German police expands use of Palantir surveillance software – DW – 08/02/2025
The surveillance software called Gotham, developed by US company Palantir, is billed as an all-rounder: gigantic amounts of data are brought together at lightning speed.
It only takes a few seconds to satisfy a police officer's curiosity: name, age, address, fines, criminal record. In combination with selected cellphones and the contents of scanned social media channels, a comprehensive profile of any person appears in an instant.
With the help of artificial intelligence (AI), the surveillance program developed by the US technology company seems to make the dreams of police and intelligence agencies come true.
Three of Germany's 16 federal states are already using Gotham: Bavaria, Hesse and North Rhine-Westphalia, Baden-Württemberg is planning to implement it soon.
However, according to privacy advocates and civil rights organizations, it come with a big problem: Along with those suspected of a crime, it can also ensnare innocent people.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The German nonprofit group Society for Civil Rights (GFF) is fundamentally opposed to the use of programs like Palantir. That's why it has lodged a constitutional complaint against the large-scale data analysis in Bavaria.
"Anyone who files a complaint, or who is a victim of a crime, or even just happens to be at the wrong place at the wrong time can attract police attention via this software," said GFF lawyer Franziska Görlitz.
According to the Berlin-based organization, such unlimited analysis of data breaches the fundamental right to informational self-determination and the confidentiality of telecommunications, which is guaranteed in the German constitution.
Whoever shows up on the police radar via this so-called data mining knows nothing about it. According to current law, police in Bavaria may use the Palantir software even when there is no indication of danger. In doing so, they are ignoring standards which apply in neighboring Hesse following a successful constitutional complaint by the GFF in 2023. The Federal Constitutional Court is yet to rule on a similar complaint against the state of North Rhine-Westphalia.
The hacker association Chaos Computer Club supports the constitutional complaint against Bavaria. Its spokesperson, Constanze Kurz, spoke of a "Palantir dragnet investigation" in which police were linking separately stored data for very different purposes than those originally intended.
"This is reason enough for this automated mass analysis not to become an everyday tool for police. But the collated data also lands in the deliberately opaque software of the US company Palantir, which the police will become dependent on for years," said Kurz.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The software company owned by US billionaire Peter Thiel made its software available to Bavaria in 2024; in Hesse, it has already been in use since 2017. The entrepreneur with German roots and New Zealand citizenship has a reputation for pursuing authoritarian goals and maintaining close contact with President Donald Trump and his political circle. US intelligence agencies and the military have long worked with the Gotham program.
In Germany, the Palantir software goes by various names such as HessenData, or VeRA in Bavaria — an acronym for "overlapping systems research and analysis platform." According to German newspaper and public service broadcasters NDR and WDR, police had already used VeRA in about 100 cases by May 2025.
One of these was the attack on the Israeli consulate in Munich in September 2024. The deputy chairman of the Police Union, Alexander Poitz, explained that automated data analysis made it possible to identify certain perpetrators' movements and provide officers with accurate conclusions about their planned actions.
"That is how the Munich police were able to take control of the situation relatively quickly and bring it to a conclusion," Poitz told public broadcaster MDR. The broadcaster reported that the US company had been granted unlimited access to the data files of the Bavarian police to merge the systems.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The computer source code is stored on servers in Germany. However, critics point out that there is no guarantee against copies finding their way to the US, according to the media outlets.
The obvious and growing dependence on foreign technology giants such as Palantir contradicts Germany's stated aspirations. The new government, comprising the center-right Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), wrote "digital policy is power politics" in its coalition agreement earlier this year, stating its goals:
"We want a digitally sovereign Germany. To do this, we will dismantle digital dependencies by developing key technologies, securing standards, protecting and expanding digital infrastructure. We will achieve resilient value chains for key industries which are integrated at the European level, from raw materials to chips to hardware and software."
Despite this, German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) seems to be keeping his options open, having so far refused to rule out purchasing Palantir software for the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Federal Police.
Dobrindt is breaking with the line of his predecessor Nancy Faeser (SPD), who had rejected the use of these programs in 2023.
