FIIs are back but retail has started selling; stay cautious on auto, IT & FMCG: Dinshaw Irani
Dinshaw Irani, CEO, Helios Mutual Fund, says Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) have returned to the Indian market, injecting $3.5-4 billion, signaling active investment. This inflow contrasts with US debt ETF outflows, suggesting a reversal of funds previously moved from India. Concerns remain about high valuations, and retail selling is impacting mid and small-cap performance. Irani remains cautious about auto, IT and certain pockets within consumer space like paints as well as FMCG
Help us with your take on the markets because the months gone by have been great for the Indian markets, at least the FIIs have made a comeback. The earnings, especially the kind of disappointment within the IT companies, with the valuations coming to the forefront and investors seem to be liking it. What is your overall mood on the market given that we have already seen a good run-up from those March lows?
Dinshaw Irani: The fact is FIIs are back. In the last two weeks, they had pumped in something like $3.5-4 odd billion into the market and the flow was very sustainable because if you look at the emerging market ETFs or India dedicated ETFs, they have not seen much flows. Basically, what this is hinting towards is that this is active money that is coming back and that is quite surprising.
If you relate it to what has happened in the US, the US debt ETFs have seen huge outflows. Basically, the money which had moved out of India had gone back to the US because they were worried about valuations, about the rupee, and the fundamentals. So, that money went back to the US, parked itself there and that is what is coming back. The fact is the US per se is now coming under a big question mark.
US President Donald Trump has been backtracking a bit and fortunately for the world as such, since he is more worried about the equity markets and it is obvious because twice he has backtracked on big calls that he made in the market. One was obviously the tariffs, once the markets started collapsing, he had to backtrack on those and he gave a 90-day reprieve.
Secondly, Trump has been after the Fed chair Jerome Powell, and when the markets went down, he backtracked on that. So, there is some sense prevailing out there, but frankly, it is still too early to call it out. Secondly, the bigger problem is the India valuations. The quarter went by which is now getting reported. The numbers are not that exciting and valuations are feeling a bit stretched because from now on, you will see cuts in earnings which are already happening. Most of the numbers that got reported saw a cut in earnings and that is where the concern is.
Frankly, we are just being a bit cautious. We are fully invested though. We have some cash – 3-4% – in a couple of funds, but otherwise we are fully invested. In my long-short fund, we are 61-62% net and ready to pull the big trigger whenever there is a pullback. We have seen Trump actually easing a bit on his rhetoric. Are you happy that this weekend you did not have to wake up to some new rhetoric by him? Was it an easy Monday morning so far for us?
Dinshaw Irani: Yes, it was, but the India-Pakistan tension is yet to play out. There something may happen and maybe that will impact the markets. But looking at the past, whenever these events have happened, the markets have only rallied up. Our Indian markets are much more resilient to this. But now the only unfortunate part is the valuations, that is where the concern arises. I do not know how many of you have noticed this but there has been a constant selling by retail I believe in the markets and that is why the midcap and smallcap space has been fairly weak as compared to the largecaps. The largecaps have held up quite appreciably and that is where the major cuts are happening because the IT pack gave a totally disappointing set of numbers. There was a relief rally out there, but I do not think that is sustainable. So, there are quite a bit of question marks right now.
You mentioned some sort of a selling pressure coming from the retail investors. No doubt, month-to-date you have a buy figure coming in from the FIIs. But the retail investors getting a bit jittery is a cause of concern. As you mentioned, the valuations are a bit stretched. Where are you looking for value right now given that we have seen a sharp fall, then a rapid rise. Now you are struggling to go ahead and allocate funds, isn't it?
Dinshaw Irani: Yes, definitely, because we have our comfort zones. One big comfort zone for us has always been the financial, the BFSI space and we have seen results out there. If anything, they have done fairly well, apart from microfinance and some of the NBFCs reporting disappointing numbers. The bulk of the reportage from that particular segment has been fairly strong, that is one area that we are very comfortable with.
Secondly, a set of numbers are yet to be reported by the hospitality sector, and that is going to be a surprise because if you are tracking that sector on the ARR basis, they have been fairly exciting. The numbers are fairly high YoY also. Again, having talked about hospitality, let us talk about hospitals, the healthcare sector. That is another area where we are comfortable with and that is going to report very good numbers going forward. These are the specific areas we are comfortable with and where we are trying to park our money.
Which are the pockets that are not looking that great to you because I just cannot get over the fact that at a point when Tata Motors was hitting around Rs 1,000, you guys came ahead and made a short call on not just Tata Motors but the overall auto space was not looking that exciting to you. At this point in time when you are having a cautious stance on the market which sectors are you betting big on?
