David Lammy and JD Vance bonded over ‘dysfunctional' childhoods – and a Diet Coke
In a series of interviews with the Guardian, conducted over several weeks, the foreign secretary opened up about a 'wonderful hour and a half' spent with Vance over drinks at the US embassy in Italy in May alongside the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner.
Lammy said he had been to mass at Vance's home and counted him as a 'friend', saying the vice-president 'relates' to him over their shared background.
'I remember being at the inauguration of the new pope in Rome with Angela Rayner and JD Vance,' he said: 'I don't think JD and Angela will mind me saying that they were having a couple of drinks … I really wanted a glass [of rosé] but instead I had a Diet Coke.'
The foreign secretary said they were all 'not just working-class politicians, but people with dysfunctional childhoods'.
'I had this great sense that JD completely relates to me and he completely relates to Angela. So it was a wonderful hour and a half,' he said.
In his interview, Lammy spoke of feeling guilty over the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy's, highly awkward first meeting with Donald Trump and Vance in the Oval Office, where the men berated him over the war.
'If I'm being honest, I felt, arrghhh!' Lammy said. 'Why hadn't I done more to support our Ukrainian colleagues in preparation for their meeting?… I was being a bit hard on myself. But I still felt guilty.'
The foreign secretary also touched on his discomfort over Keir Starmer's 'island of strangers' speech about immigration, which drew criticism that the prime minister was echoing the rightwing politician Enoch Powell.
'I think the use of language was poor,' he says. 'Poor choice. And if someone had shown me the speech, I would've said, 'Take that out'.'
On the subject of Gaza, Lammy spoke of his 'days of deep frustration, deep sadness' over the war with Israel. He said things were 'desperate for people on the ground, desperate for the hostages in Gaza', that the world was 'desperate for a ceasefire, for the suffering to come to an end'.
He also said he '100 per cent' wanted to go to Gaza 'as soon as I can get in'. Speaking before the government decided to move on to a path to recognise Palestine as an independent state, the foreign secretary described it as a 'card you can only play once'.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
In the interview, the Lammy looked back over his career and his difficult childhood, including the effect of his father – an alcoholic who was violent towards his mother, and who left for the US.
'My father didn't come back. Psychologically that is devastating. There must have been a bit of me that blamed myself. I question whether he did, in fact, love me.'
His father later died of throat cancer without his son seeing him again. Lammy said he could not emotionally handle the idea of it at the time, but added: 'I'm quite a forgiving person, my nature is wanting to build bridges, to reach out. It's why I think I'm not bad at this role.'
He described his sense of purpose as foreign secretary, saying: 'This is the first time in my life where I do not have impostor syndrome. I genuinely have a sense of being in the right place at the right time for this job.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘He's a great negotiator and diplomat': Starmer praised as UK outshines EU in Trump trade talks
As Donald Trump signed a new trade deal with the EU, many Independent readers were less focused on Brussels – and more surprised by how well the UK had done in comparison. With Keir Starmer securing lower tariffs and a visibly warmer reception from the US president, some asked: how did Britain get a better deal than the EU? Commenters were quick to praise Starmer's calm, measured style. One reader described him as a 'great negotiator and diplomat' with a 'forensic' grasp of detail, while another said Trump 'genuinely likes him' and respects that he 'stands up for himself' rather than fawning. In contrast, Europe's performance was seen as lacklustre, with the bloc 'unable to mount an effective response'. The EU-US deal itself drew criticism for being weak and symbolic, accused of rewarding Trump's coercive tactics and reframing tariffs as legitimate economic tools. Several readers lamented that the UK's apparent success would be used to claim a 'Brexit benefit' – while others were content to see the EU embarrassed. Here's what you had to say: A great negotiator and diplomat There's a lot of criticism of Starmer, and some is justified. While he might not be the greatest leader Labour we have had, there's no doubt he's a great negotiator and diplomat. What also helps him is that he has a strong sense of fairness, decency, and dignity. Then there's his obvious legal background, which you see in his forensic thoroughness when debating issues. Can you imagine Kemi Badenoch and that useless lot negotiating with Trump... he'd have a field day. DHC How do you feel about the UK's trade deal compared to Europe's? Share your thoughts in the comments and join the conversation below. Trump is half Scottish Trump is half Scottish and he seems to have a little more respect for his mother's native country. We also don't manufacture anything, and we have long given up the future capacity to be a producing nation. We are customers; Europe, on the other hand, is a competitor. 