The GFF's constitutional complaint against the use of Palantir appears to have strong public support. On German online petition platform Campact, an appeal for politicians to stop the use of the software in
Germany was signed by more than 264,000 people within a week, as of July 30.While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
28 minutes ago
- DW
Germany updates: Israel arms halt met with CDU/CSU backlash – DW – 08/09/2025
Some politicians from Chancellor Friedrich Merz's own conservative CDU party, and its Bavarian sister party the CSU, condemned the government's move to impose a partial export ban on arms to Israel. Follow DW for more. Some politicians from Chancellor Friedrich Merz's own Christian Democratic Party (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), have slammed his decision to halt arms exports to Israel. But Merz's move has also garnered some support from his conservative party, as well as Vice Chancellor Lars Klingbeil, leader of Merz's junior coalition partner, the center-left Social Democrats (SPD).Several German cities have offered to take in and provide medical treatment for seriously ill or traumatized children from the embattled and devastated Gaza Strip. However, the cities — Hannover, Dusseldorf, Bonn, Leipzig and Kiel — need the support of the federal government to do so. Federal authorities would have to take over entry procedures, the selection of the children and all coordination of the relief effort. Read more to find out why the federal government is putting the brakes on the plan, Chancellor Friedrich Merz's decision to halt German weapons exports to Israel for use in the Gaza Strip "until further notice" has been met with fierce opposition from some members of his own conservative Christian Democratic Party (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU). The CSU parliamentary group leader in the Bundestag, Alexander Hoffmann, on Saturday told Germany's biggest tabloid newspaperthat his party "was not involved in this decision, and we consider it questionable." "This would be a departure from decades of foreign policy continuity toward Israel and, as such, requires at least some explanation. We will hold internal discussions on this within the coalition," Hoffmann added. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Some conservatives are criticizing Merz for going against Germany's "Staatsräson" (reason of state). Given the history of the Holocaust, the German state sees a special responsibility for Israel. CDU security policy expert Roderich Kiesewetter also sharply criticized the decision as a "serious political and strategic mistake by Germany." Foreign policy experts from the CDU/CSU parliamentary group are meeting via videoconference on Sunday to discuss the issue. But others from the CDU/CSU alliance have welcomed the decision, including CDU foreign policy expert Norbert Röttgen. "This reaction is correct and, unfortunately, has become inevitable due to the recent decisions of the Israeli government," Röttgen told the regional newspaper . Merz has also received support from his junior coalition partner. "We offer our full solidarity with the state of Israel, but the wrongs must be called out," said Vice Chancellor Lars Klingbeil, the co-leader of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), on Friday. There's a heated debate within Friedrich Merz's own Christian Democratic Party (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), after the conservative chancellor announced on Friday that Berlin would not approve German weapons exports to Israel for use in the Gaza Strip "until further notice." The German Press Agency (DPA) has reported that foreign policy experts from the CDU/CSU parliamentary group are meeting via videoconference on Sunday, according to sources within the group. With Germany in summer recess, the spontaneous meeting shows how explosive the issue is. Stay tuned for more throughout the weekend from DW.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
As Putin and Trump talk Ukraine, what will be on the agenda? – DW – 08/09/2025
The presidents of Russia and the US plan to meet next Friday in Alaska to discuss a possible end to the war in Ukraine. What do they want to achieve, and what are the most contentious issues? Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump are scheduled to meet in person for bilateral talks on August 15 to discuss how to end the war in Ukraine. Before his election victory in November 2024, Trump announced he would end the war within the first 24 hours of his term. He is now about 200 days past his own deadline. Trump said the meeting with Putin will help accelerate the peace process. Here's an overview of what's known so far. The two leaders will meet next Friday in Alaska, a state in the northwest of the United States. The Kremlin has confirmed the meeting and has also invited Trump to Russia after the talks in Alaska. Kremlin foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov described the choice of location for the meeting as "logical." "Russia and the United States are close neighbors, bordering each other," Ushakov said. "It seems quite logical that our delegation should simply fly across the Bering Strait and that such an important and eagerly awaited summit between the leaders of the two countries should be held in Alaska." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video For the US president, who portrays himself as an accomplished dealmaker, taking a significant step toward peace would be of personal and reputational importance. His political ally, Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, recently nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. As for the actual conflict, Trump wants a ceasefire at the very least, and a long-term solution, at best. Trump has said he also wants to arrange a three-way meeting with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. But neither the Russian nor the Ukrainian leader has agreed to this yet. