Scientists in Japan develop plastic that dissolves in seawater within hours
By Irene Wang
Researchers in Japan have developed a plastic that dissolves in seawater within hours, offering up a potential solution for a modern-day scourge polluting oceans and harming wildlife.
While scientists have long experimented with biodegradable plastics, researchers from the RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science and the University of Tokyo say their new material breaks down much more quickly and leaves no residual trace.
A researcher shows a sample of ocean-degradable plastic at the Center for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS) of Japanese research institution RIKEN in Wako, Saitama Prefecture.
Image: REUTERS/Manami Yamada
The sample of colored ocean-degradable plastic being stirred and dissolved in salty water is seen during a demonstration at the Center for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS) of Japanese research institution RIKEN.
Image: REUTERS/Manami Yamada
At a lab in Wako city in Saitama Prefecture, the team demonstrated a small piece of plastic vanishing in a container of salt water after it was stirred up for about an hour.
While the team has not yet detailed any plans for commercialization, project lead Takuzo Aida said their research has attracted significant interest, including from those in the packaging sector.
Scientists worldwide are racing to develop innovative solutions to the growing plastic waste crisis, an effort championed by awareness campaigns such as World Environment Day on June 5.
Plastic pollution is set to triple by 2040, the U.N. Environment Program has predicted, adding 23-37 million metric tons of waste into the world's oceans each year.
"Children cannot choose the planet they will live on. It is our duty as scientists to ensure that we leave them with best possible environment," Aida said.
Aida said the new material is as strong as petroleum-based plastics but breaks down into its original components when exposed to salt. Those components can then be further processed by naturally occurring bacteria, thereby avoiding generating microplastics that can harm aquatic life and enter the food chain.
As salt is also present in soil, a piece about five centimeters in size disintegrates on land after over 200 hours, he added.
The material can be used like regular plastic when coated, and the team are focusing their current research on the best coating methods, Aida said. The plastic is non-toxic, non-flammable, and does not emit carbon dioxide, he added.
© Thomson Reuters 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
4 hours ago
Famed Japanese Rocket Engineer Tomifumi Godai Dies at 92
News from Japan Science Society Technology Aug 20, 2025 12:26 (JST) Tokyo, Aug. 20 (Jiji Press)--Renowned Japanese engineer Tomifumi Godai, known as the creator of the country's H-2 and H-2A rockets, died on July 24 at the age of 92, it has been learned. The Tokyo native made significant contributions to Japan's efforts to develop large rockets from the early days of the initiative. After graduating from the University of Tokyo, Godai entered a private-sector company and engaged in research and development on rockets. Later, he moved to the now-defunct Science and Technology Agency and then to the former National Aerospace Laboratory. In 1982, Godai joined the National Space Development Agency, or NASDA, a predecessor of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, or JAXA, playing a central role in developing the H-2, Japan's first fully domestically produced large rocket. He became an executive director at NASDA in 1988 and led the launch of the first H-2 rocket in 1994. In 1995, he was appointed NASDA senior vice president. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
Asahi Shimbun
9 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
More plastics turn up inside humans, raising health concerns
Microplastics mixed with sand, wooden fragments and plastic waste are found along a shore in Yamagata Prefecture. (Asahi Shimbun file photo) Researchers are raising an alarm over recent studies showing that plastic pollution is continuing to spread across the land and into the seas worldwide, threatening the health of humans and other living creatures. The studies show that miniscule plastic specks, including microplastics and nanoplastics, are finding their way inside the human body and into the heart, brain, lungs and many other organs via various routes. Plastics decompose slowly and persist as microplastics and nanoplastics in ecosystems, polluting food and water sources. Drinking bottled water can also result in the consumption of tiny plastic particles. STUDIES REVEAL CONTAMINATION In a U.S. study conducted by Columbia and Rutgers universities, a research team detected 240,000 microscopic plastic particles in an average liter of bottle water it examined. Of these, 90 percent were nanoplastics, which are pieces of plastic that are usually between 1 and 1,000 nanometers in size. One nanometer is 0.000001 millimeter. The rest were microplastics, which usually range from 5 millimeters to 1 micrometer, according to the study, published last year in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. One micrometer is 0.001 mm. Other ways of ingesting fine plastic particles include the consumption of fishes that have swallowed microplastics and nanoplastics that were released into the sea. Recent studies also suggest that plastic particles become embedded in the human body as air is inhaled that contains floating microscopic plastic fragments. The result is that plastics have been found in the heart, brain, lungs, blood, breast milk, semen and feces in humans, among other areas. A study by Japanese scientists published last year discovered fine plastic pieces in the blood of four of 11 subjects. Hideshige Takada, a visiting professor of environmental effects of chemicals at the Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology who was involved in the study, said an intake of tiny plastic specks will trigger inflammation in one form or another as they are foreign substances to human tissues. Various chemical additives incorporated into plastics are thought to be the main culprit behind the inflammation. Additives are used to maintain and enhance plastics' properties during the production of plastics, which are made from fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas. Plastics consists of a specific type of polymer, chemical compounds in which molecules are bonded together in long, repeating chains. Since plastic additives are not covalently bound to a polymer matrix, they can leach out of the polymer over time when they are broken down to microplastics and nanoplastics. The United Nations Environment Program pointed out in a 2023 report that at least 13,000 chemicals are associated with plastics and plastic production. Of these, the report continued, more than 3,200 are 'of potential concern since they are associated with carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, reproductive toxicity, endocrine disruption, and/or ecotoxicity to aquatic organisms.' But only 7,000 of the 13,000 plastic-associated chemicals have been screened for hazardous properties, the U.N. report said, adding that not enough is known about the remaining chemicals to assess the threat. Experiments with animals showed that the release of plastic chemicals can affect their reproductive ability, slow the development of fetuses and disrupt hormone production. But researchers agree that it is premature to predict that humans would experience similar disruptions from the intake because animals were exposed to high concentrations of plastic chemicals over a short period of time for the experiment. Epidemiological surveys show that patients with dementia had higher microplastic levels in their brains than those without the disease. They also report that people with plastic particles in the plaque of their neck arteries are at an elevated risk of a heart attack, stroke or death. It is unclear how plastic chemicals contribute to the risk of disease and death. But Takada said it cannot be ruled out that these chemicals are behind such events, citing other studies reporting similar findings. ENSURING A SAFER FUTURE In regulating potentially hazardous chemicals, the central question will be how to secure the usability and safety of plastic products, or how to strike a balance between them. Shigeharu Nakachi, professor of environmental chemistry with Kumamoto Gakuen University, noted that it will be an enormous technical challenge to come up with non-hazardous additives. 