A boomer couple wants to sell their 5-bedroom home. But they're delaying in hopes of avoiding at least $700,000 in taxes.
The retired couple is waiting to sell in case Congress reforms the tax on home sales.
The Friedmans are among a growing number of older homeowners holding onto their large houses.
Joel and Kathryn Friedman, both 71, are counting the days until they can sell their home and move into a 55-plus community.
The retired empty-nesters have been ready to downsize for years, but are reluctant to sell their five-bedroom, 5,000-square-foot Southern California house in large part because of at least $700,000 in capital gains taxes they estimate they'd have to pay.
Since 1997, home sale profits over $500,000 (for married couples) and $250,000 (for single filers) have been subject to a capital gains tax of up to 20%. That threshold hasn't changed since 1997, meaning that — between inflation and soaring home prices pushing an ever higher number of houses above that limit — many more home sellers have to pay the tax now than when it was first implemented.
The Friedmans are among a growing number of older homeowners discouraged by the tax from selling their valuable properties. Housing economists say that dynamic has exacerbated a shortage of family-sized homes on the market, especially in expensive places like California.
The Friedmans' house is too big for them, and maintenance costs are only rising, Joel said. "There are a million reasons why we'd like to move, but we're not because the tax is just burdensome," he said.
But that could change — there's bipartisan support in Congress for raising the federal tax threshold to boost home sales in a stagnant market. President Donald Trump recently said he's weighing eliminating the levy altogether.
Growing desperate to move, the Friedmans finally put their house on the market in May for nearly $4.5 million. But things changed for them in July, when the issue got new attention in Washington.
Just weeks after Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene introduced a bill to eliminate the federal capital gains tax on home sales, Trump said the effort could help juice housing market sales amid persistently high interest rates.
Are you an older American who has struggled to downsize your home or find retirement housing? Reach out to this reporter at erelman@businessinsider.com.
So the Friedmans are letting their listing expire and hoping the law changes in the next year.
"At the moment, it's a disincentive to put my house on the market, and it's an incentive, if you already have it on the market and you can afford to wait, to take it off the market," Joel said.
A $700,000 tax bill
The Friedmans bought their lot and built their home in 1990. Like many California homes, the property has since appreciated significantly.
Joel calculates that he and Kathryn have spent a total of $1.8 million on purchasing their land, and building and improving their property over the last more than three decades. If the couple were to sell their house for $4.5 million, he estimated that federal and state capital gains taxes would apply to about $2 million in profit after existing exemptions. That, in addition to a net investment tax, would put their tax bill at almost $700,000, including more than $400,000 in federal capital gains tax and more than $200,000 in state capital gains taxes.
Evan Liddiard, director of federal tax policy at the National Association of Realtors and a certified public accountant, estimated the couple's combined state and federal tax bill could exceed $800,000.
While the Friedmans have done well financially, they're relying on the profits from their future home sale to help fund their retirement. They're concerned that Joel's Social Security checks and Kathryn's pension won't be enough to cover healthcare bills and long-term care as they age.
"That's a sizable chunk of change for anybody," Joel said. "We're not going to be destitute, but it does help to have the extra cash."
The future of the tax
Over the last several years, the effort to reform the tax on home sales has been led by a Democrat. California Rep. Jimmy Panetta first introduced a bill in 2022 that would double the tax exclusion to $500,000 for individuals and $1 million for joint-filing couples and index it to inflation.
It's unclear whether Congress will seriously consider Greene's bill or move forward with Panetta's legislation, which has bipartisan support. Liddiard is skeptical that lawmakers would support eliminating the tax entirely, but he argued that Panetta's bill "would solve most of the problem" by dramatically shrinking the number of home sellers who'd be subject to the tax.
Liddiard said eliminating the capital gains tax or raising the exclusion threshold "is not a cure-all" for housing market woes, but would have a significant positive impact on inventory and affordability.
He argued that reducing the tax burden would mean more homes would hit the market, raising supply and lowering home prices. NAR has been lobbying to reduce the capital gains tax burden on home sellers for years.
But the proposed changes to the tax would disproportionately benefit homeowners in states, like California, that have the country's most expensive housing markets. They would also tend to help wealthier homeowners who are lucky enough to be sitting on significant home equity.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump on seeking third term: ‘Probably not'
President Trump said Tuesday he would 'probably not' seek a constitutionally prohibited third term. 'No, probably not,' Trump said with a chuckle when asked about the idea on CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'I'd like to run. I have the best poll numbers I've ever had,' Trump added. The president and some of his allies have repeatedly floated the idea of seeking a third term. At times, those comments have been dismissed as a joke, though Trump has at other points appeared more serious about the idea. 'People are asking me to run. I don't know, I never looked into it. And they do say there's a way you can do it, but I don't know about that,' Trump said earlier this year. The 22nd Amendment prohibits an individual from being elected to more than two terms as president. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) in January proposed an amendment to the Constitution that would effectively allow Trump to vie for another term in the White House by creating a carve-out for those who served nonconsecutive terms to run for a third time. The proposal has essentially no chance of passing Congress. While many Democrats have waved away Trump's comments as a distraction from kitchen table issues, the president's refusal to acknowledge his legitimate defeat in the 2020 election has sparked fears that he may not leave office in 2029 when his current term ends. Some political strategists have suggested that Trump's talk of a third term also helps keep a lid on chatter about the 2028 presidential race, taking the spotlight away from the president's administration.