Dinshaw Irani: We remain negative on the auto space. You saw the numbers from Maruti. You heard the commentary from the management. The only space that looks good right now in the auto space is probably the SUV space and unfortunately that is what the US is targeting for India. That is where they want to send their cars in and at zero duties and stuff like that. That will create a lot of competition going forward. EV has been a big disruptor anyways in that space. The second space that we do not like and have been negative for the last probably two-three months is probably IT. Except for some pockets here and there, IT is going to be a major sufferer of what is happening in the US. There is a slowdown building in and that is what the world is betting on today. If you look at the way the bond markets have been reacting in the US, it is obvious that they are looking at a slowdown going forward and if that happens, IT is a big loser because the US market is their biggest clientele. Secondly AI will play a big role in disrupting the existing model of IT, and so that is another reason why we are so negative on IT today. It is better to stay away from that segment. Certain pockets within consumer space like paints, we do not see much growth possibility. I do not think that the rally in paints space is going to sustain given the way the dynamics of the Indian economy today. And of course, FMCG where the valuations are again stretched. There was some amount of uptrading happening, but that has also stopped. I do not think that area is looking good. So, these are a few areas we are very cautious about.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Oil Surges as US Orders Partial Evacuation of Iraqi Embassy
Oil surged as the US government ordered a partial evacuation of its embassy in Iraq amid rising security risks. West Texas Intermediate futures jumped 4.9% to settle above $68 a barrel, the largest gain since October, as the Trump administration reduced embassy staff in Iraq and permitted military service-members' families to leave the region in response to ongoing security concerns. The UK Navy also issued a rare warning to mariners that higher tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping. The developments compounded speculation about possible supply disruptions in the Middle East after AFP reported that Iran threatened to target US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out. 'Iranian rhetoric has turned notably more hostile, and these threats are being substantiated by real-world developments,' said Rebecca Babin, a senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth Group. 'While geopolitical rallies are often seen as selling opportunities, this situation carries the added complexity of potential Israeli military action if negotiations break down, which is keeping traders more cautious about selling into the rally.' Elsewhere, President Donald Trump told the New York Post he's 'less confident' about whether he can convince Tehran to agree on shutting down its nuclear program. He also posted on social media that a trade deal with China was 'done,' subject to the approval of President Xi Jinping. Oil had been weighed down by expectations that a trade war between the world's two largest economies would hurt demand and that a deal with Iran would bring back sanctioned barrels, adding to rising OPEC supplies. Prices have recovered in recent sessions, supported by easing trade tensions and the outlook for summer demand. A monthly report from the US Energy Information Administration underscored the oil market's current uncertainties. While the agency expects supply to eclipse demand by 800,000 barrels a day this year, the most since it began publishing a forecast for 2025, it also doesn't see US crude production topping last month's levels before the end of next year, a sign that lower prices are curbing some supply. Signs of market tightness have also appeared along the futures curve. Earlier this week, the February-March WTI spread flipped to backwardation — where near-term prices are higher than longer-dated ones — for the first time since April, with several subsequent months following suit earlier today, signaling concerns about oversupply are easing. To get Bloomberg's Energy Daily newsletter in your inbox, click here. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump says China trade deal ‘done': 55% tariff, supply of rare earth minerals
President Donald Trump said Wednesday that the United States has reached a trade agreement with China, including an easing of curbs imposed by Beijing on export of rare earth minerals and magnets that are key inputs for industries ranging from automobiles to electronics. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. He said China would supply 'any necessary rare earths' and magnets, while the US would make concessions on allowing Chinese students to attend American universities. The Trump administration had recently begun to clamp down on the presence of Chinese nationals on US college campuses. 'We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. Relationship is excellent!' Trump wrote, without elaborating. Bloomberg quoted a White House official as saying that the agreement allows the US to charge a 55 per cent tariff on imported Chinese goods, which, crucially, includes a 10 per cent baseline 'reciprocal' tariff, a 20 per cent tariff for fentanyl trafficking, and a 25 per cent tariff reflecting pre-existing tariffs (imposed by Trump in his first term, that the Biden administration persisted with). China would charge a 10 per cent tariff on American imports, the official said. Though the details of the deal were still unclear, analysts predicted that China seems to have gained the upper-hand after its rare earth restrictions prompted US carmakers, including Ford Motor and Chrysler, to cut production. Significantly, Trump said a final deal is subject to approval from him and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Chinese state media said earlier Wednesday that Beijing had reached a 'framework' for an agreement with the US during talks in London, but there was no official response from China on Trump's subsequent claims on Truth Social. Earlier, both the negotiating sides said they had agreed in principle to a framework for dialling down trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies. After the meeting in London — the second time the two sides have met in the last couple of months, since Trump's sweeping tariff onslaught — there were indications of a reconciliation. What is beginning to get clearer after the second meeting is that this is perhaps not how the US imagined the