'Additives have been used to bolster the strength, flexibility and durability of plastics so products made from that material will be easier to use,' he said. 'It will be preferable to replace the present additives with those made of harmless components, but that will not be easy technologically.' Regulations concerning chemicals vary from one country to the next. In Japan, the use of chemicals is regulated under the chemical substances control law and the Food Sanitation Law. But there are chemicals that are not regulated in Japan due to a lack of scientific evidence definitively pinpointing their negative impact on the environment and humans. In contrast, EU nations rigorously regulate potentially hazardous chemicals under the principle of taking a precautionary approach even if their harmful effect has yet to be fully understood. So what can people do to avoid unnecessary risks posed by plastic products? Some researchers suggest that heating food in a plastic container in a microwave should be avoided due to the potential danger that additives might leach out because plastics degrade under high temperatures. Takada recommended using a microwave after placing food in heat-resistant glass or ceramic tableware, rather than in a plastic container. 'You do not have to be too concerned with the safety of plastics as long as you live a normal life,' he said. 'But you will be better off taking extra precautions whenever you can.'
Japan Today
a day ago
- Japan Today
Why are Westerners so reluctant to eat seaweed?
By Steven David Pickering Seaweed is one of the few foods that can credibly claim to be good for both people and the planet. So why don't Westerners eat more of it? It's rich in vitamins, minerals, omega-3 fatty acids and fiber. It grows without fertilizers, pesticides or fresh water, and requires no farmland. Some species even capture carbon from the atmosphere and help counter ocean acidification. From an environmental and nutritional standpoint, seaweed seems like an obvious choice for a sustainable diet. Yet in much of the West, it remains a fringe ingredient, appearing far more often wrapped around sushi in a restaurant than in a household's weekly meals. My team has been investigating this gap between seaweed's potential and its place in everyday diets. Our aim was to find out why people in some countries eat seaweed regularly and why others do not. Even actor Samuel L Jackson has recently been promoting the virtues of seaweed snacks sourced from reefs beneath offshore windfarms. But seaweed snacks are far from mainstream, especially in countries like the UK. Some of my computational social science students worked with the Europe-wide seaweed association North Sea Farmers to develop a campaign to encourage people in the Netherlands to eat more seaweed. They quickly realized that before trying to persuade people to eat more, it was important to understand the reasons they might not be eating it already. This question was the focus of our new study surveying people living in both the UK (where seaweed is rarely eaten) and Japan (where it is a daily staple). By comparing the answers, we could separate cultural familiarity from other social and psychological factors that might influence consumption. We didn't just ask whether people eat seaweed. We explored how often they eat it, how easy they think it is to buy, how likely they are to eat it in future, and how healthy they believe it to be. We also looked at their education, gender, age, political orientation, willingness to take risks, ethnic background in the UK, and levels of trust in institutions. These factors are often linked to openness to new foods and could help explain differences between countries. Some results were not too surprising. Japanese respondents ate seaweed far more often than their British counterparts, found it easier to buy, and were more willing to eat it in the future. In both countries, people who were more willing to take risks, including trying unfamiliar foods, were more likely to eat seaweed. But the really interesting differences lay in who those seaweed-eaters were. In the UK, consumption was higher among ethnic minorities and university graduates, and it tended to appeal more to those on the political left. In Japan, it was more common among women and those on the political right, reflecting its place as a traditional food rather than an alternative one. Trust in government, scientists or social media played a smaller and less consistent role, and the patterns varied between countries. In Japan, trust in government was linked with seeing seaweed as healthy, while in the UK there was no similar link. These contrasts probably reflect how seaweed is framed in each country's media and cultural narratives. The way forward Seaweed is not simply another fashionable superfood. Its potential role in sustainable food systems is supported by strong evidence. It has a low environmental footprint, can be cultivated at scale, and can improve the nutritional value of other foods when used as an ingredient. However, our research shows that making seaweed more available or promoting its health benefits will not automatically increase its use. In the UK, familiarity is a major barrier. People may have access to seaweed products yet still avoid them if they do not feel part of their cultural food landscape. In Japan, where familiarity is high, the challenge lies in ensuring younger generations keep eating it as diets become more Westernized. For countries with little tradition of eating seaweed, our research suggests the way forward is to integrate it into familiar dishes, use clear labeling and recipe ideas, and present it as an attractive and approachable option. Public figures, as Jackson has shown, can play a role in normalizing it. In countries with a strong seaweed tradition, there is room for innovation to keep the ingredient relevant and appealing in changing diets. Addressing global environmental challenges requires more than good science. It requires understanding people's habits, values and motivations, and finding ways to work with them to create change. If seaweed is to move from occasional novelty to a regular part of diets in countries where it is unfamiliar, the evidence suggests that cultural connection will be as important as nutritional value or environmental benefit. Steven David Pickering is Honorary Professor, International Relations, Brunel University of London. The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. External Link © The Conversation