Axios
7 minutes ago
- Axios
Early data shows major homicide drops in 2025 so far
Homicides declined in major U.S. cities — by more than 50% in some communities — during the first six months of the year, according to new data from an organization of law enforcement executives. Why it matters: The stats are the latest signs that violent crime in America is falling from the COVID crime wave, and that drop appears to be accelerating during President Trump's first months in office. The big picture: Violent crime ticked up early in President Biden's term, but reports show it's dropped significantly since then as law enforcement agencies responded to the pandemic surge and adopted more detailed recordkeeping. The recent downward trend in crime also counters Trump's false claims that immigration had sparked rising crime nationwide — a reason he gave for his mass deportation plan. By the numbers: Reports from 68 law enforcement agencies showed a 19% drop in homicides in the first six months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, according to stats compiled by the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA). An Axios analysis of the MCCA data found that Denver, Honolulu, Orlando, Portland and Tampa all had a 50% or more decrease in homicides during that period. Chicago, Dallas, Las Vegas, Louisville, Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Seattle all had declines in homicides of more than 30%. The intrigue: Aurora, Colorado — a city Trump repeatedly and falsely singled out as being overrun by Venezuelan immigrant gangs during the 2024 election — saw a 16% drop in homicides. Phoenix, another city Republicans claimed was besieged by violent crime because of undocumented immigrants, had an 11% decline in homicides during the first six months of this year. The data from MCCA's self-reported agencies included New York City in this report. Its previous reports didn't have New York City, which saw a 27% drop in homicides. Yes, but: Some communities did see a jump during this period. Boston experienced a 143% surge in homicides during the first six months of 2025. Cincinnati, El Paso, Fort Worth, Kansas City, Mo., and Milwaukee also saw increases, the Axios analysis found. Zoom in: Overall, violent crime appears to be falling in every category. Rape was down 9%, robbery decreased 18% and aggravated assaults fell 10%. What they're saying: "President Trump is delivering on his promise to Make America Safe Again — and the results speak for themselves," White House Assistant Press Secretary Liz Huston told Axios. "The safety of the American people is President Trump's top priority, and he's taking decisive action to protect our communities, including removing dangerous illegal aliens from our streets." The other side: "The only thing the Trump administration deserves credit for is attempting to kneecap Baltimore's progress," Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott's office said in a statement to Axios. Baltimore saw a 23% decline in homicides. "Earlier this year, the Trump Department of Justice cancelled more than $800 million in violence prevention grants." The mayor's office credited the city's Comprehensive Violence Prevention Plan and investments in new parks, playgrounds, rec centers, schools and libraries. "These historic lows are the result of a comprehensive public safety strategy that treats gun violence as a public health issue." Zoom out: The quarterly reports from MCCA typically have been a good measure of trends that are reflected in the annual FBI crime data released a year later. What we're watching: Trump has said he will tie federal grants to local police departments based on a requirement that they participate in his plans to deport millions of undocumented immigrants.


The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bacon: Nebraska GDP down 6 percent under Trump
Rep. Don Bacon (Neb.), a moderate Republican, said he's concerned about the U.S. economy, noting his state saw a 6 percent annual drop in real gross domestic product (GDP) in the first quarter of 2025. In an interview with CNN's Phil Mattingly, Bacon pointed to the recent jobs data and the latest round of tariffs as reason for his pessimism about the economy. 'From my vantage point here in Nebraska, we're seeing a bit of a troubled economic mess — or, right now, it's a troubled time,' Bacon said. 'In Nebraska, the GDP here has decreased by 6 percent over the last year, and it's all about trade, it's all about getting corn and soybeans out the door,' Bacon continued. 'So, what I hear with, you know, weak jobs numbers, we're sort of seeing that in Nebraska right now.' The Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis released a report in late June showing real GDP in the first quarter of 2025 decreased in 39 states, with Nebraska and Iowa showing the largest decline with annual rates of -6.1 percent. Declines in agriculture contributed most significantly to the drop. Bacon, one of three House Republicans reelected in districts that voted for the former Vice President Harris- Gov. Tim Walz (D-Minn.) ticket in 2024, has criticized President Trump's trade policy in the past. He again expressed his support for free and fair trade, saying, 'Free trade provides the best products at the best price, in the most efficient manner,' while adding that, in circumstances where 'it's not fair trade, the president should try to correct that.' 'But doing tariffs against 80 different countries, I have a hard time accepting that as a sound strategy,' Bacon continued. 'I think in the end the American consumer would be paying a lot more for the price of their goods. And we're already starting to see that because in the end, tariffs are a tax on consumers.' The lawmaker, who is retiring at the end of his term, said he's hearing from Fortune 500 companies and agriculture producers that 'we're losing a share of the market right now,' which he said is going to affect jobs numbers and is already having a small effect on inflation, which Bacon expects to increase. 'But if the president sticks with these numbers, I think over time, these 25 percent tariffs will be represented in the goods we buy from these countries. And so I'm concerned about the strength of our economy,' he said.