trade war to unfold. China is beginning to dictate the direction of the bilateral talks, with the US almost seen as requesting for much-needed concessions on the resumption of supplies of critical inputs. In the first round of talks in Geneva, the US delegation led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had asked the Chinese to cut its tariffs in tandem with theirs, primarily because the Americans were facing the heat back home from the early fallout of the high tariffs, including empty shelves at grocery stories and surging prices of daily use commodities. In London, the US side is learnt to have specifically asked the Chinese to 'suspend or remove' restrictions on rare earths magnets, which had forced a supply-chain crunch. The London meeting follows a call between Trump and Xi on June 5, which was initiated by the White House — the first call since Trump's reciprocal tariff announcement. After the London talks, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the deal should result in restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets 'being resolved'. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus… Once the Presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' he said. 'The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5 and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting,' the BBC quoted China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang as saying. Chinese export controls over rare earth minerals were high on the agenda of the meetings. While Beijing has not imposed an outright ban on the export of rare earth magnets, the process has been made very difficult; it could take a long time to source, posing shortage risks. Rare earth magnets, especially neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets, are crucial for EV manufacturing. They provide the strong magnetic fields needed for efficient and powerful electric motors, including traction motors that drive EVs. These magnets also play a major role in other EV components like power steering systems, wiper motors and braking systems. China has a virtual stranglehold over these rare earth magnets. In May, talks held in Geneva led to a temporary truce after the tit-for-tat tariff increases by both sides, which led to duties that peaked at 145 per cent. Trump called the outcome of the talks in Switzerland a 'total reset', which brought US tariffs on Chinese products down to 30 per cent, while Beijing cut duties on US imports to 10 per cent. Both sides also agreed to a 90-day deadline to try to reach a trade deal. However, the US and China have since accused each other of breaching the deal. The US has said that Beijing has been dragging its feet on opening up exports of rare earth metals and magnets while the Chinese claim that Washington has restricted its access to American goods such as semiconductors and other related technologies linked to artificial intelligence. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had said China had failed to roll back restrictions on exports of rare earth magnets. In the run-up to this week's talks, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said on Saturday that it had approved some applications for rare earth export licences. The problem for the US is that the Chinese side has wrested some advantage, especially by leveraging its strategy of weaponing its dominance in key sectors. Rare earth minerals and magnets is one such area, where the US is now desperate for concessions. Both sides have since claimed breaches on non-tariff pledges, but the Americans clearly seem more eager for a reconciliation, given the impact of the Chinese blockade on its key manufacturing sectors. These Chinese trade blockades are already impacting companies in other geographies. Hamamatsu-based small car maker Suzuki Motors, for instance, said last week it plans to suspend the production of its flagship Swift compact hatchback due to China's rare earth restrictions, becoming the first Japanese automaker to be impacted. There are similar worries among other manufacturing entities across the world, including in the US. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
Crippled by Op Sindoor strikes, Pak eyeing Germany for air defence upgrades
Rattled by the devastating impact of BrahMos missile strikes during India's Operation Sindoor, Pakistan is now exploring the procurement of a new air defence system to counter future to sources, Islamabad is actively considering the purchase of the IRIS-T SLM air defence system from Germany in a bid to strengthen its aerial shield against India's supersonic cruise missiles, particularly the move comes after Pakistan's existing Chinese-origin air defence systems, including the HQ-9 and HQ-16, failed to detect or intercept Indian missile attacks during the operation. In contrast, the IRIS-T SLM system has demonstrated significant effectiveness in recent combat situations. In Ukraine, where several units were redirected from Egypt due to the ongoing war, the German-made system has reportedly shot down over 60 aerial targets since its deployment last it was said to have successfully intercepted Russian Oniks missiles, which are similar in profile to India's by Diehl Defence, the IRIS-T SLM is known for its modular and compact architecture. Each unit, estimated to cost around USD 200 million, includes radar, an operations centre, and launchers, all mounted on a 20-foot interest in the system highlights its urgent push to rebuild and upgrade its air defence network, particularly after key air bases were damaged by Indian missiles during Operation grappling with a severe economic crisis, Pakistan has raised its defence budget by 18 per cent this year while simultaneously scrapping domestic development projects valued at 1,000 billion Pakistani the past month, the country has secured financial assistance totalling USD 1.8 billion from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to address its fiscal Germany's Diehl Defence, the maker of the IRIS-T SLM, is also involved in a major Indian defence initiative. The company is collaborating with Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems on Project 75I, a Rs 70,000 crore programme to build six submarines for the Indian Indian-German collaboration also includes the development of the Interactive Defence and Attack System (IDAS), which will be integrated into the India's Reliance Defence has announced a partnership to manufacture Vulcano 155mm precision-guided artillery shells domestically. The initiative is expected to generate revenues of approximately Rs 10,000 crore, with over 50 per cent of the components to be produced indigenously.