227detius A weak EU capitulating to Trump The deal has been widely criticised on the European side, viewed by some as a weak EU capitulating to Trump's demands, unable to mount an effective response. While that perception is difficult to counter, the reality is much more complex and nuanced. It's worth noting that the deal isn't a fully fleshed-out trade agreement but, for the time being, one of the many symbolic political deals Trump has announced in recent months. Yet it's not meaningless. It pauses what could have escalated into a full-scale transatlantic trade war and defuses a major source of volatility and anxiety. That said, the real challenge lies ahead – hammering out the details. Without legally binding documents, the door remains open to misinterpretation. We've seen this play out recently with the US-Japan agreement, hastily concluded a few days ago, and already sparking differing interpretations. The same could easily happen with the EU-US deal. The deal is being widely perceived as a big political win for Trump and a defeat for the EU, negatively affecting its image both domestically and worldwide. Unfortunately, this interpretation ultimately praises and legitimises an approach based on aggression and coercion, rewarding tactics that undermine trust and cooperation. Sadly, tariffs – long discredited as a blunt and damaging economic tool – are now being recast as effective policy instruments, which the EU should also wield. It's astonishing how, in only a few months, Trump has managed to frame such a confrontational strategy and unsound economic policies as a success – even with Europe. It's simply self-defeating. But whatever the "final outcome", the misery of this GileadUS administration will continue to affect the lives of billions of people! LeeisBlue I ignore all the Faragist, Corbynite vitriol Starmer really has done well in his dealings not only with Trump but also the EU and his Gaza stance. Additionally, his policies are really changing and improving our lives – e.g. the NHS is performing much better (my wife has benefitted from this). Frankly, I ignore all the Faragist, Corbynite vitriolic attacks on Starmer and co and research for myself what's ACTUALLY happening. All this Reform/Farage/Corbyn propaganda is a distraction, largely irrelevant. voxtrot UK sacrificed bioethanol sector The UK's largest trade partner, by far, in goods is the EU. Don't think EU's higher tariffs from the USA have no effect on the UK. The UK also sacrificed the bioethanol sector, and allowed US beef into the UK, to the detriment of home agriculture, to get those reduced tariffs. I know there is some desperation in some quarters to try and claim some form of #BrexitBenefit, and hope the utter disaster and failure that it is gets forgotten. wolfie Nothing to do with Starmer It's got nothing to do with Starmer. The UK got a better deal with the US than the EU despite Starmer, not because of him. The UK is an independent, sovereign nation again and no longer anchored to the failing, anti-democratic EU political union thanks to Brexit, and we're one of the US's closest allies. Our bond with the US will grow even stronger once the current shambles of a Labour government – that appears to be doing its best to suppress free speech – is booted out at the next election. Kingswood Diversifying the EU's trading partners Yes, but every trading country/bloc has the opportunity of improving their prospects by diversifying their trading portfolio. Perhaps this is what Ms von der Leyen had in mind when making a deal with Trump – i.e. to force the EU to diversify its trading partners. In the longer term, that might be the best solution. Hungubwe Trump swallowed the carrot of a state visit All to do with the vanity of Trump. The state visit was the ultimate carrot that Starmer dangled, and Trump swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. He likes the sense of self-importance which this state visit will bestow on him, and all the pomp and ceremony. Beyond this, it shows that as long as you pander to him, he's happy to tolerate most things. Charles's views on the climate and compassion for migrants would normally have him called a radical lefty by Trump, and likewise, Starmer would also get short shrift, but because they are praising Trump, he's lapping it up – for now. The only constant has been the unapologetic support for Netanyahu, and ultimately it will come to a head when the ethnic cleansing plan is put in place. At that point, the world will have to decide to confront Trump directly or capitulate under fear of tariffs, leaving NATO, etc. I fear the capitulation. Truthonly With Trump you always follow the money The UK has a