democratic chief executive, is a critic of the movement. But he wants to build, too. Mr Elrich hopes to make Montgomery County resemble its more business-oriented neighbour, Virginia, where regulations ensure that new buildings are in line with a community's existing character and taxes on development are spread out over time. In May Mr Elrich announced the county's first-ever Tax Increment Financing proposal, which aims to spur development in the eastern part of the county. Under the plan taxes would directly fund infrastructure such as roads and utilities. The backlash to rezoning in Montgomery County shows the limits of abundance liberalism as a national political programme for the Democratic Party. The suburbs are not built like New York City, nor do their residents want them to be. 'These ideologues want to urbanise everything. People move to the suburbs for quiet. The more they are estranged from real people, the more they are going to lose,' says Mr Elrich, warning his fellow Democrats. Mr Friedson, the local abundance crusader, has made many enemies who wish to sink his race for county executive. To make housing abundant and affordable, he sees the need for a new Democratic coalition, one that is younger, more engaged and more diverse. In other words, a party that does not yet exist.