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Russian president wants to prevent the NATO military alliance from expanding further eastward. It's likely he will try to convince Trump to vote against Ukraine's NATO membership . Another important point for Putin is preventing any possible NATO military presence on Ukrainian territory. He also wants a new, Russia-friendly government in Kyiv. In addition, Putin has repeatedly demanded that certain territories captured by Russian troops during the Ukraine war be permanently transferred to Russia. Putin likely expects Trump to provide assurances on this as well. The biggest point of contention is military action. Russian attacks on military and civilian targets in Ukraine have resulted in many deaths and the destruction of Ukrainian infrastructure. Ukraine is also striking back inside Russia and doing damage there. However, there's an imbalance in terms of population and Ukraine is keen to end the war and, with it, the rising death toll among its own people. But at what cost? According to experts, Russia probably won't be willing to end the war without some concessions, a pivotal factor being Ukraine's potential NATO membership. According to Kyiv, NATO membership would significantly reduce the likelihood of another Russian attack in the future because when one NATO member is attacked, the others are required to come to its aid. The security alliance includes the US and other nuclear-armed powers, the United Kingdom and France. Another negotiating point will be Ukraine's borders. Kyiv has demanded full sovereignty for Ukraine and wants the borders to go back to the way they were before the war. But experts have said it's unlikely Russia would agree, as Putin wants territories currently held by the Russian army to be transferred to Russia. Russian troops currently occupy a large part of the four eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, territories which Russia claims as its own. In addition, there are areas elsewhere in Ukraine currently held by the Russian army, as well as the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in 2014.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Germany conflicted over project to rescue children from Gaza – DW – 08/09/2025
Five German cities have offered to accept and treat sick and traumatized children from the Gaza Strip. However, conservative-led ministries in the federal government are putting the brakes on the plan. Several German cities have offered to take in and provide medical treatment for seriously ill or traumatized children from the embattled and devastated Gaza Strip. However, the cities — Hannover, Dusseldorf, Bonn, Leipzig and Kiel — need the support of the federal government to do so. Federal authorities would have to take over entry procedures, the selection of the children and all coordination of the relief effort. In a letter to Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt and Foreign Minister Johann Wadephulof the conservative bloc of the Christian Social Union (CSU) and Christian Democratic Union(CDU) respectively, the mayors of the cities have asked for help. But the federal government is hesitant. The Foreign Office and the Interior Ministry, the two departments responsible, want to review the situation first. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video A spokesperson for the Interior Ministry said August 6 that support would depend "crucially on the security situation," as well as "the possibility of departure and other factors." This is the reason, he added, why the main focus will remain on "expanding medical assistance locally and in the surrounding region." According to the spokesperson, the German government does welcome the offer, in principle. It is "a matter of great importance" to the German government to support members of civil society in providing medical treatment to minors from the Gaza Strip, he said. Interior Minister Dobrindt was somewhat more explicit on Thursday. "We must be very careful about what measures we are discussing at this point," he told the platform adding that the federal government is already helping people in Gaza. "The focus should be on providing aid on the ground," Dobrindt said. Although he understands the idea, he said the goal is to help as many people as possible, not just a few. The cities' offer has been met with outrage by Serap Güler, a conservative lawmaker at the Foreign Ministry. She said the cities were not being entirely altruistic, at least not in the case of the two North Rhine-Westphalian cities of Dusseldorf and Bonn, which are due to hold municipal elections in September. "This idea is nice for an election campaign or for scoring points, but it doesn't help the people themselves," Güler told the local newspaper. Ines Schwerdtner, leader of the opposition socialist Left Party, called Güler's statement "disgraceful." She said it was unacceptable "that Germany, as one of the few countries in the EU, is sitting idly by and watching people die." Even a spokeswoman for the Foreign Ministry later rejected Güler's statement. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video But there is something else behind the reluctance. The CDU/CSU bloc fears a new wave of irregular immigration, even if it initially involves only a few dozen children. Curbing immigration was one of their most important election promises, and it's also an issue on which the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party is constantly pushing the government with new demands. This suspicion has also been confirmed by Alexander Hoffmann, leader of the CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag. "In terms of taking in vulnerable groups, it is first and foremost the responsibility of the neighboring Arab states," he said in an interview with the tabloid And then came the decisive sentence: "A new wave of immigration to Germany cannot be the answer." Conservative politicians appear to be concerned that medical treatment for the children will only be the first step, and their relatives could also come to Germany through family reunification programs. Returning individuals to Gaza is complicated by the fact that Palestinians are considered stateless in Germany, which has not recognized Palestine as a country. On the other hand, the CDU and CSU's center-left coalition partner, the Social Democratic Party (SPD), is more open to accepting children from Gaza. Dirk Wiese, parliamentary secretary of the SPD parliamentary group in the Bundestag, said treating the children would be a "sign of humanity." A safe trip out of the country, he said, would be a prerequisite. "If there are possibilities, if agreements can be reached to provide medical treatment in Germany, then I believe we should do so." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Belit Onay, a member of the Green Party and mayor of Hannover, one of the cities that wants to take in children, has also rejected the criticism from the Foreign Ministry. The initiative has the support of a broad network of participants across party lines, Onay told the Evangelical Press Service. In addition, he pointed out, Germany has taken in injured people from Russia's war in Ukraine and abused Yazidis from Iraq in the past. "This is a tried and tested procedure. You just have to want to do it." The German government's hesitation stands in stark contrast to other European countries. Italy and Spain, for example, have already taken in seriously injured children from Gaza for treatment. The British government has also announced an evacuation operation, but the plan only involves accepting a little over a hundred children. Aid organizations are urging the government in London to act quickly, saying that children have been dying in Gaza because of protracted bureaucracy. Hannover Mayor Onay has suggested cooperating with the United Kingdom. For his part, Chancellor Friedrich Merz has not yet commented on the offer made by German you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