trade surplus with the USA of about £2 billion. The EU's trade surplus is about £200 billion. That's the difference – it's nothing to do with love of the UK or a Scottish mother or the tactics of the UK government. With Trump, you always follow the money. He does hate the EU's society because it is so much better than the US, so he feels compelled to drag it down to his level. He also knows he can play the UK like a banjo, whereas he fears the EU. We all know he will change his mind at any minute. AnonyMousse Starmer has done well on international issues Starmer has done well on international issues. The problem is that his focus on those things has left his inexperienced underlings to preside over domestic affairs. We have to remind ourselves who they replaced though. Compared to 14 years of Tory corruption and chaos, they are paragons of efficiency. Inkling
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Early modelling reveals the impact of Trump's new tariffs on global economies
The global rollercoaster ride of United States trade tariffs has now entered its latest phase. President Donald Trump 's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement placed reciprocal tariffs on all countries. A week later, amid financial market turmoil, these tariffs were paused and replaced by a 10% baseline tariff on most goods. On July 31, however, the Trump Administration reinstated and expanded the reciprocal tariff policy. Most of these updated tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 7. To evaluate the impact of these latest tariffs, we also need to take into account recently negotiated free trade agreements (such as the US- European Union deal), the 50% tariffs imposed on steel and aluminium imports, and tariff exemptions for imports of smartphones, computers and other electronics. For selected countries, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2 and the revised values of these tariffs are shown in the table below. The revised additional tariffs are highest for Brazil (50%) and Switzerland (39%), and lowest for Australia and the United Kingdom (10%). For most countries, the revised tariffs are lower than the original ones. But Brazil, Switzerland and New Zealand are subject to higher tariffs than those announced in April. In addition to the tariffs displayed above, Canadian and Mexican goods not registered as compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement are subject to tariffs of 35% and 25% respectively. Economic impacts The economic impacts of the revised tariffs are examined using a global model of goods and services markets, covering production, trade and consumption. A similar model was used to assess the impacts of the original reciprocal tariffs and the outcome of a US-China trade war. GDP impacts of the tariffs are displayed in the table below. The impacts of the additional tariffs are evaluated relative to trade measures in place before Trump's second term. Retaliatory tariffs are not considered in the analysis. An economic own goal The tariffs reduce the US annual GDP by 0.36%. This equates to US$108.2 billion or $861 per household per year (all amounts in this article are in US dollars). The change in US GDP is an aggregate of impacts involving several factors. The tariffs will compel foreign producers to lower their prices. But these price decreases only partially offset the cost of the tariffs, so US consumers pay higher prices. Businesses also pay more for parts and materials. Ultimately, these higher prices hurt the US economy. The tariffs decrease US merchandise imports by $486.7 billion. But as they drive up the cost of US supply chains and shift more workers and resources into industries that compete with imports, away from other parts of the economy, they also decrease US merchandise exports by $451.1 billion. Global impacts For most other countries, the additional tariffs reduce GDP. Switzerland's GDP decreases by 0.47%, equivalent to $1,215 per household per year. Proportional GDP decreases are also relatively large for Thailand (0.44%) and Taiwan (0.38%). In dollar terms, GDP decreases are relatively large for China ($66.9 billion) and the European Union ($26.6 billion). Australia and the United Kingdom gain from the tariffs ($0.1 billion and $0.07 billion respectively), primarily due to the relatively low tariffs levied on these countries. Despite facing relatively low additional tariffs, New Zealand's GDP decreases by 0.15% ($204 per household) as many of its agricultural exports compete with Australian commodities, which are subject to an even lower tariff. Although the revised reciprocal tariffs are, on average, lower than those announced on April 2, they are still a substantial shock to the global trading system. Financial markets have been buoyant since Trump paused reciprocal tariffs on April 9, partly on the hope that the tariffs would never be imposed. US tariffs of at least 10% to 15% now appear to be the new norm. As US warehouses run down inventories and stockpiles, there could be a rocky road ahead.
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Marco Rubio seen as dark horse rival to JD Vance as Trump's natural heir
JD Vance is facing a 'surprising' rival in the early race for the 2028 Republican presidential nomination. The vice president has long been seen as the natural heir to Donald Trump 's MAGA movement. But Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, is riding a groundswell of support among party activists and early voting states, according to CNN analyst Eric Bradner. Bradner said Rubio, who has become a member of Trump's trusted inner circle, polls particularly well in Iowa. He added that the former Florida senator is in with a shot at cultivating the support he needs to lead the MAGA movement in life after Trump. 'I was a little surprised during a recent visit to Iowa how frequently the name of Secretary of State Marco Rubio came up, often in the same breath as JD Vance,' he said. 'Both of them, despite their own very public criticism of Trump in the past, now seem to be viewed as team players; as closely aligned with Trump and with his current administration, obviously, as leading members of it.' He added that, unlike Vance, Rubio has run for president before, so he has spent time campaigning on the ground in states where gaining early traction is crucial. 'A lot of people in the early voting states remember Rubio visiting them in 2016 when he finished third in Iowa in what were pretty competitive caucuses,' Bradner noted. 'A lot of these early-state Republican voters have met Rubio before.' Vance, on the other hand, is still relatively new on the scene and may have more to prove. 'They like Vance, but they don't know him yet. They haven't had a chance to go through the usual process with him,' he said. Rubio recently sidestepped a question about his own ambitions to one day become president, instead deflecting back to Vance's credentials. 'I think JD Vance would be a great nominee … if he decides he wants to do that,' Rubio told Fox. 'I think he's doing a great job as vice president. He's a close friend, and I hope he intends to do it.' While Trump is personally entwined with the MAGA movement, the Constitution states he is unable to run for a third term. This has not stopped him repeatedly suggesting since returning to office that he would like to serve again. 'I will say this – so many people want me to do it,' Trump revealed in May. 'I have never had requests so strong as that.' 'But it's something that, to the best of my knowledge, you're not allowed to do,' he conceded. 'I don't know if that's constitutional that they're not allowing you to do it or anything else. But there are many people selling the 2028 hat.' Despite brushing off questions about a possible return to office, Trump went so far as to launch Trump 2028 merchandise promoting the possibility. Rep Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., introduced a measure shortly after the president's inauguration to change the 22nd Amendment. The proposal would change the amendment's language to specify that a president could run for a third term if the first two were not consecutive. 'No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive term,' the proposed legislation stated. This would specifically stop Trump's leading opposition - Barack Obama - from also trying to run for a third term. A recent exclusive Daily Mail/J.L. Partners poll revealed Obama would win in a theoretical matchup. Of the respondents, 52 per cent chose the former Democratic president and 41 per cent chose Trump. Obama's 11-point majority over Trump stems from an enthusiastic Hispanic base, of which 73 per cent selected Obama, and also 68 per cent of black voters. Independent voters also preferred Obama over Trump in the hypothetical match, 50 per cent for the former Democrat to just 39 per cent for Trump. Trump supporters have mused about a possible loophole in the law, if Vance - or any other close Trump ally - won a presidential race in 2028 with Trump as his running mate. Theoretically, the new president could swear in and then resign, allowing a vice president Trump to ascend back into power. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also addressed Trump's much-touted third term last month. 'You guys continue to ask the president this question about a third term and then he answers honestly and candidly with a smile and then everybody here melts down about his answer,' she said. Cruz control: Bradner said Ted Cruz could also be a contender, noting he beat Trump in Iowa in the 2016 race 'People love the job this president is doing.' Trump has also floated the idea of his eldest son, Don Trump Jr, taking his place in the White House. Bradner said Ted Cruz could also be a contender, noting he beat out Trump in Iowa in the 2016 race. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is also often floated as a contender who could rally support in his home state and beyond.
